Knowledge and Use of Caries Detection Methods among Dental Students and Dental Practitioners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Table 3
Caries risk assessment practices.
Method
Very unlikely
Unlikely
Likely
Very likely
A1-caries risk assessment for adult patients
28 (5.81%)a
70 (14.5%)a
157 (32.6%)b
227 (47.1%)b
A2-caries risk assessment for children
41 (8.54%)a
89 (18.5%)a
140 (29.2%)a
210 (43.8%)b
A3-evaluate the patients’ dietary habits
29 (6.02%)a
83 (17.2%)a
215 (44.6%)b
155 (32.2%)b
A4-identify current exposures to fluoride
52 (10.9%)a
125 (26.2%)a
181 (37.9%)b
120 (25.1%)a
A5-review medical history and lifestyle
10 (2.02%)a
37 (7.49%)a
129 (26.1%)b
318 (64.4%)c
A6-plan restorative materials and techniques based on the patients’ caries risk assessment
20 (4.09%)a
53 (10.8%)a
156 (31.9%)b
260 (53.2%)b
a, bValues in the same row and subtable not sharing the same subscript are significantly different at in the two-sided test of equality for column proportions. Cells with no subscript are not included in the test. Tests assume equal variances. Tests are adjusted for all pairwise comparisons within a row of each innermost subtable using the Bonferroni correction.