- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 589048, 9 pages
Different Mechanisms of Inflammation Induced in Virus and Autoimmune-Mediated Models of Multiple Sclerosis in C57BL6 Mice
1Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research-Kolkata, Mohanpur, Nadia West Bengal 741252, India
2IISER Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Mohali 140306, India
3Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
4Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia PA 19107, USA
5University of Pennsylvania, Scheie Eye Institute and F.M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Received 7 April 2013; Accepted 1 July 2013
Academic Editor: Arianna Scuteri
Copyright © 2013 Abhinoy Kishore et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the human central nervous system (CNS). Neurotropic demyelinating strain of MHV (MHV-A59 or its isogenic recombinant strain RSA59) induces MS-like disease in mice mediated by microglia, along with a small population of T cells. The mechanism of demyelination is at least in part due to microglia-mediated myelin stripping, with some direct axonal injury. Immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) induces experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mainly CD4+ T-cell-mediated disease, although CD8+ T cells may play a significant role in demyelination. It is possible that both autoimmune and nonimmune mechanisms such as direct viral toxicity may induce MS. Our study directly compares CNS pathology in autoimmune and viral-induced MS models. Mice with viral-induced and EAE demyelinating diseases demonstrated similar patterns and distributions of demyelination that accumulated over the course of the disease. However, significant differences in acute inflammation were noted. Inflammation was restricted mainly to white matter at all times in EAE, whereas inflammation initially largely involved gray matter in acute MHV-induced disease and then is subsequently localized only in white matter in the chronic disease phase. The presence of dual mechanisms of demyelination may be responsible for the failure of immunosuppression to promote long-term remission in many MS patients.
Multiple sclerosis (MS), one of the most common neurological diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), is characterized by multifocal inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage [1–3]. It is believed to be an autoimmune disease in which exposure of genetically predisposed people to environmental factors triggers a breakdown in T-cell tolerance to myelin antigens. Most studies have focused on the pathogenic role of myelin-specific CD4+ T cells because of the relatively strong association of susceptibility to MS with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles [4–7], but there is also increasing recognition of the importance of CD8+ T cells in the pathogenesis of demyelination [8–10]. Conditions that lead to a loss of tolerance in myelin-specific T cells are not known. Viral infection has long been postulated to be an environmental trigger that contributes to the etiology of MS [11–14], although no specific virus has been confirmed as being a causative agent.
To better understand the structural-morphological diversity of MS, many studies use experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) induced by the MBP-PLP fusion protein MP4, MOG peptide 35–55, or PLP peptide 178–191 in mice, which, respectively, display distinct pathologies . Major differences between the models reside in regional/tract specificity, kinetics of demyelination, and motor neuron involvement. All three models of induced EAE in mice provide a reasonable strategy for reproducing distinct adaptive immune-mediated pathologic features of demyelination. Previous studies  showed that the MP4 model is characterized by coinfiltration of B cells, CD8+, CD4+ T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages, whereas in MOG- and PLP-induced models, CD4+ T cells and macrophages were the predominant cell types. It is generally accepted that in different EAE models, CD4+ T cells and macrophages are the predominant lesional cell types, while CD4+ T cells are the main effector cells.
Similarly, a few animal models exist in which viral infection triggers CNS demyelination such as Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) [16, 17] and neurotropic strains of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) [18–21]. Chronic viral-induced demyelination is associated with viral persistence [22, 23] and concomitant upregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens [24–28]. While studies suggest that an intact adaptive immune system is required to promote demyelination in many viral induced models, one neurotropic strain of MHV, MHV-A59, promotes demyelination even in the absence of B and T cells . Furthermore, depletion of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells after the acute phase of infection does not prevent demyelination . Thus, different related strains of MHV may induce demyelination via unique mechanisms, and it is likely that in the absence of an intact immune response, CNS infection with some strains of MHV is responsible for onset of axonal loss and demyelination, possibly through direct destruction of CNS cells .
While EAE is useful in dissecting the role of T-cell- mediated myelin damage, viral models are helpful in understanding direct CNS cellular injury and demyelination that does not require an intact immune system. EAE- and MHV-induced demyelinating diseases are widely used MS models. Such studies have utilized that differing genetic backgrounds, or similar genetic backgrounds may have been used but in different laboratories or at different times, thus limiting direct comparison of the models. While some similarities and differences in mechanisms of demyelination have been noted, it is not clear whether differences are due to the disease itself or due to genetic or environmental differences. In the current study, we compared EAE- and RSA59- (isogenic recombinant strain of MHV-A59)-induced neuroinflammation in the identical genetic background (C57BL/6) at the same time and in the same laboratory and directly compared the type and pattern of CNS inflammation.
2. Materials and Methods
Four-week- and eight-week-old virus-free C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All animal procedures and care were conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
2.2. Induction of EAE and Scoring of Clinical Symptoms
Eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were injected subcutaneously with 100 μg MOG35–55 peptide (MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK) [32, 33] in complete Freund’s adjuvant containing 4 mg/mL Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra (DIFCO, Michigan, USA) at two sites on the back. 200 ng pertussis toxins were given intraperitoneally on days 0 and 2 after immunization. Mice were scored daily for neurologic dysfunction according to a 0–5 scale as follows: partial limp tail, 0.5; full limp tail, 1; limp tail and waddling gait, 1.5; paralysis of one hind limb, 2; paralysis of one hind limb and partial paralysis of the other hind limb, 2.5; paralysis of both hind limbs, 3; ascending paralysis, 3.5; weakness of the upper limb, 4; moribund, 4.5; death, 5 [32, 33]. At different days after immunization, mice were sacrificed, and tissues were harvested for histology.
RSA59, an isogenic recombinant strain of MHV-A59, was used as previously described [31, 34, 35]. RSA59 expresses enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) which facilitates detection of viral antigen by fluorescence without tissue staining . Virulence was assessed in previous studies by calculating the lethal dose that killed 50% of mice (LD50). Mice were injected intracranially (i.c.) with serial 10-fold dilutions of viruses (five mice per dilution). Signs of disease or death were monitored on a daily basis up to 30 days after infection. LD50 values were calculated by the Reed-Muench method .
2.4. Inoculation of Mice
Four-week-old, MHV-free, C57BL/6 (B6) mice (Jackson Laboratory) were inoculated intracranially with 50% LD50 dose of RSA59 strain (20,000 PFU) as described previously .
Mice were monitored daily for signs of disease. Mock-infected controls were inoculated similarly but with an uninfected cell lysate at a comparable dilution. Animals were sacrificed (five mice per group) at day 3, 5, 7, and 30 after infections.
2.5. Estimation of Viral Replication
The efficiency of replication of the RSA59 was determined in mice inoculated intracranially at the designated dose. On days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after infection, mice were sacrificed and perfused with 20 mL of PBS, and the brains and livers were removed. The left halves of the brain were placed directly into 2 mL of isotonic saline with 0.167% gelatin (gel saline). The remainder of the brain and liver was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and processed for histology. All organs collected for viral titer were weighed and stored frozen at −80°C until titered for virus. Brain and liver tissues from infected and control mice were homogenized, and viral titers were determined by plaque assay on an L2 cell monolayer [38–40].
MOG-immunized or viral-infected mice were sacrificed and perfused transcardially with 40 mL of PBS followed by PBS containing 4% PFA. Brain and spinal cord tissues were collected, postfixed in 4% PFA overnight at room temperature (RT), and embedded in paraffin. 5 μm sections were processed and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) for assessment of inflammation and Luxol fast blue (LFB) for demyelination. Spinal cord histopathology was assessed as in prior studies [32, 35]. Briefly, two sections were examined from each of three spinal cord levels (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar) for each mouse. All slides were coded and read in a blinded manner. Sections were assessed as follows; inflammation: 0, none; 1, few inflammatory cells; 2, organization of perivascular infiltrates; and 3, increasing severity of perivascular cuffing with extension into the adjacent tissue. Demyelination was scored based on detection of focal white matter areas lacking LFB staining using the relative four-point scale; 0, none; 1, rare foci; 2, a few areas of demyelination; 3, large (confluent) areas of demyelination; 3.5, large confluent areas in different quadrants of spinal cord white matter; 4, loss of myelin from all quadrants of the spinal cord. To confirm expected virulence of the strains used, livers from the infected mice were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with H&E [39, 41].
2.7. Immunohistochemical Analysis
Serial sections from spinal cords were stained by the avidin-biotin-immunoperoxidase technique (Vector Laboratories) using 3, 3-diaminobenzidine as substrate, and a 1 : 100 dilution of anti-CD45 (LCA; leukocyte common antigen, LY-5, BD Pharmingen), anti-Iba1 (Wako, Richmond, VA, USA), or CD3 (Dako; Carpinteria, CA, USA) as primary antibodies. Control slides from mock-infected mice were incubated in parallel.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Classical Clinical Symptoms in EAE Mice
Evidence suggests that immunization of mice with MOG to induce EAE results in an encephalitogenic T-cell response and a demyelinating autoantibody response. Immunization of MOG35-55 peptide together with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and pertussis toxin results in a chronic progressive form of EAE in C57BL/6 mice. In the current studies, 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice () were immunized with MOG35–55 and were monitored daily for signs and symptoms of EAE for 30 days. Mice developed the classical chronic progressive clinical profile of EAE (Figure 1(a)). Onset of disease occurs between days 9–12. Mice were sacrificed at EAE onset, the progressive phase (days 13–15) and at the peak of disease (days 16–30). Remaining mice () were kept for scoring of neurologic symptoms throughout the 30 days.
3.2. Viral Virulence and Replication in the Brain
Four-week-old, MHV-free, C57BL/6 (B6) mice were inoculated intracranially with 50% LD50 dose of isogenic recombinant strain RSA59 strain (20,000 PFU) as described previously. Mice were monitored daily for signs of disease. Mock-infected controls were inoculated similarly but with an uninfected cell lysate at a comparable dilution. The efficiency of replication of RSA59 was determined in mice inoculated intracranially, and the peak of viral replication was at day 5, similar to prior studies (Figure 1(b)).
3.3. Comparative Analysis of Disease Symptoms
Mice immunized with MOG displayed classic features of EAE including tail limpness, waddling gait, hind limb paralysis and ascending paralysis. In contrast, MHV-infected mice do not manifest obvious clinical neurologic impairment. Instead, they typically demonstrate ruffled fur, hunched back posturing, and significant weight loss (data not shown).
3.4. Typical CNS Inflammation in EAE Mice
Histological analysis of EAE spinal cords was done as in prior studies [32, 33] and showed expected mononuclear cell infiltration (leukocyte common antigen (LCA) staining), demyelination (Luxol fast blue (LFB) staining), and T-cell infiltration (CD3 staining) at all time points examined after disease onset (Figure 2). Similar inflammation was present in other parts of the CNS, including the meninges of the brain and deep cerebellar white matter (Figure 3). CNS inflammation was present throughout the disease course, and levels of demyelination progressed over time (Figure 2; Table 1). At all time points, infiltrating inflammatory cells (LCA+ and CD3+) in EAE spinal cords were restricted to white matter, without significant gray matter inflammation (Figure 2; Table 2). Overall, LCA staining increased by days 10–13 and then decreased by day 30. CD3+ cells initially increased then decreased by days 12–15 only to rebound and localize to demyelinating plaques in the chronic phase. Average demyelination scores are shown in Table 1.
3.5. Inflammatory CNS Pathology of RSA59
Pathology was assessed in sagittal brain sections and cross-sections from each spinal cord level at day 7 (peak inflammation) and day 30 (peak demyelination) after infection with RSA59. Demyelinating plaques were detected by LFB staining at day 7, and spinal cords showed a similar pattern of demyelination at day 30, but the number and area of plaques was larger (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). Average demyelination is shown in Table 1. In contrast to EAE, LCA+ cells are present in both gray and white matters of brain and spinal cord during acute MHV infection, but by day 30, they localize to white matter tracts, especially in spinal cord and deep cerebellar white matter (Figures 3 and 4; Table 2). In spinal cord, at days 3 and 5, most LCA+ are Iba-1+(microglia/macrophage marker), and these cells are present in gray matter (data not shown), and by day 7, LCA+/Iba-1+ cells localize in both gray and white matters (Figure 4; Table 2). By day 30, LCA+ and Iba1+ cells are present mainly in demyelinating plaques. In addition to the change in distribution of LCA+ cells, there is also a change in staining intensity and morphology. At early phases (Figure 4(a)), cells are compact and darkly staining, whereas at late phases (Figure 4(b)), cells are more ramified and less intensely stained, reflecting a change from newly arrived monocytes to mature activated macrophages. Data demonstrates that in viral-infected spinal cord there is an increase of Iba1+ cells; however, the distribution of these inflammatory cells varies significantly at different days after infection. Interestingly, in contrast to EAE, CD3+ cells are virtually absent.
Demyelination was a prominent and consistent finding, with 100% of MHV-infected mice and 85% of EAE mice developing demyelination. Though the gross level of inflammation was similar between the two models, significant differences were observed in the pattern of CNS inflammation. In EAE, inflammation was observed only in white matter at all phases of disease (Table 2). This is not unexpected since the myelin antigenic target is concentrated in white matter. In contrast, almost all MHV-infected mice exhibited inflammation within gray matter during the acute phase of disease, with inflammation becoming restricted to white matter in the chronic phase (Table 2). This pattern is consistent with the neuronal tropism of demyelinating strain of MHV and its subsequent axonal transport into white matter reported previously [31, 40]. Findings are consistent with prior studies suggesting that CNS tissue injury in MHV infection is mediated both by viral-induced cytotoxicity and by immune mechanisms. The relative contributions of these two components differ depending on viral tropism, rate of viral spread, and specificity of the immune response . Recent neural cell tropism studies indicate that axonal transport of MHV from gray to white matter is necessary to induce demyelination [31, 34]. Results show how direct autoimmune inflammation along CNS white matter tracts and inflammation secondary to viral infection tracking from gray matter to white matter can both produce similar chronic white matter demyelinating plaques. Comparison of EAE with RSA59-induced demyelination provides insight into mechanisms operative in such a complex disease as MS.
This work was supported by a Research Grant from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) (BT/PR4530/MED/301715/2012); India Indian Institute of Science Education and Research-Kolkata (IISER-K), India, start up Fund and Research Grant RG3774A2/1 from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (to Jayasri Das Sarma), NIH Grant EY015014; Grant RG 4214-A-1 from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, The F. M. Kirby Foundation, and Research to Prevent Blindness (to Kenneth S. Shindler). The authors thank IISER-K and the Department of Biotechnology for providing fellowship and research support to Abhinoy Kishore and Indian Academy of Science, India for supporting Anurag Kanunjia’s summer internship. The authors have no financial conflict of interests to disclose.
- J. H. Noseworthy, C. Lucchinetti, M. Rodriguez, and B. G. Weinshenker, “Multiple sclerosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 13, pp. 938–952, 2000.
- R. Martin, H. F. McFarland, and D. E. McFarlin, “Immunological aspects of demyelinating diseases,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 10, pp. 153–187, 1992.
- M. Sospedra and R. Martin, “Immunology of multiple sclerosis,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 683–747, 2005.
- S. Sawcer, H. B. Jones, R. Feakes et al., “A genome screen in multiple sclerosis reveals susceptibility loci on chromosome 6p21 and 17q22,” Nature Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 464–468, 1996.
- G. C. Ebers, “Genetic epidemiology of multiple sclerosis,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 155–158, 1996.
- G. C. Ebers, K. Kukay, D. E. Bulman et al., “A full genome search in multiple sclerosis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 472–476, 1996.
- J. L. Haines, M. Ter-Minassian, A. Bazyk et al., “A complete genomic screen for multiple sclerosis underscores a role for the major histocompatibility complex,” Nature Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 469–471, 1996.
- Q. Ji, A. Perchellet, and J. M. Goverman, “Viral infection triggers central nervous system autoimmunity via activation of CD8+ T cells expressing dual TCRs,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 628–634, 2010.
- E. S. Huseby, D. Liggitt, T. Brabb, B. Schnabel, C. Öhlén, and J. Goverman, “A pathogenic role for myelin-specific CD8+ T cells in a model for multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 194, no. 5, pp. 669–676, 2001.
- T. Tsuchida, K. C. Parker, R. V. Turner, H. F. McFarland, J. E. Coligan, and W. E. Biddison, “Autoreactive CD8+ T-cell responses to human myelin protein-derived peptides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 23, pp. 10859–10863, 1994.
- D. H. Gilden, “Infectious causes of multiple sclerosis,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 195–202, 2005.
- S. D. Cook and P. C. Dowling, “Multiple sclerosis and viruses: an overview,” Neurology, vol. 30, no. 7, part 2, pp. 80–91, 1980.
- J. F. Kurtzke, “Epidemiologic evidence for multiple sclerosis as an infection,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 382–427, 1993.
- C. Cermelli and S. Jacobson, “Viruses and multiple sclerosis,” Viral Immunology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 255–267, 2000.
- S. Kuerten, T. L. Gruppe, L.-M. Laurentius et al., “Differential patterns of spinal cord pathology induced by MP4, MOG peptide 35–55, and PLP peptide 178–191 in C57BL/6 mice,” APMIS, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 336–346, 2011.
- M. C. Dal Canto, B. S. Kim, S. D. Miller, and R. W. Melvold, “Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induced demyelination: a model for human multiple sclerosis,” Methods, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 453–461, 1996.
- E. L. Oleszak, J. R. Chang, H. Friedman, C. D. Katsetos, and C. D. Platsoucas, “Theiler's virus infection: a model for multiple sclerosis,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 174–207, 2004.
- J. J. Houtman and J. O. Fleming, “Pathogenesis of mouse hepatitis virus-induced demyelination,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 361–376, 1996.
- E. Lavi, D. H. Gilden, and Z. Wroblewska, “Experimental demyelination produced by the A59 strain of mouse hepatitis virus,” Neurology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 597–603, 1984.
- S. A. Stohlman and L. P. Weiner, “Chronic central nervous system demyelination in mice after JHM virus infection,” Neurology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 1981.
- L. P. Weiner, “Pathogenesis of demyelination induced by a mouse hepatitis,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 298–303, 1973.
- E. Lavi, D. H. Gilden, M. K. Highkin, and S. R. Weiss, “Persistence of mouse hepatitis virus A59 RNA in a slow virus demyelinating infection in mice as detected by in situ hybridization,” Journal of Virology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 563–566, 1984.
- S. Perlman, G. Jacobson, A. L. Olson, and A. Afifi, “Identification of the spinal cord as a major site of persistence during chronic infection with a murine coronavirus,” Virology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 418–426, 1990.
- J. L. Gombold and S. R. Weiss, “Mouse Hepatitis Virus A59 increases steady-state levels of MHC mRNAs in primary glial cell cultures and in the murine Central Nervous System,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 493–505, 1992.
- E. Lavi, A. Suzumura, L. A. Lampson et al., “Expression of MHC class I genes in mouse hepatitis virus (MHV-A59) infection and in multiple sclerosis,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 218, pp. 219–222, 1987.
- E. Lavi, A. Suzumura, E. M. Murray, D. H. Silberberg, and S. R. Weiss, “Induction of MHC class I antigens on glial cells is dependent on persistent mouse hepatitis virus infection,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 107–111, 1989.
- A. Suzumura, E. Lavi, S. R. Weiss, and D. H. Silberberg, “Coronavirus infection induces H-2 antigen expression on oligodendrocytes and astrocytes,” Science, vol. 232, no. 4753, pp. 991–993, 1986.
- A. Suzumura, E. Lavi, S. Bhat, D. Murasko, S. R. Weiss, and D. H. Silberberg, “Induction of glial cell MHC antigen expression in neurotropic coronavirus infections. Characterization of the H-2-inducing soluble factor elaborated by infected brain cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 2068–2072, 1988.
- A. E. Matthews, E. Lavi, S. R. Weiss, and Y. Paterson, “Neither B cells nor T cells are required for CNS demyelination in mice persistently infected with MHV-A59,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 257–264, 2002.
- R. M. Sutherland, M.-M. Chua, E. Lavi, S. R. Weiss, and Y. Paterson, “CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are not major effectors of mouse hepatitis virus A59-induced demyelinating disease,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 225–228, 1997.
- J. Das Sarma, L. C. Kenyon, S. T. Hingley, and K. S. Shindler, “Mechanisms of primary axonal damage in a viral model of multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 33, pp. 10272–10280, 2009.
- J. Das Sarma, B. Ciric, R. Marek et al., “Functional interleukin-17 receptor A is expressed in central nervous system glia and upregulated in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 6, article 14, 2009.
- D. C. Fitzgerald, B. Ciric, T. Touil et al., “Suppressive effect of IL-27 on encephalitogenic Th17 cells and the effector phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 3268–3275, 2007.
- J. Das Sarma, K. Iacono, L. Gard et al., “Demyelinating and nondemyelinating strains of mouse hepatitis virus differ in their neural cell tropism,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 5519–5526, 2008.
- K. S. Shindler, L. C. Kenyon, M. Dutt, S. T. Hingley, and J. Das Sarma, “Experimental optic neuritis induced by a demyelinating strain of mouse hepatitis virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 17, pp. 8882–8886, 2008.
- J. Das Sarma, E. Scheen, S.-H. Seo, M. Koval, and S. R. Weiss, “Enhanced green fluorescent protein expression may be used to monitor murine coronavirus spread in vitro and in the mouse central nervous system,” Journal of NeuroVirology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 381–391, 2002.
- L. J. Reed and H. Muench, “A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 493–497, 1938.
- J. D. Sarma, L. Fu, S. T. Hingley, and E. Lavi, “Mouse hepatitis virus type-2 infection in mice: an experimental model system of acute meningitis and hepatitis,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2001.
- J. Das Sarma, L. Fu, J. C. Tsai, S. R. Weiss, and E. Lavi, “Demyelination determinants map to the spike glycoprotein gene of coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 74, no. 19, pp. 9206–9213, 2000.
- J. J. Phillips, M. M. Chua, G. F. Rall, and S. R. Weiss, “Murine coronavirus spike glycoprotein mediates degree of viral spread, inflammation, and virus-induced immunopathology in the central nervous system,” Virology, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. 109–120, 2002.
- S. Navas, S.-H. Seo, M. M. Chua et al., “Murine coronavirus spike protein determines the ability of the virus to replicate in the liver and cause hepatitis,” Journal of Virology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 2452–2457, 2001.