Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 931258, 9 pages
Research Article

Semantic Clustering of Search Engine Results

1Department of Mathematics & Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21511, Egypt
2Department of Information Systems & Computers, Faculty of Commerce, Alexandria University, Alexandria 26516, Egypt

Received 13 August 2015; Revised 11 December 2015; Accepted 15 December 2015

Academic Editor: Chun-Wei Tsai

Copyright © 2015 Sara Saad Soliman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Campos, G. Dias, and C. Nunes, “WISE: hierarchical soft clustering of web page search results based on web content mining techniques,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI '06), pp. 301–304, Hong Kong, December 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. O. E. Zamir, Clustering Web Documents: a Phrase-Based Method for Grouping Search Engine Results, University of Washington, 1999.
  3. C. Carpineto, S. Osiński, G. Romano, and D. Weiss, “A survey of web clustering engines,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 3, article 17, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Vivisimo,
  5. A. Di Marco and R. Navigli, “Clustering and diversifying web search results with graph-based word sense induction,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 709–754, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. C. Fung, K. Wang, and M. Ester, “Hierarchical document clustering using frequent itemsets,” in Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM '03), pp. 59–70, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. F. Gelgi, H. Davulcu, and S. Vadrevu, “Term ranking for clustering web search results,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB '07), Beijing, China, June 2007.
  8. O. Zamir and O. Etzioni, “Web document clustering: a feasibility demonstration,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 46–54, Melbourne, Australia, August 1998.
  9. O. Zamir and O. Etzioni, “Grouper: a dynamic clustering interface to web search results,” Computer Networks, vol. 31, no. 11–16, pp. 1361–1374, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Osiński and D. Weiss, “A concept-driven algorithm for clustering search results,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 48–54, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. O. Borch, Clustering on-line clustering of web search results [M.S. thesis], Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2006.
  12. A. Popescul and L. H. Ungar, “Automatic labeling of document clusters,” In press,
  13. Clusty,
  14. S. Osiński, J. Stefanowski, and D. Weiss, “Lingo: search results clustering algorithm based on singular value decomposition,” in Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, pp. 359–368, Springer, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Schenker, M. Last, and A. Kandel, “Design and implementation of a web mining system for organizing search engine results,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 607–625, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Fellbaum, WordNet, Wiley, 1998.
  17. K. Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, McGraw-Hill Science, 7th edition, 2011.
  18. C. Rocha, D. Schwabe, and M. P. de Aragão, “A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web,” in Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW '04), pp. 374–383, New York, NY, USA, May 2004. View at Scopus
  19. S. C. Gates, W. Teiken, and K.-S. F. Cheng, “Taxonomies by the numbers: building high-performance taxonomies,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '05), pp. 568–577, ACM, Bremen, Germany, November 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Zhao and G. Karypis, “Evaluation of hierarchical clustering algorithms for document datasets,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '02), pp. 515–524, November 2002. View at Scopus
  21. Protégé, “The Protégé Ontology Editor,” 2011,
  22. Jena, A Semantic Web Framework for Java, Jena, 2012,
  23. E. Prud'hommeaux and A. Seaborne, SPARQL Query Language for RDF, 2011,
  24. W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL),
  25. J. Fox and R. Andersen, Using the R Statistical Computing Environment to Teach Social Statistics Courses, Department of Sociology, McMaster University, 2005.