The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 657086 | 8 pages |

Exosomes: Novel Biomarkers for Clinical Diagnosis

Academic Editor: Hiroshi Wakao
Received17 Sep 2014
Accepted08 Jan 2015
Published27 Jan 2015


Exosomes are 30–120 nm endocytic membrane-derived vesicles that participate in cell-to-cell communication and protein and RNA delivery. Exosomes harbor a variety of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids and are present in many and perhaps all bodily fluids. A significant body of literature has demonstrated that molecular constituents of exosomes, especially exosomal proteins and microRNAs (miRNAs), hold great promise as novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. In this minireview, we summarize recent advances in the research of exosomal biomarkers and their potential application in clinical diagnostics. We also provide a brief overview of the formation, function, and isolation of exosomes.

1. Introduction

Exosomes are small cell-derived vesicles of 30–120 nm that are present in many and perhaps all biological fluids. Exosomes were first discovered in the mid-1980s by the Johnstone group, who found that, in maturing mammalian reticulocytes, the transferrin receptor and some other membrane-associated elements are selectively released in multivesicular body- (MVB-) derived circulating vesicles, which they named exosomes [13]. Since Valadi et al. first reported in 2007 that exosomes also contain RNAs [4], the composition and function of exosomes have been intensely investigated. Now we know that exosomes carry various molecular constituents of their cell of origin, including proteins, lipids, mRNAs, and microRNAs (miRNAs). They are released from many cell types, such as dendritic cells (DCs), lymphocytes, platelets, mast cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and neurons, and can be found in most bodily fluids including blood, urine, saliva, amniotic fluid, breast milk, hydrothoracic fluid, and ascitic fluid, as well as in culture medium of most cell types [5]. Exosomes were initially thought to serve simply as “garbage bags” for cells to get rid of unwanted constituents. However, an increasing body of evidence has demonstrated that exosomes play an important role in cell-to-cell communication and influence both physiological and pathological processes. Additionally, molecular constituents in exosomes have been found to be associated with certain diseases and treatment responses, indicating that they may also serve as a diagnostic tool. A PubMed search generated a list of over 1,000 exosome-related articles published in the past 5 years, showing the increasing level of interest in the biomedical research community. In this review, we summarize recent progress in the study of exosomes as novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. We also provide a brief overview of the formation, function, and isolation of exosomes.

2. Formation and Composition of Exosomes

MVBs are late endosomes that carry many “intraluminal endosomal vesicles.” Some MVBs are destined for degradation in lysosomes, while other MVBs merge with the cell membrane and release the internal vesicles into the extracellular space. Of the released vehicles, the smaller ones with a diameter of 30–120 nm are called exosomes; and the larger vehicles with a diameter of 120–1000 nm are called microvesicles [68]. Exosome formation involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), which recognizes ubiquitylated proteins. In addition to ESCRT, other ESCRT-independent mechanisms operate to generate exosomes of certain biochemical compositions [9]. Exosomes isolated by differential ultracentrifugation have a cup-shaped morphology as revealed by electron microscopy imaging [10].

Exosomes have a unique and complex composition. According to Exocarta (Version 4;, the latest exosome content database, 4,563 proteins, 194 lipids, 1,639 mRNAs, and 764 miRNAs have been identified in exosomes from multiple organisms [11]. The proteins most frequently identified in exosomes are membrane transporters and fusion proteins (e.g., GTPases, annexins, and flotillin), heat shock proteins (e.g., HSC70), tetraspanins (e.g., CD9, CD63, and CD81), MVB biogenesis proteins (e.g., alix and TSG101), and lipid-related proteins and phospholipases [10, 12]. Several proteins are recognized as specific exosomal markers, among which the tetraspanins, CD63 and CD81, are the most commonly used. Exosomes are also rich in lipids, which are predominantly cholesterol, sphingolipids, phospholipids, and bisphosphates. The exosomal lipid composition has been thoroughly analyzed in exosomes secreted from several cell types including DCs and mast cells [13], reticulocytes [14], and B-lymphocytes [15]. Several reports have suggested that certain lipid components of exosomes, such as phosphatidylserine [16] and prostaglandins [17], may play an important role in exosomal functions. The discovery that exosomes also contain mRNAs and miRNAs indicates that exosomes could be a carrier of genetic information. Although the majority of RNAs found in exosomes are degraded RNA fragments with a length of less than 200 nucleotides, some full length RNAs might be present and may be shuttled to a recipient cell via endocytosis and potentially affect protein production in the recipient cell. Meanwhile, exosomal miRNAs have been found to be associated with certain diseases. For instance, several studies have noted that miRNA contents of circulating exosomes are similar to those of their originating cancer cells, suggesting that exosomal miRNAs have potential for cancer diagnostics [1820]. Also, an increasing number of studies have reported that miRNAs can be detected in exosomes isolated from noninvasively obtained bodily fluids such as saliva [21], showing potential advantages of exosomal miRNAs as novel biomarkers.

3. Function of Exosomes

Exosomes can merge with and release their contents into recipient cells (Figure 1). By transferring cellular constituents of proteins, RNAs, and lipids from one cell to another, exosomes play an important role in cell-to-cell communication [2224]. A substantial body of literature has demonstrated that exosomes exhibit a broad range of functions, depending on their cell or tissue of origin. Particularly, exosomes from certain types of immune cells, such as DCs and B cells, may mediate adaptive immune responses to pathogens and tumors [25]. Tumor cell-derived exosomes play an active role in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and response to therapy through the transfer of oncogenes and onco-miRNAs between cancer cells and between cancer cells and the tumor stroma [26]. Exosomes shed from stimulated blood cells and the vascular endothelium is involved in neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, transient ischemic attacks, and antiphospholipid syndrome [27]. Interestingly, a few recent studies have shown that exosomes are also exploited by pathogens such as prions or viruses to transfer molecules of pathogenic origin between host cells and are thereby implicated in viral spread and immune evasion [28, 29]. Furthermore, since the molecular composition of exosomes is reflective of physiological or pathophysiological changes in their cell or tissue of origin, exosomes have significant potential as biomarkers for disease diagnosis.

4. Isolation of Exosomes

Owing to their small size and low density, exosomes are usually isolated from bodily fluids and cell culture media by differential ultracentrifugation [44, 45]. Briefly, the collected biofluid is centrifuged at 300 ×g followed by a second centrifugation at 10,000 ×g to remove dead cells and cell debris. The supernatant is collected and subjected to ultracentrifugation at 100,000 ×g for 1 h or more. The pellet containing crude exosomes is subsequently washed with phosphate buffer solution to remove remaining proteins and other contaminants. The sample is subjected to a second ultracentrifugation at 100,000 ×g to yield purified exosomes. Several studies have also shown that exosomes may be isolated with higher purity using ultracentrifugation in a continuous density gradient of sucrose [46, 47].

Ultracentrifugation not only is labor-intensive and time-consuming but also requires expensive laboratory equipment, making it unsuitable for clinical applications. However, several recent technical advantages have made exosome isolation easier and faster and thus more cost-efficient. Cheruvanky et al. [48] and Merchant et al. [49] have successfully used ultrafiltration and microfiltration, respectively, for rapid isolation of urinary exosomes. Exosomes have also been isolated by immunoaffinity capture methods using lectins or antibodies against exosomal markers such as CD63, CD81, EpCAM, or Rab5 [45, 50, 51]. Precipitation followed by centrifugation is another method that has been explored for rapid exosome isolation. Nowadays, exosomes can be isolated in a one-step precipitation procedure using commercial reagents such as ExoQuick (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA). The Rekker group has demonstrated that ExoQuick is as efficient as ultracentrifugation in isolating serum exosomes for exosomal miRNA profiling and may be more efficient than ultracentrifugation in the context of exosomal RNA analysis [52].

5. Exosomes in Diagnostics

Exosomes are shed by cells under both normal and pathological conditions. They carry nucleic acids and proteins from their host cells that are indicative of pathophysiological conditions, and they are widely considered to be crucial for biomarker discovery for clinical diagnostics. For instance, tumor cells release exosomes containing tumor-specific RNAs that can be potentially used for cancer diagnosis. Over the past few years, numerous studies have demonstrated that exosomes contain nucleic acids and proteins implicated in cancer as well as neurodegenerative, metabolic, infectious, and other diseases. Furthermore, exosomes can be isolated from easily attainable biofluids such as blood and urine, making them very attractive targets for diagnostic application. In this review, we briefly summarize the main research advances reported to date in the context of diagnostic applications of exosomes.

5.1. Exosomal Proteins as Diagnostic Biomarkers

Exosomes contain diverse types of proteins including common membrane and cytosolic proteins as well as origin-specific subsets of proteins reflective of cell functions and conditions. Recently, an increasing number of exosomal proteins have been found to be potential biomarkers for a variety of diseases including cancer as well as liver and kidney diseases.

Tetraspanins, a family of scaffolding membrane proteins, are highly enriched in exosomes. The exosomal marker CD63 is a member of the tetraspanin family. Logozzi and coworkers reported in 2009 that plasma CD63+ exosomes are significantly increased in melanoma patients compared with healthy controls [31]. Most recently in 2013, Yoshioka and coworkers performed a comparative analysis of exosomal protein markers in different human cancer types and found that CD63 is present at higher levels in exosomes derived from malignant cancer cells than those derived from noncancer cells, providing further evidence that exosomal CD63 could be a protein marker for cancer [65]. CD81, another exosomal marker from the tetraspanin family, plays a critical role in hepatitis C attachment and/or cell entry. In addition, Welker and coworkers reported in 2012 that the level of serum exosomal CD81 is elevated in patients with chronic hepatitis C and seems to be associated with inflammation and severity of fibrosis, suggesting that exosomal CD81 may be a potential marker for hepatitis C diagnosis and treatment response [30].

A number of exosomal protein biomarkers have been found to be potentially useful in the diagnosis of central nervous system diseases. In 2008, Skog and coworkers detected glioblastoma-specific epidermal growth factor receptor vIII (EGFRvIII) in serum exosomes isolated from 7 out of 25 glioblastoma patients, indicating that exosomal EGFRvIII may provide diagnostic information for glioblastoma [33]. A year later, in line with Skog’s findings, Graner et al. reported that serum exosomes from patients with brain tumors possess EGFR, EGFRvIII, and TGF-beta [66]. It has also been reported that exosomal amyloid peptides accumulate in the brain plaques of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients [67]; and tau phosphorylated at Thr-181, an established biomarker for AD, is present at elevated levels in exosomes isolated from cerebrospinal fluid specimens of AD patients with mild symptoms [68]. These findings highlight the potential value of exosomes in the early diagnosis of AD, which is very important in sabotaging disease progression but currently difficult to achieve. Studies have also shown that α-synuclein, whose aggregation plays a central role in Parkinson’s disease pathology, is released in exosomes in an in vitro model system of Parkinson’s disease [69]; and prion proteins, biomarkers for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, are packaged into exosomes released from prion-infected neuronal cells [70]. These exosomal proteins may have great potential in clinical diagnostics and should be further explored.

Proteins in urinary exosomes, which are easily attainable by noninvasive means, have also been exploited for potential utility in diagnostics, especially for urinary tract diseases. In 2006, Zhou et al. found that urinary exosomal fetuin-A is increased in intensive care unit patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with patients without AKI [36]. Two years later, the same group reported that activating transcription factor 3 was found in exosomes isolated from patients with AKI but not from patients with chronic kidney disease or controls [37]. The authors thus concluded that measurement of these urinary exosomal proteins might offer diagnostic information for AKI. Urinary exosomal proteins have also been investigated as potential biomarkers for bladder cancer and prostate cancer. In 2008, Smalley et al. compared the protein profile of urinary exosomes between patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls and identified eight urinary exosomal proteins as potential biomarkers for bladder cancer, including five proteins associated with the EGFR pathway, the alpha subunit of Gs protein, resistin, and retinoic acid-induced protein 3 [40]. In 2009, Nilsson and coworkers demonstrated the presence of two known prostate cancer biomarkers, PCA-3 and TMPRSS2:ERG, in exosomes isolated from the urine of prostate cancer patients [41]. In 2012, Chen et al. identified that 24 urinary exosomal proteins were presented at significantly different levels between bladder cancer and hernia (control) patients () [71]. These urinary exosomal proteins hold great promise as new diagnostic tools and wait to be further explored. Table 1 summarizes candidate exosomal protein biomarkers reported to date for diagnostic applications.

