Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 307808, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/307808
Research Article

A Good Beginning Makes a Good Market: The Effect of Different Market Opening Structures on Market Quality

1Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Universitatsstraße 15/E3, 8010 Graz, Austria
2Institute of Banking and Finance, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Universitatsstraße 15/F2, 8010 Graz, Austria
3Department of Banking and Insurance, University of Applied Sciences Joanneum, Eggenberger Allee 11, 8020 Graz, Austria
4Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Universitatsstraße 15/4, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Received 13 June 2014; Accepted 8 October 2014

Academic Editor: Sarah Brown

Copyright © 2015 Gernot Hinterleitner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Wood, T. McInish, and J. K. Ord, “An investigation of transaction data for NYSE stocks,” Journal of Finance, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 723–739, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. R. Stoll and R. E. Whaley, “Stock market structure and volatility,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–71, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. J. Barclay, T. Hendershott, and C. M. Jones, “Order consolidation, price efficiency, and extreme liquidity shocks,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 93–121, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Madhavan, “Trading mechanisms in securities markets,” Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 607–641, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  5. N. Economides and R. A. Schwartz, “Electronic call market trading,” Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 10–18, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. I. Domowitz and A. Madhavan, “Open sesame: alternative opening algorithms in securities markets,” in The Electronic Call Auction. Market Mechanism and Trading: Building a Better Stock Market, R. A. Schwartz, N. Beiner, and M. J. Humbach, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. S. Pagano and R. A. Schwartz, “A closing call's impact on market quality at Euronext Paris,” The Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 439–484, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. R. Stoll, “Market microstructure,” in Handbook of the Economics of Finance, G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, and R. M. Stulz, Eds., chapter 9, pp. 553–604, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Pagano and A. Röell, “Auction and dealership markets. What is the difference?” European Economic Review, vol. 36, no. 2-3, pp. 613–623, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Snell and I. Tonks, “A theoretical analysis of institutional investors' trading costs in auction and dealer markets,” Economic Journal, vol. 113, no. 489, pp. 576–597, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Aitken, C. Comerton-Forde, and A. Frino, “Closing call auctions and liquidity,” Accounting & Finance, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 501–518, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Ellul, H. S. Shin, and I. Tonks, “Opening and closing the market: evidence from the London Stock Exchange,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 779–801, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Comerton-Forde, J. Rydge, and H. Burridge, “Not all call auctions are created equal: evidence from Hong Kong,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 395–413, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. N. Noussair and S. Tucker, “Experimental research on asset pricing,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 554–569, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Palan, “A Review of bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 570–588, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Theissen, “Market structure, informational efficiency and liquidity: an experimental comparison of auction and dealer markets,” Journal of Financial Markets, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 333–363, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Madhavan, “Security prices and market transparency,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 255–283, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Pagano and A. Röell, “Transparency and liquidity: a comparison of auction and dealer markets with informed trading,” Journal of Finance, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 579–611, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Biais, P. Million, and C. Spatt, “Price discovery and learning during the preopening period in the Paris Bourse,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1218–1248, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. J. Davies, “The Toronto Stock Exchange preopening session,” Journal of Financial Markets, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 491–516, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Madhavan, D. Porter, and D. Weaver, “Should securities markets be transparent?” Journal of Financial Markets, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 265–287, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. S. Eom, J. Ok, and J.-H. Park, “Pre-trade transparency and market quality,” Journal of Financial Markets, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 319–341, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. P. Chang, S. G. Rhee, G. R. Stone, and N. Tang, “How does the call market method affect price efficiency? Evidence from the Singapore Stock Market,” Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2205–2219, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. S. Pagano, L. Peng, and R. A. Schwartz, “Market structure and price formation at market openings and closings,” working paper, Evidence from Nasdaq’s Calls, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Gerace, G. G. Tian, and W. Zheng, Call Auction Transparency and Market Liquidity, The Shanghai Experience, 2009.
  26. P. Hoffmann and J. van Bommel, Pre-Trade Transparency in Call Auctions, SSRN eLibrary, 2009.
  27. U. Fischbacher, “Z-Tree: zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments,” Experimental Economics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Greiner, “An online recruitment system for economic experiments,” in Forschung und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, K. Kremer and V. Macho, Eds., GWDG Bericht 63, Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. Biais and I. Martinez, “Price discovery across the Rhine,” Review of Finance, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–74, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. J. Arifovic and J. Ledyard, “Call market book information and efficiency,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1971–2000, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. D. Friedman, “How trading institutions affect financial market performance: some laboratory evidence,” Economic Inquiry, vol. 31, pp. 410–435, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. K. C. Brown, W. V. Harlow, and L. T. Starks, “Of tournaments and temptations: an analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 85–110, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Basak, A. Pavlova, and A. Shapiro, “Optimal asset allocation and risk shifting in money management,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1583–1621, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Chevalier and G. Ellison, “Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1167–1200, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. James and R. M. Isaac, “Asset markets: how they are affected by tournament incentives for individuals,” American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 995–1004, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. J. Elton, M. J. Gruber, and C. R. Blake, “Incentive fees and mutual funds,” Journal of Finance, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 779–804, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Acker and N. W. Duck, “A tournament model of fund management,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 33, no. 9-10, pp. 1460–1483, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C.-H. Kehr, J. P. Krahnen, and E. Theissen, “The anatomy of a call market,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 249–270, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. H. Baker, “Trading location and liquidity. An analysis of U.S. dealer und agency markets for common stocks,” Journal of Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, vol. 5, pp. 1–46, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  40. C. Comerton-Forde, S. T. Lau, and T. McInish, “Opening and closing behavior following the introduction of call auctions in Singapore,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18–35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Comerton-Forde and J. Rydge, “The influence of call auction algorithm rules on market efficiency,” Journal of Financial Markets, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 199–222, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. H. Chung and C. Chuwonganant, “Transparency and market quality: evidence from SuperMontage,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S.-F. Hsieh, H.-K. Chen, and T. Ma, “Market transparency, investor strategies, and trading costs: evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange,” Accounting and Finance Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 180–191, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  44. T. Ma, Y. Lin, and H.-K. Chen, “Are investors more aggressive in transparent markets?” Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 343–380, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Toffler, Future Shock, Random House, 1st edition, 1970.
  46. M. K. Brunnermeier and M. Oehmke, Complexity in Financial Markets, 2009.
  47. C. Comerton-Forde, “Do trading rules impact on market efficiency? A comparison of opening procedures on the Australian and Jakarta Stock Exchanges,” Pacific Basin Finance Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 495–521, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y. Amihud and H. Mendelson, “Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 223–249, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Bacidore and M. L. Lipson, “The effects of opening and closing procedures on the NYSE and Nasdaq,” in Proceedings of the New Orleans Meetings (AFA '01), January 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar