About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
VolumeΒ 2012Β (2012), Article IDΒ 158067, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/158067
Research Article

Modeling Approach for Determining Equivalent Optical Constants of Plastic Shading Nets under Solar Radiation Conditions

1Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Energy Engineering, South Valley University, Aswan 81528, Egypt

Received 16 February 2012; Accepted 3 August 2012

Academic Editor: FengqiangΒ Sun

Copyright Β© 2012 A. M. Abdel-Ghany and I. M. Al-Helal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The radiative properties of several plastic shading nets were measured under natural solar radiation conditions. We found that the plastic nets behave as homogeneous translucent materials (e.g., plastic film, plastic sheets, and glass). Based on this behavior, we suggest that it is possible to treat plastic nets as translucent materials and to characterize them with equivalent optical constants (i.e., equivalent refractive indexes, 𝑛eq, and equivalent extinction coefficients, 𝜎eq). Here a physical model to determine 𝑛eq and 𝜎eq of plastic nets was described in analogy to homogeneous translucent materials. We examined three groups of nets based on their color (black, black-green, and beige). Each group consisted of nets with four or five different porosities. Nets of each group had almost the same texture structure. For each group, we derived an equation for 𝑛eq as a function of the net porosity and determined an average value for 𝜎eq. Once values of 𝑛eq and 𝜎eq were determined, the solar radiative properties of a net could then be calculated from 𝑛eq and 𝜎eq for any incident angle of solar beam radiation without the need of measurements. The present model was validated by comparing the calculated with the measured radiative properties of three nets at different incident angle of solar beam radiation. The calculated radiative properties reasonably agreed with measured values.

1. Introduction

During the last decade, the use of plastic nets for shading agricultural industrial and residential structures in hot and sunny regions has steadily expanded because plastic nets offer many economical and environmental benefits [1–4]. These include (i) reduction or elimination of energy consumption used for heating or cooling structures, (ii) reduction of crop transpiration as well as water consumption for irrigation in agriculture structures in arid regions, and (iii) improvement in environmental and human-health conditions by reducing the need for pesticides. The diffusive nature of the net threads causes the incident beam radiation to be scattered forward (specularly and diffusively) during transmission [5]. This provides a uniform radiation distribution inside structures covered with nets to add more advantages to plastic nets applications. Various types of plastic nets with different colors and different shading powers are popular in the markets and are used for many purposes in many parts of the world. Commercial nets are usually defined by the following (i) the net porosity (πœ™), that is, the surface empty area (uncovered by the plastic threads) divided by the total surface area of the net. The value of πœ™ is usually determined by image processing or solar radiation transmission [6]. (ii) The shading factor (SF), defined as the percentage of global solar radiation that the net is able to block. SF strongly depends on the incident angle of the beam radiation (πœƒ), and to estimate the value of SF for a net correctly, the directional solar radiative properties (πœƒ dependence) of the net should be determined. Accordingly, the directional solar radiative properties of nets are essentially needed to characterize different types of plastic nets according to their shading power. However, little information about how to determine these properties is available in the literature.

Some research groups have investigated the radiative properties of different types of plastic net or total net-covered structure models in laboratories under artificial lighting [2–4, 7]. In order to replace expensive measuring techniques in laboratories, we developed a simple method for measuring the radiative properties of nets under natural conditions of global, diffuse, and direct beam solar radiation, and under natural conditions of the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) [8, 9]. The method was used to test nets with different colors, porosities, and texture structures. Even though, nets are three-dimensional, nonhomogeneous, and porous materials, the behaviors of the plastic nets under solar radiation conditions were found to be similar to those of translucent homogeneous materials (e.g., plastic films, glass and rigid plastic sheets such as polycarbonate and acrylic) [8, 9]. In other words, the changes in the global, diffuse, and direct beam transmittances and reflectances of nets with the incident angle (πœƒ) were similar to those of different translucent materials that were measured under natural conditions of solar radiation [10–14]. This makes it possible to determine optical constants, in analogy to homogeneous transparent materials, to be used for calculating the radiative properties of nets. This is because calculation methods are preferable and easier than the measuring methods which are quite difficult and prohibitively expensive. Accordingly, the goal of the present study was to develop a theoretical model to investigate equivalent optical constants (i.e., equivalent refractive indexes and equivalent extinction coefficients) for plastic nets in analogy to homogeneous translucent materials. Three groups of nets (i.e., a black group, beige group, and black-green group) were selected to develop the model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Plastic Net Materials

The nets selected for testing were classified into three groups. Nets in each group have the same color, same texture structure, and different porosities (πœ™). The nets were locally produced by Saudi companies. Samples of the nets (5 cm Γ— 5 cm) were scanned at a resolution of 4800 dpi with a flatbed scanner (HP-5590). Photos of the scanned nets were magnified several times and converted into high-contrast black (thread projection area) and white (empty area) colors using Adobe Photoshop software. The resulting photos showed the net threads as black on a white background. The porosity (the empty area divided by the total surface area of the net, πœ™) of each net was estimated. The three groups were the black group having porosities πœ™ of 0.30, 0.36, 0.43, 0.54, and 0.64; the beige group having porosities πœ™ of 0.32, 0.34, 0.36, and 0.45; the black-green group having porosities πœ™ of 0.45, 0.46, 0.48, 0.50, and 0.51. In the latter group, the texture was interlaced threads made of black and green plastic robs knitted together. Photos of the tested nets (one from each group) are shown in Figure 1.

158067.fig.001
Figure 1: Scanner images of a net in each group tested in this study.
2.2. The Equivalent Optical Constants Model

In the case of homogeneous translucent materials (e.g., plastic films, plastic sheets, or glass), the measured radiative properties (reflectance, transmittance, and absorptance) are referred to as effective properties. This is because the incident beam over the material surface suffers an infinite number of multiple internal reflections inside the material itself (Figure 2). With each internal reflection, there are transmitted and reflected portions below and above the material surfaces. The summation of the reflected components above the material surface is the effective reflectance and of those below the material surface is the effective transmittance; both can be measured using radiation sensors. According to [5], transmission of direct beam radiation through a plastic net was characterized as (i) the unscattered beam that is transmitted through the net pores, (ii) the beam that is reflected forward on the thread surfaces specularly, and (iii) the beam that is diffused during transmission. On the other hand, the reflected beam will be a combination of specularly reflected beam, and backward scattered beam. For several types of nets (having different colors, porosities, and texture structures) tested in [5], the forward diffused beam was less than 20% of the incident beam radiation. For the modeling approach, the unscattered beam, the specularly reflected (forward or backward) beam and the diffused beam were assumed to have the same characteristic manner and were considered as direct beams transmitted or reflected from the net. In analogy to homogeneous materials, the effective transmittance and reflectance of a plastic net to the direct beam solar radiation (πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ) can be expressed as [15] by πœπ‘Ÿ=πœβˆ—ξ€·1βˆ’πœŒβˆ—ξ€Έ1βˆ’(πœβˆ—πœŒβˆ—)2,πœŒπ‘Ÿ=πœŒβˆ—ξ€·1+πœβˆ—πœπ‘Ÿξ€Έ,(1) where πœβˆ— is the transmittance of the beam radiation due to absorption only in the net material with a porosity πœ™ and a solid matrix of (1βˆ’πœ™); πœŒβˆ— is the interface reflectance between the net surface and air.

158067.fig.002
Figure 2: Tracing of a unit beam radiation through a translucent sheet to illustrate the concept of the effective reflectance and effective transmittance of the sheet.

By eliminating πœŒβˆ— from (1) a second-order algebraic equation with the unknown πœβˆ— can be obtained. By solving the roots of this equation, the value of πœβˆ— is given by [15] as πœβˆ—=ξƒ―πœ2π‘Ÿβˆ’ξ€·1βˆ’πœŒπ‘Ÿξ€Έ22πœπ‘Ÿξƒ°Β±βŽ§βŽͺ⎨βŽͺβŽ©ξƒ©πœ2π‘Ÿβˆ’ξ€·1βˆ’πœŒπ‘Ÿξ€Έ22πœπ‘Ÿξƒͺ2⎫βŽͺ⎬βŽͺ⎭+11/2.(2) Reasonable (i.e., positive) values for πœβˆ— are obtained by considering the plus sign of (2). The input parameters to (1) and (2) are the transmittance and reflectance of the net to direct beam radiation (πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ) that can be measured using a pyranometer underneath the net and an albedometer above the net. The value of πœŒβˆ— is obtained from the direct substitution of πœβˆ— in (1). Once values of πœβˆ— and πœŒβˆ— were determined one time (e.g., at normal incidence), the equivalent optical constants (𝑛eq and 𝜎eq) of the plastic net can be determined, in analogy to homogeneous translucent materials, as follows.

The interface reflectance πœŒβˆ— at normal incidence between the air (𝑛=1) and the net surface having the equivalent refractive index (𝑛eq) is given by πœŒβˆ—=𝑛eqξ€Έβˆ’12𝑛eqξ€Έ+12.(3) Also at normal incidence, the transmittance due to absorption (πœβˆ—) and the equivalent absorption coefficient (𝜎eq) of the net material can be expressed in similar manner of the homogeneous translucent films by replacing the film thickness with the net density or net solidity (1βˆ’πœ™), πœ™ is the net porosity. Thus, the relation between πœβˆ— and 𝜎eq is given by πœβˆ—ξ€½=Expβˆ’πœŽeqξ€Ύ.(1βˆ’πœ™)(4) In (4), 𝜎eq is dimensionless whereas the unit of the absorption coefficient of a homogeneous translucent sheet is mmβˆ’1 if the sheet thickness is in mm.

Once the values of the equivalent optical constants (𝜎eq and 𝑛eq) are determined for a net, the directional radiative properties of this net can be calculated at any incidence angle (πœƒ) of the beam radiation. In this case, the directional interface reflectance (πœŒβˆ—πœƒ) between the net surface and air is given by [12, 13] as πœŒβˆ—πœƒ=12ξƒ―sin2ξ€·πœƒβˆ’πœƒπ‘Ÿξ€Έsin2ξ€·πœƒ+πœƒπ‘Ÿξ€Έ+tan2ξ€·πœƒβˆ’πœƒπ‘Ÿξ€Έtan2ξ€·πœƒ+πœƒπ‘Ÿξ€Έξƒ°,πœƒπ‘Ÿ=sinβˆ’1ξ‚΅sinπœƒπ‘›eqξ‚Ά,(5) where πœƒπ‘Ÿ is the equivalent angle of refraction for a beam radiation penetrates through the net. The directional transmittance due to absorption (πœβˆ—πœƒ) is given by πœβˆ—πœƒξ‚»=Expβˆ’πœŽeq(1βˆ’πœ™)cosπœƒπ‘Ÿξ‚Ό.(6) The directional radiative properties, with respect to the direct beam radiation, of a plastic net can be obtained by resubstituting πœβˆ—πœƒ and πœŒβˆ—πœƒ into (1) to obtain πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ for the desired direction. The diffuse solar radiation incident over a surface can be treated as a direct beam radiation with an incidence angle (πœƒ) of 60Β° [12]. Thus the directional transmittance and reflectance of a net with respect to the global solar radiation (πœπ‘” and πœŒπ‘”) are defined by πœπ‘”=πœπ‘Ÿ,60∘𝐼𝐷+ξ€·1βˆ’πΌπ·ξ€Έπœπ‘Ÿ,πœŒπ‘”=πœŒπ‘Ÿ,60∘𝐼𝐷+ξ€·1βˆ’πΌπ·ξ€ΈπœŒπ‘Ÿ,(7) where 𝐼𝐷 is the diffuse index estimated as (𝐷𝑖/𝑆𝑖) at the desired direction πœƒ.

2.3. Measuring the Required Parameters

For determining the transmittance and reflectance of the net to direct beam solar radiation (πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ) to be used as input parameters to (1) and (2), the experiment was conducted on the roof of the building of the Agricultural Research and Experiment Station, Agriculture Engineering Department, King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 46Β° 47β€² E, longitude and 24Β° 39β€² N, latitude). The measurements were conducted at around solar noon on clear, sunny days from September 10 to September 25, 2011. One pyranometer, CMP3 (Kipp & Zonen B.V. Inc., USA), and one albedometer, CMA-11 (Kipp & Zonen B.V. Inc., USA) were used. Each net sample was tacked onto a black painted wooden frame (50 cm Γ— 60 cm Γ— 30 cm). The frame was oriented toward the sun, so that incidence angle of the solar beam radiation (πœƒ) was nearly zero. The transmitted global solar radiation (𝑆𝑑) was measured below the net surface using the pyranometer. The incident and reflected global solar radiation (𝑆𝑖 and π‘†π‘Ÿ) were measured above the net sample using the albedometer. This procedure was repeated while shading the frame with an opaque plate to measure the diffuse solar radiation components below (𝐷𝑑) and above (𝐷𝑖, π·π‘Ÿ) the net sample. The measured parameters were recorded every 10 seconds, averaged over one-minute intervals and saved in a data logger (LI-1400, 9 channels, LI-COR, Inc.). For each parameter, five values were measured at normal incidence, and the average value was obtained. The sensors had been calibrated before use by the supplier. The components of the direct beam radiation (𝐡𝑖, 𝐡𝑑, and π΅π‘Ÿ) were determined as the difference between the global and diffuse radiation components. Thus at normal incidence, the net transmittance to direct beam radiation (πœπ‘Ÿ) was estimated as (𝐡𝑑/𝐡𝑖) and the net reflectance to direct beam radiation (πœŒπ‘Ÿ) was estimated as (π΅π‘Ÿ/𝐡𝑖).

3. Results and Discussion

For each net sample, the measured values of πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ at normal incidence were substituted consequently into (2) and (1) to obtain the values of πœβˆ— and πœŒβˆ—. Substituting the values of πœβˆ— and πœŒβˆ— into (3) and (4) gives the equivalent optical constants (𝑛eq and 𝜎eq) of the selected net. The optical constants of a net did not depend on the direction of the incident beam radiation; therefore they are used to estimate the directional radiative properties of the net. The values of 𝑛eq as affected by the net porosities (πœ™) are illustrated in Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c), for the black nets group, the black-green nets group and the beige nets group, respectively. The data in Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c) show that 𝑛eq decreases when πœ™ increases and correlations between 𝑛eq and πœ™ could be obtained with reasonable 𝑅2 values in the following form: 𝑛eq𝑅=1.63βˆ’0.65(πœ™),2𝑛=0.96forblacknets,(8)eq𝑅=1.7βˆ’0.63(πœ™),2𝑛=0.86forblack-greennets,(9)eq𝑅=2.97βˆ’1.98(πœ™),2ξ€Έ=0.81forbeigenets.(10) Ideally, if the value of πœ™ in (8), (9), and (10) increased to one (no net), then the values of 𝑛eq should equal to one (i.e., the refractive index of air). However, there are residuals of +0.02 in (8), βˆ’0.07 in (9), and +0.01 in (10) that should be added to 𝑛eq estimated form (8)–(10). These equations also show that value of 𝑛eq increases with increasing brightness of the net color, which means more reflection is expected. The nets with the brightest color in this study (the beige nets) showed the highest value of 𝑛eq whereas nets with the darkest color (the black nets) showed the lowest 𝑛eq.

fig3
Figure 3: The equivalent refractive index (𝑛eq) as affected by the porosity of the tested nets: (a) is for the black group, (b) for the black-green group, and (c) for the beige group.

The effects of the net porosity πœ™ on the value of 𝜎eq are illustrated in Figures 4(a), 4(b), and 4(c) for the black group, for the black-green group, and for the beige group, respectively. According to (4) and (6) and in analogy with homogeneous translucent materials, the value of 𝜎eq should be constant for each group of nets. And the value of πœβˆ—πœƒ in (6) depends on the porosity, πœ™, of the net and on the direction, πœƒ, of the incident beam radiation. The data in Figure 4(c) for the beige nets group satisfy the hypothesis that 𝜎eq is constant for each group of nets. However, the values of 𝜎eq for the black and black-green groups (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) did not satisfy the hypothesis exactly. This was mainly due to the low number of data points as a result of the low availability of net groups in the local markets. Therefore, an average value for each net group was used.

fig4
Figure 4: The equivalent absorption coefficient (𝜎eq) as affected by the porosity of the tested nets: (a) is for the black group, (b) for the black-green group, and (c) for the beige group.

4. Validation of the Model

The main purpose of the validation is to check the capability of 𝑛eq and 𝜎eq, estimated using the present model, to calculate the directional radiative properties of nets under natural solar radiation conditions. In a previous study [8] we measured the direct beam transmittance (πœπ‘Ÿ) and reflectance (πœŒπ‘Ÿ) for a black net (πœ™=0.65), for a beige net (πœ™=0.12), and for a black-green net (πœ™=0.47) at different incident angles (πœƒ) of the direct beam solar radiation. Values of πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ at normal incidence were measured for the three nets (see Section 2.2). The simulated values of πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ using the present model at different πœƒ comparing with the measured values of πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ are illustrated, respectively, in Figures 5(a) and 5(b) for the black net, in Figures 6(a) and 6(b) for the beige net, and in Figures 7(a) and 7(b) for the black-green net. Reasonable agreement was shown between the simulated and the measured πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ for the black, beige, and black-green nets.

fig5
Figure 5: Comparison between the measured [8] and simulated values of (a) the direct beam transmittance (πœπ‘Ÿ) and (b) the direct beam reflectance (πœŒπ‘Ÿ) for the black net.
fig6
Figure 6: Comparison between the measured [8] and simulated values of (a) the direct beam transmittance (πœπ‘Ÿ) and (b) the direct beam reflectance (πœŒπ‘Ÿ) for the beige net.
fig7
Figure 7: Comparison between the measured [8] and simulated values of (a) the direct beam transmittance (πœπ‘Ÿ) and (b) direct beam reflectance (πœŒπ‘Ÿ) for the black-green net.

Figures 5(a), 5(b), 6(a), 6(b), 7(a), and 7(b) do not show measured values of πœπ‘Ÿ and πœŒπ‘Ÿ at low values of incidence angle (0∘<πœƒ<33∘) because of the latitude and the time of the year at which the experiments were carried out (the lowest value of πœƒ was estimated to be about 33Β° at solar noon). In addition, when πœƒ was near or equal to 90Β°, the beam radiation incident on the thread surfaces reflects downwards. This increased πœπ‘Ÿ to a value higher than zero and reduced πœŒπ‘Ÿ to a value much lower than one.

5. Conclusions

A modeling approach for determining the equivalent optical constants (𝑛eq and 𝜎eq) of plastic nets was described and validated. Three groups of nets (black, beige, and black-green) were tested. For each group, an equation for 𝑛eq as a function of the net porosity was derived, and an average value for 𝜎eq was determined. Using values of 𝑛eq and 𝜎eq, the directional solar radiative properties of the net can be calculated without the need of measurements which are expensive and time consumed. The resulting properties are equivalent for the whole net as a semitransparent material, not for the net material itself. The present model was validated by comparing the measured radiative properties of three of the nets, at different incident angle of solar beam radiation, with those calculated using the present model. The calculated radiative properties agreed with the measured values. Further research is needed to investigate 𝑛eq and 𝜎eq for other nets communities with different colors (e.g., a blue group, an orange group, a white group, a green group, etc.).

