About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 548280, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/548280
Review Article

A New Insight into Hepatitis C Vaccine Development

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1 Chang-Te Street, Taipei 100, Taiwan

Received 14 December 2009; Revised 25 February 2010; Accepted 5 April 2010

Academic Editor: Zhengguo Xiao

Copyright © 2010 Chun I Yu and Bor-Luen Chiang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a serious burden to public health worldwide. Currently, HCV-infected patients could undergo antiviral therapy by giving pegylated IFN- with ribavirin. However, this therapy is only effective in around 50% of patients with HCV genotype 1, which accounts for more than 70% of all HCV infection, and it is not well tolerated for most patients. Moreover, there is no vaccine available. The efforts on identifying protective immunity against HCV have progressed recently. Neutralizing antibodies and robust T cell responses including both and have been shown to be related to the clearance of HCV, which have shed lights on the potential success of HCV vaccines. There are many vaccines developed and tested before entering clinical trials. Here, we would first discuss strategies of viral immune evasion and correlates of protective host immunity and finally review some prospective vaccine approaches against chronic HCV infection.

1. Introduction

More than 170 million people are currently affected by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection worldwide with the highest prevalence in Africa and Asia [13]. Since the adoption of the all volunteer blood donor system to screen blood donations in 1990s, the incidence of HCV infection has dropped dramatically. However, some populations remain highly susceptible including drug users sharing the same devices and patients that have received unsafe therapeutic injection or unsafe blood transfer [4]. Among all HCV infected individuals, 80% of them remain chronically infected [4, 5], 10%–20% of them develop cirrhosis, and 1%–5% of them acquire liver cancer over years [6]. Therefore, previous incidence as well as new incidence all account for future disease burdens. In developed countries, HCV infection has became the leading cause for the failure of liver transplants [1]. Up until now, there is no vaccine available for HCV infection. HCV-infected patients could receive anti-viral therapy by giving pegylated interferon- (PEG-IFN) with ribavirin [7]. However, this therapy is long, expensive, toxic, and only effective in around 50% of patients for the most common genotype [8]. A regimen of 48-week therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin costing $25,000 USD is recommended for HCV genotype 1 and 24-week therapy for HCV genotype 2/3 [9]. There are many side effects associated with PEG-IFN, which have lead to early withdrawals or dose modification, including neutropenia, flu-like symptoms, neuropsychiatric disorders like depression, and autoimmune syndromes like autoimmune thyroiditis [8]. A sustained virological response (SVR) representing long lasting disappearance of viral RNA in the serum can be achieved in 80%–90% of genotype 2/3 but only around 40%–50% of genotype 1 [10, 11], which accounts for more than 70% of HCV infection in US [12, 13]. Therefore, the development of effective vaccines for HCV, especially therapeutic, is crucial in controlling chronic HCV infection.

HCV is an RNA virus with enveloped virion belonging to the family Flaviviridae. It contains a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome that is 9,600 nucleotides in length. HCV genomic RNA is composed of one open-reading frame flanked by and noncoding region. The HCV polyprotein encoded by the only open-reading frame is approximately 3,000 amino acids in length and is cleaved into three structure proteins (core, E1, and E2), and seven nonstructural proteins (p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B) [14]. According to international standardization and coordination of the nomenclature of variants of hepatitis C virus, HCV is classified into 6 clades or genotypes with 31%–33% diversity in nucleotide based on partial sequences of core/E1 and NS5B, or complete sequences. Each genotype is further divided into different subtypes with 20%–25% differences (Table 1) [15]. The importance of HCV genotype lies in its geographical distribution and treatment response to PEG-IFN and ribavirin [8]. Due to the low-fidelity of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, NS5A, in viral replication, there are many quasispecies within one infected individual [16]. Primarily HCV infects hepatocytes of humans and chimpanzees. Various molecules including CD81 [17], scavenger receptor class B type I [18], Claudin-1 [19], low density lipoprotein receptor [20], and glycosaminoglycan [21] have been shown to be the receptors for HCV. The recent discovered receptor, occludin, however, is the crucial factor allowing HCV replication in mice [22].

tab1
Table 1: HCV genotypes, subtypes, and their geographical distributions.

The studies on HCV evasion from host immunity and host immunity in HCV patients that have spontaneously recovered have allowed us to address important immunological parameters related to protective immunity. Spontaneous recovery has been linked to multifunctional cells, cross-genotype cytotoxic cells, as well as cross-genotype neutralizing antibodies. These studies have advanced our understanding on protective immunity against HCV and provide a blueprint for HCV vaccine developments. There were many vaccines developed and tested in preclinical setting in the past. Among them, several vaccines have now advanced to clinical trials. Herein, we would examine the immune evasion strategies used by HCV, discuss correlates of successful host immunity against HCV infection, and review some prospective therapeutic vaccines to chronic HCV infection.

2. Immune Evasion by HCV

HCV can target many different effectors of the immune system, which enables its escape from host immune surveillance and ultimately leads to chronic infection. HCV can inhibit IFN- production, inhibit NK activity, and produce escape mutants from antibody and cell recognition. All these have aided to the development of chronic HCV infection.

Double-stranded RNA expressed by many RNA viruses during replication could be recognized by host pathogen-recognition receptors, such as TLR3 and RNA helicases (RIG-I and MDA-5), which lead to anti-viral responses. The recognition of dsRNA by TLR3 triggers its signalling pathways. In addition to the MyD88-dependent pathway, the MyD88-independent pathway leads to phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) through adaptor protein TRIF [2325]. The activation of transcription factor IRF-3 subsequently induces type 1 IFN production and other genes involved in host defence [26]. By comparison, RIG-I activates IRF-3 for type I IFN production through another pathway required a CARD-containing adaptor protein, Cardif. During replication, HCV NS3-4A protease recognizes and cleaves both TRIF and Cardif, which blocks the signalling pathways of TLR3 and RIG-I and ultimately inhibits the production of type I IFN [2729].

The lack of type I IFN production in patients chronically infected with HCV may indirectly lead to a decrease in NK cell activity. Activated NK cells are important effectors in innate immunity against viral infection through the secretion of inflammatory cytokines like IFN- or the cytolytic ability like antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) [30]. Type I IFN activates DCs which subsequently prime NK cells via the production and transpresentation of IL-15 [31, 32]. Thus, the lack of type I IFN production might have led to the lack of IL-15 production present in the serum, which eventually causes the decrease in total number of NK cells, especially cytotoxic NK cells, in chronic HCV- infected patients [33, 34].

Antibody responses may not be sufficient to protect individuals from HCV infection since neutralizing antibodies are rarely found in acute HCV patients but are found in the majority of chronically infected patients at relatively high titers ( 320) [35, 36]. The failure of neutralizing antibodies in controlling HCV infection could be caused by several different factors. HCV can bind to very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), which facilitates the uptake of HCV by hepatocytes via the interaction between ApoB and scavenger receptor class B type I, helping HCV avoid recognition by neutralizing antibodies [37]. E2 is highly glycosylated with 11 N-linked glycans located at the conserved region outside hypervariable region 1 (HVR1), which is targeted by most antibodies. These glycosylation sites are conserved across all HCV genotypes and subtypes. Three glycans located at the CD81-binding site of E2 decrease its immunogenicity and eventually protect viruses from antibody neutralization [38]. HCV can also infect surrounding cells through a direct cell-cell contact mediated by CD81 and Claudin-1, which can also avoid itself from the clearance of neutralizing antibodies [39]. Moreover, HCV can evolve into many quasispecies representing closely related but heterogenous RNA sequences within one individual during the course of infection. The number of quasispecies identified within a single sample ranges between 3–10 variants and the sequence variation occurs mainly in the HVR1 [4042]. Studies following the evolution of HCV in one single patient well illustrated the development of quasispecies in chronic patients. Neutralizing antibodies to broad genotypes of HCV caused by continuous mounting immune response to evolving HCV could be detected in this patient. However, these antibodies could not neutralize the dominant HCV isolate from this patient at the time of sample collection. Therefore, the antibody response failed to resolve HCV infection [41]. Furthermore, the presence of interference antibodies could diminish the function of true neutralizing antibodies. Two important epitopes located at E2 envelope glycoprotein have been identified (Table 2). Whereas epitope I located at residue 412–426 is an important neutralizing site and conserved between different genotypes, epitope II at 434–446 varies among different genotypes and generates antibodies interfering with the antibody to epitope I. When analysing the appearance of antibodies specific to these two epitopes, chronic HCV patients developed antibodies to nonprotective epitope II first. The appearance of antibodies to protective epitope I only appeared at very late time point together with equal abundant interference antibodies. Indeed, when antibodies specific to epitope II were depleted from patient plasma, this plasma, which contained antibodies to epitope I, could now provide better neutralizing capacity to a variety of genotypes [43]. In addition to the constant mutation occurred in HCV, the induction of interfering antibodies is yet another strategy of HCV to escape from immune response. Since these interference antibodies appear earlier than the protective antibodies, a vaccine effective in generating antibodies to epitope I would be critical against HCV infection.

tab2
Table 2: Important epitopes of HCV recognized by T cells and B cells.

The emergence of escape mutations in cell epitopes requires a balance between virus infectivity and host immune response. The low-fidelity of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, NS5A, is generally known to be the reason for the emerging of many quasispecies within HCV- infected individuals [16]. The rapid accumulation of mutated variants could be tracked back to the slow immune response generated against HCV, which has allowed many mutations to accumulate in vivo [40, 44]. The emerging of mutational variants in cell epitopes has been carefully described both in chimpanzees [44, 45] and in humans [4648]. Firstly, when the mutation rate was analysed, amino acid substitutions within cell epitopes occurred more frequently compared to other regions [47]. Secondly, the lack of cell help in chronic phase has prevented the effectiveness of cells to clear the virus [49]. When chimpanzees with resolving HCV infection were rechallenged after cell depletion, they developed chronic HCV infection. The inability of HCV- specific cells to control HCV viremia correlated with the emerging of mutations in cell epitopes. Therefore, these ineffective cells have provided the selective pressure on shaping mutational variants of HCV. Recently, studies analysing different HCV variants within one chronically infected individual have shown that some HCV variants were actually emerging early during acute infection. Despite poor viral production while infecting hepatocytes, these variants survived due to poor recognition by host cells [50]. Therefore, a fine balance between virus infectivity and host immune response could shape HCV mutants present in chronically infected individuals.

3. Protective Immunity to HCV

Despite the ineffectiveness of the host immune system to eradicate HCV, studies on patients that have spontaneously recovered from HCV infection and vaccinated chimpanzees that have recovered from HCV challenge have allowed us to address the important immunological correlates related to HCV clearance. Some reports have shown that the clearance of HCV could be associated with certain host genetic background including host HLA types, cytokine and chemokine expression (e.g., IL-10, IL-28B, and CCR5) [5156]. For example, HCV clearance is often linked to patients with HLA-B27 allele in their MHC class I locus [55, 57]. Since MHC class I is directly associated with antigen presentation to cells, this implies the importance of cytotoxic T cells in HCV eradication. Many studies published recently have provided critical immune parameters on protective immunity against HCV.

cells are the most important effectors in controlling HCV infection. It was first recognized in earlier studies analysing acute HCV infection in chimpanzees. Few chimpanzees have resolved HCV spontaneously while most of them became chronically infected. When comparing these two groups of chimpanzees for the development of neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic cells, spontaneously recovered chimpanzees exhibited a strong cell response toward multiple viral epitopes and across multiple MHC class I restrictions (Table 2) [58]. When these spontaneously recovered chimpanzees were challenged with HCV for the second time, they recovered more rapidly, within 14 days compared to 40 days in primary infection. Specific cell number inversely correlated with HCV viral load in the blood. Additionally when cells were depleted before the third challenge, a prolonged HCV infection was observed [59]. This was further supported by similar findings in human studies. When patients with chronic HCV infection were investigated, a general lack of broad specificity and cytotoxicity in cells toward HCV epitopes was observed (Table 2) [60]. A more detailed study on HLA-matched individuals with chronic infection or spontaneously resolving infection was set to investigate the breadth, magnitude, phenotype, and function of HCV-specific cells. Individuals with resolved HCV infection contained stronger cell responses (17/20 versus 9/20; ) and specific cells to broader range of epitopes (Table 2; mean 2.3 versus 1; ) with higher frequency in circulation (mean 584 versus 95 per 1 million PBMC; ) measured by IFN- secretion in response to HCV peptides [61]. These specific cells proliferated vigorously in response to antigens and expressed memory phenotype [60, 61]. Notably a predominant expression of IL-7 receptor (CD127) on HCV-specific cells was identified in patients who recovered from infection [62]. Additionally cross-genotype cells could limit the escape of HCV and help the clearance of viruses [57]. Thus, a robust multispecific and cross-genotype cell response to different epitopes implies a successful response against HCV infection.

