Multivariate Analysis, Mass Balance Techniques, and Statistical Tests as Tools in Igneous Petrology: Application to the Sierra de las Cruces Volcanic Range (Mexican Volcanic Belt)
Table 5
Tectonic discrimination analysis of felsic magmas from the Sierra de las Cruces using multidimensional diagrams [22]a.
Figure name
Figure type
Total number of samples
Number of discriminated samples
Arc
Within-plate
Collision
IA + CA ()
IA ()
CA ()
CR + OI ()
Col ()
Major elements
--5
46
46 (0.700–0.987)
—
—
0
0
1-2-
46
—
0
46 (0.815–0.969)
0
—
1-2-5
46
—
0
46 (0.666–0.965)
—
0
1--5
46
—
27 (0.056–0.933)
—
0
19 (0.031–0.804)
2--5
46
—
—
46 (0.767–0.995)
0
0
All major element based diagrams
% prob
{230}
{46} {39.234}
{27} {35.511} 17.2%
{138} {152.57} 74.1%
{0} {0.0} 0.0%
{19} {17.938} 8.7%
Major and trace elements
--5
46
46 (0.556–0.946)
—
—
0
0
1-2-
46
—
3 (0.010–0.651)
43 (0.324–0.934)
0
—
1-2-5
46
—
3 (0.007–0.671)
43 (0.296–0.919)
—
0
1--5
46
—
33 (0.025–0.907)
—
0
13 (0.045–0.699)
2--5
46
—
—
46 (0.660–0.953)
0
0
All major and trace element based diagrams
% prob
{230}
{46} {36.007}
{39} {47.423} 23.4%
{132} {127.66} 63.0%
{0} {0.0} 0.0%
{13} {27.658} 13.6%
Trace elements
--5
46
46 (0.656–0.973)
—
—
0
0
1-2-
46
—
1 (0.003–0.560)
45 [] (0.440–0.990)
0
—
1-2-5
46
—
0
46 (0.599–0.913)
—
0
1--5
46
—
16 (0.001–0.953)
—
0
30 (0.047–0.975)
2--5
46
—
—
46 (0.744–0.996)
0
0
All trace element based diagrams
% prob
{230}
{46} {37.178}
{17} {31.627} 14.9%
{137} {145.56} 68.7%
{0} {0.0} 0.0%
{30} {34.795} 16.4%
For explanation see the footnote of Figure 6. For details of principles, equations, and application rules of the multidimensional diagrams see [22].