Associational Involvement in Dutch Municipalities and Neighbourhoods: Does Ethnic Diversity Influence Bonding and Bridging Involvement?
Table 3
Results of hierarchical (linear/logistic/multinomial) regression analyses, indirect effects ().
M3 Perceived ethnic threat
M4 Interethnic contact friends
Leisure
Interest
M5a
M5b
M5c
M6a
M6b
M6c
Bonding versus not involved
Bridging versus not involved
Bridging versus bonding
Bonding versus not involved
Bridging versus not involved
Bridging versus bonding
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
(S.E.)
Intercept
1.231 (.210)
−.359 (.409)
−.332 (.536)
−.085 (.503)
.296 (.618)
−5.940 (1.299)
−4.543 (1.105)
.509 (1.419)
Perceived ethnic threat
−.167 (.066)
−.048 (.083)
.025 (.082)
.055 (.102)
−.140 (.146)
−.102 (.147)
.046 (.197)
Interethnic contact friends
−.115 (.046)
−.334 (.160)
.105 (.150)
.448 (.192)
−.456 (.300)
.165 (.267)
.592 (.385)
Migrant stock municipality
−.012 (.006)
.026 (.011)
−.033 (.016)
−.016 (.014)
.018 (.018)
−.021 (.041)
−.052 (.032)
−.020 (.043)
Unemployment municipality
.006 (.007)
−.017 (.013)
.026 (.017)
−.000 (.016)
−.028 (.019)
.096 (.040)
.024 (.033)
−.041 (.038)
Migrant stock neighbourhood
.007 (.003)
.020 (.008)
−.015 (.013)
.026 (.010)
.045 (.015)
−.141 (.042)
.026 (.020)
.162 (.045)
Unemployment neighbourhood
.000 (.003)
.012 (.008)
−.014 (.009)
−.024 (.010)
−.010 (.012)
.005 (.014)
−.009 (.017)
−.019 (.020)
Sources: Netherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Survey [20], Statistics Netherlands [36]. Significant at < .01; significant at < .05; significant at < .10 (two-sided test of significance). All models include individual-level control variables (results available upon request).
