Hydrothermal Synthesis of Nanostructured Manganese Oxide as Cathodic Catalyst in a Microbial Fuel Cell Fed with Leachate

Haoran, Yuan; Lifang, Deng; Tao, Lu; Yong, Chen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/791672

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Bioenergy and its Environmental Impacts

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 791672 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/791672

Hydrothermal Synthesis of Nanostructured Manganese Oxide as Cathodic Catalyst in a Microbial Fuel Cell Fed with Leachate

Yuan Haoran,^1,2Deng Lifang,^1,2Lu Tao,^1,2and Chen Yong³

Academic Editor: S.-G. Zhou, B. Cao, L. Zhuang, Y.-C. Yong

Received14 Nov 2013

Accepted27 Jan 2014

Published27 Feb 2014

Abstract

Much effort has been devoted to the synthesis of novel nanostructured MnO₂ materials because of their unique properties and potential applications as cathode catalyst in Microbial fuel cell. Hybrid MnO₂ nanostructures were fabricated by a simple hydrothermal method in this study. Their crystal structures, morphology, and electrochemical characters were carried out by FESEM, N₂-adsorption-desorption, and CV, indicating that the hydrothermally synthesized MnO₂ (HSM) was structured by nanorods of high aspect ratio and multivalve nanoflowers and more positive than the naturally synthesized MnO₂(NSM), accompanied by a noticeable increase in oxygen reduction peak current. When the HSM was employed as the cathode catalyst in air-cathode MFC which fed with leachate, a maximum power density of 119.07 mW/m² was delivered, 64.68% higher than that with the NSM as cathode catalyst. Furthermore, the HSM via a 4-e pathway, but the NSM via a 2-e pathway in alkaline solution, and as 4-e pathway is a more efficient oxygen reduction reaction, the HSM was more positive than NSM. Our study provides useful information on facile preparation of cost-effective cathodic catalyst in air-cathode MFC for wastewater treatment.

1. Introduction

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a promising biotechnology that utilizes microorganisms as catalysts to decompose organic or inorganic matter and simultaneously harvest electricity, which present a new approach for generating electricity from waste and biomass [1–4]. Air breathing microbial fuel cells, typically characterized by using natural convection air-flow to their cathodes, are attractive for wastewater treatment applications due to their simple single-chamber construction and their unique ability to remove organic matter and generate bioelectricity. In such oxygen cathode system, the function of MFC would be significantly affected by the cathode performance due to the poor kinetics of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).

To improve ORR and simultaneously maximize the power density, various kinds of electrocatalysts such as Pt [5], lead dioxide [6], iron (III) phthalocyanine(FePc) and cobalt tetramethoxyphenyl porphyrin(COTMPP) [7–10], Prussian blue/polyaniline [11], iron related ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [12], Co/Fe/N/CNT [13], and Co-naphthalocyanine [14] have been evaluated for their ORR activity in MFC cathodes and the MFCs all exhibited good performances. However, the high cost of platinum, the toxicity of lead dioxide, long-term instability of the transition metal macrocycles, and phthalocyanines make these alternatives impractical.

In the past decade, manganese dioxide has been studied as one of the most promising cathode catalyst for alkaline fuel cell and metal-air batteries application [15], and several research groups have previously shown that nonprecious manganese dioxide electrocatalysts were highly efficient for catalyzing ORR and lowering overall cost at the same time [16–18]. Recent studies had paid their attention towards carbon nanotubes (CNTs) coated with manganese dioxide and MnO₂ nanoparticles [19–21]. However, very limited efforts have been made to evaluate the activities of nanostructured manganese oxides. Roche et al. [22] found that the power density of the MFC with carbon-supported MnO₂ nanoparticles can reach 161 mW/m² compared to 19 mW/m² for a benchmark Pt/C at room temperature, and when using nanostructured as cathode catalyst the MFC can achieved a peak power density of 772.8 mW/m³ [23]. Thus, it is of significant to develop manganese oxides with controllable morphology and nanostructures by using facile methods for enhancing oxygen reduction and lowering the cost of single-chamber MFC for wastewater treatment. In this study, nanostructure manganese oxide prepared by hydrothermal synthesis method is applied on MFC cathode, which shows comparable catalytic capability to naturally synthesized manganese oxide, and it could further facilitate the scaling up of MFC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Catalysts Preparation

The hydrothermally synthesized nanostructure MnO₂ (HSM) was synthesized as described elsewhere [24]. Briefly, 0.2 g MnSO₄·H₂O and 0.5 g KMnO₄ were dissolved in 100 mL distilled water; then well-mixed aqueous solution of KMnO₄ and hydrated MnSO₄ were transferred to a Teflon-lined pressure vessel (QiangQiang Instrument, Shanghai.) and loaded into an oven preheated to 140°C; the dwell time for the reaction chose 8 h when the nanostructure MnO₂ was prepared. After the reaction was finished, the pressure vessel cooled to room temperature naturally. The precipitation formed was filtered and washed with distilled water until the pH of the wash water was 7 and finally dried at 100°C in air. The same amounts of starting materials were left in a beaker overnight for the formation of MnO₂ precipitate in order to see the structural evolution of nanostructured MnO₂ from room temperature to the hydrothermal treatment. After the reaction was finished, all operations were the same as the synthesis of nanostructure MnO₂.

2.2. Characterization of MnO₂

2.2.1. FESEM

The morphology of MnO₂ was characterized with field emission scanning electronic microscopy (FESEM) (HITACHI, S-4800). The specific surface areas of MnO₂ were measured by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, in which N₂ adsorption at 77 K was applied and Carlo Erba Sorptometer was used.

2.2.2. CV

Cyclic voltammetric (CV) measurements were performed with an Autolab potentiostat (model PGSTAT 30) with a three-electrode system (Ecochemie, Netherlands). The glass carbon electrode (GCE, with a diameter of 3.0 mm) coated by catalyst severs as the working electrode a Pt wire and Ag/AgCl (sat. KCl, 222 mV versus SHE) were used as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. CV measurements were performed from –0.6 V to 0.2 V at a scan rate of 100 mV·S⁻¹ in a 0.l M KOH electrolyte. The electrolyte solution is bubbled with O₂ or N₂ to establish aerobic or anaerobic environment, respectively, for 30 min prior to each scan series, and 3 min between every two scans.

2.3. MFC Configuration and Operation

All MFCs were operated at °C in a temperature-controlled incubator (HPG-280H, China). The air-cathode MFC consisted of a plastic (Plexiglas) cuboid chamber (2 × 5 × 5 cm³) [25] and with a membrane electrode assembly on one side. Carbon felt (8 × 8 cm², Panex 33160K, Zoltex) was used as the anode. Carbon cloth and cation-exchange membrane was hot-pressed together to be cathode. Titanium wire was inserted inside the carbon felt and carbon cloth to connect the circuit. Active area of the cathode was 25 cm². For all tests, a 1000 Ω external resistance was fixed except as noted. And the anode chamber of the MFC was filled with 40 mL of leachate (collected during the biodrying pretreatment of MSW from Boluo waste treatment).

2.4. Data Acquisition

The cell voltage outputs were measured by a precision multimeter (Victory 9807A, China) and a 16-channel voltage collection instrument (AD8223, China) which continuously monitored the voltages and transferred data to the computer at an interval of 2 min. To obtain a polarization curve, the external resistor varied from 50 Ω to 10000 Ω when the voltage output approached steady state. The corresponding voltages at different external resistances were recorded and the power output (W), power density (W·m⁻²), and current output density (A·m⁻²) were calculated according to , , , where (V) is the measured voltage, (A) is the current, (Ω) is the external resistance, and (cm²) is the active surface area of the cathode, and individual electrode potentials were measured versus saturated calomel electrode (SCE). The external resistance was fixed at 1000 Ω throughout all the experiments except as noted.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Catalysts

