The Impact of Statistical Leakage Models on Design Yield Estimation

<table>Histogram (pdf plot) of <svg height="13.5625" id="M130" style="vertical-align:-2.21957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 38.862499 13.5625" width="38.862499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,13.5625)">
<g transform="translate(72,-61.15)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.41)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">l</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="3.4758339" y="0">n</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="15.966331" y="0">(</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="20.129829" y="0">𝑌</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="26.818935" y="0">)</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> shows that the FW method does not model the body of the (<svg height="7.375" id="M131" style="vertical-align:-0.17555pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 7.9250002 7.375" width="7.9250002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,7.375)">
<g transform="translate(72,-66.1)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,66.32)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑧</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> or  <svg height="10.8125" id="M132" style="vertical-align:-0.20064pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 21.862499 10.8125" width="21.862499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,10.8125)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.35)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.6)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝛿</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="6.2765059" y="0">𝑉</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="13.465731" y="0">𝑡</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>) distribution well compared to other methods.</table>

VLSI Design

The Impact of Statistical Leakage Models on Design Yield Estimation

Figure 6