Review Article
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Ulcerative Colitis Patients
Table 1
Summary of diagnostic techniques and its characteristics for CMV infection.
| Diagnostic tests | Pros | Cons | Sensitivity | Specificity |
| Serum serology | Can detect evidence of prior infection | Unable to detect active colitis | 98%–100% [27, 28] | 96%–99% [27, 28] | Antigen testing | Reasonable sensitivity and specificity for active disease | Semiquantitative, results subjective | 60%–100% [29–31] | 83%–100% [29–31] | Culture | High specificity | Poor sensitivity; long incubation; | 45%–78% [30, 32] | 89%–100% [27, 30] | DNA PCR (Serum) | High negative predictive value, may correlate with active disease | Different assays and quantitation methods; low specificity | 65%–100% [29, 30, 33] | 40%–92% [30, 33, 34] | Histologic H&E stain | Inexpensive stain | Poor sensitivity | 10%–87% [35] | 92%–100% [35] | Histologic IHC staining | Improves sensitivity over H&E staining | Expensive stain | 78%–93% [35] | 92%–100% [35] |
|
|