Control of<i> Cryptococcus Gattii</i> Biofilms by an Ethanolic Extract of<i> Cochlospermum Regium</i> (Schrank) Pilger Leaves

Almeida-Apolonio, Adriana A.; Cupozak-Pinheiro, Wellinton J.; Berres, Vagner M.; Dantas, Fabiana G. S.; Svidzinski, Terezinha I. E.; Oliveira, Kelly M. P.; Chang, Marilene R.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5764187

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 5764187 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5764187

Control of Cryptococcus Gattii Biofilms by an Ethanolic Extract of Cochlospermum Regium (Schrank) Pilger Leaves

Adriana A. Almeida-Apolonio,¹Wellinton J. Cupozak-Pinheiro,²Vagner M. Berres,³Fabiana G. S. Dantas,⁴Terezinha I. E. Svidzinski,⁵Kelly M. P. Oliveira,³and Marilene R. Chang¹

Academic Editor: Carlos H. G. Martins

Received19 Mar 2018

Revised22 Apr 2018

Accepted08 May 2018

Published06 Jun 2018

Abstract

Cryptococcus gattii is an etiologic agent of cryptococcosis and a serious disease that affects immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients worldwide. The therapeutic arsenal used to treat cryptococcosis is limited to a few antifungal agents, and the ability of C. gattii to form biofilms may hinder treatment and decrease its susceptibility to antifungal agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antifungal and antibiofilm activities of an ethanolic extract of Cochlospermum regium (Schrank) Pilger leaves against C. gattii. The antifungal activity was assessed by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using the broth microdilution technique and interaction of the extract with fluconazole was performed of checkerboard assay. The antibiofilm activity of the extract was evaluated in 96-well polystyrene microplates, and the biofilms were quantified by counting colony forming units. The extract showed antifungal activity at concentrations of 62.5 to 250 μg/mL and when the extract was evaluated in combination with fluconazole, C. gattii was inhibited at sub-MIC levels. The antibiofilm activity of the extract against C. gattii was observed both during biofilm formation and on an already established biofilm. The results showed that the ethanolic extract of the leaves of C. regium shows promise for the development of antifungal drugs to treat cryptococcosis and to combat C. gattii biofilms.

1. Introduction

Cryptococcosis is a fungal infection that occurs worldwide. Despite the predominant result of opportunistic infections of immunocompromised patients, the incidence of infections among immunocompetent individuals is increasing [1–4]. Recently, studies have shown that cryptococcosis is a neglected tropical disease, although it is not recognized as such by the World Health Organization [5, 6]. Some factors that contributed to this conclusion included high mortality rates in treated patients (ranging from 20 to 60%) that can reach 100% in untreated patients [6].

Despite the importance of this disease, the treatment of cryptococcosis is limited to the antifungals fluconazole and amphotericin B, which are used alone or in combination with 5-flucytosine [7]. The primary etiological agents of cryptococcosis are species of the complexes Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii [8], which respond differently to the treatment established for meningoencephalitis [9]. C. gattii is not only more clinically aggressive but also more difficult to control. Species of the C. gattii complex can compromise immunocompetent individuals and cause severe diseases of the central nervous system, such as meningitis, encephalitis, and meningoencephalitis [9]. In addition, lesions and long-term sequelae more commonly result from infections caused by species of the C. gattii complex than those caused by species of the C. neoformans complex [10]. Despite this disparity in symptoms, studies on possible new antifungals are primarily aimed at C. neoformans [11].

Species of the C. gattii complex have some attributes that can hinder antifungal therapy, such as heteroresistance to fluconazole [12]. In these cases, the treatment is limited to amphotericin B, which, although efficient, is highly toxic [13]. Another factor that can hinder antifungal therapies is the polysaccharide capsule, which, particularly for C. gattii, helps fungi escape the immune system [14] and decreases their susceptibility to antifungal agents [15]. In addition, the ability to form biofilms on host cells or medical devices, which is also promoted by the capsule, is a major factor associated with the high resistance of Cryptococcus spp. to antifungal drugs and host defense mechanisms [16].

In this context, it is of great importance to identify compounds with anti-Cryptococcus activity to aid in the treatment of cryptococcosis and alleviate the limitations of the current options. A promising alternative is the use of medicinal plants. Recently, Kumari et al. [17] evaluated the action of six essential oils extracted from medicinal plants on biofilms formed by Cryptococcus species, but these authors did not include isolates of C. gattii.

Cochlospermum regium (Schrank) Pilger, also known as yellow cotton tree, is a shrub found in the Brazilian cerrado, Paraguay, and Bolivia. It is a medicinal plant that is popularly indicated for the treatment of various diseases [18]. The extract of C. regium from roots presents antimicrobial action against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and studies report the presence of various compounds such as phenolic, gallic acid, and ellagic acid [19–21], as well as the presence of sesquiterpenes in essential oil, organic acids, flavonoids, triterpenes, tannins, and steroids of leaves of C. regium [19, 22]. Recently, our research group showed antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of a C. regium leaf extract against Escherichia coli and Candida tropicalis [22]. In this context, the aims of the present study were to evaluate the antifungal and antibiofilm activities of an ethanolic extract of C. regium leaves (Schrank) Pilger against C. gattii.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The leaves of C. regium (Schrank) P. were collected in the cerrado of Mato Grosso do Sul state (22°08'47.2''S; 054°54'54.1''W) under authorization number 57730-1 of the Biodiversity Authorization and Information System (SISBIO). The plant was identified in the herbarium of the Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences of the Federal University of Grande Dourados by Professor Dr. Zefa Valdivina Pereira. A sample of the species was deposited in the herbarium under DDMS registration 5001.

2.2. Production of a Crude Plant Extract

The leaves were dried in a circulating air oven at 30 °C and pulverized in a blade mill. The crude extract of the leaves of C. regium (ECR) was obtained by mixing 200 g of the powdered plant material with 1000 mL of 95% ethanol and maintaining the mixture at 25 °C for 72 h with shaking every 12 h. The obtained vegetal extract was rotoevaporated (Rotavapor R-215, Buchi) at 35 °C until complete volatilization of the solvent and then lyophilized using an EC MicroModulyo system coupled to a Savant VLP80 ValuPump vacuum pump.

2.3. Cryptococcus gattii Isolates and Growth Conditions

For the antifungal susceptibility and checkerboard assays, three C. gattii strains were assayed, including two isolated from sputum specimens (476 and 2164) and one from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; 32G), obtained from the Microbiological Research Laboratory of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. A reference strain, C. gattii (ATCC 56990, Rockville, MD, USA), was included in all assays.

In each experiment, the yeasts were subcultured in Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA; Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h at 35 °C. For antifungal susceptibility and checkerboard assays, the density of yeast cells suspended in a saline solution (0.85%) was adjusted to a transmittance of 88% at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer. Next, 1:50 and 1:20 cell dilutions were made in RPMI-1640 medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Sigma-Aldrich) containing L-glutamine, buffered with 0.165 M MOPS (3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid, Sigma-Aldrich) and supplemented with 2% glucose.

2.4. Antifungal Susceptibility Assay on Planktonic C. gattii Cells

The antifungal activity of ECR was evaluated using the microdilution technique in broth, according to the standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, M27-A3) [23], with some modifications for natural products.

The ECR was dissolved in 80% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and serial dilutions of the extract were performed in 96-well flat-bottom microplates (Kasvi) containing RPMI-1640 medium. The ECR concentrations assayed were 1.95, 3.90, 7.81, 15.62, 31.25, 62.50, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL, and the microplates were incubated for 48-72 h at 35 °C.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined as the lowest ECR concentration that prevented visible growth of C. gattii after incubation. Fluconazole was used as a control, and the assay was performed in duplicate at two different times.

2.5. In Vitro “Checkerboard” Assay on Planktonic C. gattii Cells

An assay to evaluate the combined effect of ECR and fluconazole was performed based on the CLSI M27-A3 [23]. The final concentrations assayed were 3.9-500 μg/mL for ECR and 0.5-64 μg/mL for fluconazole. Together, the drugs formed a matrix of combinations of different concentrations in 96-well flat-bottom microplates, which were incubated for 48-72 h at 35 °C.

The interpretation of results was based on the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI), defined as follows: FICI=(ECR MIC in combination/ECR ECM alone)+(MIC of fluconazole in combination/MIC of fluconazole alone). The antifungal activity of the extract and the antifungal combination was interpreted as synergistic (FICI≤0.5), additive effect (0.5<FICI<1), indifferent (1≤FICI<4), or antagonist (FICI≥4) [24].

2.6. Evaluation of the Antibiofilm Activity of ECR

Growth Conditions for C. gattii ATCC 56990. For the ECR activity assays on biofilms, C. gattii ATCC 56990 was cultured in Sabouraud dextrose broth (HiMedia) for 24 h at 30 °C with shaking. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000 g for five min, washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in RMPI-1640 medium. Using a Neubauer chamber, the cell density was adjusted to 1x10⁸ colony forming units (CFUs)/mL [25].

Activity of ECR on Biofilm Formation by C. gattii ATCC 56990. The effect of ECR on biofilm formation was assessed according to Martinez and Casadevall [25], with minor modifications. The assay was performed in 96-well polystyrene polystyrene microplates, with 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/mL of ECR added simultaneously to wells with the yeast. To form biofilms, the microplates were incubated at 35 °C for 48 h with shaking. A positive control (fungal cells and broth) and a negative control (broth only) were included. C. gattii biofilms were washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20 in trisphosphate buffer (TBS) to remove the nonadherent cryptococcal cells. The biofilms were characterized by the C. gattii viability assay to determine the CFUs, and the experiment was conducted in triplicate.

Activity of ECR on Preformed Biofilms. The effect of ECR on preformed biofilms was evaluated according to Martinez and Casadevall [25], with minor modifications. The assay was performed in 96-well bottom polystyrene microplates, with C. gattii ATCC 56990 added in RPMI-1640 broth. To form biofilms, the microplates were incubated at 35 °C for 48 h with shaking. C. gattii biofilms were carefully washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20 in TBS to remove the nonadherent cryptococcal cells. After washing, the biofilms were treated with 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/mL ECR. The microplates were incubated again at 35 °C for 48 h with shaking. Next, the biofilms were washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20 in TBS to remove the nonadherent cryptococcal cells. A positive control (fungal cells and broth) and a negative control (broth only) were included. The biofilms were characterized by the C. gattii viability assay to determine the CFUs, and the experiment was conducted in triplicate.

Viability of C. gattii Cells in a Biofilm after Being Treated with ECR. The viability of C. gattii strains was determined in each of the biofilm assays described above. After the biofilms were scraped from the wells of the microplates, the resulting cell suspensions were vigorously vortexed for 5 min to disaggregate the cells. Serial dilutions (in PBS) of each cell suspension were prepared and plated by the ASD drop plate technique [26]. Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24-48 h. After incubation, the CFUs per unit area (Log₁₀ CFU/cm²) of microtiter plate well were enumerated [27].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The results were evaluated by ANOVA, and the means were compared by Tukey’s posttest. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant for all evaluations. Statistical and graphical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism^® 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

The MIC results for ECR against C. gattii ATCC 56990 and three clinical C. gattii isolates (two from sputum and one from CSF) are presented in Table 1. All strains were inhibited by ECR, with MICs ranging from 62.5 to 250 μg/mL.

When ECR was evaluated in combination with fluconazole, C. gattii was inhibited at sub-MIC levels. However, according to the observed FICI values (1 to 1.25), the combination of the two antifungal drugs was not different from the drugs alone (Table 1).

The activity of ECR on C. gattii ATCC 56990 biofilms is presented in Figure 1(a) (during biofilm formation) and Figure 1(b) (preformed biofilm) by determining the number of viable cells (in Log₁₀ CFU/cm²). When comparing C. gattii ATCC 56990 biofilm formation in the presence and absence of ECR, the extract reduced the amount of biofilms formed by 25.33 to 42.58% in a dose-dependent manner, with a maximum observed reduction of 2 log₁₀. For preformed biofilms, ECR reduced the amount of biofilms by 7.13 to 15.44% (Table 2).

(a)

(b)

Figure 1

Activity of extract of C. regium against Cryptococcus gattii (ATCC 56990) biofilms. (a) Evaluation of ECR activity during biofilm formation by ANOVA and Tukey’s posttest. (p<0.05) indicates a significant difference. Different letters over each column indicate a significant difference between samples (p<0.05). (b) Evaluation of ECR activity on preformed biofilms by ANOVA and Tukey’s posttest. (p<0.05) indicates a significant difference. Different letters over each column indicate a significant difference between samples (p<0.05).

4. Discussion

C. gattii is a primary etiological agent of cryptococcosis and is associated with severe and fatal cases of this disease. This encapsulated yeast can cause serious disease symptoms in humans and cause high levels of mortality. Unlike C. neoformans, which primarily infects immunocompromised patients, C. gattii is more often associated with infections of immunocompetent individuals [14].

In Brazil and in other countries where 5-flucytosine is not available, the treatment of C. gattii-induced cryptococcosis is limited to two drugs, fluconazole, and amphotericin B, which are frequently used in combination. However, this therapeutic choice has been questioned, since these two drugs may have variable interactions, from synergistic to antagonistic [28]. In addition, preventative measures for this disease are nonexistent, since it is caused by environmental yeasts that affect humans, primarily by inhalation. Thus, the transmission and virulence potential of this yeast combine to produce high mortality rates, justifying the search for new treatment or control options for this serious infection.

Among the attributes of Cryptococcus spp. that contribute to their virulence, the ability to form biofilms on abiotic surfaces is recognized as an important factor [29] and may help these environmental yeasts enter the human body. Thus, new therapeutic options aimed at preventing biofilm formation by cryptococcosis-causing fungi, such as C. gattii, would be useful in the prophylaxis of this disease but are currently unavailable, to the best of our knowledge. Unfortunately, neither fluconazole [25] nor amphotericin B [29] perform well on biofilms containing Cryptococcus spp.

The search for new compounds with anti-Cryptococcus properties is of great importance to maximize treatment options and prevent cryptococcosis. The results obtained in this study show that ECR could be a promising candidate to treat cryptococcosis caused by species of the C. gattii complex, since the extract presented MICs of 62 to 250 μg/mL against the C. gattii species assayed, exhibiting good to moderate antifungal activity [30].

Considering our previous findings on the antimicrobial activity of ECR against other pathogenic microorganisms [22], we believe that this extract is even more promising for the treatment of hospital and domestic surfaces. This is because, considering its proven action against E. coli, Candida tropicalis, and now Cryptococcus (specifically the C. gattii complex of resistant species), ECR could be used to prevent biofilm formation. It is important to highlight that our previous study showed that ECR is innocuous for animal cells (92% cell viability for VERO lines) and did not show mutagenic potential in an Ames assay [22].

In the present study, we also evaluated the combination of ECR with fluconazole and observed that these antifungal drugs did not show a satisfactory interaction in vitro. Although this could be viewed as an unfavorable result, the concomitant use of both drugs in the same patient without one interfering with the antifungal activity of the other could be allowed. Thus, fluconazole could be used to treat cryptococcosis in parallel with ECR, avoiding the formation of biofilms on cell surfaces and preventing reinfections. Complementary studies could also validate the use of ECR as a coadjuvant in the treatment of cryptococcosis caused by C. gattii species.

The formation of biofilms contributes to the permanence of microorganisms in a host and helps protect against antimicrobials [31]. The yeasts of the genus Cryptococcus are endowed with a polysaccharide capsule composed primarily of glucuronoxylomannan, which is an important structural component of Cryptococcus biofilms [32]. Cryptococcus spp. may form biofilms on polystyrene plates and medical devices [32, 33] and may be more resistant to amphotericin B and caspofungin [25]. The evaluation of viable cells is a direct method that allows quantifying the yeasts that present cell viability after treatment with a drug [27, 34]. The results of our study showed that ECR could reduce the biomass of a mature biofilm, according to the cell viability of the biofilm after treatment with the extract. However, ECR exhibited a superior antibiofilm activity when it was present during C. gattii biofilm formation, since an ECR concentration of 10 mg/mL resulted in a reduction of 42.58% of viable C. gattii cells compared to the control, indicating its potential use in prophylaxis.

5. Conclusions

The results of our study showed that an ethanolic extract of C. regium leaves showed antifungal activity and especially antibiofilm activity against C. gattii. Thus, the results of the present study expand the known antifungal properties of the leaves of this plant. However, additional tests are necessary to characterize the chemical compounds responsible for this antifungal activity. In addition, trials aimed at assessing the applicability of the extract at promoting positive health outcomes should be performed.

Data Availability

Previously reported cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and antimicrobial activity data from Cochlospermum regium (Schrank) Pilger leaves ethanolic extract were used to support this study and are available at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4687154. This prior study is cited at relevant places within the text as [22].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. The manuscript is based on the course works of authors Wellinton Jhon Cupozak-Pinheiro [35] and Vagner Mateus Berres [36].

References

P. A. D. F. De Aguiar, R. S. Pedroso, A. S. Borges, T. A. Moreira, L. B. de Araújo, and D. V. D. B. Röder, “The epidemiology of cryptococcosis and the characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated in a Brazilian University Hospital,” Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, vol. 95, no. e13, pp. 1–9, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Fang, Z. Fa, and W. Liao, “Epidemiology of Cryptococcus and cryptococcosis in China,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 78, pp. 7–15, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lizarazo, P. Escandón, C. I. N. Agudelo, C. Firacative, W. Meyer, and E. Castañeda, “Retrospective study of the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Cryptococcus gattii infections in Colombia from 1997-2011,” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 8, no. 11, p. e3272, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-R. Tan, X.-Y. Long, G.-L. Li, J.-X. Zhou, and L. Long, “Spectrum of neuroimaging findings in cryptococcal meningitis in immunocompetent patients in China — A series of 18 cases,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 368, pp. 132–137, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Armstrong-James, G. Meintjes, and G. D. Brown, “A neglected epidemic: Fungal infections in HIV/AIDS,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 120–127, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Molloy, T. Chiller, G. S. Greene et al., “Cryptococcal meningitis: A neglected NTD?” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 11, no. 6, Article ID e0005575, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Coelho and A. Casadevall, “Cryptococcal therapies and drug targets: the old, the new and the promising,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 792–799, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Kwon-Chung, J. E. Bennett, B. L. Wickes et al., “The Case for Adopting the “Species Complex” Nomenclature for the Etiologic Agents of Cryptococcosis,” mSphere, vol. 2, no. 1, p. e00357-16, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Franco-Paredes, T. Womack, T. Bohlmeyer et al., “Management of Cryptococcus gattii meningoencephalitis,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 348–355, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C.-A. Chen, W. Meyer, and T. C. Sorrell, “Cryptococcus gattii infections,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 980–1024, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Samantaray, J. N. Correia, M. Garelnabi, K. Voelz, R. C. May, and R. A. Hall, “Novel cell-based in vitro screen to identify small-molecule inhibitors against intracellular replication of Cryptococcus neoformans in macrophages,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Varma and K. J. Kwon-Chung, “Heteroresistance of Cryptococcus gattii to fluconazole,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2303–2311, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Laniado-Laborín and M. N. Cabrales-Vargas, “Amphotericin B: side effects and toxicity,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 223–227, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Williamson, J. N. Jarvis, A. A. Panackal et al., “Cryptococcal meningitis: Epidemiology, immunology, diagnosis and therapy,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. T. Grossman and A. Casadevall, “Physiological differences in Cryptococcus neoformans strains in vitro versus in vivo and their effects on antifungal susceptibility,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 61, no. 3, Article ID e02108-16, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Aslanyan, D. Sanchez, S. Valdebenito, E. Eugenin, R. Ramos, and L. Martinez, “The Crucial Role of Biofilms in Cryptococcus neoformans Survival within Macrophages and Colonization of the Central Nervous System,” Journal of Fungi, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 10, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kumari, R. Mishra, N. Arora et al., “Antifungal and anti-biofilm activity of essential oil active components against Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus laurentii,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, article no. 