Nomenclature

𝐡𝑖:Direct beam solar radiation flux incident on the net surface (Wmβˆ’2)
π΅π‘Ÿ:Direct beam solar radiation flux reflected from the net (Wmβˆ’2)
𝐡𝑑:Direct beam solar radiation flux transmitted through the net (Wmβˆ’2)
𝐷𝑖:Diffuse radiation flux incident on the net surface (Wmβˆ’2)
π·π‘Ÿ:Diffuse radiation flux reflected from the net surface (Wmβˆ’2)
𝐷𝑑:Diffuse radiation flux transmitted through the net (Wmβˆ’2)
𝐼𝐷:The diffuse index (i.e., ratio of diffuse to global solar radiation flux)
𝑛eq:Equivalent refractive index of the net (dimensionless)
𝑆𝑖:Global solar radiation flux incident on the net surface (Wmβˆ’2)
π‘†π‘Ÿ:Global solar radiation flux reflected from the net surface (Wmβˆ’2)
𝑆𝑑:Global solar radiation flux transmitted through the net (Wmβˆ’2)
Ξ¦:The net porosity (i.e., the empty area per unit area)
πœƒ:Incident angle of solar beam radiation (degree)
πœƒπ‘Ÿ:Equivalent refracted angle of solar beam radiation (degree)
πœŒπ‘”:Reflectance of the net to global solar radiation (dimensionless)
πœŒπ‘Ÿ:Reflectance of the net to direct beam solar radiation (dimensionless)
πœŒβˆ—:Interface reflectance between the net surface and air (dimensionless)
πœŒβˆ—πœƒ:Directional interface reflectance between the net surface and air (dimensionless)
𝜎eq:Equivalent absorption coefficient of the net (dimensionless)
πœπ‘”:Transmittance of the net to global solar radiation (dimensionless)
πœπ‘Ÿ:Transmittance of the net to direct beam solar radiation (dimensionless)
πœβˆ—:Transmittance of the net due to absorption only in the net threads (dimensionless).

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Plan for Sciences and Technology (NPST) Program, King Saud University, Project no. 09-ENE912-02. The authors express thank to M. R. Shady for technical assistance during the experiments.

References

  1. S. Castellano, G. M. Scarascia, G. Russo, et al., β€œPlastic nets in agriculture: a general review of types and applications,” Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 24, pp. 799–808, 2008.
  2. S. Castellano, G. Russo, and G. Scarascia Mugnozza, β€œThe influence of construction parameters on radiometric performances of agricultural nets,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 718, pp. 283–290, 2006. View at Scopus
  3. D. Briassoulis, A. Mistriotis, and D. Eleftherakis, β€œMechanical behaviour and properties of agricultural nets—part II: analysis of the performance of the main categories of agricultural nets,” Polymer Testing, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 970–984, 2007. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus
  4. D. Briassoulis, A. Mistriotis, and D. Eleftherakis, β€œMechanical behaviour and properties of agricultural nets—part I: testing methods for agricultural nets,” Polymer Testing, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 822–832, 2007. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus
  5. A. M. Abdel-Ghany and I. M. Al-Helal, β€œCharacterization of solar radiation transmission through plastic shading nets,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 1371–1378, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus
  6. A. M. Abdel-Ghany and I. M. Al-Helal, β€œAnalysis of solar radiation transfer: a method to estimate the porosity of a plastic shading net,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1755–1762, 2011. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus
  7. S. Hemming, G. L. A. M. Swinkels, S. Castellano, G. Russo, and G. M. Scarascia, β€œNumerical model to estimate the radiometric performance of net covered structures (AGRONETS),” in Proceedings of the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering for a Sustainable World (AgEng '08), Crete, Greece, June 2008.
  8. I. M. Al-Helal and A. M. Abdel-Ghany, β€œMeasuring and evaluating solar radiative properties of plastic shading nets,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 677–683, 2011. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus
  9. I. M. Al-Helal and A. M. Abdel-Ghany, β€œResponses of plastic shading nets to global and diffuse PAR transfer: optical properties and evaluation,” Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 125–132, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus
  10. A. M. Abdel-Ghany, T. Kozai, and C. Chun, β€œEvaluation of selected greenhouse covers for use in regions with a hot climate,” Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, vol. 45, pp. 242–250, 2001.
  11. L. He, T. H. Short, and X. Yang, β€œSolar radiation transmittance of a double-walled acrylic pellet-insulated greenhouse,” Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 2559–2563, 1991. View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Duffie and W. A. Beckman, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1991.
  13. M. M. Elsayed, I. S. Taha, and J. A. Sabbagh, Design of Solar Thermal Systems, Scientific Publishing Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 1st edition, 1994.
  14. S. S. Soulayman, Z. Nassif, and A. Harfoush, β€œTransmittance, reflectance and absorptance of multi-plate planar window,” Renewable Energy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 1991. View at Scopus
  15. A. M. Abdel-Ghany, T. Kozai, C. Kubota, and I. S. Taha, β€œInvestigation of the spectral optical properties of the liquid radiation filters for using in the greenhouse application,” Japan Journal of Agriculture Meteorology, vol. 57, pp. 11–19, 2001.