Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Erratum

An erratum for this article has been published. To view the erratum, please click here.

The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 802701, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/802701
Research Article

Investigation of Sesamol on Myeloperoxidase and Colon Morphology in Acetic Acid-Induced Inflammatory Bowel Disorder in Albino Rats

Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India

Received 26 August 2013; Accepted 20 November 2013; Published 30 January 2014

Academic Editors: M. Galuppo and J. M. Reid

Copyright © 2014 Phani Krishna Kondamudi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of gastrointestinal tract of immune, genetic, and environmental origin. In the present study, we examined the effects of sesamol (SES), which is the active constituent of sesame oil in the acetic acid (AA) induced model for IBD in rats. Methods. The groups were divided into normal control, AA control, SES, and sulfasalazine (SS). On day 7, the rats were killed, colon was removed, and the macroscopic, biochemical, and histopathological evaluations were performed. Results. The levels of MPO, TBARS, and tissue nitrite increased significantly () in the AA group whereas they reduced significantly in the SES and SS treated groups. Serum nitrite levels were found to be insignificant between the different groups. Conclusions. The mucosal protective effects of sesamol in IBD are due to its potential to reduce the myeloperoxidase and nitrite content.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with its two main forms: Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), usually affects the quality of life of the patients. The pathological findings include loss of mucosal integrity and inflammatory cell infiltration [1]. The pathophysiology remains elusive [211]. Apart from these, reactive oxygen species (ROS) also play an important role in the mucosal damage and proved to play an important role in the progression of the disease [12, 13]. In acute colitis patients, along with epithelial cell damage, there is marked infiltration of inflammatory cells. The damaged epithelial cells are rapidly repaired by restitution, proliferation, and differentiation. The most critical process for mucosal healing is restitution [14, 15]. The drug therapy is limited to immunity and microbes instigated IBD and has a lot of limitations due to their toxicities [16, 17]. Moreover, some drugs like NSAIDs, isotretinoin, antibiotics, oral contraceptives, mycophenolate mofetil, ipilimumab, rituximab, and sodium phosphate act as causative agents for inflammatory bowel like diseases [18]. Nowadays, the use of medicinal plants or their active ingredients have been increased in the treatment of IBD to those which are unresponsive to the standard therapy. In particular, the focus has been shifted to the relatively nontoxic food additives but lack of sufficient scientific understanding related to their mechanism of action limits their use into the main stream of medical care. The present drug, sesamol (SES), is a component of traditional health food in various Asian countries [19]. It protects against atherosclerosis, hypertension, and aging [20, 21]. It has also been explored for wound healing [22], antioxidant [23], anti-inflammatory [24], and free radical scavenging activity [25]. The anti-inflammatory effect of SES on dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) model of colitis has been studied [26]. In acute models like trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid (TNBS) induced colitis also, the activity of sesame oil has been explored [27] but not the active constituent sesamol. So, the present study investigates the anti-inflammatory effect of sesamol in an acute model of colitis. Of several models for the induction of IBD, we have used acetic acid because intrarectal administration of dilute acetic acid into rodents or rabbits leads to epithelial injury and increased permeability followed by an acute mucosal/transmural inflammation in a dose-dependent manner [28]. The mimicking features which this model shows while correlating with human IBD are vasopermeability, prolonged neutrophils infiltration, and increased production of inflammatory mediators [29]. So, the present study involves the anti-inflammatory activity along with mucosal healing of SES in acetic acid (AA) induced IBD.

2. Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Acetic acid, 2-thiobarbituric acid, and trichloro-acetic acid wrere obtained from (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India). Sesamol, O-dianisidine dihydrochloride, and Griess reagent were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Total protein kit was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL USA. Analytical grade chemicals were used.

2.2. Animals

Healthy inbred female albino rats of Wistar strain (160–200 g) were used. The rats were kept in air-conditioned room maintained at a temperature of °C with a 24 hr light-dark cycle. The animals had free access to standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. The experiments were approved by Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) (vide no. IAEC/KMC/88/2011-2012) and were carried according to the guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Government of India. Intrarectal administration of AA was carried out under ketamine anesthesia.