The nanostructured MnO₂ is synthesized by hydrothermal method and MnO₂ (NSM) is precipitated at room temperature naturally. SEM images of the obtained MnO₂ are displayed in Figure 1. As can be seen from the pictures, the flowerlike whiskers of MnO₂ were formed as the material prepared at room temperature by natural synthesis, and when hydrothermally treated for 8 h, there has been an increase in the size of the individual whiskers which replicates the formation of nanostructured surface with a distinct platelike morphology, and the nanoarchitecture with few rods evolving in addition to nanostructured platelike morphology was observed, the same as Subramanian found [24]. Moreover, the BET surface areas of hydrothermal and NSM were determined to be 24.91 and 111.89 m²/g, respectively (Table 1). For the HSM, the nanostructure increases the BET surface area and is easier for the organic substrates to be adsorbed on the cathodes, and the high BET surface areas of MnO₂ catalysts could enhance the oxygen absorption and electron acceptance on catalysts surface. Oxygen vacancies created to fulfill an overall charger balance can migrate onto the surface of MnO₂ nanorod and play important roles in catalysis [18]. With the nanorod surface properties and the existence of oxygen vacancies, the MnO₂ should substantially increase the oxygen reaction rate and electron acceptance capability. On the other hand, the specific nanorod and platelike structure of the MnO₂ catalysts facilitated oxygen adhesion.

(a)

(b)

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of the Catalysts

Cyclic voltammograms recorded at scan rate of 100 mV/s for naturally and hydrothermally synthesized MnO₂ in a 0.l M KOH electrolyte under aerobic (bubbled with O₂) and anaerobic (bubbled with N₂) environment are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen from the figures that the MnO₂ possesses a reduction peak (−0.5 to −0.3 V) in aerobic environment but no peak in anaerobic environment (Figure 2), indicating the peak attribution to the catalyzed ORR process.

Comparing with the naturally synthesized MnO₂, the peak potential of HSM was −0.385 V versus Ag/AgCl, more positive than that for naturally synthesized MnO₂ (−0.443 V) and the HSM with a noticeable increase in oxygen reduction peak current (Figure 2). This may suggest an effective disproportionation of the electrogenerated hydrogen peroxide by the HSM nanorods and nanostructured platelike [23]. More importantly, the improved dispersion of nanostructured MnO₂ favors oxygen adsorption due to its larger BET, facilitating electron transfer through the film and decreasing the ORR over potential. In addition, the presence of oxygenated groups on the surface of cathode catalyst, partially due to oxidation by permanganate, may facilitate oxygen reduction, as reported by Kinoshita [26]. Thus, as the NSM is relatively low adsorption of oxygen and weaker ORR performance, it was expected that between the naturally and hydrothermally synthesized MnO₂, the HSM would constitute a more effective cathode catalyst material for MFCs.

3.3. MFC Performances with Various Catalysts

The performance of MFCs with the NSM and HSM was evaluated alongside that of the cathode without loading catalyst by monitoring cell voltage output, anode and cathode polarization, and power density. As shown in Figure 3, a maximum stable voltage of 0.42 V was delivered by the MFC loading with HSM, which was larger than loading with NSM (0.34 V) and without loading catalyst (0.21 V) MFCs achieved. The main reason for the higher power generation of HSM MFC was that HSM possessed high oxygen reduction rates (ORRs), and the low voltage generation of MFC without loading catalyst could be explained by its higher (250 Ω, as shown in Table 1). The difference of among these MFCs may have been due to the electrical characteristics of the various catalysts, particularly conductivity [18]. Therefore, the sufficient dispersion of nanostructured MnO₂ over the cathode surface resulted in high conductivity and decreased the cathodic resistance, thus achieving a better performance in the MFC loading with HSM.

Power densities of different catalysts were compared using a polarization curve measurement. The HSM-based MFC had the highest maximum power density than NSM-based MFC and without loading catalyst MFC. The Maximum power density (based on 25 cm² projected anode surface area) of 119.07 mW/m² (about 5.95 W/m³ based on 50 cm³ anode volume, which was about 6.7 times higher than electrochemically deposition nanostructured (772.8 mW/m³) [23]), was obtained with HSM as cathode catalyst (with a current density of 0.49 A/m²), while a maximum power density of 32.11 mW/m² and 42.05 mW/m² was achieved at current densities of 0.22 A/m² and 0.29 A/m² without any catalyst or with NSM as cathode catalyst (Figure 4(a)), about 73.03% and 64.68% lower than that with HSM, respectively. The results of this investigation on the dependency of power generation in MFCs are consistent with the results of the BET studies. To understand this observation better, the individual electrode potentials were also measured (Figure 4(b)). The anodic potentials were almost identical in all case due to the matured anodic biofilms, whereas the cathodic potentials were varied, so it was evident that the cathode was the limiting factor in these MFC reactors. For instance, in hydrothermally synthesized MnO₂ MFC, with the increased current densities of 0–0.8 A/m², the anode potential increased insignificantly from −0.52 to −0.46 V, whereas the cathode potential dropped from −0.17 to −0.36 V; the larger driving force with an over potential of 0.19 V required for the cathode compared to the value of 0.06 V required for the anode indicates that power generation from the MFC was dominated by cathode polarization. This is also consistent with the higher OCV (Table 1) and the lower internal resistance of HSM-based MFC than NSM-based MFC, since the lower internal resistance would result in a less ohmic loss and less polarization [27]. Therefore, the results indicated that MnO₂ prepared with a hydrothermal synthesis method could be effectively used as a catalyst in single-chamber air-cathode MFCs to generate current.

(a)

(b)

3.4. Oxygen Reduction Mechanisms

The ORR mechanism in alkaline media on is usually described by the partial 2-electron reduction of O₂ as follows:

Manganese oxides were found to facilitate the decomposition of hydrogen peroxides, according to the disproportionation reaction (3) [28]. Oxygen can then be reduced according to the reaction (1); the overall reaction is then the apparent 4-electron reduction of O₂:

The 4-electron process to combine oxygen with electrons and protons directly to produce water as the end product; however, 2-electron processes involving the information of hydrogen peroxide ions as the intermediate. And the hydrogen peroxide ions are corrosive and can degrade the membrane and/or corrode the fuel cell cathode [29, 30]. Furthermore, Cao et al. [31] have studied the mechanism of the ORR in several MnO₂-catalysed air electrodes. It was found that the ORR is accompanied by the reduction of MnO₂ and that the catalytic activity is dependent on the electrochemical redox activity of these species. In addition, the oxygen reduction at MnO₂-catalyzed air cathode proceeds through chemical oxidation of the surface Mn³⁺ ions generated by the discharge of MnO₂ rather than through a direct two-electron reduction as previously suggested.

According to Bard and Faulkner [32], the number of electron transfer involved in the oxygen reduction at 25°C could be estimated with Randles-sevcik equation (5): where is peak current (A), is Faraday’s constant (96485 C/mol), is the number of electrons appearing in half-reaction for the redox couple, is the electrode area (cm²), is the electrolyte’s diffusion coefficient (cm²/s), is the concentration of electrolyte at the electrode surface (mol/cm³), is the potential scanning rate (v/s), is the universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K), and is the absolute temperature (K). At 25°C, for in cm², in cm²/s, in mol/cm³, and in v/s, in amperes is as follows: in this study was approximately 0.07 cm². Then according to the data shown in Figure 2, in NSM is calculated to be 2.2, but in HSM it is calculated to be 4.3, suggesting that an apparent 2-e reduction of oxygen was achieved on the NSM in alkaline pH solution, but an apparent 4-e reduction of oxygen was achieved on the HSM. This result is the same as the one on /C using ring-disc electrode in alkaline solution [22] and the one on electrochemically deposition nanorods in neutral solution [23]. Moreover, the previous studies indicated that 4-e pathway is more efficient than 2-e pathway [30, 33]. This result further confirmed the previous outcome in this study.