2161, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sólon, L. F. G. Brandão, and J. M. Siqueira, “Kunth com ênfase nos aspectos etnobotânicos, farmacológicos, toxicológicos e químicos de Cochlospermum regium (Mart. et. Schr.) Pilger,” Revista Eletrônica de Farmácia, vol. 6, no. 3, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Inácio, T. A. Paz, B. W. Bertoni, M. A. R. Vieira, M. O. M. Marques, and A. M. S. Pereira, “Histochemical investigation of Cochlospermum regium (Schrank) Pilg. leaves and chemical composition of its essential oil,” Natural Product Research (Formerly Natural Product Letters), vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 727–731, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Solon, C. A. Carollo, L. F. G. Brandão et al., “Phenolic derivatives and other chemical compounds from,” Química Nova, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1169–1172, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. L. B. Mügge, J. Paula-Souza, J. C. Melo, and M. G. L. Brandão, “Native plant species with economic value from Minas Gerais and Goiás: a discussion on the currentness of the data recovered by the French naturalist auguste de saint-hilaire,” Horticultura Brasileira, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 455–462, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Leme, A. B. Rodrigues, A. A. Almeida-Apolonio et al., “In vitro control of uropathogenic microorganisms with the ethanolic extract from the leaves of Cochlospermum regium (Schrank) Pilger,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2017, pp. 1–8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: approved standard M27-A3, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2008.
R. E. Lewis, D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, M. A. Pfaller, and M. E. Klepser, “Comparison of Etest, chequerboard dilution and time-kill studies for the detection of synergy or antagonism between antifungal agents tested against Candida species,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 345–351, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Martinez and A. Casadevall, “Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans biofilms to antifungal agents in vitro,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1021–1033, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Donegan, C. Matyac, R. Seidler, and A. Porteous, “Evaluation of methods for sampling, recovery, and enumeration of bacteria applied to the phylloplane,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Monteiro, S. Silva, M. Negri et al., “Silver nanoparticles: influence of stabilizing agent and diameter on antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 383–391, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. A. Santos, L. F. Gouveia, E. L. S. Taylor et al., “Dynamic interaction between fluconazole and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus gattii,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2553–2558, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Benaducci, J. D. C. O. Sardi, N. M. S. Lourencetti et al., “Virulence of Cryptococcus sp. biofilms in vitro and in vivo using Galleria mellonella as an alternative model,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 7, article no. 290, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Morales, A. Paredes, P. Sierra, and L. A. Loyola, “Antimicrobial activity of three Baccharis species used in the traditional medicine of Northern Chile,” Molecules, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 790–794, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ramage, R. Rajendran, L. Sherry, and C. Williams, “Fungal biofilm resistance,” International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 528521, 14 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Martinez and A. Casadevall, “Specific antibody can prevent fungal biofilm formation and this effect correlates with protective efficacy,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 6350–6362, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Genebat, M. J. Mayorga-Buiza, E. Castillo-Ojeda, M. Rivero-Garvía, F. J. Márquez-Rivas, and M. E. Jiménez-Mejías, “Cryptococcal Infection of the Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in an HIV-Infected Patient with an Excellent Immunovirologic Status,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 99, pp. 810–810.e13, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Negri, S. Silva, I. R. G. Capoci, J. Azeredo, and M. Henriques, “Candida tropicalis Biofilms: Biomass, Metabolic Activity and Secreted Aspartyl Proteinase Production,” Mycopathologia, vol. 181, no. 3-4, pp. 217–224, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Cupozak-Pinheiro, Atividade antibiofilme do extrato etanólico das folhas de Cochlospermum regium (Mart & Schrank) Pilger (Bixaceae) contra Cryptococcus gattii, Completion of course work, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, 2017.
V. M. Berres, Investigação da potencial atividade antifúngica de Cochlospermum regium (Mart Schrank) Pilger (Bixaceae) e sua combinação com fluconazol frentea Cryptococcus gattii, Completion of course work, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, 2017.

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Adriana A. Almeida-Apolonio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2667

Downloads

787

Citations