Associational Involvement in Dutch Municipalities and Neighbourhoods: Does Ethnic Diversity Influence Bonding and Bridging Involvement?
Table 2
Results of hierarchical multinomial regression analyses, direct contextual-level effects ( = 1,604; = 630; = 58).
Leisure
Interest
M1a
M1b
M1c
M2a
M2b
M2c
Bonding versus not involved
Bridging versus not involved
Bridging versus bonding
Bonding versus not involved
Bridging versus not involved
Bridging versus bonding
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
Intercept
−.500 (.521)
−.021 (.488)
.509 (.598)
−6.192 (1.276)
−4.599 (1.080)
.735 (1.390)
Migrant stock municipality
−.035 (.016)
−.015 (.014)
.020 (.018)
−.023 (.040)
−.049 (.032)
−.015 (.043)
Unemployment municipality
.027 (.017)
−.000 (.016)
−.029 (.019)
.097 (.039)
.023 (.033)
−.043 (.038)
Migrant stock neighbourhood
−.016 (.013)
.026 (.010)
.047 (.015)
−.145 (.042)
.026 (.020)
.166 (.045)
Unemployment neighbourhood
−.015 (.009)
−.024 (.010)
−.009 (.012)
.005 (.014)
−.009 (.016)
−.018 (.020)
Sources: Netherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Survey [20], Statistics Netherlands [36]. Significant at p < .01; significant at p < .05; significant at p < .10 (two-sided test of significance). All models include individual-level control variables (results available upon request).