Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 820436, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/820436
Research Article

Standardization of Syndrome Differentiation Defined by Traditional Chinese Medicine in Operative Breast Cancer: A Modified Delphi Study

Department of Mammary Disease, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, China

Received 29 July 2014; Revised 3 September 2014; Accepted 25 September 2014

Academic Editor: Zhaohui Liang

Copyright © 2015 Qianqian Guo and Qianjun Chen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Jemal, F. Bray, M. M. Center, J. Ferlay, E. Ward, and D. Forman, “Global cancer statistics,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 69–90, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Siegel, J. Ma, Z. Zou, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2014,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 9–29, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and National Breast Cancer Centre, Breast Cancer in Australia: An Overvie, vol. 34, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Canberra, Australia, 2006.
  4. A. Micheli, P. Baili, M. Quinn et al., “Life expectancy and cancer survival in the EUROCARE-3 cancer registry areas,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 14, supplement 5, pp. v28–v40, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Sant, T. Aareleid, F. Berrino et al., “EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94—results and commentary,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 14, supplement 5, pp. v61–v118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. P. Coleman, G. Gatta, A. Verdecchia et al., “EUROCARE-3 summary: cancer survival in Europe at the end of the 20th century,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 14, supplement 5, pp. v128–v149, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Linstone and M. Turoff, The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA, 2002.
  8. J. Jones and D. Hunter, “Consensus methods for medical and health services research,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 311, no. 7001, pp. 376–380, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Pelletier, C. Duffield, A. Adams, S. Nagy, J. Crisp, and S. Mitten-Lewis, “Australian nurse educators identify gaps in expert practice,” Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 224–231, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W.-C. Chie, C.-S. Huang, J.-H. Chen, and K.-J. Chang, “Utility assessment for different clinical phases of breast cancer in Taiwan,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 677–683, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Moussa and C. Bridges-Webb, “Quality of care in general practice. A delphi study of indicators and methods,” Australian Family Physician, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 465–473, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Gallagher, C. Bradshaw, and H. Nattress, “Policy priorities in diabetes care: a Delphi study,” Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Brown, “Delphi process: a methodology using for the elicitation of opinions of experts,” The Rand Corporation, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 3925, 1987. View at Google Scholar