Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2016, Article ID 8729053, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8729053
Research Article

A Survey on the Effect of Livestock Production System and Finishing Diet on Sensory Characteristics of Foal Meat Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis

1Centro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia No. 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrán das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain
2Area de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias de Ourense, Universidad de Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain

Received 8 September 2015; Accepted 24 January 2016

Academic Editor: Mohamed Hanafi

Copyright © 2016 José M. Lorenzo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. FAOSTAT, “Online database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,” 2015, http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QL/E.
  2. D. Franco, E. Rodríguez, L. Purriños, S. Crecente, R. Bermúdez, and J. M. Lorenzo, “Meat quality of ‘Galician Mountain’ foals breed. Effect of sex, slaughter age and livestock production system,” Meat Science, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 292–298, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. V. Sarriés, B. E. Murray, D. Troy, and M. J. Beriain, “Intramuscular and subcutaneous lipid fatty acid profile composition in male and female foals,” Meat Science, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 475–485, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Lorenzo, C. Fuciños, L. Purriños, and D. Franco, “Intramuscular fatty acid composition of ‘Galician Mountain’ foals breed. Effect of sex, slaughtered age and livestock production system,” Meat Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 825–831, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. M. Lorenzo and M. Pateiro, “Influence of type of muscles on nutritional value of foal meat,” Meat Science, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 630–638, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Lorenzo, M. Pateiro, and D. Franco, “Influence of muscle type on physicochemical and sensory properties of foal meat,” Meat Science, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Franco, S. Crecente, J. A. Vázquez, M. Gómez, and J. M. Lorenzo, “Effect of cross breeding and amount of finishing diet on growth parameters, carcass and meat composition of foals slaughtered at 15 months of age,” Meat Science, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 547–556, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Lanza, C. Landi, M. Scerra, V. Galofaro, and P. Pennisi, “Meat quality and intramuscular fatty acid composition of Sanfratellano and Haflinger foals,” Meat Science, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 142–147, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Rodrigues and A. Teixeira, “Effect of sex and carcass weight on sensory quality of goat meat of Cabrito Transmontano,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 711–715, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. C. Gower, “Generalized Procrustes analysis,” Psychometrika, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “Sensory analysis—general guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors,” ISO 8586:2012, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. H. J. MacFie, N. Bratchell, K. Greenhoff, and L. V. Vallis, “Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests,” Journal of Sensory Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–148, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. J. Alcalde, I. Moreno-Indias, A. Horcada, A. Molina, and M. Juárez, “Generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) as a tool to discriminate among sheep breeds,” Archiv Tierzucht, vol. 57, no. 28, pp. 1–10, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Rodrigues and A. Teixeira, “Effect of breed and sex on pork meat sensory evaluation,” Food and Nutrition Sciences, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 599–605, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Risvik, “Sensory properties and preferences,” Meat Science, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 67–77, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y.-J. Nam, Y.-M. Choi, D.-W. Jeong, and B.-C. Kim, “Comparison of postmortem meat quality and consumer sensory characteristic evaluations, according to porcine quality classification,” Food Science and Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 307–311, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Rentfrow, M. L. Linville, C. A. Stahl, K. C. Olson, and E. P. Berg, “The effects of the antioxidant lipoic acid on beef longissimus bloom time,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 3034–3037, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. C. Resconi, M. M. Campo, M. Font i Furnols, F. Montossi, and C. Sañudo, “Sensory quality of beef from different finishing diets,” Meat Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 865–869, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Rodrigues and A. Teixeira, “Use of generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) to test the effects of sex and carcass weight on sensory quality evaluations of Terrincho lamb meat,” Meat Science, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 485–488, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Kor and S. Keskin, “Quality and sensory evaluation for goat meat using generalized procrustes analysis,” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1313–1316, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus