The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 321924 |

Arie Fitzgerald Blank, Lídia Cristina Alves Camêlo, Maria de Fátima Arrigoni-Blank, José Baldin Pinheiro, Thiago Matos Andrade, Edenilson dos Santos Niculau, Péricles Barreto Alves, "Chemical Diversity in Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Brown Germplasm", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2015, Article ID 321924, 11 pages, 2015.

Chemical Diversity in Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Brown Germplasm

Academic Editor: Dun Xian Tan
Received30 Oct 2014
Accepted27 Apr 2015
Published14 May 2015


The aim of this study was to perform chemical characterization of Lippia alba accessions from the Active Germplasm Bank of the Federal University of Sergipe. A randomized block experimental design with two replications was applied. The analysis of the chemical composition of the essential oils was conducted using a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer. The chemical composition of the essential oils allowed the accessions to be allocated to the following six groups: group 1: linalool, 1,8-cineole, and caryophyllene oxide; group 2: linalool, geranial, neral, 1,8-cineol, and caryophyllene oxide; group 3: limonene, carvone, and sabinene; group 4: carvone, limonene, g-muurolene, and myrcene; group 5: neral, geranial, and caryophyllene oxide; and group 6: geranial, neral, o-cymene, limonene, and caryophyllene oxide.

1. Introduction

The Verbenaceae family consists of approximately 175 genera and 2,800 species distributed in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide and in temperate regions of the southern hemisphere. In addition, a few species are found in temperate regions of the northern hemisphere [1]. The genus Lippia includes several plant species of medicinal interest and comprises approximately 200 shrub species with a pantropical distribution and approximately 150 species distributed across rupestrian grasslands and tropical savannas (cerrados) in Brazil [2]. The species Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown, also known as Lippia geminata HBK and Lantana alba (Mill), is a shrub with a height of approximately 3 meters [3]. In traditional Brazilian medicine, this species is popularly known as lemon balm [4].

This species is considered by some authors [5] to be promising for use in the pharmaceutical, aromatic, and perfumery industries and may also be suitable for the agricultural chemical industry because of its proven antifungal, insecticidal, and repellent properties. The essential oil obtained from L. alba has been recognized as a potential source of several commercially important terpenoid compounds [6].

The chemical composition of essential oils consists of a mixture of many organic compounds in various concentrations, ranging from very low quantities (traces) to major compounds. Therefore, the variability of chemical types is a cause for concern from the standpoint of the use of essential oils as herbal medicines because some compounds may be unsuitable for achieving a desired result. This problem regarding medicinal plants is common in Brazil [7].

Essential oils are primarily produced by the plant leaves and are formed through the secondary metabolism of plants. The typical compounds of this type include mono- and sesquiterpenes. Both the oil composition and plant yield, including biomass, are directly influenced by environmental factors, which represent a challenge for producers in establishing productive and stable genotypes and maintaining the chemical uniformity demanded by the industry [5].

The rich pharmacological potential of L. alba is related to the wide chemical variability of its essential oils. This variability allows the classification of this species into chemotypes, which can be defined according to the major chemical components of the essential oils [8]. The essential oils of some chemotypes identified from L. alba differ in their chemical composition, with citral, carvone, and linalool representing the major components identified [9]. The limonene-carvone chemotype is characterized by the presence of limonene and carvone and the absence of neral and geranial (citral). Limonene is used as a solvent in cleaning products, foodstuffs, and the cosmetics industry. Carvone is used as a carminative and in cosmetic products and has bactericidal and fungicidal properties [10].

The degree of variability in the active ingredient found in a medicinal species should be very low so that the drugs produced from that species are safe and effective [8]. Therefore, the identification and correct classification of chemotypes, which exhibit distinct active ingredients in medicinal plants, are of great importance for maintaining quality, planning cultivation, and obtaining phytochemicals that do not impair users’ health [11].

Thus, the aim of this study was to perform chemical characterization of accessions of L. alba (Mill.) NE Br. from the Active Germplasm Bank (AGB) of the Federal University of Sergipe.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The experiment was conducted at the “Campus Rural da UFS” experimental farm, located in the municipality of São Cristóvão, state of Sergipe, at a latitude of 11°00′ S and longitude of 37°12′ W. Plants of 48 accessions of L. alba from the AGB at UFS were evaluated (Table 1).

AccessionMunicipality/stateOriginUFS herbarium code

LA-01ABC-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 14784
LA-02Araguaína-TocantinsUniversity of Brasília 14785
LA-03Atibaia-São PauloUniversity of Brasília 13466
LA-04Botucatu-São PauloUniversity of Brasília 13501
LA-08Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13475
LA-09Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 14786
LA-10Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13495
LA-13Fortaleza-CearáFederal University of Ceará 13488
LA-15Florianópolis-Santa Catarina University of Brasília 13486
LA-17Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13494
LA-19Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13491
LA-20Ilhéus-BahiaUniversity of Brasília 14787
LA-21Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13493
LA-22Lavras-Minas GeraisUniversity of Brasília 13476
LA-24Luziânia-GoiásUniversity of Brasília 13477
LA-27Piracicaba-São PauloUniversity of Brasília 13443
LA-28Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13487
LA-29Planaltina de Goiás-GoiásUniversity of Brasília 13485
LA-30Posse-Goiás University of Brasília 13454
LA-32Rio de Janeiro-Rio de Janeiro University of Brasília 13480
LA-36Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13472
LA-37Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13455
LA-39Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13497
LA-40Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13456
LA-41Curitiba-ParanáUniversity of Brasília 13484
LA-42Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13444
LA-43Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 13490
LA-44Brasília-Distrito FederalUniversity of Brasília 14788
LA-45Viçosa-Minas GeraisUniversity of Brasília 13498
LA-49Aracaju-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13471
LA-52Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13481
LA-53Telha-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13446
LA-54Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13478
LA-55Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13468
LA-56Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13465
LA-57Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13469
LA-58Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13482
LA-59Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13500
LA-60Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13499
LA-61Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13479
LA-62Rio Real-BahiaFederal University of Sergipe13451
LA-63Santana do São Francisco-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13445
LA-67Santana do São Francisco-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13464
LA-68Santana do São Francisco-Sergipe Federal University of Sergipe14789
LA-69Gararu-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13467
LA-70Cristinápolis-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13473
LA-71Paripiranga-SergipeFederal University of Sergipe13447
LA-72Traipú-AlagoasFederal University of Sergipe13496

A randomized block experimental design with two replications was employed. Each plot consisted of three plants. Spacing of 1.5 meters was maintained both between individual plants and between rows. The fertilization applied in the field was 5 kg of cattle manure per pit. Culture practices such as weeding and hydration were performed whenever necessary.

2.2. Distillation and Analysis of Essential Oils

The plants were cut at a height of 30 cm from the soil, and the leaves were dried in an incubator with forced airflow at a temperature of 40°C for five days [12]. After drying, the leaves were weighed on an electronic scale, and essential oils were extracted using the hydrodistillation method in a Clevenger apparatus. For hydrodistillation, 75 g of dry leaves and 2.0 L of distilled water were used per flask, and the distillation period was 120 minutes after the initiation of water vapor condensation in the Clevenger apparatus. After extraction, the essential oils were collected and stored in a freezer in amber glass vials.

Chemical analysis of the essential oil was performed at the Laboratory of Chromatography of the Department of Chemistry at the Federal University of Sergipe.

Qualitative analysis of the chemical composition of the essential oil was performed in a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS, model QP 5050A, Shimadzu) equipped with an AOC-20i autosampler (Shimadzu) and a fused-silica capillary column (5% phenyl, 95% dimethylpolysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., and film thickness of 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific) using helium as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min−1. The temperature ramp was 50°C for 2 min, followed by an increase of 4°C min−1 until reaching 200°C, then an increase of 15°C until reaching 300°C, after which a constant temperature was maintained for 15 min. The injector temperature was maintained at 250°C, and that of the detector (or interface) was maintained at 280°C. A volume of 0.5 μL was injected using ethyl acetate. The partition rate of the injected volume was 1 : 100, and the column pressure was 64.20 kPa. The MS conditions included an ion capture detector operated through electron impact and an impact energy of 70 eV, a scan rate of 1,000, a scan interval of 0.50 fragment/s, and a fragment mass range between 40 Da and 500 Da.

Quantitative analysis of the chemical constituents was performed by flame ionization gas chromatography (FID), using a Shimadzu GC-17A (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) instrument, under the following operational conditions: capillary ZB-5MS column (5% phenyl-arylene-95%-dimethylpolysiloxane) fused-silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA), under the same conditions as reported for the GC-MS. Quantification of each constituent was estimated by area normalization (%). Compound concentrations were calculated from the GC peak areas and they were arranged in order of GC elution.

The essential oil components were identified by comparing their mass spectra with the available spectra in the equipment database (NIST05 and WILEY8). Additionally, the measured retention indices were compared with those in the literature [13]. The relative retention indices (RRI) were determined using the van den Dool and Kratz [14] equation and a homologous series of -alkanes (C8–C18) injected under the chromatography conditions described above.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data were subjected to variance analysis, and the means were compared using the Scott-Knott test (). The chemical composition data were analyzed through two multivariate analysis methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and arrangement analysis (cluster) based on the similarity and distribution of the compounds, using Statistica software, version 7.0.

3. Results and Discussion

Among the compounds present in the essential oils from 48 accessions, 33 were identified and are listed according to their order of elution (Table 2).



5-Methyl-6-hepten-2-one9810.00a0.00a0.46a 0.41a0.34a0.00a0.00a0.00a
cis-sabinene hydrate10650.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
cis-linalool oxide10670.86b0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c1.20a0.00c0.00c
trans-linalool oxide10840.65b0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.98a0.00d0.00d
Geraniol 12490.00c0.00c0.71c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Myrtanyl acetate13240.00d0.00d0.13c0.00d0.24c0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geranyl acetate13790.00c0.00c0.35b0.29b0.00c0.00c0.82a0.00c
Germacrene B15590.57b0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.28c0.00c0.00c
Spathulenol 15770.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e
Caryophyllene oxide15822.93d11.33c0.00e10.69c14.24c3.66d17.77b0.00e
Humulene epoxide II16080.00d0.00d0.15d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.59b0.00d
Essential oil content (%)2.53a1.30d2.06c1.02d0.79e2.54a0.86e0.80e


cis-sabinene hydrate10650.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
cis-linalool oxide10670.00c0.00c0.00c0.64b0.00c1.00a0.00c0.80b
trans-linalool oxide10840.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.23c0.00d0.61b
Geraniol 12490.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Myrtanyl acetate13240.00d0.00d0.53b0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geranyl acetate13790.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Germacrene B15590.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c1.26a
Spathulenol 15770.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e
Caryophyllene oxide158210.35c16.86b14.04c3.18d14.63c4.35d4.11d0.00e
Humulene epoxide II16080.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.29c0.20c0.00d0.00d
Essential oil content (%)1.09d1.04d0.89e1.33d0.76e2.53a2.50a2.26b


cis-sabinene hydrate10650.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.29b
cis-linalool oxide10670.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.30c
trans-linalool oxide10840.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geraniol 12490.00c0.00c0.00c2.03b0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Myrtanyl acetate13240.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.72a0.00d0.00d
Geranyl acetate13790.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Germacrene B15590.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Spathulenol 15770.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e
Caryophyllene oxide158214.86c10.89c1.32e20.46b0.00e28.09a0.00e11.43c
Humulene epoxide II16080.00d0.00d0.00d0.35c0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Essential oil content (%)0.58e0.66e1.06d1.26d2.21b0.80e1.84c0.53e


cis-sabinene hydrate10650.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.46b0.00c0.00c0.33b
cis-linalool oxide10670.15c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.27c0.00c0.00c
trans-linalool oxide10840.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geraniol 12490.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c3.38a0.00c0.00c0.00c
Myrtanyl acetate13240.00d0.00d0.00d0.50b0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geranyl acetate13790.27b0.00c0.00c0.00c0.40b1.03a0.00c0.00c
Germacrene B15590.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Spathulenol 15770.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e3.21a
Caryophyllene oxide158212.46c11.66c0.00e13.43c5.37d19.89b6.05d5.05d
Humulene epoxide II16080.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.66b0.34c1.45a
Essential oil content (%)0.85e0.90e1.80c0.69e1.06d1.18d2.00c0.76e


cis-sabinene hydrate10650.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.22c0.00c0.00c
cis-linalool oxide10670.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
trans-linalool oxide10840.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geraniol 12490.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Myrtanyl acetate13240.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geranyl acetate13790.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c1.01a0.83a0.00c0.83a
Germacrene B15590.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Spathulenol 15770.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e0.00e
Caryophyllene oxide15827.54d5.96d0.00e0.00e5.00d2.59d4.85d3.00d
Humulene epoxide II16080.38c0.00d0.00d0.00d0.87b0.36c0.00d0.31c
Essential oil content (%)1.93c2.33b1.60c2.66a0.66e1.00d1.73c0.66e


cis-sabinene hydrate10650.00c0.61a0.00c0.73a0.35b0.00c0.00c0.74a
cis-linalool oxide10670.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
trans-linalool oxide10840.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geraniol 12490.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Myrtanyl acetate13240.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d0.00d
Geranyl acetate13790.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.64a
Germacrene B15590.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c0.00c
Spathulenol 15770.00e2.85b0.00e2.59c1.82d0.00e0.00e0.00e
Caryophyllene oxide15820.99e4.10d0.00e3.58d4.59d0.00e9.28c1.57e
Humulene epoxide II16080.00d1.17a0.00d1.33a0.36c0.00d0.71b0.00d
Essential oil content (%)1.59c0.66e2.80a1.23d1.17d1.95c1.46d1.20d

RRI: relative retention index. Means followed by different letters in each row were significantly different by the Scott-Knott test ().

The variation in the concentrations of compounds among the accessions may have been a consequence of their origin, considering that in this experiment all of the accessions were grown in the same environment. Similar results were observed previously in studies with three chemotypes of L. alba from different Brazilian states (Rio de Janeiro, Ceará, and São Paulo) [15] and with accessions of Pogostemon sp. from the Active Germplasm Bank of the Federal University of Sergipe [16].

The chemical analysis (Table 2) indicated that the most abundant compounds among the accessions were 1,8-cineole, linalool, myrcene, limonene, carvone, geranial, and neral, leading to the formation of six clusters according to the obtained chemical compositions, which were differentiated through cluster analysis (Figure 1). The compound linalool, present in accessions LA-01 and LA-22 (84.73% and 84.45%, resp.), showed the highest abundance. A similar result was reported by [17]. Linalool is widely used in the perfume, cosmetic, and fragrance industries [12].

Considering the similarities of the chemical constituents of the essential oils of these 48 accessions, the clusters were classified as follows: Cluster 1 included LA-01, LA-09, LA-22, and LA-27, which contained the following major compounds: linalool, 1,8-cineole, and caryophyllene oxide. Cluster 2 was formed by accessions LA-20 and LA-24 and comprised the following major compounds: linalool, geranial, neral, 1,8-cineole, and caryophyllene oxide. Cluster 3 was formed by accession LA-13, with the following major compounds: limonene, carvone, and sabinene. Cluster 4 comprised accessions LA-56, LA-57, and LA-70, with the following major compounds: carvone, limonene, g-muurolene, and myrcene. Cluster 5 was formed by accessions LA-02, LA-04, LA-08, LA-10, LA-15, LA-17, LA-19, LA-21, LA-28, LA-29, LA-32, LA-37, LA-40, LA-41, LA-42, LA-44, LA-45, and LA-49 and exhibited the following major compounds: neral, geranial, and caryophyllene oxide. Cluster 6 consisted of accessions LA-03, LA-30, LA-36, LA-39, LA-43, LA-52, LA-53, LA-54, LA-55, LA-58, LA-59, LA-60, LA-61, LA-62, LA-63, LA-67, LA-68, LA-69, LA-71, and LA-72, which contained geranial, neral, o-cymene, limonene, and caryophyllene oxide (Figure 2).

According to the PCA (Figure 3), the first principal component accounted for 20.55% of the total variability in the data and was positively associated with 1,8-cineol (), cis-linalool oxide (), linalool (), and trans-linalool oxide () and negatively associated with geranial () and neral ().

The second principal component represented 12.39% of the total variation in the data and showed a positive correlation with 1-octen-3-ol (), myrtenal (), myrtanyl acetate (), and caryophyllene oxide () and a negative correlation with carvone () and limonene ().

