The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 352638 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/352638

Chemical Diversity in Basil (Ocimum sp.) Germplasm

Academic Editor: Carin von Muhlen
Received03 Nov 2014
Accepted19 Dec 2014
Published01 Jan 2015

Abstract

The present study aimed to chemically characterize 31 accessions and seven cultivars of basil. The percentage composition of the essential oils of the accessions and cultivars was based on the 14 most abundant constituents: 1,8-cineole, linalool, methyl chavicol, neral, nerol, geraniol, geranial, methyl cinnamate, β-bourbonene, methyl eugenol, α-trans-bergamotene, germacrene-D, epi-α-cadinol, and δ-cadinene. The genetic materials were classified into eight clusters according to the chemical composition of the essential oils: Cluster 1—mostly linalool and 1,8-cineole; Cluster 2—mostly linalool, geraniol, and α-trans-bergamotene; Cluster 3—mostly linalool, methyl chavicol, methyl cinnamate, and β-bourbonene; Cluster 4—mostly linalool, methyl chavicol, epi-α-cadinol, and α-trans-bergamotene; Cluster 5—mainly linalool, methyl eugenol, α-trans-bergamotene, and epi-α-cadinol; Cluster 6—mainly linalool, geraniol, and epi-α-cadinol; Cluster 7—mostly linalool and methyl chavicol; Cluster 8—mainly geranial and neral.

1. Introduction

The genus Ocimum L. (Lamiaceae) comprises more than 30 species that are found in tropical and subtropical regions [1]. Due to their economic importance, the most cultivated species in the world are O. x citriodorum Vis., O. americanum L., O. basilicum L., O. gratissimum L., O. minimo L., and O. tenuiflorum L. [2].

Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) is a medicinal plant traditionally used for the treatment of respiratory and intestinal problems and kidney malfunction [3]. Basil is economically important due to the use of its essential oil in hygiene and cleaning products, perfumes, and cosmetics and as a local anesthetic and antiseptic [4]. Furthermore, basil essential oil has been tested in the control of plant pests [5, 6] and diseases [7] and has been shown to act as an antioxidant [8] and an antimicrobial [9].

Basil has a complicated taxonomy due to the numerous varieties of cultivars within the species that do not differ significantly in morphology. Thus, the classification of genotypes only by morphological features becomes difficult due to anthropogenic interference with selection, cultivation, and hybridization [10]. Due to the hybridization of several species and varieties, there is a wide variability of the chemical constituents [11]. Chemical characterization can be used to separate the accessions based on the presence or concentration of specific substances and to determine the intrinsic variability or variability among accessions of the same species [10]. Despite the wide variation in the chemical composition of basil essential oil within the same species, monoterpenes and phenylpropanoids predominate [12, 13].

Genotype characterization based on the chemical constitution of the essential oil has been used in several cultures such as Zingiber officinale [14] and Hyptis suaveolens [15], including plants of the genus Ocimum, with emphasis on O. basilicum [16]. Several studies assessing the chemical composition of 18 basil essential oils observed that the samples distributed into seven distinct types, each one presenting as the major volatile compound among the following: linalool, methyl cinnamate, methyl cinnamate/linalool, methyl eugenol, citral, methyl chavicol (estragole), and methyl chavicol/citral.

A total of 27 basil cultivars were characterized according to the chemical composition of their essential oils, and the cultivars were grouped into five different types: eugenol/linalool (30–35% linalool and 12–20% eugenol); linalool (52–66%); estragole/linalool (22–38% estragole and 21–37% linalool); (Z) methyl cinnamate (19–38%); and estragole (38–95%) [4].

The chemical characterization of 38 basil genotypes resulted in seven groups: linalool (19–73%); linalool/eugenol (28–66% linalool and 5–29% eugenol); methyl chavicol (20–72% methyl chavicol); methyl chavicol/linalool (8–29% methyl chavicol and 8–53% linalool); methyl eugenol/linalool (two accessions with 37% and 91% methyl eugenol and 60% and 15% linalool); methyl cinnamate/linalool (9.7% methyl cinnamate and 31% linalool); and bergamotene (one accession with bergamotene as the major constituent) [17].

Morphological and agronomic characterization of 55 basil accessions showed genetic variability in Ocimum sp. The present study observed genotypic variations in relation to the content and yield of essential oil, and promising genotypes were noted for the development of cultivars with high content and yield of essential oil rich in linalool and other active ingredients [18].

These comparative studies show a high variation in the chemical composition of basil essential oil and how important it is to conduct research investigating these chemical characterizations because the identification of types of basil helps in pharmacological, medicinal, and phytopathological studies. Thus, the present study aimed to chemically characterize the volatile constituents of accessions and cultivars of O. basilicum L. grown in Northeastern Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growing Conditions

The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm “Rural Campus of the UFS.” A randomized complete block design with two repetitions was used to evaluate 38 genotypes of O. basilicum with 31 accessions provided by the North Central Regional PI Station, Iowa State University, USA, and seven commercial cultivars donated by the companies Topseed and Johnny’s Selected Seeds (Table 1). Each replication consisted of a 2.5 m row with 0.5 m space between plants and 0.8 m between rows.


AccessionSpeciesOrigin

NSL 6421Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 170579Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 170581Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 172996Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 172997Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 174285Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 176646Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 182246Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 197442Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 207498Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 211586Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 253157Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 296390Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 296391Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 358464Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 358466Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 358467Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 358471Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 358472Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 368697Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 368698Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 368699Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 368700Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 379414Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414193Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414194Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414196Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414197Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414198Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414199Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
PI 414200Ocimum basilicum North Central Regional PI Station
“Genovese”Ocimum basilicum Topseed (Brazil)
“Sweet Dani”Ocimum x citriodorumJohnny’s Selected Seeds Co
“Cinnamon”Ocimum basilicum Johnny’s Selected Seeds Co.
“Fino Verde”Ocimum basilicum Johnny’s Selected Seeds Co.
“Red Rubin”Ocimum basilicum Johnny’s Selected Seeds Co.
“Osmin Purple”Ocimum basilicum Johnny’s Selected Seeds Co.
“Italian Large Leaf”Ocimum basilicum Johnny’s Selected Seeds Co.

According to [30].

The seedlings were grown in a greenhouse with a 50% shading screen in polystyrene trays with 128 alveoli. The substrate mixture used was composed of coconut powder, cattle manure, and carbonized rice husk at a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio, which had been chosen during preliminary tests of the substrates’ composition. Seven days after sowing, 90% of the accessions had emerged, and 30 days after sowing, the seedlings were transplanted to the field. For soil preparation, cleaning and subsequent liming with dolomitic limestone were performed to reach 60% base saturation two months before the establishment of the experiment. Poultry manure was used as a nutrient source at a ratio of 27.5 m3 h−1.

Three months after cultivation, the plants were harvested, and the leaves were placed to dry in an oven with air circulation at a temperature of 40°C for five days.

2.2. Distillation and Chemical Analysis of Essential Oils

The extraction of the essential oil from dried leaves was performed by the hydrodistillation method with a Clevenger-type apparatus [19] for 160 minutes [20]. A total of 50 g dry leaves were used for each flask.

Oil sample analysis was performed on a Shimadzu QP5050A (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) system comprising a AOC-20i autosampler and gas chromatograph interfaced to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS) instrument employing the following conditions: column J&W Scientific DB-5MS (Folsom, CA, USA) fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film, composed of 5% phenylmethylpolysiloxane), using helium carrier gas with a flow of 1.2 mL·min−1. The temperature was programmed to be maintained at 50°C for 1.5 min, followed by an increase of 4°C/min up to 200°C and then at 15°C/min up to 250°C, keeping this temperature constant for 5 min. The injector temperature was 250°C, and the detector temperature was 280°C; a volume of 0.5 μL ethyl acetate was injected; the partition rate of the injected volume was 1 : 87 at 64.20 kPa column pressure. The mass spectrometry conditions were quadrupole ion detector operating by electron impact at an impact energy of 70 eV; sweep speed of 1.000; sweep interval of 0.85 fragments/s; and fragments detected in the range 40–550 Da.

The quantitative analysis of the chemical components was performed by flame ionization detector (FID) gas chromatography using a Shimadzu GC-17A (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) under the following operating conditions: ZB-5MS capillary column (5% phenyl-arylene-95%-dimethylpolysiloxane) of fused silica (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA) under the same conditions as described for GC-MS. The quantification of each component was calculated by area normalization. Compounds concentrations were calculated from the GC relative peak areas (%) and they were arranged in order of GC elution.

The essential oil components were identified by comparing their mass spectra with spectra available in the database of the equipment (NIST05, NIST21, and WILEY8). These libraries allowed comparisons of the spectral data, which had a similarity index of 80%. Furthermore, the measured retention indices were compared to the indices in the literature [21]. The relative retention indices (RRIs) are determined using equation [22] relative to a homologous series of -alkanes (C9–C18), injected under the chromatographic conditions described above.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The chemical composition data were analyzed by two multivariate analysis methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and arrangements analysis (cluster) based on the similarity between individuals and their constituent distribution, using the Statistica software version 7.0 Statsoft company.

3. Results and Discussion

The 14 principle compounds were identified from the essential oils of 31 accessions and seven cultivars and are listed according to elution order in Table 2. Linalool was the main constituent of the essential oil of most accessions and cultivars of basil. In the cultivars “Genovese,” “Fino Verde,” “Red Rubin,” and “Osmin Purple” and in the accessions NSL6421, PI 197442, PI 358464, PI 368698, and PI 414194, the linalool concentration was over 60% (Table 2). Linalool was also the major compound in basil essential oil in Italy [23, 24] and in the United States [17].


Genotype Chemical compounds (%)
C1C2C3C3C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14
RRI
10331098119512281240125512701379138414011436148015131640

NSL 64218.7672.153.000.000.000.510.000.000.000.002.371.121.020.00
PI 1705798.1138.620.570.000.000.000.000.0030.750.000.000.621.155.17
PI 1705812.4638.8613.370.000.003.230.000.000.0011.193.680.002.064.81
PI 1729960.007.2845.820.000.001.790.000.000.002.723.793.582.730.00
PI 1729970.009.1128.760.000.000.150.000.000.158.380.0010.482.4514.17
PI 1742850.3453.4419.470.000.000.000.000.000.150.003.582.622.455.65
PI 1766460.3412.170.700.000.000.150.000.000.0026.8415.910.004.5331.76
PI 1822460.3434.150.700.000.000.150.000.000.000.109.912.622.4527.35
PI 1974428.0061.570.700.000.0019.400.000.000.000.002.092.622.151.10
PI 2074981.5813.6435.880.000.000.740.000.000.004.443.753.932.090.00
PI 2115860.0011.270.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0013.522.627.9951.22
PI 2531570.0019.6721.366.884.536.300.000.650.211.853.752.050.990.00
PI 2963902.3210.2419.680.000.000.670.000.000.0016.853.572.133.460.00
PI 2963910.0016.5430.782.714.872.636.300.000.003.553.032.741.681.29
PI 35846410.1770.940.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.921.260.690.00
PI 3584660.0017.303.791.330.4846.270.001.860.001.454.051.691.180.00
PI 3584675.4650.970.000.000.0016.000.000.000.000.007.912.202.215.15
PI 3584711.3124.580.000.000.0023.460.000.000.004.293.270.853.5628.41
PI 3584720.0059.170.000.000.0020.600.000.000.000.009.912.622.455.22
PI 3686970.0026.369.100.000.0010.540.005.200.003.293.742.492.524.60
PI 36869814.1968.650.000.000.007.570.000.000.000.003.752.620.000.00
PI 3686990.0024.640.000.000.0017.840.000.000.005.1013.085.452.4020.53
PI 3687000.9549.2615.050.000.000.910.000.660.000.940.941.732.050.00
PI 3794140.3438.220.700.240.0026.780.000.000.000.002.902.622.4519.38
PI 4141935.8344.220.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.009.412.625.1832.66
PI 4141946.1065.620.000.000.000.000.000.002.360.007.912.622.453.98
PI 4141960.342.930.700.000.000.000.000.000.000.004.062.6210.6853.60
PI 4141977.1044.135.440.000.000.150.090.000.000.105.952.522.3529.33
PI 4141980.3422.4626.330.000.000.150.000.000.000.002.362.622.5534.59
PI 4141996.6635.9820.700.000.000.000.000.000.000.0010.911.621.4519.83
PI 4142001.8338.6814.400.240.000.150.090.000.150.102.682.622.3517.94
Genovese11.8575.090.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.003.310.450.651.68
Sweet Dani0.000.000.005.0433.981.0643.020.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Cinnamon7.0033.674.700.000.000.000.0031.640.000.008.911.581.872.29
Fino Verde3.3074.840.000.000.003.450.000.000.000.003.202.622.253.50
Red Rubin13.1565.600.360.000.000.000.000.000.000.005.190.940.571.79
Osmin Purple0.0063.510.560.000.000.850.000.003.130.000.533.950.912.41
Italian Large Leaf13.8554.442.700.000.000.000.000.000.000.004.261.132.374.86

