Clinical Study

The Conventional Non-Articulated SACH or a Multiaxial Prosthetic Foot for Hypomobile Transtibial Amputees? A Clinical Comparison on Mobility, Balance, and Quality of Life

Table 1

Demographic features of study subjects with different Medical Functional Classification Level (MFCL) fitting two main prosthesis types: Total Surface Bearing (TSB) and Prosthesis Tibiale Kegel (PTK).

SubjectsGenderMFCL levelAge (years)Body mass (kg)Height (cm)Time since amputation (years)Prosthesis typeEtiology

1MaleK2661001712TSBVascular disease
2MaleK271601725TSBNeoplasia
3FemaleK26510015924PTKTrauma
4MaleK2518218234PTKTrauma
5MaleK259801685TSBTrauma
6MaleK2747516556PTKTrauma
7MaleK268721728TSBVascular disease
8MaleK274811658TSBVascular disease
9MaleK267771805TSBVascular disease
10MaleK265771635TSBVascular disease
11MaleK268881784TSBVascular disease
12MaleK2581001804TSBVascular disease
13MaleK263691635TSBVascular disease
14FemaleK274801607TSBVascular disease
15MaleK263971713TSBTrauma
16MaleK278561612TSBVascular disease
17MaleK1717016011TSBVascular disease
18FemaleK264601591TSBVascular disease
19MaleK274741736TSBVascular disease
20MaleK260721671TSBTrauma

Mean66.778.7168.69.8
SD6.713.27.613.5