4. Conclusions

Variability was observed in the chemical composition of the essential oils of L. alba accessions obtained from the AGB at UFS, resulting in the formation of six different groups.

The compounds characterizing the six groups were as follows: group 1: linalool, 1,8-cineole, and caryophyllene oxide; group 2: linalool, geranial, neral, 1,8-cineol, and caryophyllene oxide; group 3: limonene, carvone, and sabinene; group 4: carvone, limonene, g-muurolene, and myrcene; group 5: neral, geranial, and caryophyllene oxide; and group 6: geranial, neral, o-cymene, limonene, and caryophyllene oxide.

The most abundant compounds were 1,8-cineol, linalool, myrcene, limonene, carvone, geranial, and neral.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors are grateful to FAPITEC/SE, CNPq, CAPES, and ETENE/BNB for their financial support of this work and to Professors Jean Kleber de Abreu Mattos (University of Brasília) and Renato Innecco (Federal University of Ceará) for the donation of L. alba accessions.


  1. S. L. Goulart and C. R. Marcati, “Comparative wood anatomy of root and stem of Lippia salviifolia Cham. (Verbenaceae),” Revista Brasileira de Botânica, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 263–275, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. R. G. Salimena, “Novos sinônimos e tipificação em Lippia sect. Rhodolippia (Verbenaceae),” Darwiniana, vol. 40, pp. 121–125, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  3. E. E. Stashenko, B. E. Jaramillo, and J. R. Martínez, “Comparison of different extraction methods for the analysis of volatile secondary metabolites of Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown, grown in Colombia, and evaluation of its in vitro antioxidant activity,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1025, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. G. S. Filho, J. G. Melo, A. M. Saraiva, A. M. Gonçalves, M. N. Psiottano, and H. S. Xavier, “Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical profile from the roots of Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 506–509, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Y. Yamamoto, C. A. Colombo, J. A. Azevedo Filho et al., “Performance of ginger grass (Lippia alba) for traits related to the production of essential oil,” Scientia Agricola, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 481–489, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. K. Gupta, S. P. S. Khanuja, and S. Kumar, “In vitro micropropagation of Lippia alba,” Current Science, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 206–210, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Jannuzzi, J. K. A. Mattos, R. F. Vieira, D. B. Silva, H. R. Bizzo, and L. A. M. Gracindo, “Avaliação agronômica e identificação de quimiotipos de erva cidreira no Distrito Federal,” Horticultura Brasileira, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 412–417, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. M. Souza, Bandeamento cromossômico em Lippia alba, UFLA, Lavras, Brazil, 2006.
  9. L. Julião, E. Tavares, C. Lage, and S. Leitão, “Cromatografia em camada fina de extratos de três quimiotipos de Lippia alba (Mill) N.E.Br. (erva-cidreira),” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 13, pp. 36–38, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. R. A. Santos, R. Innecco, and C. F. Fernandes, Efeitos da altura de corte de erva-cidreira (Lippia alba) na produção de biomassa e óleo essencial, vol. 35, Boletim de pesquisa e desenvolvimento/EMBAPA Rondônia, 2006.
  11. M. E. Pascual, K. Slowing, E. Carretero, D. Sánchez Mata, and A. Villar, “Lippia: traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology: a review,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 201–214, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. L. S. Carvalho Filho, A. F. Blank, P. B. Alves et al., “Influence of the harvesting time, temperature and drying period on basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 16, pp. 24–30, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. P. Adams, Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, Allured Publishing, Carol Stream, Ill, USA, 2007.
  14. H. van den Dool and P. D. Kratz, “A generalization of the retention index system including liner temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 11, pp. 463–471, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. S. Tavares, L. S. Julião, D. Lopes, H. R. Bizzo, C. L. S. Lage, and S. G. Leitão, “Análise do óleo essencial de folhas de três quimiotipos de Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Br. (Verbenaceae) cultivados em condições semelhantes,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. F. Blank, T. C. P. Sant'ana, P. S. Santos et al., “Chemical characterization of the essential oil from patchouli accessions harvested over four seasons,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 831–837, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Lorenzo, D. Paz, P. Davies, R. Vila, S. Caigueral, and E. Dellacassa, “Composition of a new essential oil type of Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown from Uruguay,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 356–359, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Arie Fitzgerald Blank et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.