BiofluidDiseaseAssociated proteinsReference

PlasmaChronic hepatitis CCD81[30]
Melanoma CD63, caveolin-1, TYRP2, VLA-4, HSP70, HSP90[31, 32]
Glioblastoma Epidermal growth factor receptor VIII[33]
Prostate cancerSurvivin[34]
Plasma cell dyscrasias c-src[35]

UrineAcute kidney injuryFetuin-A, ATF 3[36, 37]
Liver injuryCD26, CD81, S1c3A1, CD10[38]
Bartter syndrome type 1NKCC2[39]
Bladder cancerEGF, α subunit of Gs, resisitin, retinoic acid-induced protein 3, and so forth.[40]
Prostate cancerPSA, PCA3[41]

Plasma, cell culture medium, and ascitesHuman ovarian cancerL1CAM, CD24, ADAM10, EMMPRIN, claudin[42, 43]

5.2. Exosomal Nucleic Acids as Diagnostic Biomarkers

Valadi’s discovery in 2007 that exosomes contain RNAs [4] has intrigued great interest in the research of exosomal RNAs, especially miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers. Recent studies have shown that exosomal miRNAs are protected from RNase-dependent degradation and thus can be stably detected in circulating plasma and serum [20, 54, 72], making them “ideal” biomarkers for clinical diagnostic applications.

Exosomal miRNAs have been most frequently exploited as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. In 2008, a year after Valadi’s discovery on exosomal miRNA, Taylor and Gercel-Taylor reported that eight miRNAs previously demonstrated as diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer are found at similar levels in biopsy specimens of ovarian cancer and serum exosomes isolated from the same ovarian cancer patients; however, these exosomal miRNAs could not be detected in normal controls, suggesting that exosomal miRNAs, which are easily attainable, could potentially be used as surrogate diagnostic markers for biopsy profiling [20]. In 2009, Rabinowits and coworkers performed a similar study in lung adenocarcinoma, in which they compared circulating levels of tumor-derived exosomes, exosomal small RNA, and specific exosomal miRNAs between lung adenocarcinoma patients and control subjects. They found similar miRNA patterns in circulating exosomes and tumor biopsies from lung adenocarcinoma patients, both significantly different from those detected in control subjects, suggesting that circulating exosomal miRNA might be useful as a screening test of lung adenocarcinoma [19].

Early detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer may be achieved using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test; however, the PSA test suffers from low specificity and a high false-positive rate, which may lead to overtreatment of indolent prostate cancers. Therefore, new markers with a higher diagnostic accuracy are much needed for prostate cancer. In 2008, Mitchell et al. reported that the level of circulating miR-141 is a robust diagnostic marker for prostate cancer [54]. Furthermore, later work by Brase and coworkers showed that serum levels of miR-141 and miR-375 are correlated with tumor progression in prostate cancer [55]. Given that exosomal miRNAs are a major component of RNase-resistant miRNAs in serum or plasma specimens [54, 72], it is plausible to speculate that circulating exosomal miR-141 and miR-375 may be valuable markers for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Exosomal miRNAs also show potential as biomarkers for the diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). In 2013, Tanaka et al. reported that the exosomal miR-21 level is elevated in serum from patients with ESCC versus serum from patients who have benign tumors without systemic inflammation. In addition, exosomal miR-21 is positively correlated with tumor progression and aggressiveness. Importantly, Tanaka et al. claimed that miRNA-21 was not detected in serum that remained after exosome extraction, suggesting that exosomal miRNA-21 is the exclusive source of circulating miRNA-21 [56]. Moreover, Takeshita and coworkers reported in 2013 that serum miRNA-1246 shows a sensitivity of 71.3% and a specificity of 73.9% for ESCC diagnosis. Serum miRNA-1246 is also significantly correlated with the tumor, lymph node, and metastasis stage and has been found to be a strong independent risk factor for poor survival [57]. Interestingly, Takeshita et al. found that although miRNA-1246 is elevated in serum exosomes from ECSS patients, it is not upregulated in ESCC tissue samples, suggesting that serum exosomal miRNA-1246, but not biopsy derived-miRNA-1246, has strong potential as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in ESCC [57].

Exosomal miRNAs also demonstrate potential as diagnostic biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases and renal fibrosis [59, 60, 63, 64]. Besides, a few studies have shown that, in addition to miRNAs, exosomal mRNAs may be potentially used as biomarkers in clinical diagnostics [62, 64]. Table 2 summarizes candidate exosomal RNA biomarkers reported to date for diagnostic applications.

Biofluid Disease Associated RNAsReference

PlasmaOvarian cancermiR-21, -141, -200a, -200b, -200c, -203, -205, -214[20]
Lung cancermiR-17, -3p, -21, -20b, -223, -301, let-7f[19, 53]
Prostate cancermiR-141, miR-375[54, 55]
Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)miR-21, miR-1246[56, 57]
Breast cancermiR-21[58]
Cardiovascular diseasemiR-1, miR-133a[59, 60]

Cell culture mediumGastric cancerLet-7 family miRNAs[61]
Colorectal cancermRNAs[62]

UrineRenal fibrosismiR-29c, CD2APmRNA[63, 64]

5.3. Exosomes from Other Biofluids as Diagnostic Biomarkers

There is emerging evidence that bodily fluids other than serum and urine may serve as alternate sources for diagnostic exosomes. For instance, Palanisamy et al. reported in 2010 that human saliva contains hundreds of stable mRNA core transcripts, which may be exploited as a possible resource for disease diagnostics [73]. In 2013, Lau et al. showed that saliva exosomes may provide discriminatory biomarkers for pancreatic cancer [74]. Amniotic fluid is another bodily fluid that has been investigated as a potential source of diagnostic exosomal markers. In 2007, Keller et al. isolated exosomes from amniotic fluid and demonstrated for the first time that fetal exosomes are present in amniotic fluid [75], suggesting that exosomes from amniotic fluid may potentially be used in early prenatal diagnostics. Gilad et al. reported in 2008 that miRNAs associated with the human placenta (miR-526a, -527, -515-5p, and -R521) are detectable in both the serum and amniotic fluid of pregnant women and are correlated with pregnancy stage [76]. Further research towards these directions should broaden the application range of exosomal biomarkers.

6. Conclusions

Research on the biology, function, and potential application of exosomes has increased exponentially over the past decade. A significant body of literature has demonstrated that one or perhaps the most important biomedical utility of exosomes is their potential application as biomarkers in clinical diagnostics. Compared with biomarkers detected in conventional specimens such as serum or urine, exosomal biomarkers provide comparable or higher specificity and sensitivity attributed to their excellent stability. Particularly, exosomal biomarkers from easily obtainable biofluids such as saliva would be very suitable for clinical applications. Recent technical advances in exosome isolation not only facilitated exosome research but also made exosomal diagnostics more cost-efficient. In addition to exosomal proteins and RNAs, exosomal lipids have also been shown to have diagnostic potential [77]. The utility of exosomes may be further expanded, since they are found not only in mammalian cells but also in diverse pathological microorganisms such as gram-negative bacteria, eukaryotic parasites of the kinetoplast lineage, and opportunistic fungal pathogens [78]. In general, exosomal biomarkers are still in the early discovery/development stage and their potential value in clinical diagnostics waits to be fully explored.


AD:Alzheimer’s disease
AKI:Acute kidney injury
DCs:Dendritic cells
EGFRvIII:Epidermal growth factor receptor vIII
ESCC:Esophageal squamous cell cancer
MVB:Multivesicular body
PSA:Prostate-specific antigen.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.


This study was supported by Grants from the National Science Foundation of China (no. 81360083).


