The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 874764 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/874764

Quorum Sensing Activity of Mesorhizobium sp. F7 Isolated from Potable Water

Academic Editor: Christian Staehelin
Received19 Apr 2014
Revised11 Jul 2014
Accepted21 Jul 2014
Published06 Aug 2014

Abstract

We isolated a bacterial isolate (F7) from potable water. The strain was identified as Mesorhizobium sp. by 16S rDNA gene phylogenetic analysis and screened for N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) production by an AHL biosensor. The AHL profile of the isolate was further analyzed using high resolution triple quadrupole liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) which confirmed the production of multiple AHLs, namely, N-3-oxo-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C8-HSL) and N-3-oxo-decanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C10-HSL). These findings will open the perspective to study the function of these AHLs in plant-microbe interactions.

1. Introduction

Bacterial cell-cell communication, also termed quorum sensing (QS), occurs when the cell density has reached a threshold level that could regulate gene expressions via signalling molecules [1, 2]. Acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) molecules which are responsible for QS activity are synthesized by AHL synthase (LuxI homologue) whereby AHL will bind to its cognate receptor (LuxR homologue) to form a AHL-LuxR complex which in turn modulates a battery of QS-mediated gene expression [3, 4]. Upon sensing the AHLs, the Proteobacteria population works in synchrony to generate a significant impact on the bacterial physiological activities including bioluminescence, antibiotic production, plasmid conjugal transfer, and synthesis of exoenzyme virulence factors in plant and animal pathogens [5, 6]. Structurally, AHL consists of a conserved homoserine lactone moiety and the acyl chain length that ranges from 4 to 18 carbons [7].

Bacteria are commonly known to perform intra- or interspecies communication with the help of AHL. For example, a study on the interaction between Serratia liquefaciens MG1 and Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) gave first indications that AHL molecules of rhizosphere bacteria stimulate plant defense responses [8].

Rhizobia which include the genera Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Azorhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium exhibit nitrogen fixing properties in root nodules of legumes which can only be achieved when bacteria carry large self-transmissible genetic elements, either plasmids or integrating conjugative elements that include symbiotic genes [9]. Plant growth is often limited by the availability of nitrogen, and, hence, plant-rhizobia interactions are particularly important for sustainable and environment-friendly crop production without the use of nitrogen fertilizers [10].

A key mechanism in the symbiotic process is the involvement of QS [11]. Signaling and communication between the host and rhizobia are required for successful symbiotic interactions [12]. The various functions regulated by AHLs of Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium range from exopolysaccharide production [13], rhizosphere-related gene expression [14], and the conjugal transfer of pSym plasmids [15]. QS is also an important mechanism in other plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria [16].

AHLs have been identified in various rhizobial strains (Table 1). For example, a marine Mesorhizobium sp. was isolated that produced novel long-chain N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones, namely, 5-cis-3-oxo-C12-HSL and 5-cis-C12-HSL. It was shown that both these compounds were able to restore protease and pyoverdine production of an AHL-deficient Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 lasI rhlI double mutant, suggesting the AHLs could be used for intergenus signaling [26]. In other previous studies, when C4-HSL, C6-HSL, 3-oxo-C6-HSL, and 3-oxo-C8-HSL are applied to the plant, these AHLs promoted the growth of Arabidopsis [2729] whereas 3-oxo-C10-HSL induced the formation of adventitious roots in mung beans [30]. On the other hand, 3-oxo-C14-HSL and 3-OH-C14-HSL induced resistance in Arabidopsis and barley plants towards biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens [31].


AHLRepresentative organisms

3-oxo-C8-HSLRhizobium sp. strain NGR234, Rhizobium leguminosarum, Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Rhizobium etli CFN42 [15, 1721]
3-OH-C8-HSLR. leguminosarum, S. meliloti, and R. etli CFN42 [17, 19, 22]
C8-HSLR. leguminosarum and S. meliloti [14, 17, 2124]
3-OH-C14-HSLR. leguminosarum [25]
C16-HSLS. meliloti [19]

In another study on Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, it was found that the production of 3-oxo-C8-HSL led to activation of the transcriptional regulator TraR which significantly decreased the growth rate of NGR234 [15]. Moreover, it was shown that the regulatory gene TraI of Rhizobium etli CFN42 controls synthesis of 3-oxo-C8-HSL and conjugative plasmid transfer [17].