RRI: Relative Retention Index. Identification of the chemical constituents: C1 = 1,8-cineole, C2 = linalool, C3 = methyl chavicol, C4 = nerol, C5 = neral, C6 = geraniol, C7 = geranial, C8 = methyl cinnamate, C9 = -bourbonene, C10 = methyl eugenol, C11 = -trans-bergamotene, C12 = germacrene-D, C13 = -cadinene, and C14 = epi--cadinol.

The cultivar “Cinnamon” stood out for its high concentration of methyl cinnamate, 31%, a chemical constituent with a cinnamon aroma. This constituent was present in only three accessions and always at levels below 6% (Table 2). This result is similar to the result reported for Ocimum americanum var. americanum in Brazil [25], O. canum [26], and “Cinnamon” in Australia [27].

The accessions PI 414196, PI 176 646, PI 211586, PI 414193, and PI 414198 showed epi-α-cadinol levels above 30%; accession PI 358466 presented 46% geraniol, and accession PI 172996 presented 45% methyl chavicol (Table 2). The presence of methyl chavicol in basil essential oil has been reported in genotypes in Yemen, USA, Thailand, United Kingdom [28], Brazil [25], and local varieties in Turkey [16].

The variety “Sweet Dani” contained high levels of neral (33.98%) and geranial (43%) constituents (Table 2), confirming what had already been reported [29] on the high concentrations of citral (68%) in this cultivar. In a study genetically characterizing Ocimum species [30], the cultivars that had citral as the major compound were grouped in the Ocimum x citriodorum Vis. cluster; thus, the cultivar “Sweet Dani” is a natural hybrid between O. basilicum and O. Americanum. Because all of the accessions and cultivars in the present study were grown in the same environment, variations in the concentrations of the compounds among the accessions and cultivars may have been a consequence of the place of origin; chemical variations may occur among accessions and cultivars of basil from different regions [31, 32].

According to our chemical analyses (Table 2), the compounds found in greatest quantity among the accessions were 1,8-cineole, linalool, methyl chavicol, neral, nerol, geraniol, geranial, methyl cinnamate, β-bourbonene, methyl eugenol, α-trans-bergamotene, germacrene-D, epi-α-cadinol, and δ-cadinene, which defined the formation of eight clusters according to chemical composition and differentiation by cluster analysis (Figure 1).

Considering the similarities of the chemical constituents of the essential oils of 31 accessions and seven cultivars of basil, the clusters were characterized as follows: Cluster 1 NSL-6421, PI-358 464, “Genovese,” “Fino Verde,” PI-368698, PI-414194, “Red Rubin,” “Osmin Purple,” and “Italian Large Leaf” with linalool and 1,8-cineole as the major compounds; Cluster 2: PI-197442, PI-358472, and PI-358467 with linalool, geraniol, and α-trans-bergamotene as the major compounds; Cluster 3: PI-170579, “Cinnamon,” PI-170581, PI-174285, and PI-368700 with linalool, methyl chavicol, methyl cinnamate, and β-bourbonene as the major compounds; Cluster 4: PI-182246, PI-414193, PI-414197, PI-414198, PI-414199, and PI-414200 with linalool, methyl chavicol, epi-α-cadinol, and α-trans-bergamotene as the major compounds; Cluster 5: PI-176646, PI-211586, and PI-414196 with linalool, methyl eugenol, α-trans-bergamotene, and epi-α-cadinol as the major compounds; Cluster 6: PI-358466, PI-358471, PI-368699, and PI-379414 with linalool, geraniol, and epi-α-cadinol as the major compounds; Cluster 7: PI-172996, PI-207498, PI-296391, PI-172997, PI-296390, PI-253157, and PI-368697 with linalool and methyl chavicol as the major compounds; and Cluster 8: “Sweet Dani” with geranial and neral as the major compounds (Figure 2). This last cluster showed similar results to the study of [29] wherein citral (geranial and neral) was the major compound of the genotype O. x citriodorum Vis.

The grouping of cultivars and accessions of basil through the chemical composition of the essential oil provides the market with new groups of plants with similar major active compounds, thus broadening the sources of raw materials for the industries. Various activities of O. basilicum essential oil are being investigated, such as its antibacterial effects against Escherichia coli with oil from the cultivar Maria Bonita (PI-197442-S3-bulk 5) [33]. Thus, it can be inferred that Cluster 2 accessions would also express this activity.

According to principal component analysis (Figure 3), the first principal component accounted for 21.82% of the total variance and was positively related to δ-cadinene () and epi-α-cadinol () and negatively related to germacrene-D () and methyl eugenol (). The second principal component represented 20.87% of the total variance and was positively related to geranial (), () and nerol (). The third principal component accounted for 12.65% of the total variance and was positively related to linalool () and 1,8-cineole () and negatively related to methyl chavicol (), geraniol (), and methyl cinnamate ().

We observed a correlation greater than 0.50 among some of the chemical constituents of basil essential oil in the accessions and cultivars under study (Table 3). The correlation between geranial and neral was positive and very strong (0.99), suggesting that these constituents that are present in the oil of the cultivar “Sweet Dani” are closely correlated, indicating that, possibly, when selecting this cultivar aimed at producing an oil with a higher content of geranial, neral will also be selected.


Chemical compoundC2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14

C10.66−0.36−0.26−0.18−0.22−0.160.080.15−0.28−0.08−0.32−0.34−0.28
C2−0.46−0.34−0.32−0.05−0.30−0.060.04−0.42−0.13−0.21−0.43−0.38
C30.15−0.05−0.24−0.07−0.05−0.130.18−0.240.38−0.07−0.18
C40.670.060.57−0.04−0.06−0.05−0.19−0.14−0.25−0.22
C5−0.070.99−0.04−0.04−0.07−0.22−0.21−0.23−0.16
C6−0.08−0.04−0.11−0.060.030.01−0.10−0.10
C7−0.04−0.04−0.07−0.22−0.21−0.21−0.14
C8−0.04−0.070.15−0.07−0.05−0.13
C9−0.09−0.22−0.14−0.12−0.09
C100.28−0.010.170.08
C11−0.060.380.48
C120.120.10
C130.80
C141.00

Identification of the chemical constituents: C1 = 1,8-cineole, C2 = linalool, C3 = methyl chavicol, C4 = nerol, C5 = neral, C6 = geraniol, C7 = geranial, C8 = methyl cinnamate, C9 = -bourbonene, C10 = methyl eugenol, C11 = -trans-bergamotene, C12 = germacrene-D, C13 = -cadinene, and C14 = epi--cadinol.

Nerol and neral as well as nerol and geranial, all present in the cultivar “Sweet Dani,” showed a correlation coefficient of 0.67 and 0.57 (moderate), respectively, for each pair. Epi-α-cadinol showed strong positive correlation with δ-cadinene (0.80) among Cluster 5 accessions (PI-176646, PI-211586, and PI-414196). A moderate positive correlation was observed between 1,8-cineole and linalool (0.66) among the accessions and cultivars of Cluster 1 (NSL-6421, PI-358464, PI-368698, PI-414194, PI-197442, PI-358472, PI-358467, “Red Rubin,” “Osmin Purple,” “Italian Large Leaf,” “Genovese,” and “Fino Verde”), and these components were the major compounds in Cluster 1.

Most of the constituents showed correlation coefficients that were classified as weak or very weak, which indicates a low correlation among the variables under study.

4. Conclusions

The accessions and cultivars were classified according to the chemical composition of their essential oils, forming eight clusters: Cluster 1—mostly linalool and 1,8-cineole; Cluster 2—mostly linalool, geraniol, and α-trans-bergamotene; Cluster 3—mostly linalool, methyl chavicol, methyl cinnamate, and β-bourbonene; Cluster 4—mostly linalool, methyl chavicol, epi-α-cadinol, and α-trans-bergamotene; Cluster 5—mainly linalool, methyl eugenol, α-trans-bergamotene, and epi-α-cadinol; Cluster 6—mainly linalool, geraniol, and epi-α-cadinol; Cluster 7—mostly linalool and methyl chavicol; Cluster 8: mainly geranial and neral. We observed that compounds such as linalool, geraniol, methyl cinnamate, geranial, neral, methyl chavicol, and epi-α-cadinol showed concentrations above 30% in some of the accessions and cultivars.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank ETENE/BNB, CNPq, FAPITEC/SE, and CAPES for their financial support of this work.

References

  1. A. Paton, “A synopsis of Ocimum L. (Labiatae) in Africa,” Kew Bulletin, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 403–435, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  2. K. Carović-Stanko, Z. Liber, V. Besendorfer et al., “Genetic relations among basil taxa (Ocimum L.) based on molecular markers, nuclear DNA content, and chromosome number,” Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Lorenzi and F. J. A. Matos, Plantas medicinais no Brasil: nativas e exóticas, Instituto Plantarum, Nova Odessa, Brazil, 2008.
  4. Z. Liber, K. Carović-Stanko, O. Politeo et al., “Chemical characterization and genetic relationships among Ocimum basilicum L. cultivars,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1978–1989, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. Erler, I. Ulug, and B. Yalcinkaya, “Repellent activity of five essential oils against Culex pipiens,” Fitoterapia, vol. 77, no. 7-8, pp. 491–494, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. L. Chang, I. L. K. Cho, and Q. X. Li, “Insecticidal activity of basil oil, trans-anethole, estragole, and linalool to adult fruit flies of Ceratitis capitata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 203–209, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J.-W. Zhang, S.-K. Li, and W.-J. Wu, “The main chemical composition and in vitro antifungal activity of the essential oils of Ocimum basilicum Linn. var. pilosum (Willd.) Benth,” Molecules, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 273–278, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. O. Politeo, M. Jukic, and M. Milos, “Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of free volatile aglycones from basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) compared with its essential oil,” Food Chemistry, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 379–385, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Carović-Stanko, S. Orlić, O. Politeo et al., “Composition and antibacterial activities of essential oils of seven Ocimum taxa,” Food Chemistry, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 196–201, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. F. M. Valls, “Caracterização de Recursos Genéticos Vegetais,” in Recursos genéticos vegetais, L. L. Nass, Ed., Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. E. Simon, J. Quinn, and R. G. Murray, “Basil: a source of essential oils,” in Advances in New Crops, J. Janick and J. E. Simon, Eds., Timber Press, Portland, Ore, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  12. F. Tateo, “The composition of various oils of Ocimum basilicum L,” Journal Agricultural Food Chemistry, vol. 1, pp. 137–138, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Marotti, R. Piccaglia, and E. Giovanelli, “Differences in essential oil composition of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Italian cultivars related to morphological characteristics,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 3926–3929, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. Wohlmuth, M. K. Smith, L. O. Brooks, S. P. Myers, and D. N. Leach, “Essential oil composition of diploid and tetraploid clones of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) grown in Australia,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1414–1419, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. R. Azevedo, I. F. P. Campos, H. D. Ferreira et al., “Essential oil chemotypes in Hyptis suaveolens from Brazilian Cerrado,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. Telci, E. Bayram, G. Yilmaz, and B. Avcı, “Variability in essential oil composition of Turkish basils (Ocimum basilicum L.),” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 489–497, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. V. D. Zheljazkov, A. Callahan, and C. L. Cantrell, “Yield and oil composition of 38 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) accessions grown in Mississippi,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 241–245, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. F. Blank, J. L. S. Carvalho Filho, A. L. Santos Neto et al., “Caracterização morfológica e agronômica de acessos de manjericão e alfavaca,” Horticultura Brasileira, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 113–116, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Guenther, The Essential Oils: Volume Three—Individual Essential Oils of the Plant Families Rutaceae and Labiatae, Krieger, Malabar, Fla, USA, 1972.
  20. J. L. S. Carvalho Filho, A. F. Blank, P. B. Alves et al., “Influence of the harvesting time, temperature and drying period on basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) essential oil,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. P. Adams, Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatograpy/Mass Spectroscopy, Allured, Carol Stream, Ill, USA, 2007.
  22. H. van den Dool and P. D. Kratz, “A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas—liquid partition chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 11, pp. 463–471, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Labra, M. Miele, B. Ledda, F. Grassi, M. Mazzei, and F. Sala, “Morphological characterization, essential oil composition and DNA genotyping of Ocimum basilicum L. cultivars,” Plant Science, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 725–731, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. de Masi, P. Siviero, C. Esposito, D. Castaldo, F. Siano, and B. Laratta, “Assessment of agronomic, chemical and genetic variability in common basil (Ocimum basilicum L.),” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. F. Vieira and J. E. Simon, “Chemical characterization of basil (Ocimum spp.) found in the markets and used in traditional medicine in Brazil,” Economic Botany, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. P. Martins, L. R. Salgueiro, R. Vila et al., “Composition of the essential oils of Ocimum canum, O. gratissimum and O. minimum,” Planta Medica, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 187–189, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. J. Lachowicz, G. P. Jones, D. R. Briggs et al., “Characterization of five varieties of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) grown in Australia,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2660–2665, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. J. Grayer, G. C. Kite, F. J. Goldstone, S. E. Bryan, A. Paton, and E. Putievsky, “Infraspecific taxonomy and essential oil chemotypes in sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum,” Phytochemistry, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1033–1039, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. R. Morales and J. E. Simon, “‘Sweet Dani’: a new culinary and ornamental lemon basil,” HortScience, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 148–149, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  30. R. F. Vieira, P. Goldsbrough, and J. E. Simon, “Genetic diversity of basil (Ocimum spp.) based on RAPD markers,” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 94–99, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. J. Pascual-Villalobos and M. C. Ballesta-Acosta, “Chemical variation in an Ocimum basilicum germplasm collection and activity of the essential oils on Callosobruchus maculatus,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 673–679, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. S. Verma, R. C. Padalia, A. Chauhan, and S. T. Thul, “Exploring compositional diversity in the essential oils of 34 Ocimum taxa from Indian flora,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 45, pp. 7–19, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. C. L. de Aquino, G. G. Santos, R. C. Trindade et al., “Atividade antimicrobiana dos óleos essenciais de erva-cidreira e manjericão frente a bactérias de carnes bovinas,” Alimento e Nutrição, vol. 21, pp. 529–535, 2010. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Andréa Santos da Costa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2016 Views | 932 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder