Veterinary Medicine International

Veterinary Medicine International / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 850568 | 5 pages |

Pathological Study of Blood Parasites in Rice Field Frogs, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus (Wiegmann, 1834)

Academic Editor: Timm C. Harder
Received19 Jan 2011
Revised30 Apr 2011
Accepted11 Jul 2011
Published12 Sep 2011


One hundred and forty adult rice field frogs, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus (Wiegmann, 1834), were collected in Srakaew province, Thailand. For blood parasite examination, thin blood smears were made and routinely stained with Giemsa. The results showed that 70% of the frogs (98/140) were infected with 5 species of blood parasites, including a Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism, Trypanosoma chattoni, Hepatozoon sp. a, Hepatozoon sp. b, and Lankesterella minima. Pathological examination of the liver, lung, spleen, and kidney of the frogs that were apparently infected with one of these blood parasites were collected and processed by routine histology and subsequently stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological findings associated with the Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism and Trypanosoma chattoni-infected frogs showed no pathological lesions. Hepatozoon sp. a and Hepatozoon sp. b-infected frogs developed inflammatory lesions predominantly in the liver, demonstrating granuloma-like lesions with Hepatozoon sp. meronts at the centre. Tissue sections of Lankesterella minima-infected frogs also showed lesions. Liver and spleen showed inflammatory lesions with an accumulation of melanomacrophage centres (MMCs) surrounding the meronts and merozoites. It is suggested that Hepatozoon sp. a, Hepatozoon sp. b, and Lankesterella minima-infections are capable of producing inflammatory lesions in the visceral organs of rice field frogs, and the severity of lesions is tentatively related to levels of parasitemia.

1. Introduction

Studies in several geographical regions have indicated anurans infected with variety of blood parasites, including viruses, rickettsiae, several species of protozoans, and microfilariae [16]. Trypanosoma spp. (Euglenozoa: Kinetoplastida) are heteroxenous and vector transmitted through a variety of mechanisms. The classification of anuran trypanosomes is still in confusion because some species may be polymorphic [79]. Trypanosoma rotatorium is a polymorphic species with a wide geographical distribution, while Trypanosoma chattoni is a monomorphic species that is found in Asia, Europe, and America [7, 10]. Hepatozoon spp. (Apicomplexa: Hepatozoidae) are often found in amphibians, appearing as large banana-shaped organisms in the cytoplasm of host erythrocytes. Hepatozoon species possess heteroxenous life cycles, with sexual reproduction and sporogony occurring in an arthropod definitive host. Transmission occurs when such an arthropod, infected with mature oocysts, often containing thousands of sporozoites, is consumed by a vertebrate host. Released sporozoites then migrate to the visceral organs, primarily to the liver, and undergo merogony. The meronts are released into the bloodstream where they form gamonts in erythrocytes. Lankesterella spp. (Apicomplexa: Lankesterellidae) are recognized as parasites of frogs and some other ectotherms. Merogony and sporogony occur in vascular endothelial cells in the visceral organs of the vertebrate hosts. Mature sporozoites are released into the bloodstream and invade erythrocytes. Intraerythrocytic sporozoites are taken up by vectors during feeding and it is believed that frogs became infected upon the digestion of sporozoite-bearing vectors. Leeches and mosquitoes have been shown to be capable vectors [6].

In Thailand, a survey of mainly blood parasites and helminthes of amphibians has been undertaken [1012]. There are few published data on the pathogenicity of blood parasites infections in amphibian hosts. Experimental infections with Trypanosoma inopinatum were lethal to European green frogs and caused haemorrhages, swollen lymph glands, and anaemia [7]. Trypanosoma rotatorium can be pathogenic in tadpoles and in heavy infections with trypanosomes accumulate in the kidneys [7]. The rice field frog, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus (Wiegmann, 1834), is one of the most widely distributed frogs in this country and is of economic importance as a food source of the local population. In this paper, the blood parasites of naturally infected rice field frogs were examined, and a histopathological study of their visceral organs was undertaken.

2. Materials and Methods

One hundred and forty wild rice field frogs, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, from Wang Nam Yen district, Srakeaw province, Thailand were collected from July to October 2007 by a local commercial vendor. The frogs were bled by cardiac puncture, blood was preserved in heparinized tubes and then examined for hematocrit value. A few drops of fresh blood were smeared, fixed with 100% methanol, and stained with Giemsa. Each thin blood smear was examined and classified under a light microscope [5, 9, 13]. The parasitemia was calculated by counting the number of parasites per 5,000 erythrocytes on a thin blood film for evaluating the blood parasite-infected status and recorded.

Visceral organs such as liver, lungs, spleen, and kidney of the frogs that were apparently infected with just one species of blood parasite were then collected and processed by routine histology and subsequently stained with haematoxylin and eosin for histopathological examination. These slides were also observed with a light microscope.

3. Results

Of naturally infected frogs, 70% (98/140) were positive for blood parasites. Hematocrit values were not statistically different between the infected ( ) and noninfected frogs ( ) at 22.64 ± 5.31 and 22.81 ± 5.82 (mean ± SD), respectively, ( ). The parasites were identified as 5 species: a Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism (I–V forms), Trypanosoma chattoni, Hepatozoon sp. a, Hepatozoon sp. b, and Lankesterella minima (Figures 1(a)1(j)). Prevalences of frogs apparently infected with one species of the blood parasite only were: the Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism (11.4%, 16/140), Trypanosoma chattoni (22.1%, 31/140), Hepatozoon sp. a (4.3%, 6/140); Hepatozoon sp. b (1.4%, 2/140), and Lankesterella minima (7.1%, 10/140) respectively (Table 1). Histopathological study of the visceral organs in the case of the Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism and Trypanosoma chattoni-infected frogs with average parasitemias of 0.01% of erythrocytes, showed no pathologic lesions in the tissues. There was no detectable macroscopic change in the various organs. Hepatozoon sp. a- and Hepatozoon sp. b- infected frogs, with parasitemias of 0.28% and 0.49% of erythrocytes, respectively, showed pathologic lesions predominantly in liver. The lesions revealed subacute to chronic inflammation. There were evidence of lymphocyte and eosinophil infiltration around the meronts of Hepatozoons sp. a and Hepatozoons sp. b as granulomatous-like lesions. However, in infected frogs with average parasitemias of 0.01% of erythrocytes, there were no remarkable lesions. The frogs that were infected with Lankesterella minima, with average parasitemias of 0.15% of erythrocytes, showed pathologic lesions at the meront and merozoite stages in the various visceral organs, liver, lung, spleen, and kidney. It was found that the meront and merozoite stages were surrounded by the melanomacrophage centers (MMCs). The lung and kidney with merozoite stages also showed tissue damage with a mild degree inflammation. However, in infected frogs with average parasitemias below 0.01% of erythrocytes, no remarkable lesions could be recognized (Figures 2(a)2(f) and Table 1).

Blood parasitePrevalence (%) (+ve/total frogs)Average parasitemias (percentages of erythrocyte infected, mean ± SD)

Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism 11.4% (16/140)0.01 ± 0.01
Trypanosoma chattoni 22.2% (31/140)0.01 ± 0.01
Hepatozoon sp. a 4.3% (6/140)0.12 ± 0.18
Hepatozoon sp. b 1.4% (2/140)0.12 ± 0.20
Lankesterella minima 7.1% (10/140)0.15 ± 0.45

4. Discussion and Conclusion

Blood parasites that were observed in wild rice field frogs, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus in Wang Nam Yen district, Srakaew province, Thailand from July to October 2007, included trypanosomes, haemogregarines, and lankesterellids, with trypanosomes having highest prevalence. The morphologies and measurements of the Trypanosoma rotatorium-like species (I–V forms) and Trypanosoma chattoni observed in this study are similar to the observation of Werner [5]. The Hepatozoon was differentiated into species a and b by the characteristics of the parasitophorus vacuole [13]. However, the species could not be identified with any currently known to science. For the Lankesterella, sporozoites observed in the rice field frog were similar in size and morphology to those of Lankesterella minima, which is the most prevalent species reported from frogs in the USA, Europe, and Asia [4, 11, 12]. Thus, the Lankesterella in this report could be identified as Lankesterella minima.