Robust cells with broad specificity and function predict a spontaneous recovery in individuals with acute HCV infection. helper cells are important in shaping adaptive immune effectors like B cells and cells. Even with the critical role of cells in controlling HCV infection, a broad specificity of cells to HCV could be found in some patients with chronic HCV infection [63]. The difference between spontaneous resolving and chronic persistence seems to lie on the quality of the cell response [6265]. When studying the specificity of cells in acute HCV infected individuals, individuals with spontaneously resolving HCV infection have cells specific to many different HCV epitopes compared to chronically infected individuals (Table 2) [62, 66, 67]. A similar study was reported in patients responding to IFN- treatment (Table 2) [68]. When the function of cells was analysed, multifunctional cells with the capacity to secrete IL-2 and IFN- seemed to correlate better with HCV clearance during acute HCV infection. In contrast, acute HCV- infected individuals became chronically infected when their specific cells secreted no IL-2 [62, 65]. Therefore, multi-specific cells capable of secreting IL-2 and IFN- are critical in the generation of quality cell responses necessary for HCV eradication.

In spite of the general lack of protection with neutralizing antibodies to HCV, cross-genotype neutralizing antibodies seem to render protection against HCV infection. HCV-infected patients can develop anti-HCV antibodies to HCV core, NS3, NS4, and NS5 proteins as measured by a third generation of anti-HCV assays [69]. Neutralizing antibodies to HCV, however, are detected using E1 and E2 expressing HCV pseudotype particles (HCVpp) [35]. Since E1 and E2 proteins are present on the surface of HCV virions and are critical for viral entry into hepatocytes, specific antibodies to certain E1 and E2 regions, mostly IgG isotype, have neutralizing capacity [35, 36, 70]. New findings using human monoclonal antibodies derived from HCV infected patients demonstrated that specific antibodies against certain E1 and E2 epitopes have in vitro cross-genotype neutralizing capacity to HCVpp (Table 2) [7072]. In addition, when these cross-genotype neutralizing antibodies were given to humanized mice following intravenous HCV challenge, these antibodies could offer passive protection and prevent HCV replication in vivo [72]. Furthermore, a study on intravenous drug users with resolved HCV infection demonstrated the contribution of broad neutralizing antibodies in HCV clearance. When these individuals with resolving infection experienced a secondary HCV infection, the majority of them (83%) would clear the virus spontaneously compared to 25% of them in primary infection. When the specificity of neutralizing antibodies was analysed, neutralizing antibodies reacting to a broad range of genotypes were found in patients spontaneously recovered instead of those who became chronically infected [73].

Studies on patients responding to IFN- -based therapy have revealed the importance of innate immunity in HCV clearance. Several genome-wide association studies on chronic HCV-infected patients have identified a strong genetic association of IL28B gene, which encoded for IFN- , on the responsiveness to standard IFN- and ribavirin therapy. Three different studies analysing patient populations at Australian [74], Japan [75], and United States [56, 76] have demonstrated that the polymorphism at the upstream of IL28B is associated strongly with sustained virological response. Patients with genotype expressing more IL28 mRNA respond better to standard IFN therapy. This genetic variation of IL28B has also been shown to be associated with individuals who were infected by HCV and experienced spontaneously viral clearance [56]. When different geographic populations are compared, C allele (rs 12979860) occurs most often in individuals from Asia, then Europe, and least common from Africa origin. Since 36.4% of non-Africa individuals and only 9.3% of Africa individuals spontaneously clear HCV, it further confirms the association of C allele to HCV clearance [76]. IFN- together with IFN- (IL-29) and IFN- (IL-28B), which act through the receptor complex consisting of IL-28R and IL-10R and then signal through JAK/STAT pathway, has very similar anti-viral effects as type I interferon (IFN- and IFN- ). Although the importance of IFN- on the immune system to combat HCV infection remains mostly unknown, IFN- can inhibit HCV replication in hepatoma cells (Huh-7.5) [77]. In addition, IFN- can enhance antiviral activities of IFN- and vice versa, which suggest the possible mechanism of IL-28B polymorphism in the responsiveness of PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy [77, 78]. A pilot study on chronic HCV patients received pegylated IFN- alone or with ribavirin has showed some promising results in HCV RNA reduction after 4 weekly subcutaneous injections [79]. Overall, these data suggest the benefit of IFN- in controlling HCV infection.

4. Vaccine Approach

The development of vaccines against HCV has been hampered greatly by the availability of research tools. Due to the limited tissue tropism and host selection, HCV could be generated in vitro in tissue culture system only very recently. Without tissue culture techniques, there would not have been enough viruses for vaccine antigens and immunological bioassay. The development of HCV pseudotype particles by genetically expressing & in retrovirus vector [80] has successfully filled the gap before the discovery of cell culture HCV (HCVcc) [17]. Moreover, it facilitates the identification of various receptors for HCV entry. Currently, various vaccines are primarily tested in chimpanzees and humans. Through the identification of different receptors for HCV entry, it allows the construction of a humanized mouse model, which expresses HCV entry receptors like occludin [22]. Although it is still early in the development, the availability of small animal models could accelerate the preclinical screening for potential vaccine candidates.

After the diagnostic kits for HCV became available, the implementation of HCV screening during blood transfusions and organ transplants has dramatically decreased the numbers of new cases of HCV infection. However, chronic HCV infection still presents in many individuals. This emphasizes the importance of therapeutic vaccination against HCV infection. One of the challenges dealing with chronic infection is to rescue impaired T cells. Thus, the goals of therapeutic vaccines are to generate broad and multi-specific cells, to activate cytotoxic cells and finally to generate cross-genotype neutralizing antibodies. Due to the variability of HCV, a combination approach including vaccination, anti-viral therapy or immune modulation might be necessary. Many vaccines have been tested by both nonprofit and profit organizations. Most of them are still at preclinical stage with some advanced into phase I or II trials to determine safety and efficacy of the candidate vaccines in a small group of patients. Earlier vaccine approaches aiming to generate neutralizing antibodies against E1 failed to show efficacy in chronic HCV patients in spite of its effect on antibody production. Consequently, the recombinant E1 with alum adjuvanted vaccine has been discontinued after an unsatisfactory outcome in its phase II trial [88]. Therefore, most of HCV vaccines are focused on generating cytotoxic cells in addition to antibody responses. Different vaccines have been developed over years including epitope vaccines, vector vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines, and DNA vaccines. A review on the progress and efficacy of vaccines currently in clinical trials is summarized in Table 3.

tab3
Table 3: Main vaccines in clinical trials for HCV.
4.1. Epitope Vaccines

HCV peptide-based vaccines with different adjuvants are among the earliest vaccines aiming to induce Th1 and cytotoxic T cell response in chronic HCV patients. One of these, IC41, contains 5 conservative peptides from core, NS3 and NS4 proteins, which are conserved within HCV genotype 1 and 2, and include 4 known HLA-A2 epitopes and 3 promiscuous epitopes. In a randomized, dose escalating phase I trial, 128  - healthy volunteers received 4 subcutaneous vaccinations every 4 weeks. IC41 adjuvanted with poly-L-arginine was well tolerated by these healthy volunteers [89]. When this vaccine was given to 60 chronic HCV nonresponders, there were 67% of patients with specific T cell proliferation, 33% with specific IFN- -secreting cells, and 25% with specific IFN- -secreting cells. Three responders with the strongest IFN- -secreting T cells had a transient decline in serum HCV RNA ( 1 log) [81]. Since the response was not efficient in controlling HCV viral load, IC41 would require further modifications by using more intense regimens and stronger adjuvants or could be incorporated into the combination therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin [90]. Other two peptide vaccines composed of peptides derived from conservative region of HCV with ISA51, an emulsified incomplete Freud adjuvant, were shown to be safe in HCV-infected patients [82, 91]. Preliminarily, 26 patients received subcutaneous injection of a conserved peptide derived from HCV core (C35-44, YLLPRRGPRL) biweekly. 15 of 25 patients showed an increase in peptide-specific cell response measured by IFN- production and 2 patients demonstrated 1 log decrease in HCV viral load after 12 vaccinations. The clinical efficacy would require further validation in phase II trial [82]. In addition, another phase I trial with virosome-based vaccine containing NS3 peptides derived from HCV is ongoing. It is a single-blinded placebo-controlled randomised trial with 30 healthy volunteers to evaluate dose-dependent safety and vaccine-induced immune response (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00445419). No data from this clinical study have been released at this time. Overall, the response with peptide-based vaccines shows good tolerability but their efficacy remains to be optimised.

4.2. Vector Vaccines

HCV vaccines delivered by attenuated virus vectors could induce effective and cell responses. Modified Virus of Ankara (MVA), a highly attenuated poxvirus strain, is immunogenic and safe compared to other strains of poxvirus due to the lack of several genes coding for immunomodulatory proteins, such as the soluble receptors for IFN- , type I IFN, TNF- , and CC-chemokines [92]. It has been used in several different vaccine designs, such as HIV, tuberculosis, colorectal cancer, and melanoma [9396]. Owing to its high immunogenicity and cross-reactivity, individuals immunized with vaccinia virus or MVA-based vaccines have a strong antivector response. However, this preexisting immunity would not affect the induction of immunity against vectored antigens despite lower amount of specific T cells and antibodies to vectored antigens were observed [97]. Vaccines based on MVA vector expressing HCV antigens including NS3, NS4, and NS5B have been shown to induce IFN- -secreting cells and specific cells capable of secreting IFN- and killing in vitro and in vivo when tested in HLA-A2.1 and HLA-B7.2 transgenic mice [98]. The phase I trial in 15 chronic HCV patients who received 3 weekly injections demonstrated that MVA-HCV (TG4040) was well tolerated, and 6 of 15 patients showed a decline in HCV viral load (0.5–1.4 log) associated with significant increase in IFN- -secreting T cells [83]. Currently, a phase II trial has been proposed to treat chronic HCV patients in combinational therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin.

4.3. Recombinant Protein Vaccines

Recombinant HCV proteins require a strong Th1 adjuvant in order to generate specific T cell response to HCV. HCV E1/E2 glycoproteins emulsified with MF59, a proprietary oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant, have shown to induce a strong C cell response with significant production of neutralizing antibodies to E1 and E2 in nonhuman primates [99]. No information has been released from one double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized trial with 60 healthy volunteers to evaluate dose-dependent safety and vaccine-induced immune response (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00500747). The vaccine, GI-5005, designed to treat chronic HCV infection is containing heat-killed yeast cells expressing conserved NS3-core fusion protein. Because of its yeast components, this vaccine can induce robust and cytotoxic cell responses. In preclinical studies, vaccinated mice exhibited strong Th1 with IL-2 and IFN- production and cytotoxic activity to NS3 and core proteins measured by in vitro killing assay and in vivo tumor challenge experiment. Biweekly repeated administration could effectively improve their specific immune response [100]. With this successful pre-clinical result, phase I trial has also demonstrated its safety and shown to induce immune response in chronic HCV patients [101]. Phase II trial was designed to compare a combined therapy with GI-5005 and PEG-IFN/ribavirin to PEG-IFN/ribavirin alone in chronic HCV patients. At the end of 48-week treatment, patients received GI-5005 and PEG-IFN/ribavirin had 74% of response rate determined by HCV RNA less than 25 IU/mL in contrast to 59% without GI-5005. In addition, clinical tests have suggested a better liver function by ALT normalization after the combined therapy [84]. Another vaccine based on conserved HCV core protein is adjuvanted with ISCOMATRIX, an adjuvant composed of saponin, cholesterol, and phospholipid to form sphere particles with 40  in diameter. The first phase I trial in 30 healthy volunteers provided the evidence for its safety and tolerability. As to the efficacy measured by immune response, 8 volunteers who received the highest antigen dose, 50  , all showed antibody response to core protein, 7 with cytokine-producing T cells, and 2 with cell responses measurable by intracellular IFN- staining [85]. A phase Ib trial is prepared to evaluate its safety and immune response in chronic HCV- infected patients.

4.4. DNA Vaccines

DNA vaccines using naked DNA delivered by electroporation have been designed to treat chronic HCV patients. Due to the heterogeneity of HCV subtypes in most chronically infected patients, a DNA vaccine was designed to include the most conserved region including NS3 and NS4A. Through extensive codon modification, the DNA can be effectively expressed in vivo and elicit a Th1 response and cytotoxic response. These primed cells could effectively eliminate NS3/4A expressing hepatocytes and tumor cells in mouse model [102, 103]. This DNA vaccine (ChronVac-c) has been given to 12 patients with chronic HCV infection through intramuscular electroporation. Preliminary results suggested that the vaccine is safe and immunogenic after 4 monthly vaccinations. Two out of three patients received the highest dose of 1500  showed a decrease in serum HCV RNA (1.2 & 2.4 log). Moreover, after completing the vaccination, three patients who received standard IFN- -based therapy had an accelerated clearance in HCV viral load. Therefore, ChronVac-c has been proposed to treat chronic HCV patients in combination with standard IFN- -based therapy [86]. Another DNA vaccine currently in phase I clinical trial is CIGB-230, a mixture of recombinant HCV core protein and core/E1/E2-expressing plasmid DNA. Vaccination in 15 chronic HCV patients showed that this vaccine is safe, partially immunogenic, and able to stabilize liver histology despite persistent detection of HCV RNA [87].

The lessons from studying protective immunity against acute HCV infection have taught us the importance of multi-functional cells toward a broad spectrum of viral epitopes. With the help of these cells, the body can then generate functional cytotoxic T cells to eliminate virus-infected hepatocytes and produce neutralizing antibodies to prevent HCV from entering into uninfected cells [6264]. The prototype of ideal vaccine would have to meet these requirements. HCV E1/E2 glycoprotein emulsified with MF59 can induce a strong cell response and neutralizing antibody to E1 and E2 [99]. Vaccination with defective alphaviral particles with RNA encoding for HIV gag has shown to generate a strong gag-specific cell response [104]. Through different adjuvant and antigen combinations, Lin et al. [105] have formulated a prime-boost regimen. Mice were first primed with E1/E2 glycoprotein, CpG, and MF59 to induce robust Th1 response, and followed by the boost vaccination with defective alphaviral particles with RNA encoding for HCV E1/E2/NS3-5 to generate a strong cytotoxic cell response. With this protocol, mice also generated neutralizing antibodies to E1/E2 capable of neutralizing heterogeneous HCV isolates. Although this vaccine approach remains to be evaluated in other pre-clinical trials, this would set a prototype for the next generation of HCV vaccines.

5. Conclusion

Various immunological parameters favoring HCV clearance have gradually been identified. Together with the knowledge on the strategies deployed by HCV, we now have a good picture on the war against chronic HCV infection. The issue would lie on how to use the information in various vaccine platforms the scientists worldwide have built for years. In addition to vaccine development, efforts on developing anti-viral drugs are underway. Several targets for drug development have been proposed including NS3-4A serine protease, NS5B RdRp, HCV -NCR, HCV viral entry and fusion, and p7 ion channel. Among them, NS3-4A serine protease inhibitor has gone into clinical trial with edges on blocking viral replication and enhancing viral recognition by innate immunity. Since the nature of HCV in chronic infected patients is changeable, we would have to modify our strategy accordingly. A combination therapy including vaccination, anti-viral therapy like NS3-4A protease inhibitor, and immune modulation like IFN- or IFN- would need to be tailored to meet individual requirements. With the help of NS3-4A protease inhibitor, antigen-presenting cells, especially DCs and Kupffer cells, and infected hepatocytes can now sense HCV infection by TLR3 and RIG-I pathways, which consequently activates innate and adaptive immune responses. Since the immune response to HCV is skewed in chronic HCV patients, it can be redirected toward Th1 and cytotoxic T cell responses through the work of vaccines and immune modulators. Hence, the availability of multiple vaccines and treatment options is critical in treating chronic HCV patients.

References

  1. C. W. Shepard, L. Finelli, and M. J. Alter, “Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection,” Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 558–567, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. G.-L. Xia, C.-B. Liu, H.-L. Cao, et al., “Prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections in the general Chinese population. Results from a nationwide cross-sectional seroepidemiologic study of hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E virus infections in China, 1992,” International Hepatology Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 62–73, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Frank, M. K. Mohamed, G. T. Strickland, et al., “The role of parenteral antischistosomal therapy in the spread of hepatitis C virus in Egypt,” Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9207, pp. 887–891, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. J. Alter, “Hepatitis C virus infection in the United States,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 88–91, 1999. View at Scopus
  5. G. L. Armstrong, A. Wasley, E. P. Simard, G. M. McQuillan, W. L. Kuhnert, and M. J. Alter, “The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 144, no. 10, pp. 705–714, 2006. View at Scopus
  6. M. J. Tong, N. S. El-Farra, A. R. Reikes, and R. L. Co, “Clinical outcomes after transfusion-associated hepatitis C,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, no. 22, pp. 1463–1466, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. Di Bisceglie, J. Thompson, N. Smith-Wilkaitis, E. M. Brunt, and B. R. Bacon, “Combination of interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C: re-treatment of nonresponders to interferon,” Hepatology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 704–707, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. M. P. Manns, H. Wedemeyer, and M. Cornberg, “Treating viral hepatitis C: efficacy, side effects, and complications,” Gut, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1350–1359, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. S. D. Sullivan, D. M. Jensen, D. E. Bernstein, et al., “Cost-effectiveness of combination peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin compared with interferon α-2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 1490–1496, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. M. P. Manns, J. G. McHutchison, S. C. Gordon, et al., “Peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon α-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial,” Lancet, vol. 358, no. 9286, pp. 958–965, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. W. Fried, M. L. Shiffman, K. R. Reddy, et al., “Peginterferon α-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 13, pp. 975–982, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. O. V. Nainan, M. J. Alter, D. Kruszon-Moran, et al., “Hepatitis C virus genotypes and viral concentrations in participants of a general population survey in the United States,” Gastroenterology, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 478–484, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. L. M. Blatt, M. G. Mutchnick, M. J. Tong, et al., “Assessment of hepatitis C virus RNA and genotype from 6807 patients with chronic hepatitis C in the United States,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 196–202, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Tang and H. Grise, “Cellular and molecular biology of HCV infection and hepatitis,” Clinical Science, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 49–65, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. P. Simmonds, J. Bukh, C. Combet, et al., “Consensus proposals for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes,” Hepatology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 962–973, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. J. Bukh, R. H. Miller, and R. H. Purcell, “Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus: quasispecies and genotypes,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–63, 1995. View at Scopus
  17. B. D. Lindenbach, M. J. Evans, A. J. Syder, et al., “Complete replication of hepatitis C virus in cell culture,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5734, pp. 623–626, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. E. Scarselli, H. Ansuini, R. Cerino, et al., “The human scavenger receptor class B type I is a novel candidate receptor for the hepatitis C virus,” EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 5017–5025, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. J. Evans, T. von Hahn, D. M. Tscherne, et al., “Claudin-1 is a hepatitis C virus co-receptor required for a late step in entry,” Nature, vol. 446, no. 7137, pp. 801–805, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. V. Agnello, G. Abel, M. Elfahal, G. B. Knight, and Q.-X. Zhang, “Hepatitis C virus and other flaviviridae viruses enter cells via low density lipoprotein receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 22, pp. 12766–12771, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Germi, J.-M. Crance, D. Garin, et al., “Cellular glycosaminoglycans and low density lipoprotein receptor are involved in hepatitis C virus adsorption,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 206–215, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. A. Ploss, M. J. Evans, V. A. Gaysinskaya, et al., “Human occludin is a hepatitis C virus entry factor required for infection of mouse cells,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7231, pp. 882–886, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. M. Yamamoto, S. Sato, H. Hemmi, et al., “Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent Toll-like receptor signaling pathway,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5633, pp. 640–643, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. M. Yamamoto, S. Sato, K. Mori, et al., “Cutting edge: a novel Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adapter that preferentially activates the IFN-β promoter in the Toll-like receptor signaling,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 12, pp. 6668–6672, 2002. View at Scopus
  25. S. E. Doyle, S. A. Vaidya, R. O'Connell, et al., “IRF3 mediates a TLR3/TLR4-specific antiviral gene program,” Immunity, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 251–263, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Sato, H. Suemori, N. Hata, et al., “Distinct and essential roles of transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7 in response to viruses for IFN-α/β gene induction,” Immunity, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 539–548, 2000. View at Scopus
  27. K. Li, E. Foy, J. C. Ferreon, et al., “Immune evasion by hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease-mediated cleavage of the Toll-like receptor 3 adaptor protein TRIF,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 2992–2997, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. J. C. Ferreon, A. C. M. Ferreon, K. Li, and S. M. Lemon, “Molecular determinants of TRIF proteolysis mediated by the hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 21, pp. 20483–20492, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. E. Meylan, J. Curran, K. Hofmann, et al., “Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG-I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7062, pp. 1167–1172, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. L. L. Lanier, “Evolutionary struggles between NK cells and viruses,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 259–268, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. M. Lucas, W. Schachterle, K. Oberle, P. Aichele, and A. Diefenbach, “Dendritic cells prime natural killer cells by trans-presenting interleukin 15,” Immunity, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 503–517, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. E. F. Castillo, S. W. Stonier, L. Frasca, et al., “Dendritic cells support the in vivo development and maintenance of NK cells via IL-15 trans-presentation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 8, pp. 4948–4956, 2009.
  33. U.-C. Meier, R. E. Owen, E. Taylor, et al., “Shared alterations in NK cell frequency, phenotype, and function in chronic human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infections,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 19, pp. 12365–12374, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. L. Golden-Mason, L. Madrigal-Estebas, E. McGrath, et al., “Altered natural killer cell subset distributions in resolved and persistent hepatitis C virus infection following single source exposure,” Gut, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1121–1128, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  35. B. Bartosch, J. Bukh, J.-C. Meunier, et al., “In vitro assay for neutralizing antibody to hepatitis C virus: evidence for broadly conserved neutralization epitopes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 24, pp. 14199–14204, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. C. Logvinoff, M. E. Major, D. Oldach, et al., “Neutralizing antibody response during acute and chronic hepatitis C virus infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 27, pp. 10149–10154, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. P. Maillard, T. Huby, U. Andreo, M. Moreau, J. Chapman, and A. Budkowska, “The interaction of natural hepatitis C virus with human scavenger receptor SR-BI/Cla1 is mediated by ApoB-containing lipoproteins,” FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 735–737, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. F. Helle, A. Goffard, V. Morel, et al., “The neutralizing activity of anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies is modulated by specific glycans on the E2 envelope protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 81, no. 15, pp. 8101–8111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  39. J. M. Timpe, Z. Stamataki, A. Jennings, et al., “Hepatitis C virus cell-cell transmission in hepatoma cells in the presence of neutralizing antibodies,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. P. Farci, A. Shimoda, A. Coiana, et al., “The outcome of acute hepatitis C predicted by the evolution of the viral quasispecies,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5464, pp. 339–344, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. von Hahn, J. C. Yoon, H. Alter, et al., “Hepatitis C virus continuously escapes from neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses during chronic infection in vivo,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 667–678, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  42. P. Farci, A. Shimoda, D. Wong, et al., “Prevention of hepatitis C virus infection in chimpanzees by hyperimmune serum against the hypervariable region 1 of the envelope 2 protein,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 26, pp. 15394–15399, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Zhang, L. Zhong, E. B. Struble, et al., “Depletion of interfering antibodies in chronic hepatitis C patients and vaccinated chimpanzees reveals broad cross-genotype neutralizing activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 18, pp. 7537–7541, 2009.
  44. A. L. Erickson, Y. Kimura, S. Igarashi, et al., “The outcome of hepatitis C virus infection is predicted by escape mutations in epitopes targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes,” Immunity, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 883–895, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Weiner, A. L. Erickson, J. Kansopon, et al., “Persistent hepatitis C virus infection in a chimpanzee is associated with emergence of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape variant,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 2755–2759, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Timm, G. M. Lauer, D. G. Kavanagh, et al., “CD8 epitope escape and reversion in acute HCV infection,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 200, no. 12, pp. 1593–1604, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  47. A. L. Cox, T. Mosbruger, Q. Mao, et al., “Cellular immune selection with hepatitis C virus persistence in humans,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 11, pp. 1741–1752, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. I. Tester, S. Smyk-Pearson, P. Wang, et al., “Immune evasion versus recovery after acute hepatitis C virus infection from a shared source,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 11, pp. 1725–1731, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. A. Grakoui, N. H. Shoukry, D. J. Woollard, et al., “HCV persistence and immune evasion in the absence of memory T cell help,” Science, vol. 302, no. 5645, pp. 659–662, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  50. L. Uebelhoer, J.-H. Han, B. Callendret, et al., “Stable cytotoxic T cell escape mutation in hepatitis C virus is linked to maintenance of viral fitness,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 9, Article ID e1000143, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. S. Knapp, B. J. W. Hennig, A. J. Frodsham, et al., “Interleukin-10 promoter polymorphisms and the outcome of hepatitis C virus infection,” Immunogenetics, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 362–369, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. A. Mangia, R. Santoro, M. Piattelli, et al., “IL-10 haplotypes as possible predictors of spontaneous clearance of HCV infection,” Cytokine, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 103–109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. A. Goulding, A. Murphy, G. MacDonald, et al., “The CCR5-Δ32 mutation: impact on disease outcome in individuals with hepatitis C infection from a single source,” Gut, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1157–1161, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  54. A. Mangia, R. Gentile, I. Cascavilla, et al., “HLA class II favors clearance of HCV infection and progression of the chronic liver damage,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 984–989, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. C. Neumann-Haefelin, S. McKiernan, S. Ward, et al., “Dominant influence of an HLA-B27 restricted CD8+ T cell response in mediating HCV clearance and evolution,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 563–572, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. D. L. Thomas, C. L. Thio, M. P. Martin, et al., “Genetic variation in IL28B and spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7265, pp. 798–801, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. E. Dazert, C. Neumann-Haefelin, S. Bressanelli, et al., “Loss of viral fitness and cross-recognition by CD8+ T cells limit HCV escape from a protective HLA-B27-restricted human immune response,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 376–386, 2009. View at Scopus
  58. S. Cooper, A. L. Erickson, E. J. Adams, et al., “Analysis of a successful immune response against hepatitis C virus,” Immunity, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 439–449, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. N. H. Shoukry, A. Grakoui, M. Houghton, et al., “Memory CD8+ T cells are required for protection from persistent hepatitis C virus infection,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 12, pp. 1645–1655, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. H. Wedemeyer, X.-S. He, M. Nascimbeni, et al., “Impaired effector function of hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+ T cells in chronic hepatitis C virus infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 3447–3458, 2002. View at Scopus
  61. G. M. Lauer, E. Barnes, M. Lucas, et al., “High resolution analysis of cellular immune responses in resolved and persistent hepatitis C virus infection,” Gastroenterology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 924–936, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Urbani, B. Amadei, P. Fisicaro, et al., “Outcome of acute hepatitis C is related to virus-specific CD4 function and maturation of antiviral memory CD8 responses,” Hepatology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 126–139, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  63. D. E. Kaplan, K. Sugimoto, K. Newton, et al., “Discordant role of CD4 T-cell response relative to neutralizing antibody and CD8 T-cell responses in acute hepatitis C,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 654–666, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  64. S. Smyk-Pearson, I. A. Tester, J. Klarquist, et al., “Spontaneous recovery in acute human hepatitis C virus infection: functional T-cell thresholds and relative importance of CD4 help,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 1827–1837, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  65. N. Semmo, C. L. Day, S. M. Ward, et al., “Preferential loss of IL-2-secreting CD4+ T helper cells in chronic HCV infection,” Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1019–1028, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  66. J. Schulze zur Wiesch, G. M. Lauer, C. L. Day, et al., “Broad repertoire of the CD4+ Th cell response in spontaneously controlled hepatitis C virus infection includes dominant and highly promiscuous epitopes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 3603–3613, 2005. View at Scopus
  67. C. L. Day, N. P. Seth, M. Lucas, et al., “Ex vivo analysis of human memory CD4 T cells specific for hepatitis C virus using MHC class II tetramers,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 831–842, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J.-J. Lasarte, M. Garcia-Granero, A. Lopez, et al., “Cellular immunity to hepatitis C virus core protein and the response to interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C,” Hepatology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 815–822, 1998. View at Scopus
  69. J. M. Barrera, B. Francis, G. Ercilla, et al., “Improved detection of anti-HCV in post-transfusion hepatitis by a third-generation ELISA,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 1995. View at Scopus
  70. J.-C. Meunier, R. S. Russell, V. Goossens, et al., “Isolation and characterization of broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies to the E1 glycoprotein of hepatitis C virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 966–973, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  71. M. Perotti, N. Mancini, R. A. Diotti, et al., “Identification of a broadly cross-reacting and neutralizing human monoclonal antibody directed against the hepatitis C virus E2 protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 1047–1052, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  72. M. Law, T. Maruyama, J. Lewis, et al., “Broadly neutralizing antibodies protect against hepatitis C virus quasispecies challenge,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 25–27, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  73. W. O. Osburn, B. E. Fisher, K. A. Dowd, et al., “Spontaneous control of primary hepatitis C virus infection and immunity against persistent reinfection,” Gastroenterology, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 315–324, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  74. V. Suppiah, M. Moldovan, G. Ahlenstiel, et al., “IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-α and ribavirin therapy,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1100–1104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  75. Y. Tanaka, N. Nishida, M. Sugiyama, et al., “Genome-wide association of IL28B with response to pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1105–1109, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  76. D. Ge, J. Fellay, A. J. Thompson, et al., “Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7262, pp. 399–401, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  77. T. Marcello, A. Grakoui, G. Barba-Spaeth, et al., “Interferons α and λ inhibit hepatitis C virus replication with distinct signal transduction and gene regulation kinetics,” Gastroenterology, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1887–1898, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  78. H. Zhu, M. Butera, D. R. Nelson, and C. Liu, “Novel type I interferon IL-28A suppresses hepatitis C viral RNA replication,” Virology Journal, vol. 2, p. 80, 2005.
  79. A. J. Muir, M. Shiffman, A. Zaman, et al., “A phase 1b dose-ranging study of 4 weeks of PEG-interferon (IFN) lambda (PEG-rIL-29) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) in patients with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Boston, Mass, USA, October-November 2009.
  80. B. Bartosch, J. Dubuisson, and F.-L. Cosset, “Infectious hepatitis C virus pseudo-particles containing functional E1-E2 envelope protein complexes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 5, pp. 633–642, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. C. S. Klade, H. Wedemeyer, T. Berg, et al., “Therapeutic vaccination of chronic hepatitis C nonresponder patients with the peptide vaccine IC41,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 1385–1395, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  82. S. Yutani, N. Komatsu, S. Shichijo, et al., “Phase I clinical study of a peptide vaccination for hepatitis C virus-infected patients with different human leukocyte antigen-class I-A alleles,” Cancer Science, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1935–1942, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  83. F. Habersetzer, J.-P. Zarski, V. Leroy, et al., “A novel vectorized HCV therapeutic vaccine (TG4040): results of a phase I study in naive patients chronically infected by HCV,” in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL '09), Copenhagen, Denmark, April 2009.
  84. J. G. McHutchison, E. J. Lawitz, T. D Boyer, et al., “GI-5005 therapeutic vaccine plus PEG-IFN/Ribavirin improves end of treatment response at 48 weeks versus PEG-IFN/Ribavirin in naive genotype 1 chronic HCV patients,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, Boston, Mass, USA, October-November 2009.
  85. D. Drane, E. Maraskovsky, R. Gibson, et al., “Priming of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses using a HCV core ISCOMATRIX vaccine: a phase I study in healthy volunteers,” Human Vaccines, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 151–157, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. M. M. Sallberg, L. Frelin, H. Diepolder, et al., “A first clinical trial of therapeutic vaccination using naked DNA delivered by in vivo electroporation shows antiviral effects in patients with chronic hepatitis C,” in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver, Copenhagen, Denmark, April 2009.
  87. L. Alvarez-Lajonchere, N. H. Shoukry, B. Gra, et al., “Immunogenicity of CIGB-230, a therapeutic DNA vaccine preparation, in HCV-chronically infected individuals in a Phase I clinical trial,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 156–167, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  88. G. Leroux-Roels, A. H. Batens, I. Desombere, et al., “Immunogenicity and tolerability of intradermal administration of an HCV E1-based vaccine candidate in healthy volunteers and patients with resolved or ongoing chronic HCV infection,” Human Vaccines, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–65, 2005.
  89. C. Firbas, B. Jilma, E. Tauber, et al., “Immunogenicity and safety of a novel therapeutic hepatitis C virus (HCV) peptide vaccine: a randomized, placebo controlled trial for dose optimization in 128 healthy subjects,” Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 4343–4353, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  90. H. Wedemeyer, E. Schuller, V. Schlaphoff, et al., “Therapeutic vaccine IC41 as late add-on to standard treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 37, pp. 5142–5151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  91. S. Yutani, A. Yamada, K. Yoshida, et al., “Phase I clinical study of a personalized peptide vaccination for patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) 1b who failed to respond to interferon-based therapy,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 42, pp. 7429–7435, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  92. T. J. Blanchard, A. Alcamí, P. Andrea, and G. L. Smith, “Modified vaccinia virus Ankara undergoes limited replication in human cells and lacks several immunomodulatory proteins: implications for use as a human vaccine,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 1159–1167, 1998.
  93. A. Dangoor, P. Lorigan, U. Keilholz, et al., “Clinical and immunological responses in metastatic melanoma patients vaccinated with a high-dose poly-epitope vaccine,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 863–873, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. E. Sandstrom, C. Nilsson, B. Hejdeman, et al., “Broad immunogenicity of a multigene, multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine boosted with heterologous HIV-1 recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 198, no. 10, pp. 1482–1490, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  95. T. Hawkridge, T. J. Scriba, S. Gelderbloem, et al., “Safety and immunogenicity of a new tuberculosis vaccine, MVA85A, in healthy adults in South Africa,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 544–552, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  96. R. Harrop, N. Connolly, I. Redchenko, et al., “Vaccination of colorectal cancer patients with modified vaccinia Ankara delivering the tumor antigen 5T4 (TroVax) induces immune responses which correlate with disease control: a phase I/II trial,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 11, part 1, pp. 3416–3424, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  97. L. Gudmundsdotter, C. Nilsson, A. Brave, et al., “Recombinant Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) effectively boosts DNA-primed HIV-specific immune responses in humans despite pre-existing vaccinia immunity,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 33, pp. 4468–4474, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  98. A. Fournillier, E. Gerossier, A. Evlashev, et al., “An accelerated vaccine schedule with a poly-antigenic hepatitis C virus MVA-based candidate vaccine induces potent, long lasting and in vivo cross-reactive T cell responses,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 42, pp. 7339–7353, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  99. D. T. O'Hagan, M. Singh, C. Dong, et al., “Cationic microparticles are a potent delivery system for a HCV DNA vaccine,” Vaccine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 672–680, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  100. A. A. Haller, G. M. Lauer, T. H. King, et al., “Whole recombinant yeast-based immunotherapy induces potent T cell responses targeting HCV NS3 and Core proteins,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1452–1463, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  101. F. Habersetzer, T. F. Baumert, and F. Stoll-Keller, “GI-5005, a yeast vector vaccine expressing an NS3-core fusion protein for chronic HCV infection,” Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 456–462, 2009.
  102. L. Frelin, G. Ahlen, M. Alheim, et al., “Codon optimization and mRNA amplification effectively enhances the immunogenecity of the hepatitis C virus nonstructural 3/4A gene,” Gene Therapy, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 522–533, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  103. G. Ahlen, J. Nystrom, I. Pult, L. Frelin, C. Hultgren, and M. Sällberg, “In vivo clearance of hepatitis C virus nonstructural 3/4A-expressing hepatocytes by DNA vaccine-primed cytotoxic T lymphocytes,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 192, no. 12, pp. 2112–2116, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  104. S. Perri, C. E. Greer, K. Thudium, et al., “An alphavirus replicon particle chimera derived from Venezuelan equine encephalitis and Sindbis viruses is a potent gene-based vaccine delivery vector,” Journal of Virology, vol. 77, no. 19, pp. 10394–10403, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. Y. Lin, T. Kwon, J. Polo, et al., “Induction of broad CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses and cross-neutralizing antibodies against hepatitis C virus by vaccination with Th1-adjuvanted polypeptides followed by defective alphaviral particles expressing envelope glycoproteins gpE1 and gpE2 and nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 5,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 15, pp. 7492–7503, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus