Review Article
Physiotherapy Treatment in Patients with Hemophilia and Chronic Ankle Arthropathy: A Systematic Review
Table 4
Analysis of the methodological quality of Czepa et al.’s [
14] study, by Van Tulder scale.
| Items | Czepa et al. (2013) [14] |
| Was the method of randomization adequate? | No | Was the treatment allocation concealed? | No | Were the groups similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators? | Yes | Was the patient blinded to the intervention? | No | Was the care provider blinded to the intervention? | No | Was the outcome assessor blinded to the intervention? | No | Were cointerventions avoided or similar? | No | Was the compliance acceptable in all groups? | No | Was the drop-out rate described and acceptable? | No | Was the timing of the outcome assessment in all groups similar? | Yes | Did the analysis include an intention-to-treat analysis? | No |
|
|