Here, we have identified the AHLs of Mesorhizobium sp. F7 which was isolated from potable water. We showed that this strain produces two AHLs, 3-oxo-C8-HSL and 3-oxo-C10-HSL.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Sample Collection and Processing

A water sample was collected from domestic filtered water with nonwoven fabric and powdered activated carbon features installed in Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia). The tap was left open to flow for a few minutes before the sample was collected in a sterile plastic tube. The water sample was processed within an hour of sample collection. An aliquot of the water sample (100 μL) was plated on Difco Reasoner’s 2A agar (0.5 g/L proteose; 0.5 g/L casamino acids; 0.5 g/L yeast extract; 0.5 g/L dextrose; 0.5 g/L soluble starch; 0.3 g/L dipotassium phosphate; 0.05 g/L magnesium sulfate; 0.3 g/L sodium pyruvate) and incubated at 37°C under aerobic growth condition for 3 days. The observable different morphologies of the bacteria colonies were isolated and screened for AHL production using cross-streaking with Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 [32].

2.2. Isolation and Characterization of Isolate F7

The bacterial isolate F7 was found to exhibit QS properties among all isolates through an AHL biosensor screen (Chromobacterium violaceum CV026). The genomic DNA was extracted using a MasterPureTM DNA Purification Kit (EPICENTRE Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The isolate F7 was later characterized by analyzing its 16S rRNA gene. The 16S rRNA was PCR amplified using 27F forward primer (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′), 515F forward primer (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′), and 1525R reverse primer (5′-AAGGAGGTGWTCCARCC-3′) using a PCR mix (Promega Kit, Madison, WI, USA). The PCR amplification that was carried out consists of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 repeated cycles at 94°C for 30 s of denaturing, 60°C for 30 s of annealing, and 72°C for 1 min 30 s of extension, and a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. Product sequence alignment was done using GenBank Blastn database and phylogenetic analysis was done using molecular evolutionary genetic analysis (MEGA) version 5.2 [33].

2.3. AHL Extraction

A single pure colony of isolate F7 was cultured overnight in R2 broth [34] buffered to pH 6.5, with 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS, 50 mM, pH 6.5) at 37°C with shaking (220 rpm). The supernatant was extracted twice with 100 mL of acidified (0.1% v/v glacial acetic acid) ethyl acetate [35]. The AHL extract was dried and stored at −20°C prior to further analysis.

2.4. Measurement of Bioluminescence

Preliminary screening of AHLs production by isolate F7 was done using an AHL biosensor (Escherichia coli [pSB401]). E. coli [pSB401] harbors lux from the pSB401 plasmid which will produce bioluminescence activity when exogenous short chain AHLs are supplied [36]. Cell density bioluminescence measurements were done using an Infinite M200 luminometer-spectrophotometer (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). To every well of a 96-well optical bottom microtitre plate, an aliquot of 200 μL diluted () E. coli [pSB401] overnight culture in LB broth supplemented with tetracycline (20 μg/mL) and 1 μL extracted AHL were added [37]. Acetonitrile and synthetic 3-oxo-C6-HSL (250 pg/μL) were used as the negative and positive standards, respectively. Results were indicated as relative light units/optical density (RLU/O) against incubation time (hour) [38].

2.5. Identification of AHL by High Resolution Tandem Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

LC-MS/MS was performed using Agilent 6490 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and all experimental conditions were performed essentially as reported previously. The settings for the Agilent Mass Hunter software for MS spectra analysis were applied as described [39, 40].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification of a Bacterial Isolate from Potable Water

Isolate F7 was identified by analyzing its 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequence [4143]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using Mega 5.2 software to align it with other rRNA sequences obtained from GenBank. A total of 988 unambiguously aligned nucleotides were analysed using the Neighbor-Joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test is shown next to the branches [42]. The bar represents evolutionary distance as 0.002 change per nucleotide. Based on the phylogenetic tree obtained from the 16S rRNA sequencing (Figure 1), F7 was identified as Mesorhizobium sp.

3.2. Production of AHL by Mesorhizobium sp. F7

Isolate F7 was screened for its production of short chain AHL molecules by using luminometer-spectrophotometer, where the activation of bioluminescence of the biosensor E. coli [pSB401] was observed (Figure 2). Bioluminescence measurement was done for 24 h, 37°C. Cells were grown in the presence of AHL extracted from culture supernatant of Mesorhizobium sp. and synthetic 3-oxo-C6-HSL and acetonitrile were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Data are presented as means of ± SEM values of triplicate experiments.

To identify the AHLs, triple quadrupole LC/MS analysis was used. The MS results of the material from culture supernatants of Mesorhizobium sp. F7 are presented in Figure 3. The data provide evidence for the presence of both short and long chain AHL molecules, namely, 3-oxo-C8-HSL ( 242.0000) and 3-oxo-C10-HSL ( 270.0000).

It was shown in other reports that the biological activity of AHLs applied to plants and the plant response is dependent on the length of lipid chains of AHLs. For instance, 3-oxo-C10-HSL was shown to be capable of inducing adventitious roots in mung bean [30] whereas 3-oxo-C8-HSL was active on Arabidopsis seedlings where it affected expression of 53 proteins related to plant primary metabolism, energy status, cytoskeleton, and defense [44]. Hence, we speculate that the AHLs produced by Mesorhizobium sp. F7 possess similar functions. Future experiments are required to test whether rhizobial strains producing specific AHLs can be used as biocontrol bacteria to stimulate plant defense reactions against plant pathogens.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Kok-Gan Chan conceived the idea and secured funding for the work. Pei-Ling Yong carried out the research, and both authors were involved in data analysis and writing of the paper. All authors read and approved the paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the University of Malaya for High Impact Research Grant (UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/CHAN/01, Grant no. A-000001-50001) awarded to Kok-Gan Chan.

References

  1. C. Fuqua, S. C. Winans, and E. P. Greenberg, “Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 50, pp. 727–751, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. D. Robson, A. R. J. Cox, S. J. McGowan, B. W. Bycroft, and G. P. C. Salmond, “Bacterial N-acyl-homoserine-lactone-dependent signalling and its potential biotechnological applications,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 458–464, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Swift, J. P. Throup, P. Williams, G. P. C. Salmond, and G. S. A. B. Stewart, “Quorum sensing: a population-density component in the determination of bacterial phenotype,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 214–219, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Swift, J. Allan Downie, N. A. Whitehead, A. M. L. Barnard, G. P. C. Salmond, and P. Williams, “Quorum sensing as a population-density-dependent determinant of bacterial physiology,” Advances in Microbial Physiology, vol. 45, pp. 199–270, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. P. C. Salmond, B. W. Bycroft, G. S. A. B. Stewart, and P. Williams, “The bacterial “enigma”: cracking the code of cell-cell communication,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 615–624, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. M. Hardman, G. S. A. B. Stewart, and P. Williams, “Quorum sensing and the cell-cell communication dependent regulation of gene expression in pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 199–210, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y.-H. Dong, J.-L. Xu, X.-C. Li, and L.-H. Zhang, “AiiA, an enzyme that inactivates the acylhomoserine lactone quorum- sensing signal and attenuates the virulence of Erwinia carotovora,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 3526–3531, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Schuhegger, A. Ihring, S. Gantner et al., “Induction of systemic resistance in tomato by N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone-producing rhizosphere bacteria,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 909–918, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Passador, J. M. Cook, M. J. Gambello, L. Rust, and B. H. Iglewski, “Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes requires cell-to-cell communication,” Science, vol. 260, no. 5111, pp. 1127–1130, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Freiberg, R. Fellay, A. Bairoch, W. J. Broughton, A. Rosenthal, and X. Perret, “Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6631, pp. 394–401, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. E. González and M. M. Marketon, “Quorum sensing in nitrogen-fixing rhizobia,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 574–592, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Schultze and A. Kondorosi, “Regulation of symbiotic root nodule development,” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 32, pp. 33–57, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. M. Marketon, S. A. Glenn, A. Eberhard, and J. E. González, “Quorum sensing controls exopolysaccharide production in Sinorhizobium meliloti,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 325–331, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. Rodelas, J. K. Lithgow, F. Wisniewski-Dye et al., “Analysis of quorum-sensing-dependent control of rhizosphere-expressed (rhi) genes in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 12, pp. 3816–3823, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  15. X. He, W. Chang, D. L. Pierce, L. O. Seib, J. Wagner, and C. Fuqua, “Quorum sensing in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 regulates conjugal transfer (tra) gene expression and influences growth rate,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 809–822, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. N. Bhattacharyya and D. K. Jha, “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1327–1350, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Tun-Garrido, P. Bustos, V. González, and S. Brom, “Conjugative transfer of p42a from Rhizobium etli CFN42, which is required for mobilization of the symbiotic plasmid, is regulated by quorum sensing,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 1681–1692, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. Hwang, P. Li, L. Zhang et al., “TraI, a luxI homologue, is responsible for production of conjugation factor, the Ti plasmid N-acylhomoserine lactone autoinducer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 4639–4643, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. M. Marketon and J. E. González, “Identification of two quorum-sensing systems in Sinorhizobium meliloti,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 13, pp. 3466–3475, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. R. Piper, S. Beck Von Bodman, and S. K. Farrand, “Conjugation factor of Agrobacterium tumefaciens regulates Ti plasmid transfer by autoinduction,” Nature, vol. 362, no. 6419, pp. 448–450, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Wilkinson, V. Danino, F. Wisniewski-Dyé, J. K. Lithgow, and J. A. Downie, “N-acyl-homoserine lactone inhibition of rhizobial growth is mediated by two quorum-sensing genes that regulate plasmid transfer,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 16, pp. 4510–4519, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Wisniewski-Dyé, J. Jones, S. R. Chhabra, and J. A. Downie, “raiIR genes are part of a quorum-sensing network controlled by cinI and cinR in Rhizobium leguminosarum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 1597–1606, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. T. Cubo, A. Economou, G. Murphy, A. W. B. Johnston, and J. A. Downie, “Molecular characterization and regulation of the rhizosphere-expressed genes rhiABCR that can influence nodulation by Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, no. 12, pp. 4026–4035, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. M. Marketon, M. R. Gronquist, A. Eberhard, and J. E. González, “Characterization of the Sinorhizobium meliloti sinR/sinI locus and the production of novel N-acyl homoserine lactones,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 20, pp. 5686–5695, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. K. Lithgow, A. Wilkinson, A. Hardman et al., “The regulatory locus cinRI in Rhizobium leguminosarum controls a network of quorum-sensing loci,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 81–97, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Krick, S. Kehraus, L. Eberl et al., “A marine Mesorhizobium sp. produces structurally novel long-chain N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 3587–3594, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. U. Von Rad, I. Klein, P. I. Dobrev et al., “Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to N-hexanoyl-DL-homoserine-lactone, a bacterial quorum sensing molecule produced in the rhizosphere,” Planta, vol. 229, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Liu, Z. Bian, Z. Jia, Q. Zhao, and S. Song, “The GCR1 and GPA1 participate in promotion of Arabidopsis primary root elongation induced by N-Acyl-homoserine lactones, the bacterial quorum-sensing signals,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 677–683, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. T. Schenk, E. Stein, K. Kogel, and A. Schikora, “Arabidopsis growth and defense are modulated by bacterial quorum sensing molecules,” Plant Signaling & Behavior, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 178–181, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. Bai, C. D. Todd, R. Desikan, Y. Yang, and X. Hu, “N-3-oxo-decanoyl-l-homoserine-lactone activates auxin-induced adventitious root formation via hydrogen peroxide- and nitric oxide-dependent cyclic GMP signaling in mung bean,” Plant Physiology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 725–736, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Schikora, S. T. Schenk, E. Stein, A. Molitor, A. Zuccaro, and K. Kogel, “N-acyl-homoserine lactone confers resistance toward biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens via altered activation of AtMPK6,” Plant Physiology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 1407–1418, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. H. McClean, M. K. Winson, L. Fish et al., “Quorum sensing and Chromobacterium violaceum: exploitation of violacein production and inhibition for the detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones,” Microbiology, vol. 143, no. 12, pp. 3703–3711, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. Wong, W. Yin, Y. Choo, C. Sam, C. Koh, and K. Chan, “Coexistence of quorum-quenching and quorum-sensing in tropical marine Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain MW3A,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 453–461, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Y. M. Yunos, W. S. Tan, C. L. Koh et al., “Pseudomonas cremoricolorata strain ND07 produces N-acyl homoserine lactones as quorum sensing molecules,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 11595–11604, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. A. Ortori, J. Dubern, S. R. Chhabra et al., “Simultaneous quantitative profiling of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone and 2-alkyl-4(1H)-quinolone families of quorum-sensing signaling molecules using LC-MS/MS,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 399, no. 2, pp. 839–850, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. K. Winson, S. Swift, L. Fish et al., “Construction and analysis of luxCDABE-based plasmid sensors for investigating N-acyl homoserine lactone-mediated quorum sensing,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. W. Yin, K. Purmal, S. Chin et al., “N-Acyl homoserine lactone production by Klebsiella pneumonia isolated from human tongue surface,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 3472–3483, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Y. Tan, W. Yin, and K. Chan, “Silencing quorum sensing through extracts of melicope lunu-ankenda,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4339–4351, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. E. Han-Jen, W. F. Yin, and K. G. Chan, “Pandoraea sp. RB-44, a novel quorum sensing soil bacterium,” Sensors, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 14121–14132, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. W. Chen, C. L. Koh, C. K. Sam, W. F. Yin, and K. G. Chan, “Short chain N -acyl homoserine lactone production by soil isolate Burkholderia sp. strain A9,” Sensors, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 13217–13227, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  41. N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. Felsenstein, “Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap,” Evolution, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 783–791, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  43. K. Tamura, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 30, pp. 11030–11035, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. Miao, F. Liu, Q. Zhao, Z. Jia, and S. Song, “A proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana seedling responses to 3-oxo-octanoyl-homoserine lactone, a bacterial quorum-sensing signal,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 427, no. 2, pp. 293–298, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Pei-Ling Yong and Kok-Gan Chan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1001 Views | 459 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.