The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 780616 |

Rui Tian, Gonglin Hou, Dan Li, Ti-Fei Yuan, "A Possible Change Process of Inflammatory Cytokines in the Prolonged Chronic Stress and Its Ultimate Implications for Health", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 780616, 8 pages, 2014.

A Possible Change Process of Inflammatory Cytokines in the Prolonged Chronic Stress and Its Ultimate Implications for Health

Academic Editor: Rongqian Wu
Received17 Jan 2014
Revised19 Apr 2014
Accepted22 Apr 2014
Published03 Jun 2014


Sustained stress triggers series of changes in the brain and the body. At the early stage of stress, the activated hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) axis can upregulate the levels of glucocorticoid (GCs) and catecholamines (CAs), respectively, and then they in turn inhibit the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines directly or indirectly while promoting the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines. At the prolonged stage, the sustained activated HPA demonstrates cortisol-resistance. At the same time, the inflammation related transcription pathway, such as nuclear-factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling, may be inhibited. Additionally, the inflammatory cytokines mediate a negative feedback regulation on themselves. Collectively, these regulations may increase the proinflammatory cytokines while decreasing the anti-inflammatory cytokines. This may further activate NF-κB and increase the proinflammation cytokines, which in turn reduce the inflammatory responses, contributing to various diseases.

1. Introduction

Chronic stress leads to various diseases, mainly through the activation of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) axis, with upregulation of glucocorticoid (GCs) (cortisol in human) and catecholamines (CAs) (noradrenaline and adrenaline), respectively. These secreted molecules then function through separate receptors on different types of cells, including both the nerve cells and immune cells [19]. In addition, it is suggested that the chronic stress inhibits proinflammatory cytokines secretion which mediate the cellular immunity, while the stress can also activate anti-inflammatory cytokines secretion that activate the humoral immunity [36, 8, 10, 11]. This led to the general hypothesis that chronic stress leads to disease status through immunosuppression [6, 12].

Interestingly, inflammation is a key pathogenic mechanism in many diseases [1316]. Indeed, neuroinflammation has been recognized as one important aspect in chronic stress-induced depression in both animal models and clinical human patients. Therefore, the effects of chronic stress on inflammation signaling, especially the cytokines, are complicated at different stages of disease in different organs. The present review summarized the roles of cytokines in linking chronic stress to disease.

2. Chronic Stress Leads to Downregulation of Proinflammatory Cytokines

Chronic stress exerts the effects on paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and locus coeruleus-noradrenaline center (LC-NA) of hypothalamus as well as brain stem. In response, the hypothalamus secretes corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and arginine vasopressin (AVP), which activate the HPA axis and ultimately upregulate GCs from the adrenal cortex. At the same time, the activated locus coeruleus-secreted-noradrenaline can further promote sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis and thereby provoke the release of catecholamines (mainly noradrenaline and adrenaline) from the adrenal medulla to the brain and peripheral blood.

GCs and CAs, respectively, act on glucocorticoid receptors (GR) and adrenergic receptors (α-AR and β-AR) on the surfaces or in the cytoplasm of immune cells; monocytes and neutrophils are mainly included, which in turn inhibit the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and INF-γ, while promoting the secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 [7, 17]. The complexes, such as cortisol and GR, enter the nucleus and inhibit the transcription control pathways, including nuclear-factor kappa-B (NF-κB), activator-protein 1 (AP-1), JAK-STAT factors, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and other pathways [12, 1820], which in turn decrease the proinflammatory cytokines. Besides, motor vagus nerves secrete acetylcholine (ACh), which may also inhibit IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [7, 21].

Th1 to Th2 shift is also included in regulating the inflammatory cytokines. Specifically, Th1 cells primarily secrete IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and INF-γ, which activate cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophage and further promote the cellular immunity, whereas Th2 cells secrete a different set of cytokines, primarily IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, which promote humoral immunity. All of the above pathways can enhance Th1 to Th2 shift [3, 6, 10, 17, 18, 22]. Other studies about the Th1 to Th2 switch suggest that GCs and CAs also act on their classic cytoplasmic/nuclear receptors on APCs to suppress the production of the main inducer of Th1 responses, IL-12, and pathogens invasion also suppresses IL-12 secretion of APCs; so, these all promote the Th1 to Th2 shift; that is, they suppress the proinflammatory cytokines secretion, whereas they enhance the anti-inflammatory cytokines [17, 18, 22] (shown in Figure 1).

In summary, GCs and CAs inhibit the proinflammatory cytokines [23, 24], which are served as the main reason that the activated HPA axis and SNS axis inhibit the proinflammatory factors. In vitro, a negative dose-dependent relationship between GCs and proinflammatory cytokines was found, such as IL-6 and IL-8 [25]. Some researchers found that GCs suppressed IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α production in both the parents caring for a cancer child and the parents of healthy children [23]. At the signal transduction level, stress hormones such as GCs and CAs inhibit the inflammation related pathways, including NF-κB, AP-1, JAK-STAT, MAPKs, and so forth (see above). However, several studies recently indicated that glucocorticoid promotes the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, but they did not rule out other potential signaling pathways downstream of GR activation, which are involved in the inflammatory process [26]. In addition, it has been well established that chronic stress upregulates different hormones, such as CRH, ACTH, GCs, and CAs [13, 10], supporting that chronic stress downregulates the proinflammatory cytokines.

3. Chronic Stress May Also Increase Proinflammatory Cytokines

There are fewer studies about chronic stress impacting on the cytokines compared with the studies about that on chronic hormones, especially that the cytokines involved are relatively limited, including IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, INF-γ, EGF, VEGF, TGF-α, and so forth, while other cytokines are less involved. This might be because there are few cytokines at high circulating levels in vivo, compared to other stress hormones, especially in asymptomatic individuals. For example, IL-6, whose circulating levels are often higher than those of other cytokines in asymptomatic individuals, is only reliably detectable using high-sensitive assay kits [4].

At present, the research about that has included caregiver stress, job stress and burnout, low socioeconomic status (SES), childhood adversity and life event, lack of social support, loneliness, and so forth. These researches have demonstrated that chronic stress increases the proinflammatory cytokine [13, 11, 2732]. For instance, some researchers have performed meta-analysis to more than 300 studies about chronic stress, and they have found an increased production of IL-6 and INF-γ during the chronic stress, compared with the control groups. Although a variety of paradigms are adopted, conclusions are quite consistent [10].

Hence, it is obvious that there is a conflict between the mechanism of chronic stress acting on inflammatory cytokines and the outcomes observed in quite a few studies. These inconsistencies are suggested to be results of the type, duration and intensity of stressors, detection methods, and individual differences [3, 33].

Hans Selye described the “general adaptation syndrome,” activated by an organism in order to overcome various challenges [34, 35]. Although he did not exclude some of the responses to threats which are specific, he considered that most of them are nonspecific; that is, the organism responses activated by different stressors are similar. It was supported by the observations that different stressors could provoke an identical biochemical reaction in the organism, such as cortisol changes. His view has caused considerable controversy, but the main argument has been the definition of the stress (Selye believed that stress is the nonspecific response of the body to any demand mad upon it, with the reaction triad) [36]. Meanwhile, some excellent stress measurement scales, such as the Social Readjustment Rating Scale [37], Perceived Stress Scale [38], the Satisfaction with Life Scale [39], and a modified version of the Profile of Mood States [40], et cetera, whose definition of stressors based on need to activate and adjust the mental and physical resources to deal with, are still widely used to scale the positive and negative stress events and mood states [12, 41]. So, the view that “different psychological stress may cause the identical response” to some extent is accepted.

Whether the chronic stress evoke nonspecific responses or not is not further discussed here, but a basic fact, based on the present studies, is that the proinflammatory cytokines have been observed a consistent increase in many chronic stress studies; for this reason, we believe that identical reactions to a certain extent can be activated by different stressors. Accordingly, excluding the individual differences, what mainly cause the inconsistencies in these studies? Does chronic stress upregulate or downregulate the proinflammatory cytokines? We consider that the prolonged stress can be divided into serial stages, and in each stage the inflammatory cytokines are influenced in different ways. We will mainly discuss this problem in the following.

4. The Upregulation/Downregulation Is Stage-Dependent during Chronic Stress

We consider that there are three serial stages in the chronic stress, based on all the above (the contradiction between the mechanism of chronic stress impacting on cytokines and the outcomes observed in the current human studies (Figure 2)).(i)At the early stage, chronic stress downregulate the proinflammatory cytokines while upregulating the anti-inflammatory cytokines (see above the mechanism in detail).(ii)Sustained stress may lead to HPA axis “fatigue,” that is, the response of HPA axis to sustained stress can be blunted [18]. Meanwhile, the long-term stress also causes glucocorticoid-resistance; that is to say, with prolonged exposure to stress hormones, glucocorticoid receptors are downregulated and the immune system’s sensitivity to the cortisol declines [18, 42, 43]. Evidence of this phenomenon is derived from clinical studies that long-term administration of synthetic glucocorticoid medications to patients with inflammatory disease induces a glucocorticoid-resistance syndrome in which initial therapeutic dosages do not come to offer the effective dose, and a huge number of research support for glucocorticoid-resistance, in which chronic stressors have been shown to diminish the capacity of glucocorticoids to suppress cytokine production, for instance, some researchers have found that the capacity of the synthetic glucocorticoid (dexamethasone) to suppress IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, et cetera, secretion declines [12, 44, 45]. Recent research indicates that multiple mechanisms contribute to this resistance [20], such as repression of GR gene expression by glucocorticoid-induced GR binding to an negative glucocorticoid response element (nGRE) on a GR-NCoR1-histone deacetylase 3-containing repression complex (NR3C1) [46], GRβ antagonizing the action of GRα [47], and phosphorylation of GR by p38 MAPK [48]. Besides, research suggests that epinephrine and norepinephrine can downregulate glucocorticoid receptor expression [7]. So what happened at the cellular levels? The transcription of I kappa B alpha (IκB), induced by glucocorticoid stimulation to block the NF-κB activation, is diminished with the blunted HPA axis and glucocorticoid-resistance. Accordingly, the inflammation related pathways are activated, and they in turn activate the genes responsible for proinflammatory cytokine production [12, 18]. Additionally, the negative feedback of the organism is also accounted for the inflammatory cytokines reregulation [18]. Above all, the proinflammatory cytokines are upregulated, which is consistent with the main results observed in lots of studies, and it implies that the inflammatory cytokines enter the second stage in the change process with chronical stress exposure. Most of the human studies for chronic stress may be at this stage, for the initial of the studies is not from the onset of the stress exposures; on the contrary, they might be constantly or frequently in the stressful conditions before they participated in the studies. Other support for the assumption comes from numerous studies demonstrating that lots of the subjects even show the depressive-like behavior [23, 4952]. Furthermore, the depressive-like behavior can be induced by the proinflammatory cytokines (see below) [52, 53].(iii)The second stage is followed by the next stage, unless the sustained stress exposure is removed. The lasting impacts of HPA axis “fatigue,” glucocorticoid-resistance, and activated NF-κB on cytokines cause the proinflammatory cytokines to increase further, which to a certain level induce inflammatory response. In addition, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and other cytokines in turn activate NF-κB, in which the mechanism includes the proinflammatory cytokines leading to phosphorylation and loss of I-κB [54], oxidative stress, and proinflammatory cytokines inducing histone acetylation and NF-κB/AP-1 activation [55]. All the steps induce continued increased proinflammatory cytokines, and finally inflammation, which may induce various diseases.In these current days, the second and the third stage in our presentation, to some extent, equal the “low-grade inflammation” in some research. This “low-grade inflammation” is not the acute inflammation accompanies acute inflammation symptom, such as fever, swelling, and acute infection, but a systematic low-grade inflammation with a longer term phenomenon and an increase in the circulating levels of inflammatory markers, and this state is more sensitive and susceptible to acute stress and other stimuli [56, 57].

5. From Inflammation to Diseases

Increasing amounts of data suggest that inflammatory responses have an important role in the pathophysiology of a variety of diseases, including depression, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.

Inflammation is characterized by a cellular response whereby the proinflammatory cytokines of the innate immune response promote the expression and release of chemokines and cellular adhesion molecules (CAM) in the local environment. And inflammatory response related immune cells include macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells, as well as the activated T-helper and T-cytotoxic cells, which are recruited by the proinflammatory mediators to the inflammation region. The proinflammatory mediators also enter the peripheral circulation and promote the liver cells to produce acute-phase reactive proteins (such as C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, Haptoglobin), and activate the HPA axis, interact with the neural transmitters, and induce behavioral changes: the “sickness behavior” (such as fatigue, depression, and cognitive dysfunction). And all the above reactions subserve the metabolic demand of inflammation [30, 31, 58]. At the cellular levels, NF-κB is activated by kinds of pathways (such as Toll-like receptors, IL-1, el at.) to boost the proinflammatory mediators secretion, including proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ), chemokines, CAM, and APP [31].

5.1. Inflammation and Depression

The proinflammatory cytokines in the peripheral blood go through the weak region of blood-brain barrier or by their specific transport proteins on the brain endothelial cells (the circumventricular organs) or transmit the signals to the specific regions of the brain by the vagus nerve fibers [31]. In the CNS, the proinflammatory cytokines alter the metabolic processes of neurotransmitters, such as serotonin (5-ht) and dopamine (DA) [59], whose secretion suppression and the reuptake block take a role in the pathogenesis of depression and provide advices to the therapy. Then, the proinflammatory cytokines activate the CRH of the PVN and upregulate ACTH and cortisol, and abundant of studies suggest that the overexpression of CRH is the key link between the chronic stress and depression [60]. Besides, the proinflammatory cytokines disrupt synaptic plasticity through altering the relevant growth factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [61]. And many evidences come from clinical treatment for infectious diseases, in which they present the IFN-α-induced depressive symptom, and IFN-α is the inducer of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β [31].

5.2. Inflammation and Diabetes

Diabetes is considered as a kind of inflammatory and metabolic diseases, so the overproduction of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β has been observed in people with diabetes [62, 63]. The mechanism of the inflammatory response leading to diabetes is not fully described, while accumulating data support that the lack of TNF-α or inhibiting its receptor induces the increased sensitivity of insulin [62]. Recent studies also suggested that the inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, could induce insulin-8 resistance [62, 64]. The mechanism of the insulin-resistance involves the activated NF-κB pathway and several relevant serine/threonine kinases, such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and inhibitor of NF-κB (IKK) [65]. In fact, insulin works as proinflammatory factor, and it is involved in the anabolic pathway, whereas the basic inflammatory response favors a catabolic state and suppresses anabolic pathways, such as the insulin signaling pathway [58]. Additionally, the beta cells, which secrete insulin, can be disordered by activated NF-κB, or damaged by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which is stimulated by the proinflammatory cytokines [66].

5.3. Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerotic heart disease, coronary heart disease (CHD), congestive heart-failure (CHF), and other cardiovascular diseases, have been associated with elevated levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ [6769]. These proinflammatory cytokines are believed to contribute to atherosclerotic plaque formation and cardiac irritability. The atheroma is preceded by a fatty streak, an accumulation of lipid-laden cells, macrophages, and some T cells, beneath the endothelium. Then the activated macrophages lead to the release of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, oxygen and nitrogen radicals, and other inflammatory molecules and, ultimately, to inflammation and tissue damage, which promote the atherosclerotic plaque formation. Besides, the activated NF-κB induces cardiac hypertrophy [67, 69].

Additionally, inflammatory processes are well known to contribute to the onset and progression of immune diseases, including allergic diseases, autoimmune diseases, and infections; there has been increasing data suggesting that inflammatory responses take a role in other diseases. For instance, they may induce osteoporosis. The proinflammatory cytokines can block the vitamin D receptors to disturb the role of vitamin D in the bone formation, and meanwhile, the activated NF-κB promotes osteoclast activity and bone reabsorption [70]. Besides, inflammation signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, have been implicated in the neoplastic process, for they play a role in the tumor cells growth and proliferation as well as in resistance to chemotherapeutic agents [13]. Finally, the concerns about the relationship between inflammation and ageing have been raised in the current years. IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, and other proinflammatory cytokines are overexpressed in variety of age-related diseases and are positively associated with age. Research suggests that the elevated IL-6 levels lead to high mortality in the elderly [71]. Additionally, IL-6 can inhibit the activity of telomerase and speed up to shorten the length of telomere, which might be associated with premature ageing of cells [1, 72].

6. Summary

In conclusion, there is a serial of changes in the proinflammatory cytokines under the sustained stress. At the early stage, chronic stress activates the HPA axis, SAM axis, and the vagus fiber, which in turn secrete GCs, CAs, and Ach to disturb the inflammatory cytokines in their homeostasis and downregulate the proinflammatory cytokines while upregulating the anti-inflammatory cytokines; in the second stage, the lasting stress exposure induce HPA “fatigue,” glucocorticoid-resistance, NF-κB activation, and the negative feedback, which in turn promote the proinflammatory cytokines; in the third stage, the continued stress further increases the proinflammatory cytokines and ultimately cause inflammation, which may induce various diseases.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by Science Philosophy Betterment Society (Registered British Virgin Islands).


  1. R. Glaser and J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, “Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 243–251, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. I. Webster Marketon and R. Glaser, “Stress hormones and immune function,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 252, no. 1-2, pp. 16–26, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. M. V. Reiche, S. O. V. Nunes, and H. K. Morimoto, “Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 617–625, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Hänsel, S. Hong, R. J. A. Cámara, and R. von Känel, “Inflammation as a psychophysiological biomarker in chronic psychosocial stress,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. P. Chrousos, “The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, no. 20, pp. 1351–1363, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. P. Chrousos, “Stress, chronic inflammation, and emotional and physical well-being: concurrent effects and chronic sequelae,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. S275–S291, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. J. Tracey, “The inflammatory reflex,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 853–859, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Tsigos and G. P. Chrousos, “Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 865–871, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. E. Miller, E. Chen, and K. J. Parker, “Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 959–997, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. C. Segerstrom and G. E. Miller, “Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 601–630, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Calcagni and I. Elenkov, “Stress system activity, innate and T helper cytokines, and susceptibility to immune-related diseases,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1069, pp. 62–76, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. E. Miller, E. Chen, J. Sze et al., “A functional genomic fingerprint of chronic stress in humans: blunted glucocorticoid and increased NF-κB signaling,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 266–272, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W.-W. Lin and M. Karin, “A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1175–1183, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. M. Coussens and Z. Werb, “Inflammation and cancer,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 860–867, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. M. El-Omar, M. Carrington, W. Chow et al., “Interleukin-1 polymorphisms associated with increased risk of gastric cancer,” Nature, vol. 404, no. 6776, pp. 398–402, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Bollrath and F. R. Greten, “IKK/NF-B and STAT3 pathways: central signalling hubs in inflammation-mediated tumour promotion and metastasis,” EMBO Reports, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1314–1319, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. J. Elenkov and G. P. Chrousos, “Stress hormones, Th1/Th2 patterns, pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines and susceptibility to disease,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 359–368, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. I. Webster, L. Tonelli, and E. M. Sternberg, “Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 20, pp. 125–163, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. M. Reichardt, J. P. Tuckermann, M. Göttlicher et al., “Repression of inflammatory responses in the absence of DNA binding by the glucocorticoid receptor,” EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 7168–7173, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Kadmiel and J. A. Cidlowski, “Glucocorticoid receptor signaling in health and disease,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 518–530, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. R. Bernik, S. G. Friedman, M. Ochani et al., “Pharmacological stimulation of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 781–788, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. I. J. Elenkov and G. P. Chrousos, “Stress hormones, proinflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines, and autoimmunity,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 966, pp. 290–303, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. G. E. Miller, S. Cohen, and A. K. Ritchey, “Chronic psychological stress and the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines: a glucocorticoid-resistance model,” Health Psychology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 531–541, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. L. Raison and A. H. Miller, “When not enough is too much: the role of insufficient glucocorticoid signaling in the pathophysiology of stress-related disorders,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 160, no. 9, pp. 1554–1565, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. J. Oppenheim, C. O. C. Zachariae, N. Mukaida, and K. Matsushima, “Properties of the novel proinflammatory supergene “intercrine” cytokine family,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 9, pp. 617–648, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. M. Busillo, K. M. Azzams, and J. A. Cidlowski, “Glucocorticoids sensitize the innate immune system through regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 44, pp. 38703–38713, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, K. J. Preacher, R. C. MacCallum, C. Atkinson, W. B. Malarkey, and R. Glaser, “Chronic stress and age-related increases in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 15, pp. 9090–9095, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. E. Graham, T. F. Robles, J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, W. B. Malarkey, M. G. Bissell, and R. Glaser, “Hostility and pain are related to inflammation in older adults,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 389–400, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, T. J. Loving, J. R. Stowell et al., “Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1377–1384, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. S. Yudkin, M. Kumari, S. E. Humphries, and V. Mohamed-Ali, “Inflammation, obesity, stress and coronary heart disease: is interleukin-6 the link?” Atherosclerosis, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 209–214, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. L. Raison, L. Capuron, and A. H. Miller, “Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depression,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. P. Gouin, R. Glaser, W. B. Malarkey, D. Beversdorf, and J. Kiecolt-Glaser, “Chronic stress, daily stressors, and circulating inflammatory markers,” Health Psychology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 264–268, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. F. Sorrells, J. R. Caso, C. D. Munhoz, and R. M. Sapolsky, “The stressed CNS: when glucocorticoids aggravate inflammation,” Neuron, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Selye, “A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents,” Nature, vol. 138, no. 3479, p. 32, 1936. View at: Google Scholar
  35. H. Selye, “The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation,” Journal of Allergy, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 358–398, 1946. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. W. Mason, “A re-evaluation of the concept of “non-specificity” in stress theory,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 323–333, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  37. T. H. Holmes and R. H. Rahe, “The social readjustment rating scale,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 213–218, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. Cohen, T. Kamarck, and R. Mermelstein, “A global measure of perceived stress,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 385–396, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  39. E. Diener, R. A. Emmons, R. J. Larsen, and S. Griffin, “The satisfaction with life scale,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  40. P. D. Usala and C. Hertzog, “Measurement of affective states in adults. evaluation of an adjective rating scale instrument,” Research on Aging, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 403–426, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. Cohen, W. J. Doyle, R. B. Turner, C. M. Alper, and D. P. Skoner, “Emotional style and susceptibility to the common cold,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 652–657, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Cohen, D. Janicki-Deverts, W. J. Doyle et al., “Chronic stress, glucocorticoid receptor resistance, inflammation, and disease risk,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 16, pp. 5995–5999, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. N. Rohleder, “Acute and chronic stress induced changes in sensitivity of peripheral inflammatory pathways to the signals of multiple stress systems—2011 Curt Richter Award Winner,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 307–316, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. L. Stark, R. Avitsur, D. A. Padgett, K. A. Campbell, F. M. Beck, and J. F. Sheridan, “Social stress induces glucocorticoid resistance in macrophages,” The American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 280, no. 6, pp. R1799–R1805, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  45. G. E. Miller and E. Chen, “Life stress and diminished expression of genes encoding glucocorticoid receptor and β2-adrenergic receptor in children with asthma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 14, pp. 5496–5501, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Ramamoorthy and J. A. Cidlowski, “Exploring the molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid receptor action from sensitivity to resistance,” Endocrine Development, vol. 24, no. 41, p. 56, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. J. Lewis-Tuffin, C. M. Jewell, R. J. Bienstock, J. B. Collins, and J. A. Cidlowski, “Human glucocorticoid receptor β binds RU-486 and is transcriptionally active,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2266–2282, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Anbalagan, B. Huderson, L. Murphy, and B. G. Rowan, “Post-translational modifications of nuclear receptors and human disease,” Nuclear Receptor Signaling, vol. 10, article e001, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Åsberg, A. Nygren, R. Leopardi et al., “Novel biochemical markers of psychosocial stress in women,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID e3590, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. Glaser, T. F. Robles, J. Sheridan, W. B. Malarkey, and J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, “Mild depressive symptoms are associated with amplified and prolonged inflammatory responses after influenza virus vaccination in older adults,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1009–1014, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. M. Pyter, V. Pineros, J. A. Galang, M. K. McClintock, and B. J. Prendergast, “Peripheral tumors induce depressive-like behaviors and cytokine production and alter hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 22, pp. 9069–9074, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. Dantzer and K. W. Kelley, “Twenty years of research on cytokine-induced sickness behavior,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Chourbaji, A. Urani, I. Inta et al., “IL-6 knockout mice exhibit resistance to stress-induced development of depression-like behaviors,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 587–594, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. A. Beg, T. S. Finco, P. V. Nantermet, and A. S. Baldwin Jr., “Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 lead to phosphorylation and loss of IκBα: a mechanism for NF-κB activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3301–3310, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  55. I. Rahman, P. S. Gilmour, L. A. Jimenez, and W. MacNee, “Oxidative stress and TNF-a induce histone Acetylation and NF-κB/AP-1 activation in alveolar epithelial cells: potential mechanism In gene transcription in lung inflammation,” in Oxygen/Nitrogen Radicals: Cell Injury and Disease, vol. 37 of Developments in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, pp. 239–248, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. von Känel, U. Hepp, B. Kraemer et al., “Evidence for low-grade systemic proinflammatory activity in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 744–752, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Rohleder, “Stimulation of systemic low-grade inflammation by psychosocial stress,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 181–189, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. K. E. Wellen and G. S. Hotamisligil, “Inflammation, stress, and diabetes,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1111–1119, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. J. Dunn, J. Wang, and T. Ando, “Effects of cytokines on cerebral neurotransmission: comparison with the effects of stress,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 461, pp. 117–127, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  60. M. J. Owens and C. B. Nemeroff, “Physiology and pharmacology of corticotropin-releasing factor,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 425–473, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  61. T. Lu, Y. Pan, S. Kao et al., “Gene regulation and DNA damage in the ageing human brain,” Nature, vol. 429, no. 6994, pp. 883–891, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. P. Dandona, A. Aljada, and A. Bandyopadhyay, “Inflammation: the link between insulin resistance, obesity and diabetes,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 4–7, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. van Greevenbroek, C. Schalkwijk, and C. Stehouwer, “Obesity-associated low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus: causes and consequences,” The Netherlands Journal of Medicine, vol. 71, pp. 174–187, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  64. J. C. Pickup, “Inflammation and activated innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabletes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 813–823, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. U. Özcan, Q. Cao, E. Yilmaz et al., “Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5695, pp. 457–461, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Perreault and A. Marette, “Targeted disruption of inducible nitric oxide synthase protects against obesity-linked insulin resistance in muscle,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1138–1143, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. G. K. Hansson, “Mechanisms of disease: inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 16, pp. 1685–1695, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. L. Mehta, T. G. P. Saldeen, and K. Rand, “Interactive role of infection, inflammation and traditional risk factors in atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1217–1225, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. Libby, P. M. Ridker, and A. Maseri, “Inflammation and atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1135–1143, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. H. Tilg, A. R. Moschen, A. Kaser, A. Pines, and I. Dotan, “Gut, inflammation and osteoporosis: basic and clinical concepts,” Gut, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 684–694, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. T. B. Harris, L. Ferrucci, R. P. Tracy et al., “Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 506–512, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. E. S. Epel, E. H. Blackburn, J. Lin et al., “Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 49, pp. 17312–17315, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Rui Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.