  1. R. M. Johnstone, “The Jeanne Manery-Fisher Memorial Lecture 1991. Maturation of reticulocytes: formation of exosomes as a mechanism for shedding membrane proteins,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 70, no. 3-4, pp. 179–190, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. T. Pan and R. M. Johnstone, “Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: selective externalization of the receptor,” Cell, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 967–977, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B.-T. Pan, K. Teng, C. Wu, M. Adam, and R. M. Johnstone, “Electron microscopic evidence for externalization of the transferrin receptor in vesicular form in sheep reticulocytes,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 942–948, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Valadi, K. Ekström, A. Bossios, M. Sjöstrand, J. J. Lee, and J. O. Lötvall, “Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 654–659, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Théry, L. Zitvogel, and S. Amigorena, “Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 569–579, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. Bang and T. Thum, “Exosomes: new players in cell-cell communication,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2060–2064, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Sun, X. Zhuang, S. Zhang et al., “Exosomes are endogenous nanoparticles that can deliver biological information between cells,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 342–347, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. V. Vlassov, S. Magdaleno, R. Setterquist, and R. Conrad, “Exosomes: current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: General Subjects, vol. 1820, no. 7, pp. 940–948, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. El Andaloussi, I. Mäger, X. O. Breakefield, and M. J. A. Wood, “Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 347–357, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Conde-Vancells, E. Rodriguez-Suarez, N. Embade et al., “Characterization and comprehensive proteome profiling of exosomes secreted by hepatocytes,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 5157–5166, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Mathivanan, C. J. Fahner, G. E. Reid, and R. J. Simpson, “Exocarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. D1241–D1244, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Subra, D. Grand, K. Laulagnier et al., “Exosomes account for vesicle-mediated transcellular transport of activatable phospholipases and prostaglandins,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2105–2120, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Laulagnier, C. Motta, S. Hamdi et al., “Mast cell- and dendritic cell-derived display a specific lipid composition and an unusual membrane organization,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 380, no. 1, pp. 161–171, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Olver and M. Vidal, “Proteomic analysis of secreted exosomes,” Subcellular Biochemistry, vol. 43, pp. 99–131, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Wubbolts, R. S. Leckie, P. T. M. Veenhuizen et al., “Proteomic and biochemical analyses of human B cell-derived exosomes: potential implications for their function and multivesicular body formation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 13, pp. 10963–10972, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Zakharova, M. Svetlova, and A. F. Fomina, “T cell exosomes induce cholesterol accumulation in human monocytes via phosphatidylserine receptor,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 174–181, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. X. Xiang, A. Poliakov, C. Liu et al., “Induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by tumor exosomes,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. 2621–2633, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D.-Q. Feng, B. Huang, J. Li et al., “Selective miRNA expression profile in chronic myeloid leukemia K562 cell-derived exosomes,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 7501–7508, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Rabinowits, C. Gerçel-Taylor, J. M. Day, D. D. Taylor, and G. H. Kloecker, “Exosomal microRNA: a diagnostic marker for lung cancer,” Clinical Lung Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 42–46, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. D. Taylor and C. Gercel-Taylor, “MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Michael, S. D. Bajracharya, P. S. T. Yuen et al., “Exosomes from human saliva as a source of microRNA biomarkers,” Oral Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Lakkaraju and E. Rodriguez-Boulan, “Itinerant exosomes: emerging roles in cell and tissue polarity,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 199–209, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. S. Schorey and S. Bhatnagar, “Exosome function: from tumor immunology to pathogen biology,” Traffic, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 871–881, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. van Niel, I. Porto-Carreiro, S. Simoes, and G. Raposo, “Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. X. B. Li, Z. R. Zhang, H. J. Schluesener, and S. Q. Xu, “Role of exosomes in immune regulation,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 364–375, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. Kharaziha, S. Ceder, Q. Li, and T. Panaretakis, “Tumor cell-derived exosomes: a message in a bottle,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1826, no. 1, pp. 103–111, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. L. Horstman, W. Jy, A. Minagar et al., “Cell-derived microparticles and exosomes in neuroinflammatory disorders,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 79, pp. 227–268, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Belting and A. Wittrup, “Nanotubes, exosomes, and nucleic acid-binding peptides provide novel mechanisms of intercellular communication in eukaryotic cells: implications in health and disease,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 183, no. 7, pp. 1187–1191, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. M. Pegtel, M. D. B. van de Garde, and J. M. Middeldorp, “Viral miRNAs exploiting the endosomal-exosomal pathway for intercellular cross-talk and immune evasion,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1809, no. 11-12, pp. 715–721, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. W. Welker, D. Reichert, S. Susser et al., “Soluble serum CD81 is elevated in patients with chronic hepatitis c and correlates with alanine aminotransferase serum activity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e30796, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Logozzi, A. de Milito, L. Lugini et al., “High levels of exosomes expressing CD63 and caveolin-1 in plasma of melanoma patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID e5219, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. Peinado, M. Alečković, S. Lavotshkin et al., “Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET,” Nature Medicine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 883–891, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Skog, T. Würdinger, S. van Rijn et al., “Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1470–1476, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Khan, J. M. S. Jutzy, M. M. A. Valenzuela et al., “Plasma-derived exosomal survivin, a plausible biomarker for early detection of prostate cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e46737, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. G. di Noto, L. Paolini, A. Zendrini, A. Radeghieri, L. Caimi, and D. Ricotta, “C-src enriched serum microvesicles are generated in malignant plasma cell dyscrasia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 8, Article ID e70811, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Zhou, T. Pisitkun, A. Aponte et al., “Exosomal Fetuin-A identified by proteomics: a novel urinary biomarker for detecting acute kidney injury,” Kidney International, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1847–1857, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Zhou, A. Cheruvanky, X. Hu et al., “Urinary exosomal transcription factors, a new class of biomarkers for renal disease,” Kidney International, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 613–621, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Conde-Vancells, E. Rodriguez-Suarez, E. Gonzalez et al., “Candidate biomarkers in exosome-like vesicles purified from rat and mouse urine samples,” PROTEOMICS—Clinical Applications, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 416–425, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. A. Gonzales, T. Pisitkun, J. D. Hoffert et al., “Large-scale proteomics and phosphoproteomics of urinary exosomes,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 363–379, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. M. Smalley, N. E. Sheman, K. Nelson, and D. Theodorescu, “Isolation and identification of potential urinary microparticle biomarkers of bladder cancer,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2088–2096, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Nilsson, J. Skog, A. Nordstrand et al., “Prostate cancer-derived urine exosomes: a novel approach to biomarkers for prostate cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1603–1607, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Keller, A.-K. König, F. Marmé et al., “Systemic presence and tumor-growth promoting effect of ovarian carcinoma released exosomes,” Cancer Letters, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Li, C. A. Sherman-Baust, M. Tsai-Turton, R. E. Bristow, R. B. Roden, and P. J. Morin, “Claudin-containing exosomes in the peripheral circulation of women with ovarian cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 9, article 244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Raposo, H. W. Nijman, W. Stoorvogel et al., “B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 1161–1172, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Théry, S. Amigorena, G. Raposo, and A. Clayton, “UNIT 3.22 isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids,” Current Protocols in Cell Biology, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J.-M. Escola, M. J. Kleijmeer, W. Stoorvogel, J. M. Griffith, O. Yoshie, and H. J. Geuze, “Selective enrichment of tetraspan proteins on the internal vesicles of multivesicular endosomes and on exosomes secreted by human B-lymphocytes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 32, pp. 20121–20127, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. van Niel, J. Mallegol, C. Bevilacqua et al., “Intestinal epithelial exosomes carry MHC class II/peptides able to inform the immune system in mice,” Gut, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1690–1697, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Cheruvanky, H. Zhou, T. Pisitkun et al., “Rapid isolation of urinary exosomal biomarkers using a nanomembrane ultrafiltration concentrator,” American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology, vol. 292, no. 5, pp. F1657–F1661, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. L. Merchant, D. W. Powell, D. W. Wilkey et al., “Microfiltration isolation of human urinary exosomes for characterization by MS,” PROTEOMICS—Clinical Applications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Barrès, L. Blanc, P. Bette-Bobillo et al., “Galectin-5 is bound onto the surface of rat reticulocyte exosomes and modulates vesicle uptake by macrophages,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 696–705, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. Chen, J. Skog, C.