2.3. Induction of Colitis and Treatments

The protocol and dosing strategies were taken from the previous study with a slight modification [30]. 24 rats were divided into 4 groups of 6 animals each as follows: normal control, AA control, Sesamol treated (SES), and sulfasalazine treated (SS). From day 1 to day 3, SES and SS treated groups were given 100 mg/kg p.o. whereas AA treated group was given 0.3% CMC. On day 4, all the animals except control group were given acetic acid (3% v/v) by intracolonical administration, 2 h after administration of the drugs to the animals in their respective groups. Volume of acetic acid administered was 2 mL of 3% (v/v) by intracolonical route. After anesthetizing the rats with ketamine, an intravenous cannula (21G) was inserted into the rectum [6-7 cm from the anus]. Animals were kept in that position for a few minutes and later washed with saline to remove the remaining acetic acid solution. (Make sure that the instilled acetic acid should not come out as it causes writhing activity in the rectum.) The control animals were instilled with distilled water. On day 6, drug administration was continued to the respective groups and finally on the 7th day all the animals were sacrificed. The entire colon starting from caecum was taken and placed on a slab for measuring the length and weight. Around 6-7 cm of proximal part of colon was taken for biochemical estimation which includes nitrite, TBARS, and MPO by placing them in physiological buffer pH 7.4 until the homogenization of the samples was carried out. A small part of proximal colon was taken for histopathological study and stored in 10% formalin until the histological studies were carried out. Before killing the animals, blood was collected, serum and plasma were separated individually from each rat, and the samples were estimated for nitrite levels.

2.4. Homogenization of Samples

The samples were homogenized in an ice container at a concentration of 10% (w/v) in 11.5 g/L solution of potassium chloride by using a glass homogenizer. After this, the homogenized samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was pipetted out with a microtiter pipette and separated into aliquots for individual biochemical estimations.

2.5. Assay of Colonic MPO

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an enzyme found in the intracellular granules of neutrophils which can be utilized as an indirect measure of the neutrophil content of the tissue sample [31]. The entire estimation was carried out in a 96-well plate and the readings were taken on a microplate reader (ELx800, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at 490 nm. 50 μL of sample was taken in duplicate. To this, 250 μL of ODA-H2O2 was added which comprises of 680.45 mg of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate in 100 mL of distilled water and the pH was adjusted to 6.0. ODA solution includes 0.167 mg of ODA in 1 mL of phosphate buffer of pH 6.0. Finally, ODA-H2O2 was prepared by adding 1 mL of 30% of H2O2 in 1 mL of ODA solution. After addition, the reading was noted at 5 min and 15 min. After this, 4 M H2SO4 was added to stop the reaction and once again the reading was noted. The concentrations of MPO at subsequent time intervals were determined from standard plot which uses horse radish peroxidase as standard. Note that H2O2 and ODA solutions are light sensitive, so they were wrapped in aluminum foil. The entire experiment was done under dark conditions especially addition of ODA-H2O2 solution.

2.6. Assay of Lipid Peroxides in Colonic Homogenates

Malondialdehyde (MDA) which was formed by the breakdown of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) serves as an index for determining the extent of peroxidation reaction [32]. 250 μL of TBA-TCA reagent was added to 250 μL of colonic homogenate. The reagent comprises of 15% (w/v) of trichloroacetic acid (TCA); 0.375% (w/v) of 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA); 15 mg of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT); and 200 μL of 0.25 N hydrochloric acid. The solution was kept in a sonicator for half an hour and gently heated on a magnetic stirrer for about 1 hr to assist the dissolution of TBA. After addition, these samples were heated on a water bath for about 40 min at 80°C. After heating, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a 96-well plate for measuring the absorbance at 432 nm. The concentrations of MDA were determined by constructing a standard plot by 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane.

2.7. Nitrite Assay

During inflammation, macrophages and neutrophilic granulocytes of intestinal mucous membrane are activated and release large amounts of toxic NO [33], which would damage the intestinal mucous membrane or even react with superoxide anion () and produce more active oxidizing substance called oxidized nitrous acid (OONO). The cell membranes and organelles contain proteins and lipids which are oxidized by these oxidizing species and destruct the tissue in terms of free radical chain reaction so that the integrity of mucus membranes as a barrier is destroyed. In this assay, 100 μL of sample (serum or colonic tissue homogenate) was taken and to this 100 μL of Griess reagent was added in a 96-well plate. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm by placing the plate undisturbed in dark for 10 min. The concentrations were calculated with standard plot by using sulfanilamide as standard.

2.8. Statistics

The results were expressed as mean ± SEM of six readings. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by posthoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test by using Prism 5.03 Demo Version (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). was considered to be significant.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight

Figure 1 shows that the intracolonical administration of acetic acid caused the body weight to decrease from the 4th day onwards and continued until the 7th day, that is, the day of sacrifice. Compared to control there was a significant weight loss in AA and SES groups which were found to be , , and  g, respectively, at , whereas there was no significant weight loss in SS group which was found to be . It was also found that there was a significant difference between the test drug (SES) and standard drug (SS) at .

802701.fig.001
Figure 1: Effects of sesamol and sulfasalazine on the body weight of albino rats. as compared to positive control.
3.2. Colon Weight

From Figure 2, it can be seen that weight of the colon increased significantly at which was found to be , , and  g in AA, SES, and SS treatment groups, but when compared to AA group, none of the treatments ameliorate this effect.

802701.fig.002
Figure 2: Effects of sesamol and sulfasalazine on colon weight of rats. as compared to positive control.
3.3. MPO Estimation

Figure 3 depicts a significant rise in the levels of MPO at in the AA group which was found to be μg/mg of tissue. There was a significant decrease in the levels of MPO in drug treated groups (SES and SS) when compared to AA group at , which was found to be and μg/mg of tissue, respectively. In between the standard and test drug treatment groups, no significant difference was observed.

802701.fig.003
Figure 3: Effect of sesamol and sulfasalazine on the levels of MPO in tissue homogenates. as compared to positive control; as compared to AA group only.
3.4. Tissue Nitrite Estimation

It is evident from Figure 4 that when compared to the control group there was a significant rise in the levels of tissue nitrite at in the AA group which was found to be  ng/μg of protein. Compared to AA group, both SES and SS treated groups showed a significant decrease in the levels of tissue nitrite which were found to be , and , respectively.

802701.fig.004
Figure 4: Effects of sesamol and sulfasalazine on the levels of tissue nitrite. as compared to positive control; as compared to AA group only.
3.5. TBARS Estimation

Figure 5 exhibits a significant rise in the levels of MDA in the AA group at which is found to be  nM/mg of protein. When compared to AA group, the levels of MDA were not significantly reduced at in SES and SS treatment groups and were found to be , and  nM/mg of protein, respectively.

802701.fig.005
Figure 5: Effect of SES and SS on the concentration of MDA in the colonic tissue homogenates; as compared to positive control.
3.6. Estimation of Serum Nitrite

Results were expressed as concentration of nitrite in μg and also percentage decrease with respect to control in the serum. As shown in Figure 6, when compared to control only, AA induced group only showed a decrease in the levels of nitrite in the serum, whereas in the remaining groups the decrease was not found to be significant.

802701.fig.006
Figure 6: Effect of SES and SS on serum nitrite concentration; as compared to positive control.
3.7. Histopathological Studies

The normal histology of the colon was noted in the control (Figure 7(a)). In the AA treated group, colonic shrinkage of villi and mucosal layer was clearly seen (Figure 7(b)). Sesamol and sulfasalazine treated groups were similar to control (Figures 7(c) and 7(d), resp.) depicting normal crypts and few inflammatory cell infiltration.

fig7
Figure 7: Histopathological studies; (a) normal control; (b) AA group; (c) SES treated; and (d) SS treated.

4. Discussion

Inflammatory bowel disease is a disorder in which both autoimmune and immune mediated disorders are involved [34]. Of the two forms, especially in UC, an autoantigen named human tropomyosin isolated form 5 (hTM5) plays an important role in the activation of humoral and cellular mediated responses [35].

Modification of factors associated with IBD results in provision of relief to the patients. Apart from these factors, reactive oxygen species (ROS) also play an important role in the progression of the disease [36, 37]. Hence, we have selected sesamol (SES) which has a proved anti-inflammatory [24] and antioxidant activity [23] but its role in acetic acid-induced model of IBD has not been found out.

The mechanism by which AA induces colitis involves the entry of protonated form of acid into the epithelium where it dissociates to liberate protons causing intracellular acidification that might account for the epithelial injury [38].

In the present study, the actions of SES was assessed depending upon the gross (body weight and colon weight) and biochemical parameters (MPO, lipid per-oxidation and nitrite).

Weight loss is mainly due to abdominal pain and anorexia [39]. There was significant reduction in the body weight in the AA and SES treatment groups when compared to control which was ameliorated in the SS treatment group.

Weight of colon is raised due to the inflammation and also because of the increased activity of the fibroblasts leading to the overgrowth of muscularis mucosa [40]. All the groups showed significant rise in the weight of colon when compared with control.

Myeloperoxidase activity gives a quantitative measure of disease severity and a method of evaluating drug action in animal models of intestinal inflammation [31]. In our experiment, myeloperoxidase activity in the inflamed colon was determined. The drug SES was able to produce a reduction in the MPO activity, which can be considered as a manifestation of the anti-inflammatory activities of the test compound in the AA model.

In the present study, AA induced group showed a significant rise in the lipid peroxides which is indicative of oxidative stress [41]. The test drug was able to combat oxidative stress by reducing the colonic tissue contents of lipid peroxides but not in a significant manner.

Nitric oxide plays an important role in the pathogenesis of IBD [42, 43] and the levels of NO have been found to be raised in UC, CD, and toxic megacolon [44, 45]. NO levels in the colon of AA groups were found to be significantly raised when compared with normal control group which is in accordance with the earlier reports [46]. The treatment groups (SES and SS) showed a significant decrease in the levels of NO which indicated the mucosal protective activity of these compounds. This was further confirmed with histopathology findings. In contrast the levels of serum NO levels were found to be decreased in the AA group which is not correlating with the previously mentioned report due to unknown reason [46]. Sesame oil is shown to accelerate the healing activity in TNBS induced colitis model [27]. One of the constituents of roasted sesame oil, sesamol, proved that this is the main active constituent, because of its effective antioxidant [23], free radical scavenging properties [25] able to suppress MPO, TBARS, and NO. So, we might conclude that the drug, namely, SES showed a comparable activity with SS and also protected the mucosa from the harmful effects of acetic acid.

Abbreviations

CD:Crohn’s disease
SES:Sesamol
AA:Acetic acid
IBD:Inflammatory bowel disease
MPO:Myeloperoxidase
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
SS:Sulfasalazine
TBARS:Thiobarbituric acid reactive substrate
UC:Ulcerative colitis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, for providing the facilities to carry out the project. They would also like to acknowledge All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE), New Delhi, through RPS (Research Promotion Scheme) for microplate reader used in the present study.

References

  1. R. J. Xavier and D. K. Podolsky, “Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 427–434, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Asquith, P. Mackintosh, and P. L. Stokes, “Histocompatibility antigens in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” The Lancet, vol. 303, no. 7848, pp. 113–115, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. W. Somerville, R. F. A. Logan, M. Edmond, and M. J. S. Langman, “Smoking and Crohn's disease,” British Medical Journal, vol. 289, no. 6450, pp. 954–956, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. J. Irvine and J. K. Marshall, “Increased intestinal permeability precedes the onset of Crohn's disease in a subject with familial risk,” Gastroenterology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1740–1744, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. K. Podolsky and K. J. Isselbacher, “Composition of human colonic mucin. Selective alteration in inflammatory bowel disease,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 142–153, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. L. Round and S. K. Mazmanian, “The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 313–323, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Salzman and C. Bevins, “Negative interactions with the microbiota: IBD,” in GI Microbiota and Regulation of the Immune System, G. Huffnagle and M. Noverr, Eds., pp. 67–78, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. M. W. Farmer, “Association of inflammatory bowel disease in families,” Frontiers of Gastrointestinal Research, vol. 11, pp. 17–26, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Bouma and W. Strober, “The immunological and genetic basis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 521–533, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Roussomoustakaki, J. Satsangi, K. Welsh et al., “Genetic markers may predict disease behavior in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1845–1853, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. K. Yamamoto-Furusho, “Genetic factors associated with the development of inflammatory bowel disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 42, pp. 5594–5597, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. P. Pavlick, F. S. Laroux, J. Fuseler et al., “Role of reactive metabolites of oxygen and nitrogen in inflammatory bowel disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 311–322, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Wiseman and B. Halliwell, “Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 313, part 1, pp. 17–29, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Okamoto and M. Watanabe, “Cellular and molecular mechanisms of the epithelial repair in IBD,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 50, pp. S34–S38, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Takagi, Y. Naito, T. Okuda et al., “Ecabet sodium promotes the healing of trinitrobenzene-sulfonic-acid-induced ulceration by enhanced restitution of intestinal epithelial cells,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1259–1265, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. R. Lichtenstein, M. T. Abreu, R. Cohen, and W. Tremaine, “American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 940–987, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. R. Lichtenstein, B. G. Feagan, R. D. Cohen et al., “Serious infections and mortality in association with therapies for Crohn’s disease: TREAT registry,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 621–630, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. K. Kondamudi, R. Malayandi, C. Eaga, and D. Aggarwal, “Drugs as causative agents and therapeutic agents in inflammatory bowel diseases,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 289–296, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Namiki, “The chemistry and physiological function of sesame,” Food Reviews International, vol. 11, pp. 281–329, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  20. Y. Fukuda, T. Osawa, M. Namiki, and T. Ozaki, “Studies on antioxidative substances in sesame seed,” Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, vol. 49, pp. 301–306, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  21. Y. Fukuda, T. Osawa, and M. Namiki, “Chemistry of lignan antioxidants in sesame seed and oil,” in Food Phytochemicals for Cancer Prevention II: Teas, Spices and Herbs, C. T. Ho, T. Osawa, M. T. Huang, and R. T. Rosen, Eds., pp. 264–274, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. R. Shenoy, A. T. Sudheendra, P. G. Nayak, P. Paul, N. G. Kutty, and C. M. Rao, “Normal and delayed wound healing is improved by sesamol, an active constituent of Sesamum indicum (L.) in albino rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 608–612, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Hsu, K. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Chuang, and M. Liu, “Sesamol delays mortality and attenuates hepatic injury after cecal ligation and puncture in rats: role of oxidative stress,” Shock, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 528–532, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. R. Chavali, T. Utsunomiya, and R. A. Forse, “Increased survival after cecal ligation and puncture in mice consuming diets enriched with sesame seed oil,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 140–143, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. K. Parihar, K. R. Prabhakar, V. P. Veerapur et al., “Effect of sesamol on radiation-induced cytotoxicity in Swiss albino mice,” Mutation Research, vol. 611, no. 1-2, pp. 9–16, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. K. Kondamudi, H. Kovelamudi, G. Mathew, P. G. Nayak, C. M. Rao, and R. R. Shenoy, “Modulatory effects of sesamol in dinitrochlorobenzene-induced inflammatory bowel disorder in albino rats,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 65, pp. 658–665, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Periasamy, D. Z. Hsu, V. R. Chandrasekaran, and M. Y. Liu, “Sesame oil accelerates healing of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced acute colitis by attenuating inflammation and fibrosis,” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 674–682, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. B. R. MacPherson and C. J. Pfeiffer, “Experimental production of diffuse colitis in rats,” Digestion, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 135–150, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. O. Elson, R. B. Sartor, G. S. Tennyson, and R. H. Riddell, “Experimental models of inflammatory bowel disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1344–1367, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. M. Harputluoglu, U. Demirel, N. Yücel et al., “The effects of Gingko biloba extract on acetic acid induced colitis in rats,” The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 177–182, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. E. Krawisz, P. Sharon, and W. F. Stenson, “Quantitative assay for acute intestinal inflammation based on myeloperoxidase activity. Assessment of inflammation in rat and hamster models,” Gastroenterology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1344–1350, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. Manju, V. Balasubramaniyan, and N. Nalini, “Rat colonic lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status: the effects of dietary luteolin on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine challenge,” Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 535–551, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. M. McCafferty, “Peroxynitrite and inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 436–439, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Z. Wen and C. Fiocchi, “Inflammatory bowel disease: autoimmune or immune-mediated pathogenesis?” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 195–204, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. M. Das and L. Biancone, “Is IBD an autoimmune disorder?” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, supplement 2, pp. S97–S101, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. D. Millar, D. S. Rampton, C. L. Chander et al., “Evaluating the antioxidant potential of new treatments for inflammatory bowel disease using a rat model of colitis,” Gut, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 407–415, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Dijkstra, H. Moshage, H. M. van Dullemen et al., “Expression of nitric oxide synthases and formation of nitrotyrosine and reactive oxygen species in inflammatory bowel disease,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 416–421, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  38. B. S. Thippeswamy, S. Mahendran, M. I. Biradar et al., “Protective effect of embelin against acetic acid induced ulcerative colitis in rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 654, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Bobin-Dubigeon, X. Collin, N. Grimaud, J. Robert, G. Le Baut, and J. Petit, “Effects of tumour necrosis factor-α synthesis inhibitors on rat trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid-induced chronic colitis,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 431, no. 1, pp. 103–110, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. B. Pucilowska, K. L. Williams, and P. K. Lund, “Fibrogenesis IV. Fibrosis and inflammatory bowel disease: cellular mediators and animal models,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 279, no. 4, pp. G653–G659, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. E. Niki, “Lipid peroxidation products as oxidative stress biomarkers,” BioFactors, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Perner and J. Rask-Madsen, “Review article: the potential role of nitric oxide in chronic inflammatory bowel disorders,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. Dong, Q. Mei, J. Yu, J. Xu, L. Xiang, and Y. Xu, “Effects of melatonin on the expression of iNOS and COX-2 in rat models of colitis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1307–1311, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. B. Grisham, K. P. Pavlick, F. S. Laroux, J. Hoffman, S. Bharwani, and R. E. Wolf, “Nitric oxide and chronic gut inflammation: controversies in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Investigative Medicine, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 272–283, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. K. Boughton-Smith, S. M. Evans, C. J. Hawkey et al., “Nitric oxide synthase activity in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease,” The Lancet, vol. 342, no. 8867, pp. 338–340, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H. H. Hagar, A. El Medany, E. El Eter, and M. Arafa, “Ameliorative effect of pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate on acetic acid-induced colitis in rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 554, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus