The Impact of Statistical Leakage Models on Design Yield Estimation

<table>Different methods to be compared against the CDF matching approach involve moment matching to <svg height="13.5625" id="M51" style="vertical-align:-2.21957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 38.862499 13.5625" width="38.862499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,13.5625)">
<g transform="translate(72,-61.15)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.41)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">l</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="3.4758339" y="0">n</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="15.966331" y="0">(</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="20.129829" y="0">𝑌</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="26.818935" y="0">)</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>, Schwartz-Yeh, and Fenton-Wilkinson methods.</table>

VLSI Design

The Impact of Statistical Leakage Models on Design Yield Estimation

Figure 4