Research Article
Design of an All-Digital Synchronized Frequency Multiplier Based on a Dual-Loop (D/FLL) Architecture
Table 1
All-digital frequency multiplier architectures comparison.
|
Proposed D/FLL architecture | |
| | | Advantages | | (i) No phase error accumulation. | | (ii) The multiplication factor is controllable. | | (iii) Portable. | | Disadvantages | | (i) Dual-loop architecture. | |
|
ADPLL [3, 5] | |
| | | Advantages | | (i) Single-loop architecture. | | (ii) Able to achieve wide lock range. | | Disadvantages | | (i) Phase error accumulation. | | (ii) Frequency fine tuning mechanism is challenging. | |
|
ADDLL [2, 4] | |
| | | Advantages | | (i) Single-loop architecture. | | (ii) No phase error accumulation. | | Disadvantages | | (i) Limited phase capturing range. | | (ii) The multiplication factor is not controllable. | | (iii) Edge combining circuit is needed. | | (iv) Any mismatch in the edge combining logic will be translated directly into a duty-cycle error and fixed-pattern jitter. | |
|
|