Review Article

Small-Scale 5G Testbeds for Network Slicing Deployment: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Comparison of small-scale testbeds for network slicing in 5G, which ✓ denotes supported feature and ✗ denotes unsupported feature.

TestbedSDNNFVCloud comp.Multi-domainMulti-tenancyMANOMulti-RATsE2E slicingCross-locationML-enabledOpen-sourceMANO type

1. 5G4IoT [38, 39]
2. 5GTN [40]✓ (https://5gtn.fi/)OSM, CloudBand
3. SEMIoTICS [41]✓ (https://www.semiotics-project.eu/)OpenStack tacker
4. Mosaic5G [43]✓ (http://mosaic5g.io/)JOX
5. Orion [45, 46]OSM and a customized orchestrator
6. 5G Testbed for NS [47]✓ (https://github.com/ashxz47)
7. POSENS [48, 49]✓ (https://github.com/wnlUc3m)Customized OSM
8. UPC testbed [50]
9. M-CORD based testbed [52, 53]✓ (https://nick133371.github.io/)XOS
10. NS for 5G IoT and eMBB [55]
11. Transformable resources slicing testbed [56]✗(E2E slice traverses over RAN, TN and CN.)VLSP, Kubernetes, and OpenStack
12. DSAF [58]Customized python-based orchestrator
13. SliceNet [59]OSM, OpenBaton
14. IqInf testbed [60]
15. Slice-aware SA testbed [61]Service assurance integrated with MANO
16. Simula [62, 63]✓ (https://github.com/simula/5gvinni-oai-ns)OSM
17. 5GIIK [64, 65]✓ (https://bit.ly/3rgOgd6)OSM
18. ONAP based testbed [67]ONAP
19. BlueArch [68]Open MANO, RIFT.io
20. MEC IoT platform [69, 70]OSM
21. CAI [71]✓ (https://bit.ly/3tXErSX)