Research Article

Benign Phyllodes Tumors: Comparison of Prognosis among Three Different Surgical Approaches

Table 2

Patient and tumor characteristics of the 17 recurred cases.

Case numberSurgical approachAge (y)Maximum diameter (cm)Time to postoperative recurrence (mo)Recurrent tumor pathologyTumor size after recurrence (cm)

1US-VAE493.212Benign PT1.7
2US-VAE233.610Benign PT2.3
3US-VAE224.96Benign PT3.5
4US-VAE222.78Benign PT1.2
5US-VAE362.39Benign PT1.8
6US-VAE552.596Benign PT3.1
7Local lumpectomy42324Benign PT5.4
8Local lumpectomy41810Benign PT1.2
9Local lumpectomy354.26Benign PT3.2
10Local lumpectomy485.410Malignant PT1.3
11Local lumpectomy373.12Benign PT1.5
12Local lumpectomy226.82Benign PT1.6
13Local lumpectomy46460Benign PT2.1
14Local lumpectomy642.312Benign PT1.5
15Extend lumpectomy414.712Benign PT1.8
16Extend lumpectomy128.46Benign PT5.9
17Extend lumpectomy433.28Benign PT1.3

US-VAE: ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision; PT: phyllodes tumor.