Research Article

Tribology of Coated 316L SS by Various Nanoparticles

Table 2

Comparison of surface microhardness between 316L SS substrates and various coating materials at different sputtering times using one-way ANOVA.

Variables1st reading2nd reading3rd reading4th readingMean GPaSD ±ANOVA

Nb-1 hr2.262.032.062.152.120.105F = 14.783
Nb-2 hrs2.232.452.542.462.420.134
Nb-3 hrs2.182.652.462.532.460.200
SS1.902.001.891.851.910.064

Ta-1 hr2.422.662.822.912.700.217F = 29.580
Ta-2 hrs2.573.032.812.822.810.190
Ta-3 hrs3.083.132.732.902.960.181
SS1.902.001.891.851.910.064

V-1 hr2.212.021.962.032.050.109F = 37.977
V-2 hrs2.242.302.342.382.320.061
V-3 hrs2.332.442.472.442.420.062
SS1.902.001.891.851.910.064

Nb2.222.382.352.382.330.075F = 103.499
Ta2.692.942.792.882.820.110
V2.262.252.262.282.260.014
SS1.902.001.891.851.910.064

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.