Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 532628, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/532628
Clinical Study

Accidental Durotomy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Management

Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, Germany

Received 25 September 2014; Accepted 2 January 2015

Academic Editor: Stavros G. Memtsoudis

Copyright © 2015 Jan-Helge Klingler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. H. Lee, W. M. Yue, W. Yeo, H. Soeharno, and S. B. Tan, “Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” European Spine Journal, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2265–2270, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Wang, J. Li, H. Wang et al., “Posterior short segment pedicle screw fixation and TLIF for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar/lumbar fracture,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 15, no. 1, article 40, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. H. Deininger, M. I. Unfried, V. I. Vougioukas, and U. Hubbe, “Minimally invasive dorsal percutaneous spondylodesis for the treatment of adult pyogenic spondylodiscitis,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 151, no. 11, pp. 1451–1457, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. T. Foley, L. T. Holly, and J. D. Schwender, “Minimally invasive lumbar fusion,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. S26–S35, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Ntoukas and A. Müller, “Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Park and J. W. Ha, “Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach,” Spine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 537–543, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Senker, C. Meznik, A. Avian, and A. Berghold, “The frequency of accidental dural tears in minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques,” Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 373–377, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Ruban and J. E. O'Toole, “Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 31, no. 4, p. E15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. E. Telfeian, G. T. Reiter, S. R. Durham, and P. Marcotte, “Spine surgery in morbidly obese patients,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 97, supplement 1, pp. 20–24, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. D. Than, A. C. Wang, A. B. Etame, F. la Marca, and P. Park, “Postoperative management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 263–266, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. W. Brantigan, A. D. Steffee, M. L. Lewis, L. M. Quinn, and J. M. Persenaire, “Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1437–1446, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. A. Selznick, M. F. Shamji, and R. E. Isaacs, “Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 207–213, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. J. Williams, C. A. Sansur, J. S. Smith et al., “Incidence of unintended durotomy in spine surgery based on 108,478 cases,” Neurosurgery, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 117–123, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. A. Tan, M. K. Kasliwal, and R. G. Fessler, “Minimally invasive versus open laminotomy,” The Spine Journal, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1081–1082, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. A. R. Sulaiman and M. Singh, “Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis,” Ochsner Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. A. Ross, “Complications of minimally invasive, tubular access surgery for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar surgery,” Minimally Invasive Surgery, vol. 2014, Article ID 451637, 5 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. H. Khan, J. Rihn, G. Steele et al., “Postoperative management protocol for incidental dural tears during degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a review of 3,183 consecutive degenerative lumbar cases,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 22, pp. 2609–2613, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. A. Mehta, M. J. McGirt, G. L. Garcés Ambrossi et al., “Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity,” Neurological Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38–42, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Sakeb and K. Ahsan, “Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. E. Epstein, “The frequency and etiology of intraoperative dural tears in 110 predominantly geriatric patients undergoing multilevel laminectomy with noninstrumented fusions,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 380–386, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. H. Sin, G. Caldito, D. Smith, M. Rashidi, B. Willis, and A. Nanda, “Predictive factors for dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in patients undergoing lumbar surgery,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 224–227, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. C. Wang, H. H. Bohlman, and K. D. Riew, “Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine. Management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1728–1732, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Agnelli, “Prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 24, supplement 1, pp. IV-4–IV-12, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus