Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 612767, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/612767
Research Article

Multicriteria Personnel Selection by the Modified Fuzzy VIKOR Method

Institute of Information Technology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, 9 B. Vahabzade Street, AZ1141 Baku, Azerbaijan

Received 10 April 2015; Revised 24 July 2015; Accepted 27 July 2015

Academic Editor: Mariofanna G. Milanova

Copyright © 2015 Rasim M. Alguliyev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. T. Robertson and M. Smith, “Personnel selection,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 441–472, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Daǧdeviren, “A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 451–460, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C.-F. Chien and L.-F. Chen, “Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: a case study in high-technology industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 280–290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. E. Karsak, “Personnel selection using a fuzzy MCDM approach based on ideal and anti-ideal solutions,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium, vol. 507 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, pp. 393–402, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S.-F. Zhang and S.-Y. Liu, “A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 11401–11405, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Dursun and E. E. Karsak, “A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 4324–4330, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Wei, X. Li, and R. Bi, “Using ANP to do the information personnel evaluation,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 439-440, pp. 749–753, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. K. Oostrom, D. van der Linden, M. P. Born, and H. T. van der Molen, “New technology in personnel selection: how recruiter characteristics affect the adoption of new selection technology,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2404–2415, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. W. Choo, “Information culture and organizational effectiveness,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 775–779, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Steinwachs, “Information and culture—the impact of national culture on information processes,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 193–204, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. S. Cameron and D. R. Ettington, “The conceptual foundations of organizational culture,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 4, pp. 429–447, Agathon, New York, NY, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. S. Cameron and S. J. Freeman, “Cultural congruence, strength, and type: relationships to effectiveness,” Research in Organizational Change and Development, vol. 5, pp. 23–58, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. S. Cameron and R. E. Quinn, Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework, Jossey Bass, Reading, Mass, USA, 2011.
  14. A. Curry and C. Moore, “Assessing information culture—an exploratory model,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. N. Khan and F. T. Azmi, “Reinventing business organisations: the information culture framework,” Singapore Management Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 37–62, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. W. Choo, C. Furness, S. Paquette et al., “Working with information: information management and culture in a professional services organization,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 491–510, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Bergeron, L. Heaton, C. W. Choo, B. Detlor, D. Bouchard, and S. Paquette, “Knowledge and information management practices in knowledge-intensive organizations: a case study of a Quebec public health management organization,” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, Montreal, Canada, May 2007.
  18. C. W. Choo, P. Bergeron, B. Detlor, and L. Heaton, “Information culture and information use: an exploratory study of three organizations,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 792–804, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Alguliev and R. Mahmudova, “Structural approach to the formation of information culture of individuals,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics Engineering and Information Science (ICIEIS '11), vol. 254 of Part 4, pp. 29–40, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 2011.
  20. Y. Deng, F. T. S. Chan, Y. Wu, and D. Wang, “A new linguistic MCDM method based on multiple-criterion data fusion,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 6985–6993, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Noor-E-Alam, T. F. Lipi, M. A. A. Hasin, and A. M. M. S. Ullah, “Algorithms for fuzzy multi expert multi criteria decision making (ME-MCDM),” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 367–377, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Opricovic and G.-H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. P. Rotshtein, “Fuzzy multicriteria choice among alternatives: worst-case approach,” Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 379–383, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y.-H. Chang, C.-H. Yeh, and Y.-W. Chang, “A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2179–2187, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Paksoy, N. Y. Pehlivan, and C. Kahraman, “Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2822–2841, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Yu, W. Zhang, and Y. Xu, “Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with applications to personnel evaluation,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 52, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2006.
  28. T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, vol. 186, Springer, 1981.
  30. B. Roy and B. Bertier, “La méthode ELECTRE II: une méthode de classement en presence de critères multiples,” Note de Travail 142, Groupe Metra, Direction Scientifique, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. P. Brans and P. Vincke, “A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM,” Management Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 647–656, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  32. H.-T. Lin, “Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 937–944, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Parameshwaran, S. Praveen Kumar, and K. Saravanakumar, “An integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 26, pp. 31–41, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Kelemenis and D. Askounis, “A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4999–5008, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. Zhang and Q. Zhang, “Multi-stage evaluation and selection in the formation process of complex creative solution,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 2375–2404, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. V. Rao, Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods, Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, Springer, London, UK, 2013.
  37. Z.-X. Su, “A hybrid fuzzy approach to fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 695–711, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2341–2354, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Z. Güngör, G. Serhadlıoğlu, and S. E. Kesen, “A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 641–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Guo, “Hybrid multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy information and GRA method,” ISRN Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 146026, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. H. Deng and C.-H. Yeh, “Simulation-based evaluation of defuzzification-based approaches to fuzzy multiattribute decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 968–977, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Baležentis, T. Baležentis, and W. K. M. Brauers, “Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 7961–7967, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Baležentis and S. Zeng, “Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: an extension of the MULTIMOORA method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 543–550, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. H. Jian, G. Sizong, and F. Changli, “The fuzzy measure and application of a kind of circular fuzzy number,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, pp. 1–4, Wuhan, China, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. Guha and D. Chakraborty, “A new approach to fuzzy distance measure and similarity measure between two generalized fuzzy numbers,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 90–99, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. F. Li, L. Su, X. Yu, J. Qiu, and C. Wu, “The absolute value of fuzzy number and its basic properties,” Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. M. Sugeno, “An introductory survey of fuzzy control,” Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 59–83, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. C. C. Lee, “Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller, Parts I and II,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 404–435, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  50. G. N. Yücenur and N. Ç. Demirel, “Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3702–3707, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S.-P. Wan, Q.-Y. Wang, and J.-Y. Dong, “The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 52, pp. 65–77, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S.-K. Hu, M.-T. Lu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 4401–4413, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Rostamzadeh, K. Govindan, A. Esmaeili, and M. Sabaghi, “Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 49, pp. 188–203, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Opricovic, “A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 363–380, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. T.-H. Chang, “Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan,” Information Sciences, vol. 271, pp. 196–212, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Yazdani and A. F. Payam, “A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS,” Materials & Design, vol. 65, pp. 328–334, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Opricovic, “Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12983–12990, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. K. Patil and R. Kant, “A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of knowledge management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 679–693, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Kendall and J. D. Gibbons, Rank Correlation Methods, Edward Arnold, London, UK, 5th edition, 1990.