-H. Hsu et al., “Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 505–511, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Rekker, M. Saare, A. M. Roost et al., “Comparison of serum exosome isolation methods for microRNA profiling,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 47, no. 1-2, pp. 135–138, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Silva, V. García, Á. Zaballos et al., “Vesicle-related microRNAs in plasma of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients and correlation with survival,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 617–623, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. P. S. Mitchell, R. K. Parkin, E. M. Kroh et al., “Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10513–10518, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  55. J. C. Brase, M. Johannes, T. Schlomm et al., “Circulating miRNAs are correlated with tumor progression in prostate cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 608–616, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Y. Tanaka, H. Kamohara, K. Kinoshita et al., “Clinical impact of serum exosomal microRNA-21 as a clinical biomarker in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1159–1167, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Takeshita, I. Hoshino, M. Mori et al., “Serum microRNA expression profile: miR-1246 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 644–652, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. Corcoran, A. M. Friel, M. J. Duffy, J. Crown, and L. O'Driscoll, “Intracellular and extracellular microRNAs in breast cancer,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. F. Chen, E. M. Mandel, J. M. Thomson et al., “The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation,” Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 228–233, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y. Kuwabara, K. Ono, T. Horie et al., “Increased microRNA-1 and microRNA-133a levels in serum of patients with cardiovascular disease indicate myocardial damage,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 446–454, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. Ohshima, K. Inoue, A. Fujiwara et al., “Let-7 microRNA family is selectively secreted into the extracellular environment via exosomes in a metastatic gastric cancer cell line,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 10, Article ID e13247, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. B. S. Hong, J.-H. Cho, H. Kim et al., “Colorectal cancer cell-derived microvesicles are enriched in cell cycle-related mRNAs that promote proliferation of endothelial cells,” BMC Genomics, vol. 10, article 556, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. L.-L. Lv, Y.-H. Cao, H.-F. Ni et al., “MicroRNA-29c in urinary exosome/microvesicle as a biomarker of renal fibrosis,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 305, no. 8, pp. F1220–F1227, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. L. Lv, Y. H. Cao, M. M. Pan et al., “CD2AP mRNA in urinary exosome as biomarker of kidney disease,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 428, pp. 26–31, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. Y. Yoshioka, Y. Konishi, N. Kosaka, T. Katsuda, T. Kato, and T. Ochiya, “Comparative marker analysis of extracellular vesicles in different human cancer types,” Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, vol. 2, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. W. Graner, O. Alzate, A. M. Dechkovskaia et al., “Proteomic and immunologic analyses of brain tumor exosomes,” FASEB Journal, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1541–1557, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Rajendran, M. Honsho, T. R. Zahn et al., “Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid peptides are released in association with exosomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 30, pp. 11172–11177, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. Saman, W. Kim, M. Raya et al., “Exosome-associated tau is secreted in tauopathy models and is selectively phosphorylated in cerebrospinal fluid in early Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 6, pp. 3842–3849, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. L. Alvarez-Erviti, Y. Seow, A. H. Schapira et al., “Lysosomal dysfunction increases exosome-mediated alpha-synuclein release and transmission,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 360–367, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. L. J. Vella, R. A. Sharples, V. A. Lawson, C. L. Masters, R. Cappai, and A. F. Hill, “Packaging of prions into exosomes is associated with a novel pathway of PrP processing,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 211, no. 5, pp. 582–590, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. C.-L. Chen, Y.-F. Lai, P. Tang et al., “Comparative and targeted proteomic analyses of urinary microparticles from bladder cancer and hernia patients,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 5611–5629, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. P. Hunter, N. Ismail, X. Zhang et al., “Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 11, Article ID e3694, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. V. Palanisamy, S. Sharma, A. Deshpande, H. Zhou, J. Gimzewski, and D. T. Wong, “Nanostructural and transcriptomic analyses of human saliva derived exosomes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e8577, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. C. Lau, Y. Kim, D. Chia et al., “Role of pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes in salivary biomarker development,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 37, pp. 26888–26897, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. S. Keller, C. Rupp, A. Stoeck et al., “CD24 is a marker of exosomes secreted into urine and amniotic fluid,” Kidney International, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 1095–1102, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. Gilad, E. Meiri, Y. Yogev et al., “Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 9, Article ID e3148, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. P. del Boccio, F. Raimondo, D. Pieragostino et al., “A hyphenated microLC-Q-TOF-MS platform for exosomal lipidomics investigations: application to RCC urinary exosomes,” Electrophoresis, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 689–696, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. J. M. Silverman and N. E. Reiner, “Exosomes and other microvesicles in infection biology: organelles with unanticipated phenotypes,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Jin Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

14535 Views | 4870 Downloads | 164 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.