Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 980280, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/980280
Clinical Study

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Kidneys with Obstructive Uropathy: Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Etiology

1Department of Radiology, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, 35160 Izmir, Turkey
2Department of Radiology, Firat University Medical Faculty, 23100 Elazig, Turkey
3Department of Statistic, Faculty of Science, Fırat University, 23100 Elazig, Turkey

Received 22 August 2013; Accepted 24 December 2013; Published 9 February 2014

Academic Editors: Y. C. Cheung and Y. Mardor

Copyright © 2014 Tugce Ozlem Kalayci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Cova, E. Squillaci, F. Stacul et al., “Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 77, no. 922, pp. 851–857, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Squillaci, G. Manenti, F. Di Stefano, R. Miano, L. Strigari, and G. Simonetti, “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal tumours,” Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. C. Thoeny, F. de Keyzer, R. H. Oyen, and R. R. Peeters, “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 911–917, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Sandrasegaran, C. P. Sundaram, R. Ramaswamy et al., “Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of renal masses,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 438–445, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Nayyar, A. K. Sarda, R. C. M. Kaza, and V. J. Anand, “The obstructed kidney,” Indian Journal of Surgery, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Toya, S. Naganawa, H. Kawai, and M. Ikeda, “Correlation between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the kidneys,” Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 59–64, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. L. Zhang, E. E. Sigmund, H. Rusinek et al., “Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Balliu, J. C. Vilanova, I. Peláez et al., “Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficients to differentiate benign from malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 560–566, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. Oztekin, C. Calli, O. Kitis et al., “Reliability of diffusion weighted MR imaging in differentiating degenerative and infectious end plate changes,” Radiology and Oncology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 97–102, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Namimoto, Y. Yamashita, K. Mitsuzaki, Y. Nakayama, Y. Tang, and M. Takahashi, “Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse renal disease by diffusion weighted echo-planar imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 9, pp. 832–837, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  11. G. Verswijvel, V. Vandecaveye, G. Gelin et al., “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal infection: preliminary results,” Journal Belge de Radiologie, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 100–103, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Fukuda, I. Ohashi, K. Hanafusa et al., “Anisotropic diffusion in kidney: apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 11, pp. 156–160, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  13. Z. Bozgeyik, E. Kocakoc, and F. Sonmezgoz, “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings of kidneys in patients with early phase of obstruction,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 138–141, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Toyoshima, K. Noguchi, H. Seto, M. Shimizu, and N. Watanabe, “Functional evaluation of hydronephrosis by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and split glomerular filtration rate,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 642–646, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. H. M. Chan, E. Y. K. Tsui, S. H. Luk et al., “MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis,” Clinical Imaging, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 110–113, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus