Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 751465, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/751465
Clinical Study

Evaluation of Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstructions with More Than 10-Year Follow-Up

1Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan

Received 11 September 2014; Revised 16 January 2015; Accepted 16 January 2015

Academic Editor: Daisuke Sakai

Copyright © 2015 Masataka Deie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [7 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Vineet Jain, Ankit Goyal, Mukul Mohindra, Rahul Kumar, Deepak Joshi, and Deepak Chaudhary, “A comparative analysis of arthroscopic double-bundle versus single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jorge Chahla, Gilbert Moatshe, Mark E. Cinque, Grant J. Dornan, Justin J. Mitchell, Taylor J. Ridley, and Robert F. LaPrade, “Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 441 Patients at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mauricio Kfuri, James L. Cook, Clayton W. Nuelle, Jeffrey L. Milles, Ferris M. Pfeiffer, James P. Stannard, and Patrick A. Smith, “Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques,” Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 523–531, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christian Owesen, Eline Aas, and Asbjørn Årøen, “Surgical reconstruction is a cost-efficient treatment option for isolated PCL injuries,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jeffrey L. Milles, Clayton W. Nuelle, Ferris Pfeiffer, James P. Stannard, Patrick Smith, Mauricio Kfuri, and James L. Cook, “Biomechanical Comparison: Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques,” Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 347–351, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christopher J. Tucker, Patrick W. Joyner, and Nathan K. Endres, “Single Versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstruction: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Evidence,” Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • João Alberto Ramos Maradei-Pereira, Alexandre Estevão Vamos Kokron, César Augusto Martins Pereira, and Marco Martins Amatuzzi, “Thick graft vs. double-bundle technique on posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: experimental biomechanical study with cadavers,” Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar