The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7496576 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7496576

Characterization and Quantification of Heavy Metals in Oued Sebou Sediments

Academic Editor: Claudio Cameselle
Received31 Jan 2019
Revised10 May 2019
Accepted02 Jun 2019
Published26 Jun 2019

Abstract

The discharge of large quantities of industrial and domestic effluents into the estuaries, with or without treatment, has led to an increase in the amount of micropollutants present in the sediments. In this study, we have assessed the quality of sediments of Sebou river studying the physicochemical parameters, percentage of organic matter, mineralogy, and trace levels of metal elements trapped in the sample sediments of Sebou river. The sediments samples were collected from the upstream of Fez river, confluence between the Fez river and the Sebou river, Ain Nokbi river, and edge of Sebou river, where wastewaters from the city of Fez are discharged. The sediments samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, while trace levels of metallic elements, Calcium, Zinc, Copper, Cadmium, Iron, and Nickel, were determined by the ICP-AES analysis. The obtained results show that there is a significant change in the values of the studied metals which is probably due to industrial effluents. Indeed, the metal content in the sediments reaches particularly high values exceeding the limit recommended by WHO. These results suggested that the pollution by metallic industrial effluents discharged without treatments poses potential threat to the receiving rivers and may represent a danger for humans which are exposed to pollutants due to the numerous uses of such river waters.

1. Introduction

The metal elements traces (EMT) are most dreaded of the polluting substances owing to the fact that they are not biodegradable and the phenomenon of car purification proves generally to be unable to solve the problem [1]. And even if the sediments are quasi ultimate traps for the EMT, nevertheless this fixing is not final because of the change of the physicochemical conditions [2]. However, the majority of the legislations governing the acceptable levels of an element trace metal in a compartment of the environment (water, the biocoenosis, and the sediment or ground) refer to the total concentration rather than with the chemical shape of this element and the substrate in which it is [3]. This data does not provide any information about becoming element traces metal concerning its interaction in deposits, its biodisponibility, or its toxicity. The abundance of a metal element traces in a fraction of the sediment compared to another determines the impacts on a given medium [4].

Heavy metal pollution is an issue that concerns all communities affected by the preservation of water supplies at a certain level of quality. The examination of heavy metals in sediments contributes to the identification, understanding, and forecast of metal pollution. This contribution is even more important because this subset can, according to its nature and environmental conditions, act as a reservoir in the case of a massive input, which turns into a source of endogenous pollution if the discharge conditions are favorable for its use [59]. Given the magnitude of the latter, a series of investigations were carried out in aquatic ecosystem [5]. Table 1 summarizes some results of metal contamination of Moroccan and international rivers.


Authors River, location Layer Pb Zn Cr Ni Cu
(cm) (μg/g) (μg/g) (μg/g) (μg/g) (μg/g)

Singh et al. (2005) [9]Gomti, IndiaSurface40.341.78.1515.75.0
Mohiuddin et al. (2010) [26]Tsurumi, Japan0-104138110337133
Suresh et al. (2011) [27]Ponnaiyar, IndiaSurface85.2182.987.329.581.8
Lesven et al. (2010) [20]Deule, French0-62.4905-28.333179
Hassimi et al. [26]Sebou, Morocco0-10431.2157.7140424.59137.5
Hassimi et al. [26]Fez city, Morocco0-10284.4136.51376120.2581.9

The pollution of Sebou river (“Oued Sebou”, Morocco) by heavy metals gradually accumulated in the sediments is the result of the metallic contamination of a stream of water [8, 10]. The Sebou river is the largest river in Morocco. In fact, the distance between its source in the Middle Atlas and the Atlantic is around 600 km. It plays a vital role in the provision of drinking water, irrigation, and industrial use throughout its watershed [1113]. It can be divided into three distinct geomorphologic basins: the upper, middle, and lower Sebou. The sampling sites in this study are located in the middle of Sebou, where the river faces a very high pollution flow from the surface of the water and sediments; the city of Fez generates 40% of the total impact of water quality on the Sebou river; this city has 400 industrial units, employing more than 22,000 people and a wide variety of crafts. The objective of this work is to quantify and characterize the fraction of heavy metals accumulated in the sediments of Sebou river of Fez city [8].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The studied area has a continental semiarid climate with cold winter and hot summer. The winter period, between October and April, is the rainy season, while the remaining months are mainly dry [10]. The base flow of the river is around 17 m3.

The geological characteristic of Sebou watershed includes clays and calcareous formations of the middle Atlas Mountains. Samples were selected along the Sebou river and its junction with Fez river, where the principal vector of pollution is noted [8]:(i)Station N°1, “upstream of the Fez river”: located on the Fez river before its entry to the city, considered as a reference station.(ii)Station N°2, “Ain Nokbi”: located downstream of Fez city, representing the converging area of all the effluents from Fez city before joining the Sebou river.(iii)Station N°3, “confluence of Fez river with Sebou river”: the reference station which is not influenced by the pollutant emissions.(iv)Station N°4, “edge of Sebou river”: located on the Sebou river at approximately two kilometers downstream of the junction with Fez river.

2.2. Sampling and Conservation of Sediments

The sediments were collected by the manual coring method using a 1.5 m long and 15 cm diameter corer with a depth ranging from 5 cm to 15 cm. The samples were placed in decontaminated (24 h in HNO3) polyethylene containers and immediately conserved in a refrigerator (4°C).

2.3. Sediments Treatment

Total dissolution by acid attack consists of the most recommended treatment method for analyzing heavy metals [8]. 1.5 g of 80°C dried sample and 6 ml of hydrofluoric acid (HF 40%) were reflux heated at 100°C during 1 h in a 100 ml round-bottomed flask in order to dissolve silicate compounds [11]. Next, aqua regia (3 ml of nitric acid (HNO3 65%) and 9 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 38%)) was added to this mixture with continuous reflux heating during 2 h [5]. The residue after the total attack was diluted in 100 ml of ultra pure water, filtered using a syringe equipped with a 0.45 filter μm, and then analyzed by ICP-AES. The purpose of this analysis is measuring total concentration of trace elements considered as pollutants such as Ca, Zn, Cd, Fe, Cu, and Ni [11].

2.4. Methods of Analysis and Characterization

Measurements of the physicochemical parameters (temperature, pH, and electric conductivity (EC)) were performed in situ with a multiprobe (Probe Holder, Standard, portable hach) calibrated before each campaign [11].

The ICP-AES spectrometer used to measure the concentration of trace elements is Activa-M (Horiba Jobin Yvon, France) with argon plasma. The X-ray diffractometer used is X’Pert Pro Panalatycal equipped with an ultrafast X’Celerator scintillation detector with Cu Kα radiation beam (λ = 0.154060 nm), operating at 40 kV voltage and 30 mA current with a copper target. Data in 2θ were collected between 10 and 80 degrees on powdered samples with a counting step of 0.02° and a counting time in 2 s steps. The Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for the sediment samples for characterization in terms of functional groups. FTIR measurements were performed using a spectrometer (Vertex 70) and were carried out in transmittance mode, in the range of 400-4000 cm−1 with resolution of 4 cm−1 [12].

2.5. Determination of Organic Matter

The sediments were dried at 65°C in an oven for 24 h and calcined at 450°C for 1 h in a furnace. The loss on ignition corresponds to the mass difference between before and after calcination and represents the organic matter content [13].

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Physicochemical Analyses of Sediment
3.1.1. Measure of Temperature

Water temperature is an important factor in the aquatic environment because it regulates almost all physical, chemical, and biological reactions. In the study area, we noted that this temperature does not vary greatly from one station to another, Table 2, and remains close to the average annual temperature of the region, i.e., 21°C, with a minimum of 17.6°C and a maximum of 23.4°C [8].


StationsUpstream of the Fez riverAin NokbiConfluence of Fez and Sebou riversEdge of Sebou

Temperature [°C]17.6192223.4
pH7.738.278.198.9
Conductivity μs /cm1032101412031337
Sediments Loss on ignition5.816.306.2610.36

3.1.2. Measure of pH

The acidity decreases with high levels of organic matter and increases during low-water periods, when evaporation is high [8]. The pH values of the water in the alluvial groundwater of the Sebou (Table 2) do not show any significant variations, with a minimum of 7.73 (upstream of the Fez river) and a maximum of 8.9 (edge of Sebou) [14].

3.1.3. Conductivity Measurement

Conductivity is one of the ways to validate physicochemical analyses of water. Indeed, contrasting measures on a medium make it possible to highlight the existence of pollution, mixing, or infiltration zones. This parameter also makes it possible to assess the quantity of salts dissolved in water. Sebou surface water is highly mineralized with conductivity values between 1014 μs/cm and 1337 μs/cm (Table 2). These values recorded in the rainfall return period could be attributed to precipitation that caused a dilution of water mainly due to subterranean flow water sources from the middle Atlas mountains [1517].

3.1.4. Organic Matter Determination

The calculation of the organic matter of the samples by calcination also shows the presence of high organic matter content in the different stations; the observed loss on ignition is attributed to the organic matter and therefore represents the mass percentage of organic matter [17]. The rate of organic matter varies from one station to another; it reaches a maximum rate of 10.36% upstream Fez river and a minimum rate of 5.81% on the edge of Sebou (Table 2). This variation is said to be related to the high pollutant load of the city of Fez and the development of phytoplankton in rivers [4].

3.2. Sediments Analysis by X-Ray Diffraction

The mineralogical characterization of sediments is an important complement to physicochemical analyses. It makes it possible to identify different polluting ores or metals. The obtained information is based on the sediment X-ray diffractograms (Figure 1) which describes distinct crystalline phases: muscovite (KAl3Si3O10(OH)2), anhydrite (CaSO4), calcite (CaCO3), hematite (Fe2O3), halite (NaCl), quartz (SiO2), and dolomite CaMg (CO3)2 [18]. This mineralogy of sediment is a description of the mineralogical zone of the Sebou river. The diffractogram of the acid treated sediments of station N°1 (Figure 2) shows only the presence of quartz, indicating the attack of content phases [4, 17, 19].

3.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Analysis by IR spectroscopy makes it possible to identify absorption bands corresponding to the different vibrations of the characteristic bonds of the phases detected by XRD [18, 20].

The IR spectrum of station N°1 sediments (Figure 3(a)) shows that bands centred at 776 and 870 cm−1 correspond to the vibration stretching of Si-O-Al and , respectively, while the band at 946 cm−1 is attributed to the vibrations of the quartz Si-O-Si bonds. The H-O-H bonds are characterized by an intense band between 3425 cm−1 and centred around 1421 cm−1 corresponding to the valence vibrations of the Si-O-Si bond [2].

The IR spectrum of station N°2 sediments (Figure 3(b)) shows three characteristic bands of : 1633 cm−1, 1455 , and 710 . The wide bands between 3332 cm−1 and 2800 are assigned to the vibration of H-O-H and C-H cm−1. More intense band at 699 cm−1 is characteristics of silica. The bands at 3407 and 3619 cm−1 are attributed to the vibration of the O-H bond of hydroxyl groups [21]. The wide bands at 3332 and 1634 cm−1 are attributed to the axial and angular deformation of adsorbed water molecules [22].

Examination of the IR spectrum of sediments at station N°3 (Figure 3(c)) shows the following characteristic absorption bands: the 3619 cm-1 band measures the vibration of the O-H bond of the hydroxyl groups. The band at 979 cm -1 corresponds to the vibration of the Si-O bond. The 1442 cm-1 band is due to the vibrations of the C-O elongations. The vibration at 1637 cm-1 may be due to deformation of the N-H bond. The band 672 corresponds to the different modes of vibration of the Si-O-Al bond. The 503 cm-1 band is due to the vibration of the Si-O-Si bond.

The IR spectrum of station N°4 sediments (Figure 3(d)) reveals two bands of vibration at 796 cm−1 and 1000 cm−1 assigned to elongation of Si-O and Al-OH and bands at 523 cm−1 and 712 cm−1 characteristic of Si-O-Al and C-O. The spectrum represents also 3387 and 1637 cm−1 bands assigned to H-O-H and N-H [12, 18].

3.4. Sediment Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy

During the general observation of the sediments, it was found that there are grains of different morphologies after determining the chemical and mineralogical composition; we will try to assign the mineralogical constitution to each type of grain. The SEM analysis of sediments of studied stations showed similar results. Consequently, we chose the station N°1 as station model. SEM observation is coupled with quantitative chemical analysis by EDX, carried out on sediment grains (Figure 4). In accordance with the results obtained in DRX, the high proportion of iron, aluminium, calcium, and magnesium present in the sediments is related to the presence of either hematite hydroxide, calcium carbonate, dolomite CaMg(CO3)2, or muscovite KAl3Si3O10(OH) [6].

3.5. Chemical and Physicochemical Analyses of Industrial Effluents
3.5.1. Analysis of Calcium

The calcium ion concentration varies with particle depth as with particle size. The concentration increases with depth, so calcium is more concentrated at depth 15 cm than at depth 5 cm (Figure 5). The highest Ca content (614.6 mg/g) was recorded at the particle size of 200 μm, while the lowest concentration was recorded at the particle size of 120 μm (140.89 mg/g). The concentration of calcium ions is in direct relation to its geographical nature [8, 11].

3.5.2. Analysis of Iron

Figure 6 illustrates the evolution of iron concentration with granulometry (25-200 μm) and depth (5 and 15 cm). The minimum level of iron concentration of 114.6 mg/g indicates that most of the inputs of this element probably come from the upstream part. The slight gradual enrichment towards the top of the river would be a sign of a recent influx of pollution. On the other hand, the depletion of iron levels towards the surface of the cores can be explained by the disappearance of natural or anthropogenic enrichment inputs. Overall, the iron contents recorded at the different levels of granulometry are very important [10, 23].

3.5.3. Analysis of Copper

The average copper contents in the sediments of collected from top to bottom of the Sebou reservoir are 289 mg/g (depth of 15 cm and granulometry of 125 μm), the upper value, and 27 mg/g (depth of 5 cm and granulometry of 200 μm), the lower value (Figure 7). These values are very high comparing to the guide value of the copper contents of unpolluted sediments (< 25 μg/g) [5], with the exception of the 5 cm depth with 125 μm granulometry which has a relatively low content of 30.57 mg/g; this allows it to be classified as moderately contaminated sediments. The significant enrichment of the copper content at the depth of the 15 cm surface slice of the carrots on the deferential granulometries shows the existence of a recent contribution of the discharges which are strongly loaded with copper [4, 23, 24].

3.5.4. Cadmium

According to the obtained results (Figure 8), the main highest cadmium content was around 0.28 mg/g recorded at the granulometry of 125 μm and depths of 5 cm and 15 cm, while the minimum content is about 0.204 mg/g at the granulometry of 200 μm and depth of 5 cm. The average contents remain higher than the indicative value of 60 μg/g (Table 3), which allows them to be classified as heavily polluted sediments; this result can be explained by the manufacture of Cd-Ni batteries, in the protection of steel against corrosion (cadmium plating), or as a stabilizer for plastics and pigments [4].


MetalUnpolluted materialModerately pollutedHeavily polluted

Cd< 0.10.1- 0,2> 60
Cu< 2525−50> 50
Pb< 4040−60> 60
Zn< 9090−200> 200

3.5.5. Nickel

Nickel concentration in the granulometries ranging from 25 to 200 μm varies from 64.1 to 89.2 mg/g, respectively (Figure 9). These concentrations are greatly exceeding the guide value of unpolluted sediments (50 μg/g) [5]. This content could be due to the following factors: the manufacture of steels and special alloys; surface coating by electrolysis; hydrogenation of oils and organic substances; the manufacture of paints [8, 12].

3.5.6. Zinc

Zinc contents are higher in the different granulometries for all studied depths (Figure 10), respectively, between 575.6 mg/g and 909.97 mg/g, except for the granulometries of 25 μm and 63 μm at depth of 5 cm, which is a low content, which allows it to be classified as heavily polluted sediments [25].

4. Conclusions

This work was interested in the study of the physicochemical characterization of sediments of Sebou river. The results showed that the levels of pollution by metals (Ca, Fe, Cu, Cd, Zn, and Ni) are high in all the studied stations (upstream of the Fez river, Ain Nokbi, confluence of Fez river with Sebou river, and edge of Sebou river) and exceed the recommended thresholds. This contamination highlights the negative impact of discharges from the city of Fez on the sediments and of course the water of Sebou river which is used in numerous utilizations. The protection of this water face to metal pollution is necessary and imperative so that it is still useful without risk of contamination.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Innovation Center, from Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University of Fez, for its collaboration in characterization of our samples by FTIR, XRD, and ICP-AES. Mr. Abdelaziz Dra thanks also the V3D-2018 conference for accepting this work for oral presentation.

References

  1. M. Ayah, L. M. Bawa, G. Djaneye-Boundjou, S. K. Doni, and P. Nambo, “Spéciation du cadmium du chrome du cuivre et du plomb dans les sédiments des déchets de phosphate de Kpémé Sud-Togo,” International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 479–492, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. Serpaud, R. Al-Shukry, M. Casteignau, and G. Matejka, “Adsorption of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb) by the superficial sediments of a watercourse: role of pH, temperature and sediment composition,” Journal of Water Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 343–365, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. Melamed, X. Cao, M. Chen, and L. Q. Ma, “Field assessment of lead immobilization in a contaminated soil after phosphate application,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 305, no. 1-3, pp. 117–127, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Meknes, “Les métaux lourds dans les sédiments de la retenue de barrage Sidi Chahed (région de Meknès, Maroc) Heavy metals in sediments of the retaining of dam Sidi Chahed (Meknes, Morocco),” International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. C. Meknes, D. Abrid, A. El Hmaidi, A. Abdallaoui, and A. Essahlaoui, “Study of trace metals in surface sediments of the dam reservoir,” The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. El Gaidoumi, J. M. Doña Rodríguez, E. Pulido Melián et al., “Synthesis of sol-gel pyrophyllite/TiO2 heterostructures: Effect of calcination temperature and methanol washing on photocatalytic activity,” Surfaces Interfaces, vol. 14, pp. 19–25, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Hayzoun, A. Ouammou, O. Saidi, F. Khalil, and L. Bouayyadi, “Evaluation de la qualité bactériologique et chimique du Sebou, Maroc (Assessment of the bacteriological and chemical quality of the Sebou River, Morocco),” Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, vol. 5, pp. 2438–2443, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. H. Hassimi, M. Bouezmarni, A. Taleb, A. Kherbeche, M. Taleb, and V. Debbaut, “The metal elements traces dregs with the unstable fraction of the sediment of Sebou which risk?” Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 2267–2276, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  9. K. P. Singh, D. Mohan, V. K. Singh, and A. Malik, “Studies on distribution and fractionation of heavy metals in Gomti river sediments—a tributary of the Ganges, India,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 312, no. 1-4, pp. 14–27, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  10. G. Suresh, P. Sutharsan, V. Ramasamy, and R. Venkatachalapathy, “Assessment of spatial distribution and potential ecological risk of the heavy metals in relation to granulometric contents of Veeranam lake sediments, India,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 84, pp. 117–124, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Chai, X. Shen, R. Li, and G. Qiu, “The risk assessment of heavy metals in Futian mangrove forest sediment in Shenzhen Bay (South China) based on SEM–AVS analysis,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 97, no. 1-2, pp. 431–439, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. Allali, M. Monsif, N. Idrissi Kandri, and A. Zerouale, “Caractérisation physico-chimique des enduits anciens et de restauration de la muraille (Al Moahades) bab chaâfa de la médina de salé: etude comparative,” Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, vol. 5, pp. 1577–1586, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. V. Kondratenko, G. Mul, J. Baltrusaitis, G. O. Larrazábal, and J. Pérez-Ramírez, “Environmental science,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 3112–3135, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. U. Singare, “Quantification study of non -biodegradable solid waste materials accumulated in The Mangroves of Mahim Creek, Mumbai,” Journal of Marine Science: Research and Development, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. E L, Ouali. Lalami, M. Merzouki, O. E L Hillali, S. Maniar, and S. Ibnsouda Koraichi, “Pollution des eaux de surface de la ville de fes au maroc: typologie, origine Et consequences,” Larhyss Journal, vol. 9, pp. 55–72, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. I. Bounif, H. Taouil, S. Elanza et al., “Physicochemical study of dayet er-romi lake water, Khemisset Region,” American Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 101–106, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  17. B. Louriño-Cabana, L. Lesven, A. Charriau, G. Billon, B. Ouddane, and A. Boughriet, “Potential risks of metal toxicity in contaminated sediments of Deûle river in northern France,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 186, no. 2-3, pp. 2129–2137, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Amar, M. Benzerzour, A. E. Safhi, and N. Abriak, “Durability of a cementitious matrix based on treated sediments,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 8, pp. 258–276, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. B. Janice, B. F. Heather, G. Walter, F. B. David et al., “Coordinated analyses of Antarctic sediments as Mars analog materials using reflectance spectroscopy and current flight-likeinstruments for CheMin, SAM and MOMA,” Icarus, vol. 224, pp. 309–325, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. Lesven, B. Lourino-Cabana, G. Billon et al., “On metal diagenesis in contaminated sediments of the Deûle river (northern France),” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1361–1373, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. K. Labhane, V. R. Huse, L. B. Patle, A. L. Chaudhari, and G. H. Sonawane, “Synthesis of Cu doped ZnO nanoparticles: crystallographic, optical, FTIR, morphological and photocatalytic study,” Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 39–51, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Ababou, M. Ajbary, M. Taleb, and A. Kherbeche, “Direct mineral carbonation of new materials for CO2 sequestration,” Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 3106–3111, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. El Gaidoumi, J. M. Doña-Rodríguez, E. Pulido Melián et al., “Catalytic efficiency of Cu-supported pyrophyllite in heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of phenol,” Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Hayzoun, “Caractérisation et quantification de la charge polluante anthropique et industrielle dans le bassin du Sebou,” 2014, http://www.theses.fr. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. EL Morhit, M. Fekhaoui, A. EL Abidi, L. Zidane, and A. Yahyaoui, “Influence des métaux lourds sur la qualité des sédiments de l'estuaire de l'oued Loukkos N-O du Maroc),” Revue de l'association Forum du Nord du Maroc, no. 6-8, pp. 19–35, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  26. K. M. Mohiuddin, H. Zakir, K. Otomo, S. Sharmin, and N. Shikazono, “Geochemical distribution of trace metal pollutants in water and sediments of downstream of an urban river,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. G. Suresh, V. Ramasamy, V. Meenakshisundaram, R. Venkatachalapathy, and V. Ponnusamy, “Influence of mineralogical and heavy metal composition on natural radionuclide concentrations in the river sediments,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1466–1474, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Abdelaiz Dra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1975 Views | 501 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.