Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 375651, 11 pages
Research Article

Investigating IT Faculty Resistance to Learning Management System Adoption Using Latent Variables in an Acceptance Technology Model

Information Technology Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 22452, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia

Received 9 June 2015; Revised 1 September 2015; Accepted 2 September 2015

Academic Editor: Shu-Sheng Liaw

Copyright © 2015 Fatiha Bousbahi and Muna Saleh Alrazgan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. A. Zaki and H. El Zawaidy, “Using BLACKBOARD in online learning at Saudi universites: faculty members's perceptions and existing obstacles,” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, vol. 3, no. 7, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. L. Chang, Faculty Perceptions and Utilization of a Learning Management System in Higher Education, ProQuest, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 2008.
  3. Learning management system, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 2015.
  4. BloombergView, “Big Program on Campus,” 2015,
  5. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. J. McFarland and D. Hamilton, “Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 427–447, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. M. Siegel, Accepting Technology and Overcoming Resistance to Change Using the Motivation and Acceptance Model, ProQuest, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 2008.
  10. T. Teo, “Modeling technology acceptance among pre-service teachers,” in Technology Acceptance in Education, T. Teo, Ed., pp. 79–99, Sense Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. V. Venkatesh, “Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 239–260, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Teo, Technology Acceptance in Education Research and Issues, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
  13. F. D. Davis, The technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results [Ph.D. thesis], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1986.
  14. M. U. Ahmed and B. Hasan, “A path analysis of the impact of application-specific perceptions of computer self-efficacy and anxiety on technology acceptance,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 82–95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. H. Delone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  16. I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Pearson Education, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1st edition, 1980.
  17. A. Dillon and M. G. Morris, “User acceptance of information technology: theories and models,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 31, pp. 3–32, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Bétrancourt, “CHAPITRE 4. L'ergonomie des TICE: quelles recherches pour quels usages sur le terrain?” in Transformation des regards sur la recherche en technologie de l'éducation, p. 77, De Boeck Supérieur, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  19. A. C. Coffman, Teacher acceptance of web-based E-learning technology [Ph.D. thesis], Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pa, USA, 2015.
  20. H. M. Selim, “An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites,” Computers and Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 343–360, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Y. Park, “An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding University students' behavioral intention to use e-Learning,” Educational Technology and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 150–162, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Hackbarth, V. Grover, and M. Y. Yi, “Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use,” Information and Management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 221–232, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Février, Vers un modèle intégrateur ‘expérience-acceptation’: rôle des affects et de caractéristiques personnelles et contextuelles dans la détermination des intentions d'usage d'un environnement numérique de travail [Ph.D. thesis], Université Rennes 2, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Rennes, France, 2011.
  24. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. T. Curran, “LMS Evaluation: Which Tools do Faculty Really Use?”,
  26. E. Shamoail, Teachers' perceptions and experiences in adopting blackboard computer program in a Victorian secondary school: a case study [Ph.D. thesis], Victoria University, Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 2005.