4. Conclusions

In this study, by hydrothermal synthesis method a nanorods evolving in addition to nanostructure platelike morphology MnO₂ is synthesized, characterized, investigated by SEM and CV methods in alkaline solution and finally incorporated into air-cathode MFCs as cathode ORR catalysts. It is shown that the nanostructure MnO₂ has quite good capability for ORR catalysis and has an electrochemical activity towards ORR via a 4-e pathway in alkaline solution which is more efficient than 2-e pathway as the NSM undergo. When the MnO₂ are applied onto air-cathode MFC, the performance of the nanostructured MnO₂-based MFC is more efficient and stable than the natural synthesis MnO₂. Our findings provide useful information to develop appropriate nanostructured MnO₂ catalysts towards oxygen reduction in MFC using this facile method. Due to its low cost, easy preparation, and good MFC performance, this catalyst could be a very promising electrocatalyst for air-cathode MFC. It is believed that this efficient and economic catalyst could facilitate the scaling up and commercialization of MFC reactors for practical applications.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by National 973 project of China (2011CB201501), supported by Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges NSFC (51161140330), Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NKSCX2-EW-G-1-5), and The Program of Guangdong Province—Chinese Academy of sciences strategic cooperation (2010A090100035).

References

B. Logan, “Generating electricity from wastewater treatment plants,” Water Environment Research, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 209–211, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
B. E. Logan, “Simultaneous wastewater treatment and biological electricity generation,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 31–37, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Rabaey, P. Clauwaert, P. Aelterman, and W. Verstraete, “Tubular microbial fuel cells for efficient electricity generation,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 20, pp. 8077–8082, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Lovley, “Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 497–508, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu and B. E. Logan, “Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 4040–4046, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Morris, S. Jin, J. Wang, C. Zhu, and M. A. Urynowicz, “Lead dioxide as an alternative catalyst to platinum in microbial fuel cells,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1730–1734, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhao, F. Harnisch, U. Schröder, F. Scholz, P. Bogdanoff, and I. Herrmann, “Application of pyrolysed iron(II) phthalocyanine and CoTMPP based oxygen reduction catalysts as cathode materials in microbial fuel cells,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1405–1410, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. You, Q. Zhao, J. Zhang, J. Jiang, and S. Zhao, “A microbial fuel cell using permanganate as the cathodic electron acceptor,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 1409–1415, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cheng, H. Liu, and B. E. Logan, “Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 364–369, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Duteanu, B. Erable, S. M. Senthil Kumar, M. M. Ghangrekar, and K. Scott, “Effect of chemically modified Vulcan XC-72R on the performance of air-breathing cathode in a single-chamber microbial fuel cell,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 14, pp. 5250–5255, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fu, S.-J. You, G.-Q. Zhang, F.-L. Yang, X.-H. Fang, and Z. Gong, “PB/PANI-modified electrode used as a novel oxygen reduction cathode in microbial fuel cell,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1975–1979, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, P. Liang, J. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Activity and stability of pyrolyzed iron ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as cathode catalyst in microbial fuel cells,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 5093–5097, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Deng, M. Zhou, C. Liu, L. Liu, C. Liu, and S. Dong, “Development of high performance of Co/Fe/N/CNT nanocatalyst for oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells,” Talanta, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 444–448, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Kim, J.-Y. Kim, S. B. Han, K.-W. Park, G. D. Saratale, and S.-E. Oh, “Application of Co-naphthalocyanine (CoNPc) as alternative cathode catalyst and support structure for microbial fuel cells,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, pp. 342–347, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wei, W. Huang, S. Zhang, and J. Tan, “Carbon-based air electrodes carrying MnO₂ in zinc-air batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 83–85, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, C. Liu, L. Zhuang, W. Li, S. Zhou, and J. Zhang, “Manganese dioxide as an alternative cathodic catalyst to platinum in microbial fuel cells,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2825–2829, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, B. Hu, S. Suib, Y. Lei, and B. Li, “Electricity generation in continuous flow microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with manganese dioxide (MnO₂) cathodes,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, B. Hu, S. Suib, Y. Lei, and B. Li, “Manganese dioxide as a new cathode catalyst in microbial fuel cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 195, no. 9, pp. 2586–2591, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, Y. Hu, S. Li, J. Sun, and B. Hou, “Manganese dioxide-coated carbon nanotubes as an improved cathodic catalyst for oxygen reduction in a microbial fuel cell,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, no. 22, pp. 9284–9289, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Z. Lv, J. Xu et al., “Stainless steel mesh coated with MnO₂/carbon nanotube and polymethylphenyl siloxane as low-cost and high-performance microbial fuel cell cathode materials,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 201, pp. 136–141, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lu, L. Guo, S. Kharkwal, H. N. Wu, H. Y. Ng, and S. F. Y. Li, “Manganese-polypyrrole-carbon nanotube, a new oxygen reduction catalyst for air-cathode microbial fuel cells,” Journal of Power Source, vol. 221, pp. 381–386, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Roche, K. Katuri, and K. Scott, “A microbial fuel cell using manganese oxide oxygen reduction catalysts,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-W. Liu, X.-F. Sun, Y.-X. Huang et al., “Nano-structured manganese oxide as a cathodic catalyst for enhanced oxygen reduction in a microbial fuel cell fed with a synthetic wastewater,” Water Research, vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 5298–5305, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Subramanian, H. Zhu, R. Vajtai, P. M. Ajayan, and B. Wei, “Hydrothermal synthesis and pseudocapacitance properties of MnO₂ nanostructures,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 43, pp. 20207–20214, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. Yuan, L. F. Deng, Y. Chen, and S. G. Zhou, “Electricity generation from municipal solid waste leachate using microbial fuel cell technology,” Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 800–810, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Kinoshita, Electrochemical Oxygen Technology, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
L. Zhuang, S. Zhou, Y. Wang, C. Liu, and S. Geng, “Membrane-less cloth cathode assembly (CCA) for scalable microbial fuel cells,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3652–3656, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mao, D. Zhang, T. Sotomura, K. Nakatsu, N. Koshiba, and T. Ohsaka, “Mechanistic study of the reduction of oxygen in air electrode with manganese oxides as electrocatalysts,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1015–1021, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chatenet, L. Genies-Bultel, M. Aurousseau, R. Durand, and F. Andolfatto, “Oxygen reduction on silver catalysts in solutions containing various concentrations of sodium hydroxide—comparison with platinum,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1131–1140, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chatenet, M. Aurousseau, R. Durand, and F. Andolfatto, “Silver-platinum bimetallic catalysts for oxygen cathodes in chlor-alkali electrolysis. Comparison with pure platinum,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. D47–D55, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. L. Cao, H. X. Yang, X. P. Ai, and L. F. Xiao, “The mechanism of oxygen reduction on MnO₂-catalyzed air cathode in alkaline solution,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 557, pp. 127–134, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
K. Gong, F. Du, Z. Xia, M. Durstock, and L. Dai, “Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction,” Science, vol. 323, no. 5915, pp. 760–764, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Yuan Haoran et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3112

Downloads

1878

Citations

The Scientific World Journal

Bioenergy and its Environmental Impacts

Hydrothermal Synthesis of Nanostructured Manganese Oxide as Cathodic Catalyst in a Microbial Fuel Cell Fed with Leachate

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Catalysts Preparation

2.2. Characterization of MnO2

2.2.1. FESEM

2.2.2. CV

2.3. MFC Configuration and Operation

2.4. Data Acquisition

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Catalysts

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of the Catalysts

3.3. MFC Performances with Various Catalysts

3.4. Oxygen Reduction Mechanisms

4. Conclusions

Conflict of Interests

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

2.2. Characterization of MnO₂