Clinical Study

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as a Diagnostic Method for Determination of Gingival Thickness and Distance between Gingival Margin and Bone Crest

Table 1

Mean and standard deviation (sd) of gingival thickness (GT) measurements obtained by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging, transgingival probing (TP), and the method using ultrasound (US).

Teeth groupGingival thickness1 (mm)
CBCTTPUS
Mean ± sdMean ± sdMean ± sd

Incisors 1.17 ± 0.26a1161.34 ± 0.31b1161.24 ± 0.32a58<0.05
Canines1.08 ± 0.28a581.22 ± 0.27b581.03 ± 0.38a58<0.05
Premolars1.19 ± 0.48a1161.23 ± 0.37a1161.01 ± 0.43b116<0.05
Molars1.32 ± 0.54a581.39 ± 0.42a581.06 ± 0.36b58<0.05
All the teeth1.18 ± 0.40a3481.29 ± 0.35b3481.10 ± 0.39c348<0.05

Different letters in the lines indicate significant statistical differences ( < 0.05) by Tamhane’s test.