Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2016, Article ID 1017851, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1017851
Research Article

Diagnostic Phase of Calcium Scoring Scan Applied as the Center of Acquisition Window of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Improves Image Quality in Minimal Acquisition Window Scan (Target CTA Mode) Using the Second Generation 320-Row CT

1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
2Imaging Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
3Department of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, Chiba 270-2232, Japan
4Department of Radiology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan
5Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo Metropolitan Regional Office, 1-6 Tsukuda 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0051, Japan

Received 31 August 2015; Revised 4 January 2016; Accepted 13 January 2016

Academic Editor: Jinyuan Zhou

Copyright © 2016 Eriko Maeda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal et al., “Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology,” Circulation, vol. 114, pp. 1761–1791, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. D. B. Mark, D. S. Berman, M. J. Budoff et al., “ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents,” Circulation, vol. 121, pp. 2509–2543, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. J. Taylor, M. Cerqueira, J. M. Hodgson et al., “ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 22, pp. 1864–1894, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Budoff, D. Dowe, J. G. Jollis et al., “Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 21, pp. 1724–1732, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Miller, C. E. Rochitte, M. Dewey et al., “Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 22, pp. 2324–2336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Arbab-Zadeh, J. M. Miller, C. E. Rochitte et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification: the CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) international multicenter study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 379–387, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Tomizawa, S. Kanno, E. Maeda, M. Akahane, R. Torigoe, and K. Ohtomo, “Minimizing the acquisition phase in coronary CT angiography using the second generation 320-row CT,” Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 391–396, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Y. Chen, S. M. Shanbhag, and A. E. Arai, “Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 76–85, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Khosa, A. Khan, K. Nasir et al., “Influence of image acquisition on radiation dose and image quality: full versus narrow phase window acquisition using 320 MDCT,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 731590, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Fujimoto, H. Matsutani, T. Kondo et al., “Image quality and radiation dose stratified by patient heart rate for coronary 64- and 320-MDCT angiography,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 200, no. 4, pp. 765–770, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Andreini, G. Pontone, S. Mushtaq et al., “Coronary stent evaluation with coronary computed tomographic angiography: comparison between low-osmolar, high-iodine concentration iomeprol-400 and iso-osmolar, lower-iodine concentration iodixanol-320,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Funama, D. Utsunomiya, K. Taguchi, S. Oda, T. Shimonobo, and Y. Yamashita, “Automatic exposure control at single- and dual-heartbeat CTCA on a 320-MDCT volume scanner: effect of heart rate, exposure phase window setting, and reconstruction algorithm,” Physica Medica, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 385–390, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Tatsugami, T. Higaki, W. Fukumoto et al., “Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D,” The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1045–1052, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Hausleiter, T. Meyer, F. Hermann et al., “Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 301, no. 5, pp. 500–507, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Y. Chen, M. L. Steigner, S. W. Leung et al., “Simulated 50% radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D),” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1167–1175, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Bedayat, F. J. Rybicki, K. Kumamaru et al., “Reduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 381–388, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. L. Raff, A. A. Chair, S. Achenbach et al., “SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 122–136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. N. Tomizawa, S. Komatsu, M. Akahane, R. Torigoe, S. Kiryu, and K. Ohtomo, “Relationship between beat to beat coronary artery motion and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated two heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 139–146, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Tomizawa, T. Nojo, M. Akahane, R. Torigoe, S. Kiryu, and K. Ohtomo, “Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT: assessment of radiation dose reduction and image quality,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 318–324, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. M. Mutaka, “A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research,” Malawi Medical Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 69–71, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. L. Steigner, H. J. Otero, T. Cai et al., “Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus