Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 850782, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/850782
Research Article

Consequences of Physical Disturbance by Tadpoles and Snails on Chironomid Larvae

1Entomology Research Unit, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, India
2Ecology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713 104, India

Received 22 August 2013; Accepted 5 November 2013; Published 20 January 2014

Academic Editors: E. Mushinzimana and A. Pai

Copyright © 2014 Gargi Pal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Indirect interactions among community members impact on organisms. The effects of two snails, banded pond snail, Bellamya bengalensis (Lamarck), and Red-rimmed melania, Melanoides tuberculata (Müller), and tadpoles of Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider), on nonbiting midge larvae, Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer, were observed in experimental microcosm. Decrease in tube number and tube length of midge larvae was observed compared to control condition due to introduction of selected above mentioned organisms. The direct effects of non-predator organisms on the midge larvae are due to physical disturbance that destroys their tubes. This may result in vulnerability of midge larvae to predators in the wild. So the community structure may be altered by indirect effects, where one or more species, through their direct disturbance, indirectly change the abundance of other species.

1. Introduction

The dynamics of in aquatic communities are influenced by direct and indirect interactions among organisms. While changes in the population of interacting species can be identified due to direct interactions like predation, herbivory, and parasitism, it is often more subtle in case of indirect interactions [1, 2]. For instance, the effects of sharing common resource may remain obscured for two competing species until the resource is limited. [3, 4]. However, instead of any numerical changes in population, the indirect effects may be realized in terms of variations in the life history features or shift in habitat utilization of the reference population within the community. Such processes have been viewed as “trait-mediated effect” and “density-mediated effect” [1, 2, 5], when the competing consumers for resource utilization influence the life history features of each other. Several empirical studies have demonstrated habitat shifting and alteration in the life history features among species as a consequence of indirect interactions [68]. Quantification of relative importance of direct and indirect effects in community regulation in terrestrial and aquatic habitats has been experimentally studied [9]. Following comparisons among these different communities, it is observed that direct effects are generally greater in magnitude and less variable than indirect effects, and in terms of food web, short chain indirect effects were stronger than long-chain effects. In species ensembles of aquatic communities, chironomid larvae, tadpoles, and snails exploit detritus as a resource. The feeding strategies of these organisms differ from one another. While the chironomid larvae are scrapers or gatherers, the tadpoles scrape substrates for food. The snails graze on the sediment floor. In course of forging or movement of the tadpoles and snails in the sediment, they are expected to influence the tube building and foraging behaviour of midge larvae in a density-dependent manner, through an interference competition.

The chironomids play an important role in the aquatic food web serving as a major link between producers and secondary consumers [10] and contribute to the dynamics of aquatic ecosystems on account of its numeric abundance and role in nutrient cycling. According to Lawler [11], rice fields serve as temporary wetlands, which harbour many of the same species that breed in natural ponds. Therefore, the rice agroecosystem influences the regional biodiversity of many invertebrates and vertebrates. The midge larvae are food for fish, water fowl, and other invertebrates [1215]. The larvae of Chironomus spp. make tubes in the soft benthic sediments of freshwater habitats by incorporating detritus with their saliva. The tubes of chironomids are thought to have several functions. First, the tubes let larvae to obtain oxygen and food efficiently, because the larvae produce water currents in their tubes by wiggling their bodies, which act to trap food in the water at the open mouth of the tubes, and faeces can also be washed out [16]. Secondly, the tube acts as physical barrier against predaceous natural enemies [17]. Thirdly, the tubes act as protective barrier for the chironomid larvae against chemical toxicants [18]. Fourth, the tubes play an important role by contributing to a decrease in the desiccation rate [19].

The species assemblage of the tadpoles, snails, and midge larvae in the wetlands like rice fields, ponds, temporary pools, and marshes suggest that a possible competition could exist for exploiting the same resources in the benthic habitat. The effect of this competition would bear an impact on patch characteristics that might indirectly influence the spatial orientation and the growth and developmental pattern of chironomids. As a consequence, alteration in the foraging pattern of the predators may be anticipated affecting the search area and overall predation strategy. The present study was an attempt to highlight the possible effect of interspecific competition on the spatial orientation of the chironomid larvae. This may make it possible to justify the proposed hypothesis concerning interaction between non-predator species sharing the same trophic level as a factor for dispersion of the chironomid larvae and their possible role in susceptibility of midge larvae due to their repetitive destruction of tubes.

The objectives of the study were to observe the direct and indirect effects of two snail species, banded pond snail, Bellamya bengalensis (Lamarck), and Red-rimmed melania, Melanoides tuberculata (Müller), and tadpole of Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider), on the larvae of Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer in terms of tube number, tube length, and the life stages of the species. The direct effects of these species on the midge larvae are assumed to be due to competition for food and limited space, and the indirect effects are hindrance of tube construction of the chironomid larvae. As a result, midge larvae were exposed and would be vulnerable to predators. This can be viewed as an indirect effect. Indirect effects have long been a well-established observed fact in aquatic communities [20, 21].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Maintenance of Organisms

Egg masses of chironomid midges along with the substratum were collected from a pond within the University of Burdwan, Golapbag Campus, and the masses were put in a plastic container with little water. Separate plastic tubs (40 cm × 32 cm × 13 cm) each containing 10 g of ground soil were used as substratum. As soon as the larvae hatched, they were transferred to plastic tub. Larvae were reared after [2224]. Intermittent aeration was made with the air pump (SOBO Aerator, SOBO, China). Around 5 mg of crushed fish food (Tokyu, Thailand) was added every alternate day to each tub. Water of the tub was replaced every 24 h. The culture was maintained in the laboratory in natural light at 32°–34°C) 7.1–7.8 pH until they attained a certain length of 2–4 mm. Some of the mature larvae (4th instar) were put individually in the glass vial with little amount of tap water (4–9 mm depth) and the substrate. These vials, plugged with dry nonabsorbent cotton, were then kept inclined on a rearing wooden stand at room temperature. Eclosion of the adults was observed daily. Newly emerged imagines were kept in a cool dark place for 24–48 hours for sclerotization of cuticle. The adults were identified as Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer (Diptera: Nematocera: Chironomidae: Chironominae: Chironomini).

Tadpoles of Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura: Bufonidae) (0-leg stage) were procured from the same pond and placed in plastic tubs with sufficient amount of water in the laboratory under the same conditions as above. Fresh water and crushed fish food (Tokyu, Thailand) were given every day.

The snails, Melanoides tuberculata (Gastropoda: Thiaridae) and Bellamya bengalensis (Lamarck) (Gastropoda: Viviparidae), were collected from the substratum of the pond using a dip net attached with a long handle and were maintained in the laboratory in plastic tubs containing dried sediments and dead terrestrial plant leaves.

2.2. Microcosm Design

Individual tub (40 cm × 32 cm × 13 cm) having 10 g of sundried and crushed soil mixed with tap water was prepared to serve as substratum for the microcosm. After hatching, approximately 300–400 chironomid larvae were added in each tub containing 5 L of water. The numbers varied depending on the egg masses. Five grams of finely ground soil was added to each tub at 10-day interval to serve as food and tube building material. As supplementary food, 20 mg of crushed fish food was added to the tubs, every day. The microcosm was left undisturbed, when the experiments were initiated. Each tub was divided into 12 equal quadrats using threads placed along the edges. End of each thread was knotted with a small stone in order to maintain the appropriate shape of the quadrat from top view (10 cm × 10.7 cm). The quadrats allowed monitoring of the tube lengths and changes in the microcosm sediment in smaller divisions. With the initial 5 L tap water being poured in the tub, 500 mL of same water was added to the tubs for consecutive nine days, so that at the time of initiation of the experiments the total volume of water was 14 L forming a microcosm with an average depth of 13 cm. Addition of water allowed maintenance of congenial condition for the growth of the midge larvae, reducing water fouling. This setup was maintained with natural light and as previously described.

2.3. Experimental Design

To assess the impact of the snail T. tuberculata and tadpoles of D. melanostictus—on the tube building of C. striatipennis, the following experiments were carried out. In all instances, the experiments were initiated on the 11th day after hatching of C. striatipennis followed by maintenance in the microcosms, when the larvae attained an average of 2–4 mm in length (Figure 1).

850782.fig.001
Figure 1: Flow chart explaining the chronology of the experimental design.
2.3.1. Assessment of Effects of Snails and Tadpoles on Developing Chironomid Larvae

On the 11th day, the number of tubes in each quadrat in every tub was counted. Following this, a pair of B. bengalensis was added in each microcosm. Three microcosms without the snails were considered as control. On the next 24 h period, four individuals and on the third day of experiment eight individuals of B. bengalensis were added to the experimental replicates. In the next six consecutive days, M. tuberculata and tadpoles of D. melanostictus were added in succession following the same procedure. Thus, the experiment was continued for nine days using the three different species with a density-level variation of 2, 4, and 8.

At the end of each 24 h period following the placement of the snails or tadpoles, the numbers of tubes in each quadrat (Figure 2) were noted using a magnifying glass. The lengths of twelve randomly selected tubes from each quadrat were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using a transparent ruler. The data on the tube numbers and length were analyzed with a 3-way factorial ANOVA using days, quadrat, and species as variables [25, 26].

850782.fig.002
Figure 2: A typical “Bunty tub” used in the experiments, elaborating the “quadrats” from top view. The dashed lines represent the threads attached to the edges of the tub, so that from top view each quadrat (rectangular in shape—10.7 × 10 cm2) can be differentiated.

3. Results

The chironomid larvae constructed tubes as soon as they were introduced to the microcosms and remain distributed in the substratum. With the addition of fish food ad libitum, the sediments provided good nourishment for the growth of the chironomid larvae, evident from the colonization and tube formation by the 1st instar larvae.

The introduction of snails and tadpoles caused changes in the spatial distribution of the chironomid larvae. Movements of the snails and tadpoles on the substratum displaced the sediments (Figure 2) and created distinct undisturbed sediment patches with intervening trails. While in the control, these changes were absent and the distribution of the chironomid larvae was not affected as evident from the orientation of the tubes in the substratum since their construction. The trails formed by the movement of the snails were random compared to the tadpoles that exhibited a distinct pattern. In case of tadpoles, the sediments in the middle part of the microcosms were rarely affected. In contrast to this, the movement of snails affected the middle portion of the substratum more than the border areas. Continuous movement of the snails and the tadpoles led to the displacement of chironomid larvae and the changes of sizes of the tubes were apparent. In few cases, the chironomid larvae were noted to move out of the tubes or swim freely in the water. This supported the view that the movement of the snails and the tadpoles caused disturbance by destroying the tubes and consequent displacement of the chironomid larvae.

On the tenth day, the number of tubes present in each quadrat of the replicate tubs, prior to addition of the snails and tadpoles, ranged between 8 and 39 ( SE; quadrats) and the tube lengths ranged between 6.1 and 8 mm ( SE; tubes). In the subsequent days, following addition of snails and tadpoles in the microcosms, the changes in the tube number and tube length are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The changes in tube numbers were significantly different (Table 1) among the replicates, non-predator species, and their relative density. The differences in the replicates could be attributed to possible differences in the number of individuals present in each tub, since no counts were made following the initial inoculation with chironomid. Possible variations in the development rate of the larvae may have contributed to this difference. The post hoc Tukey test reveals significant differences between non-predator snail and tadpole species pairs as well as their relative density, indicating that the level of disturbances varies with the species and increases with density. Changes in the tube lengths of chironomid larvae in the microcosms were significantly affected (Table 2) by the disturbance by the non-predator snails and tadpoles and among the quadrats within the microcosms. Upon addition of non-predator snails and tadpoles in succession, the density effect was not significant as observed through the post hoc Tukey tests (Table 2). A positive correlation (; ; df = 755) was noted in the increment of tube length with time signifying that the development of chironomid midges was not halted.

tab1
Table 1: The results of 3-way factorial ANOVA on the effects of non-predators on the tube numbers per quadrat ( cm2) when the non-predators were present as separately as individual species.
tab2
Table 2: The results of 3-way factorial ANOVA on the effects of non-predators on the tube length per quadrat ( cm2) when the non-predators were present as separately as individual species.
fig3
Figure 3: Changes in the tube numbers of the developing chironomid larvae in the quadrats due to the activity of snails and tadpoles (closed circles) and control (without non-predators, bar) microcosms.
fig4
Figure 4: Changes in mean tube length of the developing chironomid larvae in the quadrats in the presence of snails and tadpoles (filled triangles) and control (without non-predators, bar) microcosms.

4. Discussion

The spatial distribution of the chironomid larvae was significantly affected due to presence of the snails and tadpoles. The density effects of these non-predators appeared to be insignificant perhaps due to the space available. Possibly owing to recurring displacements of the chironomid larvae by the non-predators, the density effects were superimposed and remained obscured as the time interval for observations was 24 h. Observations at a minor scale less than 24 h may not have allowed quantification of the density effects of these species that share the same trophic levels with the chironomid larvae. Nonetheless, it is evident that the midge larvae were displaced from the tubes by the snails and tadpoles and forced to move to the patches created due to the movements of the non-predators on the substratum. The trails along the patches formed due to the movements of the snails and tadpoles lead to the changes in the architecture of the substratum. This can be viewed as disturbance resulting in the shifting of the location of the chironomid larvae. Few chironomid larvae come out of the tubes. This observation is in conformity with the fact that the chironomids do respond to the changes in the habitat conditions either by reorienting [27, 28] or by extinction at the local scales particularly in the temporary pool [2931] and streams [32, 33].

The snails, B. bengalensis and M. tuberculata, are obligatory detritivores and depend heavily on the grazing of the substratum or on solid detritus. The tadpoles are also reliant on the detritus, but their feeding mechanism is more of a scraper than grazer. This might be a reason why the patches formed on the substratum due to the movement of the snail species appeared different from tadpoles. While the tadpoles used more of the borders of the tubs and formed more symmetric patches, the snails produced an asymmetric pattern dividing the detritus layer into irregular patches. Moreover, the wall of the microcosm was also utilized by the snails, which was rarely found to be explored by the tadpoles. The chironomid larvae remain concealed in the tube at a fixed space with least movements [34]. In the present context, both in the experimental and the control microcosms, the patch occupancy and the movement of the midge larvae were far less compared to the those of snails and tadpoles. These observations suggest that despite the chironomids sharing the same trophic levels with the tadpoles and snails, they are restricted in using available spaces of the habitat. The tadpoles and the snails utilize a larger proportion of the habitat. In the control tubs, reorientation of chironomids was evident, possibly as a result of the density effects. Although the reorientation pattern could not be differentiated with the experimental tubs, the movement of the chironomids in the control tubs was much less. Empirical evidence suggests that, under natural conditions, chironomid larvae appear in dense number in a single patch and remain crowded [3537]. To avoid crowding and intraspecific competitive interactions, the reorientation is a possible alternative [38]. Also predator-induced reorientation of the larval distribution of chironomids is known [39, 40]. However, in natural conditions, the environmental factors are more dynamic and can contribute to the addition of the resources at a regular interval. This was absent in the experimental conditions for the midge larvae. Nonetheless, the exploitative competitive effects from the snails and the tadpoles are manifested by the difference in the mean number of chironomids displaced from each quadrat.

The tube length in the chironomid larvae was found to be affected due to the presence of snails and tadpoles. The length of the midge larval tubes can be considered as an indicator of the disturbance caused by non-predator tadpoles and snails, since the length of the tubes reflects the size of the chironomid larvae residing there. In the present instance, the consequences of movements of the snails and the tadpoles over the tubes were evident; a direct effect on the tube length can be measured. As a consequence, the developmental pattern of the chironomids may be affected owing to this disturbance. The indirect effect of the tadpoles and snails with the chironomid larvae can have an additional effect by making the latter vulnerable to the predators and expend more time and energy for reconstructing tubes. Thus, the disturbance of snails and tadpoles can be described as interference competition that caused displacement of chironomid larvae due to destruction of tube nest. The individual larval tube length was also reduced as a consequence of the disturbance by the non-predators, thereby inducing negative effects on the chironomids.

5. Conclusion

The present study demonstrates consequences of indirect interactions between chironomid larvae and non-predator snails and tadpoles that share the same space resource. Repetitive movements of the snails and the tadpoles over larval habitat can be considered as a disturbance, which caused the destruction of tubes build by chironomid larvae. Rapid rebuilding of tubes is necessary to continue feeding and larval development and to avoid predation. Disturbance by non-predator snails and tadpoles decreased the length of the larval tubes. The change in numbers of tube and the decrease in tube length of chironomid larvae may be viewed as a result of indirect interactions with non-predator organism. In aquatic communities where tadpoles, snails, and chironomid coexist, such indirect interactions may influence larval development and augment vulnerability of chironomid to predators.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Head, Department of Zoology, the University of Burdwan, for providing facilities including DST-FIST. They would like to thank Mr. Bipattaran Khan for his assistance in specimen collection.

References

  1. P. A. Abrams, “Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities,” The American Naturalist, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 112–134, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. E. Werner and S. D. Peacor, “A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities,” Ecology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1083–1100, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Tilman, “Resource competition between planktonic algae: an experimental and theoretical approach,” Ecology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 338–348, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Hastings, “Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 363–373, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities, University Press of New England, Hanover, NH, USA, 1987.
  6. O. J. Schmitz, “Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs,” The American Naturalist, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 327–342, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. J. Schmitz, V. Krivan, and O. Ovadia, “Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions,” Ecology Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 153–163, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. C. Trussell, P. J. Ewanchuk, and C. M. Matassa, “Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions,” Ecology Letters, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1245–1252, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. W. Schoener, “On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities,” in Mutualism and Community Organization, H. Kawanabe, J. E. Cohen, and K. Iwasaki, Eds., pp. 365–411, Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Tokeshi, “Production ecology,” in Chironomidae: Biology and Ecology of Nonbiting Midges, P. D. Armitage, P. S. Cranston, and L. C. V. Pinder, Eds., pp. 269–296, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. P. Lawler, “Rice fields as temporary wetlands: a review,” Israel Journal of Zoology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 513–528, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Willassen and A. Bjørklund, “Emergence of Chironomidae (Diptera) and other insects from limnocorals with different fish densities: preliminary results from an experimental manipulation,” Acta Biologica Debrecina Supplementum Oecologica Hungarica, vol. 2, pp. 363–371, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. A. Wrubleski and D. M. Rosenberg, “The Chironomidae (diptera) of bone pile pond, Delta Marsh, Manitoba, Canada,” Wetlands, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 243–275, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. H. Tidwell, G. Schulmeister, C. Mahl, and S. Coyle, “Growth, survival, and biochemical composition of freshwater prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii fed natural food organisms under controlled conditions,” Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. A. Wais, G. Wolfram, B. Auer, E. Mikschi, and A. Hain, “Feeding habits of two introduced fish species (Lepomis gibbosus, Pseudorasbora parva) in Neusiedler Sea (Austria), with special reference to chironomid larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae),” Hydrobiologia, vol. 408-409, pp. 123–129, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. M. Walshe, “The feeding habits of certain Chironomid larvae (subfamily Tendipedinae),” Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. F. Macchiusi and R. L. Baker, “Effects of predators and food availability on activity and growth of Chironomus tentans (Chironomidae: Diptera),” Freshwater Biology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Halpern, A. Gasith, and M. Broza, “Does the tube of a benthic chironomid larva play a role in protecting its dweller against chemical toxicants?” Hydrobiologia, vol. 470, pp. 49–55, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Kikawada, N. Minakawa, M. Watanabe, and T. Okuda, “Factors inducing successful anhydrobiosis in the African chironomid Polypedilum vanderplanki: significance of the larval tubular nest,” Integrative & Comparative Biology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 710–714, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. A. Menge, “Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition and environmental heterogeneity,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 46, pp. 355–393, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Lubchenco and B. A. Menge, “Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 67–94, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. R. Oliver and M. E. Roussel, Part II, The Genera of Larval Midges of Canada (Diptera: Chironomidae), vol. 1746 of The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, Biosystematics Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1983.
  23. L. C. V. Pinder, “The larvae of Chironomidae (Diptera) of the Holarctic region,” in Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region, Keys and Diagnoses, Part 1: Larvae, T. Weiderholm, Ed., vol. 19, pp. 7–10, Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement, Lund, Sweden, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. H. Epler, Identification Manual for the Larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of Florida, Florida Department of Environment Protection, Division of Water Facilities, Tallahassee, Fla, USA, Revised edition, 1995.
  25. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Singapore, Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, 4th edition, 1999.
  26. P. R. Kinnear and C. D. Gray, SPPS for Windows Made Simple: Release 10, Psychology Press, Sussex, UK, 2000.
  27. M. Tokeshi and C. R. Townsend, “Random patch formation and weak competition: coexistence in an epiphytic chironomid community,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 833–845, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. P. Ruse, “Chironomid microdistribution in gravel of an English Chalk River,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 533–551, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. J. Lughart and J. B. Wallace, “Effects of disturbance on benthic functional response and production in mountain streams,” Journal of the North American Benthological Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 138–164, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. G. Martínez and R. Medel, “Indirect interactions in a microcosm-assembled cladoceran community: implications for apparent competition,” Oikos, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 111–115, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Silver, D. Wooster, and M. A. Palmer, “Chironomid responses to spatially structured dynamic streambed landscapes,” Journal of the North American Benthological Society, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 60–77, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  32. W. O. McLarney, S. Henderson, and M. M. Sherman, “A new method for culturing Chironomus tentans Fabricius larvae using burlap substrate in fertilized pools,” Aquaculture, vol. 4, pp. 267–276, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. J. McLachlan, A. Brennan, and R. S. Wotton, “Particle size and chironomid (Diptera) food in an upland river,” Oikos, vol. 31, pp. 247–252, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  34. W. M. Beck, “Environmental requirements and pollution tolerance of common fresh water Chironomidae,” EPA 600/4-77-024, U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 1977.
  35. V. Ramcharan and C. G. Paterson, “A partial analysis of ecological segregation in the chironomid community of a bog lake,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Aditya and G. K. Saha, “Predation of the beetle Rhantus sikkimensis (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) on the larvae of Chironomus Meigen (Diptera: Chironomidae) of the Darjeeling Himalayas of India,” Limnologica, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 251–257, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. M. De Haas, C. Wagner, A. A. Koelmans, M. H. S. Kraak, and W. Admiraal, “Habitat selection by chironomid larvae: fast growth requires fast food,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 148–155, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. K. Mousavi, “Boreal chironomid communities and their relations to environmental factors—the impact of lake depth, size and acidity,” Boreal Environment Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Kornijów, “The impact of predation by perch on the size-structure of Chironomus larvae—the role of vertical distribution of the prey in the bottom sediments, and habitat complexity,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 342-343, pp. 207–213, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Kehl and K. Dettner, “Predation by pioneer water beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) from sandpit ponds, based on crop-content analysis and laboratory experiments,” Archiv für Hydrobiologie, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 109–126, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus