The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 925805 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/925805

Site-Specific Analysis of Inflammatory Markers in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus Skin

Academic Editor: A. Brassard
Received02 Jan 2014
Accepted29 Jan 2014
Published11 Mar 2014

Abstract

Prior studies identified T cells, B cells, and macrophages in the inflammatory infiltrate and up-regulation of their protein products in discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) skin; however, they lacked rigorous analyses to define their specific locations in skin. Thus, we compared expressions of selected T cell, B cell, and macrophage markers in five areas of DLE, psoriasis, and normal skin. Immunostainings for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CXCR3, CXCL10, and TIA-1 were performed in biopsies of 23 DLE lesional skin, 11 psoriasis lesional skin, and 5 normal skin. Three independent observers used a graded scale to rate each marker’s presence in the epidermis, dermatoepidermal junction (DEJ), perivascular area, periadnexal area, and deep dermis. DLE lesional skin contained an increased abundance of CD3+, CD8+, and CD68+ cells at the DEJ, and CD20+ and CD68+ cells in the periadnexal area versus psoriasis and normal skin. CXCR3, CXCL10, and TIA-1 were elevated in periadnexal sites of DLE lesional skin versus psoriasis lesional skin. The aggregation of T cells, B cells, macrophages, and their protein products (CXCR3, CXCL10, and TIA-1) in the DEJ and periadnexal area of DLE lesional skin may contribute to the pathology of DLE through a coordinated, sophisticated process.

1. Introduction

As the most common manifestation of cutaneous lupus erythematosus [1, 2], discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is described as discrete, scaly erythematous papules and macules with peripheral hyperpigmentation most frequently found on the face, scalp, and neck [3, 4]. DLE lesions frequently expand during a period of active inflammation after which they heal with scarring, atrophy, and hyper- or hypopigmentation [4].

Histopathologically, inflammatory infiltrates consisting mainly of T cells, B cells, and macrophages [5] in DLE accumulate in perivascular and periadnexal areas and at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ), resulting in vacuolar interface dermatitis [6]. Various studies have demonstrated that the predominant cells in DLE are T cells [6, 7] consisting of both CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells [5, 79]. In addition, DLE lesional skin exhibits significant amounts of protein products of CD8+ T cells including the T-cell restricted intracellular antigen 1 (TIA-1) and granzyme B [5, 6]. CXCR3, a chemokine receptor found on cells [1012], and its ligands CXCL9 and CXCL10 have also been found to be up-regulated in DLE lesional skin [5]. These findings are corroborated by recent transcriptomic analyses in which DLE appears to be a -mediated process [13]. Macrophages, which can be activated by cells, have been noted to be elevated at the DEJ and in the perivascular area in DLE lesional skin [5, 6, 1416].

However, the literature has not been as consistent on the expression of B cells in DLE lesional skin [7, 17]. Investigators have observed a marked influx of B cells at the DEJ and in the perivascular area [6, 7, 18] and reported B cells to account for up to greater than 25% of the infiltrate in DLE lesional skin [19]. However, Tebbe et al. [20] and Lee et al. [21] noted that B cells were either rare or absent in the dermis of DLE lesional skin.

While describing where these cells are located in DLE lesional skin, these previous studies lacked site-specific comparisons with control skin that would determine which cells predominate at individual areas in DLE lesional skin. Identifying site predilection of these cells will provide greater insight into understanding the pathophysiology of DLE. Thus, we compared expression of T cell, B cell, and macrophage markers and their associated proteins, TIA-1, CXCR3, and CXCL10 in DLE lesional skin, psoriasis lesional skin, and normal skin. Psoriasis was chosen as a disease control because T cells and macrophages figure prominently in the pathology [22]. In addition to displaying and polarization, T cells in psoriasis also contain a sizable proportion of cells [23]. Because the dominant areas of inflammatory infiltrate in DLE lesional skin appear to be in the periadnexal area and dermoepidermal (DEJ) junction, we hypothesized that T cells, B cells, and macrophages accumulate in these two areas of DLE lesional skin when compared with psoriasis lesional skin and normal skin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Recruitment

Biopsies of DLE lesional skin lesions were performed in the outpatient clinics of Parkland Memorial Hospital and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, from May 2004 to May 2011. The diagnosis of DLE was made by clinicopathological correlation. DLE patients were also evaluated for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by determining the numbers of American College of Rheumatology SLE criteria satisfied [24, 25]. Medical charts for each DLE case were reviewed for demographic information, SLE criteria, and treatment at time of biopsy. Psoriasis lesional and normal skin biopsies were acquired from the archives of Cockerell Dermatopathology. Clinical information was unavailable for these biopsies. The institutional review board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center approved this cross-sectional pilot study.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry Preparation

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from each DLE, psoriasis, and normal skin biopsy specimen were cut into 4-micron thick sections and mounted on glass slides. Initial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Primary anti-human antibodies against CD3 (Cell Marque Corporation, Hot Springs, AR), CD4 (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA), CD8 (Cell Marque), CD20 (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ), CD68 (Ventana), CXCL10 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), CXCR3 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA), and TIA-1 (Biocare) were applied. Immunostaining using avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as substrate on an automated Ventana Benchmark instrument (Ventana) was performed using previously published protocols [26] with appropriately staining negative and positive control samples. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin and bluing reagent.

2.3. Histopathology Analysis

Under basic light microscopy, three reviewers (AG, JS, BFC) examined the staining of each marker in DLE lesional skin, psoriasis lesional skin, and normal skin in five areas: epidermis, DEJ, perivascular area, periadnexal area, and deep dermis. Each area received a rating of 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (high), which was based on a subjective assessment of the percentage of positively stained cells and the staining intensity.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Since this was a pilot study, sample size was not calculated. Mean rating scores were compared amongst the three skin groups using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis Test and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test using statistical software (GraphPad Prism 6 version 6.0c). Similar preplanned analyses were done between DLE subgroups (e.g., those with and without SLE). To reduce the number of false positives, given the numerous comparisons performed, values of <0.01 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Twenty-three DLE patients were included in the study. The average age was 46.5 years. 91.3% and 60.9% of DLE patients were female and African Americans, respectively. DLE patients with SLE (DLE+/SLE+) were more likely to be on medications, such as hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and/or quinacrine, than DLE patients without SLE (DLE+/SLE−) (Table 1).


Patient no.SLE (Y/N) AgeGenderEthnicityNo. of SLE CriteriaTreatment at biopsyBiopsy site

1N55FCaucasian3Shoulder
2N52FCaucasian3HCQScalp
3N46FCaucasian3Scalp
4N41FAA1Scalp
5N50FAA2Chin
6N42FCaucasian1Cheek
7N47MAA2Scalp
8N31FAA1Scalp
9N36FAA3Scalp
10N62FCaucasian3Cheek
11N45FCaucasian2Nasal Ala
12N41FAA3Scalp
13N50MAA2Scalp
14Y51FAsian5HCQ, MM, prednisoneScalp
15Y42FHispanic6PrednisoneArm
16Y31FAA9MM, prednisone, quinacrineUpper thigh
17Y39FAA5HCQ, prednisoneScalp
18Y73FCaucasian7PrednisoneCheek
19Y54FAA5HCQShoulder
20Y54FAA4Scalp
21Y36FAA5PrednisoneScalp
22Y42FAA6Scalp
23Y50FAA5Shoulder

Abbreviations: AA: African American, DLE: discoid lupus erythematosus, HCQ: hydroxychloroquine, MM: mycophenolate mofetil, SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.
3.2. Site-Specific Immunostaining Analyses

In the epidermis, psoriasis lesional skin () was stained more for the T cell markers, CD3, and CD4, than DLE lesional skin (). No major differences were seen between DLE lesional and normal skin epidermis () (Figure 1). At the DEJ, CD3+ T cells, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, CD20+ B cells, CD68+ macrophages, and TIA-1 were all higher in DLE lesional skin than in psoriasis lesional skin. When comparing DLE with normal skin at the DEJ, similar findings were found except that CD20+ B cells and TIA-1 were not significantly different, and CD4+ helper T cells were significantly higher in DLE lesional skin (Figure 1). In the perivascular area, no significant differences were discovered in DLE lesional skin versus psoriasis lesional skin. Conversely, when compared with normal skin, DLE lesional skin demonstrated significantly higher staining for CD3, CD20, CD68, CXCR3, and TIA-1 in the perivascular area (Figure 2). Of all five areas analyzed, the periadnexal area showcased the most marked dissimilarities between DLE and psoriasis lesional skin. All markers studied were expressed at significantly higher levels in DLE than in psoriasis lesional skin at this site. Fewer differences were noted when comparing DLE with normal skin, with only CD20 and CD68 being up-regulated in the periadnexal areas of DLE lesional skin (Figure 3). Lastly, DLE lesional skin exhibited significantly more staining than psoriasis lesional skin for CD3, CD8, and CD20 in the deep dermis. Only CD68+ macrophages significantly populated the deep dermis of DLE lesional skin versus normal skin (Figure 4).

Serial sections revealed that CXCR3 and CXCL10 appeared to have similar staining patterns as the CD3+ T cell and CD68+ macrophage populations, but not the CD20+ B cell populations (Figure 5). Immunostainings of the markers studied were also compared in the skin of DLE+/SLE− with DLE+/SLE+ patients. While the data trended towards increased staining in DLE+/SLE− skin for all of the markers studied, none were found to be significantly different in any of the five locations studied (data not shown).

4. Discussion

We analyzed the T cell, B cell, and macrophage populations and selected associated proteins (CXCR3, CXCL10, and TIA-1) in five different areas of DLE lesional skin. To determine where these markers were differentially expressed in DLE lesional skin; site-specific comparisons were made with psoriasis lesional skin and normal skin. We stratified our results into major or minor categories based on whether DLE was significantly discrepant from psoriasis and normal skin (major) or from only one of the two control groups (minor).

A major finding of T cells in DLE lesional skin was that CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells were significantly higher in DLE lesional skin versus both psoriasis lesional skin and normal skin at the DEJ. Minor findings included increased numbers of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ T cells in the periadnexal area and in the deep dermis in DLE versus psoriasis lesional skin and CD4+ helper T cells at the DEJ and in periadnexal areas in DLE lesional skin versus normal and psoriasis lesional skin, respectively. Although Tebbe et al. reported that most T cells were of the helper subtype [20], our results highlight an elevation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in DLE lesional skin, particularly at the DEJ, compared with their psoriasis and normal counterparts. A byproduct of cytotoxic T cell activity is TIA-1, which is found in azurophilic cytoplasmic granules [27]. TIA-1 is an intracellular membrane-associated protein that induces DNA fragmentation, resulting in apoptosis [28]. DLE lesional skin also demonstrated increased TIA-1 at the DEJ and in the periadnexal areas, which are both near keratinocytes and areas where CD8+ T cells were also elevated. Thus, it is likely that TIA-1 released by CD8+ T cells is associated with cellular damage resulting in hydropic degeneration and apoptosis of keratinocytes located in the epidermis and periadnexal areas. Furthermore, these apoptotic keratinocytes become likely sources of nuclear material that could be targets of autoantibodies.

B cells have largely been implicated in SLE due to their production of autoantibodies. In SLE, autoantibodies can form immune complexes that mediate tissue damage through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) [29]. Moreover, in vitro experiments involving UVB-irradiated keratinocytes isolated from SLE or subacute cutaneous lupus skin showed increased binding of anti-Ro IgG antibodies, resulting in enhanced ADCC. In contrast, irradiated keratinocytes from DLE patients did not show enhanced ADCC [30, 31]. Despite these negative findings in DLE lesional skin, our data showing B cells congregating in different areas of DLE lesional skin supports the notion of B cells and potentially autoantibodies being involved in the pathology of DLE. The major result was that B cells in DLE lesional skin were significantly higher in periadnexal areas versus those from both control groups. We postulate that autoantibodies produced by these B cells target nearby apoptotic keratinocytes displaying nuclear antigens at their cellular surface. B cells were also increased in DLE lesional skin at the DEJ, perivascular area, and in the deep dermis when compared with one of the control groups. As our data has indicated multiple areas in DLE lesional skin with significant involvement of B cells, it contrasts the findings of Tebbe et al. [20] and Lee et al. [21] that did not find enhanced levels of B cells in DLE lesional skin. One plausible explanation for the discrepancy in the literature is the methods used in the various analyses. By parceling DLE lesional skin into specific locations and monitoring for B cells at each location as opposed to analyzing the entire skin at one time, we were able to perform site-specific analyses to confirm the accumulation of B cells in various sites of DLE lesional skin.

Similar to CD8+ T cells, CD68+ macrophages were also significantly increased at the DEJ in DLE lesional skin versus both psoriasis lesional skin and normal skin. Additionally, significantly higher levels of CD68+ macrophages were found in the periadnexal area of DLE lesional skin versus both control groups. Of all the cell types, the CD68+ macrophage was the only cell type that was consistently significantly different when compared with normal skin in 4 of 5 locations studied (DEJ, perivascular area, periadnexal area, and deep dermis). Despite the enhanced presence of macrophages in DLE lesional skin, little is known regarding how macrophages contribute to the pathology of DLE. Previous studies have found that after CD3+ T cells, CD68+ cells are the next most common infiltrate in DLE [5, 6]. CD68+ macrophages may be recruited to DLE lesional skin, specifically to the DEJ and periadnexal sites, to engulf apoptotic keratinocytes. This phagocytosis could be mediated through ADCC, as macrophages can target apoptotic cells marked by autoantibodies [32]. However, it is unclear whether their accumulation is due to defective clearance of these keratinocytes or increased keratinocyte apoptosis [33]. In addition to its phagocytic properties, macrophages can highly influence T cell differentiation by secreting cytokines such as IL-12 that favor a bias. IL-12 can favor differentiation of naïve T cells to cells and promote greater IFN-γ production by cells [34]. Further inquiries are required to learn more about the specific makeup, character, and regulation of macrophages in DLE.

CXCL10 and CXCR3, which were both up-regulated in the periadnexal areas of DLE versus psoriasis lesional skin, appeared to mimic the expression patterns of effector T cells and macrophages. As CXCR3 is predominantly found on and cytotoxic T cells [35, 36], we have confirmed this finding on DLE lesional skin, as CXCR3 stainings have paralleled those of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, Wenzel et al. [5] reported that CXCR3 was found in 60–90% of lymphocytes in lesional cutaneous lupus skin. Additionally, they also noted CXCL10 staining in selected areas of the basal epidermis containing interface dermatitis of DLE lesional skin [5]. Along with the other CXCR3 ligands, CXCL9 and CXCL11, CXCL10 is richly expressed in cutaneous lupus skin [37, 38]. As activated macrophages produce CXCL10, which can help recruit T cells [39], macrophages in DLE are likely a major source of CXCL10. Thus, we propose that macrophages drive the recruitment of lymphocytes through production of CXCL10, particularly in the periadnexal areas of DLE lesional skin. Further double immunofluorescence or dual chromagen immunohistochemistry studies will be planned to corroborate these findings.

We also investigated if there were differences in the inflammatory infiltrates in DLE+/SLE− and DLE+/SLE+ skin because it is unclear whether DLE in the setting of systemic disease is different than DLE alone. While no significant differences in any marker between DLE+/SLE− and DLE+/SLE+ skin were found, there were trends towards stronger immunostaining of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CXCR3, CXCL10, and TIA-1 in most areas of DLE+/SLE− skin compared with DLE+/SLE+ skin. We hypothesize that a dilutional effect may be present in DLE patients with systemic disease in which inflammatory cells and their protein products are dispersed in other areas of the body. However, medication effect may also explain this difference, as more DLE+/SLE+ patients were on potent immunosuppressants than DLE+/SLE− patients.

The study is limited by the reviewers not being blinded during the immunohistochemical analyses. While reviewers were instructed to focus their attention on the staining intensities of the various markers and not on the underlying pathology, distinct pathological findings in DLE, psoriasis, and normal skin could be viewed in the background. Additionally, clinical data was not available for the control groups. While no significant differences in the markers studied were seen between DLE+/SLE+ and DLE+/SLE− skin, we are pursuing further investigations in these DLE skin subtypes that broaden the number of genes and proteins studied via gene microarrays and confirmatory protein expression studies.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we performed site-specific analyses of the inflammatory infiltrate and their selected proteins in DLE lesional skin compared with psoriasis lesional skin and normal skin. We found that CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD68+ macrophages are significantly higher in the DEJ of DLE lesional skin versus normal and psoriasis lesional skin. CD20+ B cells and CD68+ macrophages were also elevated in the periadnexal areas of DLE lesional skin compared with normal and psoriasis lesional skin. These periadnexal areas also contained higher expression of TIA-1, CXCR3, and CXCL10 in DLE versus psoriasis lesional skin. Aggregation of these cells in these specific areas of DLE lesional skin likely contributes to the pathology of DLE through an intricate cross-talk and coordination amongst these cells.

Abbreviations

ADCC:Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity
DEJ:Dermoepidermal junction
DLE:Discoid lupus erythematosus
SLE:Systemic lupus erythematosus
TIA-1:T-cell restricted intracellular antigen 1.

Disclosure

Benjamin F. Chong is an investigator for Amgen Incorporated and Daavlin Corporation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Mary Debram-Hart and the histopathology staff at Cockerell Dermatopathology for their technical assistance and expertise in carrying out the immunohistochemistry protocols. The research in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award no. K23AR061441 (BFC). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. C. Cardinali, M. Caproni, E. Bernacchi, L. Amato, and P. Fabbri, “The spectrum of cutaneous manifestations in lupus erythematosus—the Italian experience,” Lupus, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 417–423, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  2. O. Durosaro, M. D. P. Davis, K. B. Reed, and A. L. Rohlinger, “Incidence of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, 1965–2005: a population-based study,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 249–253, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. Rothfield, R. D. Sontheimer, and M. Bernstein, “Lupus erythematosus: systemic and cutaneous manifestations,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 348–362, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Tebbe, “Clinical course and prognosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 121–124, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Wenzel, S. Zahn, S. Mikus, A. Wiechert, T. Bieber, and T. Tüting, “The expression pattern of interferon-inducible proteins reflects the characteristic histological distribution of infiltrating immune cells in different cutaneous lupus erythematosus subsets,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 752–757, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. A. Hussein, N. M. Aboulhagag, H. S. Atta, and S. M. Atta, “Evaluation of the profile of the immune cell infiltrate in lichen planus, discoid lupus erythematosus, and chronic dermatitis,” Pathology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 682–693, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Xie, M. Jinnin, X. Zhang et al., “Immunohistochemical characterization of the cellular infiltrate in discoid lupus erythematosus,” BioScience Trends, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Wenzel, M. Uerlich, E. Wörrenkämper, S. Freutel, T. Bieber, and T. Tüting, “Scarring skin lesions of discoid lupus erythematosus are characterized by high numbers of skin-homing cytotoxic lymphocytes associated with strong expression of the type I interferon-induced protein MxA,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 153, no. 5, pp. 1011–1015, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Wenzel, E. Wörenkämper, S. Freutel et al., “Enhanced type I interferon signalling promotes Th1-biased inflammation in cutaneous lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 435–442, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. Clark-Lewis, I. Mattioli, J. H. Gong, and P. Loetscher, “Structure-function relationship between the human chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligands,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. 289–295, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. U. Syrbe, J. Siveke, and A. Hamann, “Th1/Th2 subsets: distinct differences in homing and chemokine receptor expression?” Springer Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 263–285, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Yamamoto, Y. Adachi, Y. Onoue et al., “Differential expression of the chemokine receptors by the Th1-and Th2-type effector populations within circulating CD4+ T cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 568–574, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Jabbari, M. Suarez-Farinas, J. Fuentes-Duculan et al., “Dominant Th1 and minimal Th17 skewing in discoid lupus revealed by transcriptomic comparison with psoriasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 134, pp. 87–95, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Nakamura, N. Yasaka, A. Asahina et al., “Increased numbers of CD68 antigen positive dendritic epidermal cells and upregulation of CLA (cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen) expression on these cells in various skin diseases,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 170–180, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. M. G. J. de Jong, P. E. J. van Erp, D. J. Ruiter, and P. C. M. van de Kerkhof, “Immunohistochemical detection of proliferation and differentiation in discoid lupus erythematosus,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 25, no. 6, part 1, pp. 1032–1038, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J. Flier, D. M. Boorsma, P. J. van Beek et al., “Differential expression of CXCR3 targeting chemokines CXCL10, CXCL9, and CXCL11 in different types of skin inflammation,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 398–405, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. D. Y. Mason, W. M. Comans-Bitter, J. L. Cordell, M. A. J. Verhoeven, and J. J. M. van Dongen, “Antibody L26 recognizes an intracellular epitope on the B-cell-associated CD20 antigen,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1215–1222, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  18. C. H. P. Wouters, C. Diegenant, J. L. Ceuppens, H. Degreef, and E. A. M. Stevens, “The circulating lymphocyte profiles in patients with discoid lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus suggest a pathogenetic relationship,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 693–700, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Akasu, H. J. Kahn, and L. From, “Lymphocyte markers on formalin-fixed tissue in Jessner's lymphocytic infiltrate and lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  20. B. Tebbe, L. Mazur, R. Stadler, and C. E. Orfanos, “Immunohistochemical analysis of chronic discoid and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus—relation to immunopathological mechanisms,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Lee, B. Wilkinson, J. A. Doyle, and S. Kossard, “A comparative immunohistochemical study of lichen planus and discoid lupus erythematosus,” Australasian Journal of Dermatology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 188–192, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  22. F. O. Nestle, D. H. Kaplan, and J. Barker, “Psoriasis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 5, pp. 444–509, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Kagami, H. L. Rizzo, J. J. Lee, Y. Koguchi, and A. Blauvelt, “Circulating Th17, Th22, and Th1 cells are increased in psoriasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1373–1383, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. C. Hochberg, “Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 40, no. 9, p. 1725, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. M. Tan, “Special antibodies for the study of systemic lupus erythematosus. An analysis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 753–756, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  26. G. R. Collins, L. Essary, J. Strauss, P. Hino, and C. J. Cockerell, “Incidentally discovered distant cutaneous metastasis of sacral chordoma: a case with variation in S100 protein expression (compared to the primary tumor) and review of the literature,” Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 637–643, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Anderson, C. Nagler-Anderson, C. O'Brien et al., “A monoclonal antibody reactive with a 15-kDa cytoplasmic granule-associated protein defines a subpopulation of CD8+ T lymphocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 574–582, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  28. Q. Tian, M. Streuli, H. Saito, S. F. Schlossman, and P. Anderson, “A polyadenylate binding protein localized to the granules of cytolytic lymphocytes induces DNA fragmentation in target cells,” Cell, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 629–639, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. Ahmed and J. H. Anolik, “B-cell biology and related therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 109–130, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. Furukawa, T. Itoh, H. Wakita et al., “Keratinocytes from patients with lupus erythematosus show enhanced cytotoxicity to ultraviolet radiation and to antibody-mediated cytotoxicity,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 164–170, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. Yoshimasu, A. Hiroi, T. Ohtani, K. Uede, and F. Furukawa, “Comparison of anti 60 and 52 kDa SS-A/Ro antibodies in the pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Zighelboim, B. Bonavida, and J. L. Fahey, “Evidence for several cell populations active in antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 1737–1742, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
  33. A. Kuhn, M. Herrmann, S. Kleber et al., “Accumulation of apoptotic cells in the epidermis of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus after ultraviolet irradiation,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 939–950, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Manetti, P. Parronchi, M. G. Giudizi et al., “Natural killer cell stimulatory factor (interleukin 12 [IL-12]) induces T helper type 1 (Th1)-specific immune responses and inhibits the development of IL-4-producing Th cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 1199–1204, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  35. R. Bonecchi, G. Bianchi, P. P. Bordignon et al., “Differential expression of chemokine receptors and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 T helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 129–134, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. L. Rabin, M. K. Park, F. Liao, R. Swofford, D. Stephany, and J. M. Farber, “Chemokine receptor responses on T cells are achieved through regulation of both receptor expression and signaling,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 7, pp. 3840–3850, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  37. T. Gambichler, Z. Genc, M. Skrygan et al., “Cytokine and chemokine ligand expression in cutaneous lupus erythematosus,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 319–323, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Meller, F. Winterberg, M. Gilliet et al., “Ultraviolet radiation-induced injury, chemokines, and leukocyte recruitment: an amplification cycle triggering cutaneous lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1504–1516, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. H. Dufour, M. Dziejman, M. T. Liu, J. H. Leung, T. E. Lane, and A. D. Luster, “IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10; CXCL10)-deficient mice reveal a role for IP-10 in effector T cell generation and trafficking,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 7, pp. 3195–3204, 2002. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ryan B. Thorpe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1654 Views | 1030 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.