There was no statistical difference between the hematocrit value of infected and noninfected frogs. That could be because the blood parasites form part of the normal fauna of wild frogs. All the frogs were clinically normal and, thus, considered suitable for human consumption. In the case of the trypanosomes, including the Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism and Trypanosoma chattoni, there was no evidence of pathological lesions in any visceral organs. It is suggested that the number of blood parasites found in those frogs with average parasitemias at or below 0.01% of erythrocytes did not affect frog health or produce any clinical signs. Hepatozoon sp. a and b meronts and Lankesterella minima meronts and merozoites produced pathological lesions predominantly in the liver with subacute to chronic inflammation [14, 15]. Those lesions resembled granulomas in liver which corresponded to cell-mediated immune response [15, 16]. The meronts and merozoites of Lankesterella minima presented in various organs, that is, liver, lung, and kidney, producing mild degree inflammatory response [15]. The stages developed in the reticuloendothelial system, associated with the melanomacrophage centers (MMCs) [9]. In the case of haemogregarine and lankesterellid infections, the severity of histopathological lesions observed appeared to be tentatively related to the levels of parasitemia.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that wild rice field frogs, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, were infected with 5 species of blood parasites, including 2 species of trypanosomes, 2 of Hepatozoon, and one lankesterellid. Frogs apparently with just one of these infections showed pathological lesions in the visceral organs only in the case of Hepatozoon sp. a and b (meronts mainly in liver) and Lankesterella minima (meronts and merozoites in liver, lung, spleen, and kidney). No evidence of any inflammatory lesion was found in the various organs in the case of the Trypanosoma rotatorium-like organism and Trypanosoma chattoni. The severity of the lesions in the wild frogs infected with blood parasites ranged from severe to mild in the order Hepatozoon sp. a, Hepatozoon sp. b, Lankesterella minima, the Trypanosoma rotatorium- like organism and Trypanosoma chattoni, respectively. In addition, the severity of the pathological lesions appeared to relate to the levels of parasitemia (percentages of erythrocytes infected). However, the infected frogs did not show any clinical signs of sickness although blood parasites may be stress factors including immunosuppressive conditions that render hosts more susceptible to secondary infection. This information will be useful for health monitoring in the frog management industry and ecological conservation.


The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive criticism in both scientific and linguistic matters.


  1. R. Kudo, “On the protozoa parasitic in frogs,” Transactions of American Microscopical Society XLI, no. 2, pp. 59–76, 1922. View at: Google Scholar
  2. W. H. Ewers, “Blood parasites of some New Guinea reptiles and amphibia,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 172–174, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  3. N. D. Levine and R. R. Nye, “A survey of blood and other tissue parasites of leopard frogs Rana pipiens in the United States,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. R. Barta and S. S. Desser, “Blood parasites of amphibians from Algonquin Park, Ontario,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 180–189, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. K. Werner, “Blood parasites of amphibians from Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 356–363, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. S. Desser, “The haemogregarinidae and lankesterellidae,” Parasitic Protozoa, vol. 4, pp. 247–272, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. E. Bardsley and R. Harmsen, “The trypanosomes of anura,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 11, pp. 1–73, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. R. Barta, Y. Boulard, and S. S. Desser, “Blood parasites of Rana esculenta from Corsica: comparison of its parasites with those of eastern North American ranids on the context of host phylogeny,” Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, vol. 108, pp. 6–20, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. S. Desser, “The blood parasites of anurans from Costa Rica with reflections on the taxonomy of their trypanosomes,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 152–160, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  10. D. S. Martin, A. D. G. Wright, J. R. Barta, and S. S. Desser, “Phylogenetic position of the giant anuran trypanosomes Trypanosoma chattoni, Trypanosoma fallisi, Trypanosoma mega, Trypanosoma neveulemairei, and Trypanosoma ranarum inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 566–571, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Chutmongkonkul, W. Khonsue, and P. Pariyanonth, “Blood parasites of six species of wild amphibians from Khun Mae Kuang forest area, Thailand,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium of the Asian Zoo and Wildlife Medicine and the 1st Workshop on the Asian Zoo and Wildlife Pathology, p. 48, Thailand, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. Chutmongkonkul and P. Pariyanonth, “Hematozoa of amphibians in Thailand,” in Proceedings of the 14th Proceedings Association of Reptilian and Amphibians Veterinarians, p. 118, New Orleans, La, USA, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  13. T. G. Smith, “The genus Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Adeleina),” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 565–585, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Chutmongkonkul, P. Pariyanonth, J. Tangtrongpairos, and A. Sailasuta, “Lankesterella in Hoplobatrachus rugulosus in Thailand,” in Proceedings of the 31st Congress on Sciences and Technology of Thailand at Suranaree University of Technology (STT '05), pp. 89–90, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, October 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Rungsipipat, “Cell of Chronic Inflammation,” in General Veterinary Pathology, pp. 103–108, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Point Graphic Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  16. E. J. Wozniak, S. R. Telford, D. F. DeNardo, G. L. McLaughlin, and J. F. Butler, “Granulomatous hepatitis associated with Hepatozoon sp. meronts in a southern water snake (Nerodia fasciata pictiventris),” Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Achariya Sailasuta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2602 Views | 1363 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.