- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 327852, 2 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/327852

## Erratum to “Compact Operators for Almost Conservative and Strongly Conservative Matrices”

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia^{2}Department of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India

Received 18 April 2014; Accepted 16 June 2014; Published 3 July 2014

Copyright © 2014 S. A. Mohiuddine et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

We redefine the space and state the results of [1] in this light.

Let be a semigroup of positive regular matrices .

A bounded sequence is said to be -*almost convergent* to the value if and only if , as uniformly in , where
and which is -transform of a sequence (see Mursaleen [2]). The number is called the generalized limit of , and we write . We write

Using the idea of -almost convergence, we define the following.

An infinite matrix is said to be -*almost conservative* if for all , and we denote it by . An infinite matrix is said to be -*strongly conservative* if for all , and we denote it by .

Now, we restate Theorem 11 and Theorem 15 of [1] as follows, respectively.

Theorem 11. *Let be a -almost conservative matrix. Then, one has
**
where .*

*Proof. *It follows on the same lines as of Theorem 11 [1] by only replacing by .

Theorem 15. *Let be a normal positive regular matrix. Let be an infinite matrix. Then, one has the following.*(i)*If , then
* (ii)*If , then
* *where for all .*(iii)*If , then
* *where is the composition of the matrices and ; that is, .*

*Proof. *It follows on the same lines as Theorem 15 of [1] by only replacing by .

*Remark 1 (see [2]). *If consists of the iterates of the operator defined on by , where is an injection of the set of positive integers into itself having no finite orbits, then -invariant mean is reduced to the -mean and -almost convergence is reduced to -convergence. In this case, our results are reduced to the results of [3].

#### References

- S. A. Mohiuddine, M. Mursaleen, and A. Alotaibi, “Compact operators for almost conservative and strongly conservative matrices,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2014, Article ID 567317, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - M. Mursaleen, “On $\mathcal{A}$-invariant mean and $\mathcal{A}$-almost convergence,”
*Analysis Mathematica*, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 173–180, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - M. Mursaleen and A. K. Noman, “On σ-conservative matrices and compact operators on the space V
_{σ},”*Applied Mathematics Letters: An International Journal of Rapid Publication*, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1554–1560, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus