About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 941767, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/941767
Research Article

Prevalence of Past and Reactivated Viral Infections and Efficacy of Cyclosporine A as Monotherapy or in Combination in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis—Synergy Study: A Longitudinal Observational Study

1Novartis Farma Italia, Origgio (Va), Italy
2Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
3Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
4Istituto Ortopedico Pini, Milan, Italy
5Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy
6Ospedale Regionale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
7Azienda Ospedaliera Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy
8Ospedale San Martino, Genoa, Italy
9MediData srl, Modena, Italy

Received 27 December 2013; Accepted 10 March 2014; Published 3 April 2014

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Valacchi

Copyright © 2014 Delia Colombo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We have prospectively evaluated psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients for (1) seropositivity for former viral infections and seroconversion and (2) efficacy of cyclosporine A (CsA) alone or in combination with other immunosuppressants in a time period of 12 months. Screening included HBV antibodies and antigens, HCV antibodies and RNA, HSV 1-2, HZV, EBV, and CMV IgG, and IgM, HHV-6 DNA, and HIV 1-2 antibodies. PsA was evaluated by the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). At baseline, 126 (56%) out of 225 evaluable patients had 2 or more seropositivities indicative of former infections, and 31 patients (13.8%) presented seropositivity for HCV, HBV, HSV-1 and -2, HHV-6, EBV, or parvovirus infection; one of them, positive for HBAg, was treated with lamivudine, while the remaining 30 received no specific treatment. None of the 31 patients developed virus reactivation. A reduction () of PASI, BASDAI, and VAS scores was observed at 6 and 12 months. The treatment of PsA with CsA as monotherapy or in combination was safe and effective. In vitro experiments and clinical findings, including those from our study, suggest that CsA as monotherapy or in combination with biologics might be the treatment of choice in PsA HCV-positive patients.

1. Introduction

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a disabling complication which occurs in 6% to 39% of psoriatic patients [1, 2]. The clinical picture is characterized by skin and nail psoriasis associated with heterogeneous spondyloarthropathy, usually manifesting as synovitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and spondylitis [3]. In most patients, the skin disease precedes musculoskeletal involvement. Obesity is a risk factor for the development of PsA in patients with psoriasis [4]. Its early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment can relieve pain and inflammation and, possibly, help prevent progressive joint involvement and damage [3]. Over the past years, advances have been made in the understanding of genetic and molecular mechanisms of PsA and its management [3].

Patients with PsA are often treated with systemic immunosuppressant agents (e.g., steroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, biologic drugs), which might increase the risk of reactivation of past infections or the acquisition of new infections. Such infections could possibly be life-threatening. Despite the influence of these treatments on the development of infections, data addressing this issue are scant.

Aims of this study were to evaluate, in a population of patients with PsA, seropositivity for former viral infections or suggestive for acute viral infection, efficacy of cyclosporine A (CsA) administered in routine clinical practice alone or in combination with other immunosuppressants in a time period of 12 months, and the occurrence of adverse events during the study period.

2. Patients and Methods

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee at each participating center and signed informed consent was obtained from participating patients. This was a cross-sectional and longitudinal study (12 months), carried out in 238 consecutive patients with diagnosis of PsA performed within 8 years from baseline, treated for at least 3 months with CsA as monotherapy or in combination with one or more systemic drugs. The diagnosis of PsA was performed according to the CASPAR criteria [5]. Psoriasis was evaluated by the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) [6]. PsA was evaluated based on the joints involved, the patients’ and the physicians’ global assessment of the disease using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [7]. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) [8] was used to evaluate inflammation of the spine. Baseline screening for latent and acute viral infections included hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies (anti-HBs and anti-HBc) and surface antigen, hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies and RNA, herpes simplex virus 1-2 (HSV 1-2) IgG and IgM, herpes zoster virus (HZV) IgG and IgM, human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) DNA, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) IgG and IgM, human immunodeficiency virus 1-2 (HIV 1-2) antibodies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG and IgM, and parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM. Follow-up visits were performed at 6 and 12 months to investigate new pathologies and treatments, evolution of PsA (PASI, VAS, and BASDAI), and occurrence of adverse events.

Data are reported as mean ± SD, median (), or percentage, as appropriate. Changes in the PASI and BASDAI values at selected time points were compared using the paired t-test.

3. Results

3.1. Patients and Treatments

Two hundred thirty-eight patients with PsA were screened in 24 centers. Thirteen patients not fulfilling the inclusion criteria were excluded from the analysis which, therefore, was conducted on 225 patients at baseline. The number of patients evaluable at 6- and 12-month followups was 177 and 174, respectively. Eleven patients (4.9%) had been vaccinated for HB and were excluded from baseline and follow-up analysis for HBV seroconversion.

Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline are reported in Table 1. The most common type of psoriasis was psoriasis vulgaris (plaque psoriasis). As expected, PsA was equally distributed among males and females, and, on average, the diagnosis of psoriasis required less time than the diagnosis of PsA; the time between psoriasis and PsA diagnoses was 9.3 years (±13.6), on average. Median time () from the diagnosis of the disease to the first systemic treatment for psoriasis or PsA was 4 years ( 1–13). One hundred five patients (46.7%) had comorbidities; cardiovascular comorbidities were observed in 62 patients (27.6%).

tab1
Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline.

Systemic, topic, and other treatments at baseline and follow-up visits are reported in Table 2. At baseline, all patients were treated with oral CsA for at least 3 months, 48.9% as systemic monotherapy, 16% in combination with methotrexate, and 10.2% in combination with biologic agents; 78% of patients received also topic treatments. During the study period there was a modest decrease in the use of CsA as both monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate, while a significant increase was observed in the combination CsA/biologic agents (Table 2). The study period was also characterized by a decrease in the frequency of topic therapy (from 78% at baseline to 59% at the end of the study).

tab2
Table 2: Description of treatments at baseline and at the end of study.

3.2. Prevalence of Latent Viral Infections

At baseline, 56% of evaluable patients had 2 or more seropositivities indicative of former viral infections (Figure 1). The most frequent were VZV (95.3%), HSV-1 (92.2%), EBV (89.2%), CMV (77%), and HSV-2 (67%). No subject showed HIV antibodies. None of these patients experienced reactivation or new onset viral infections or other infectious diseases during the following 12 months. A linear relationship was observed between the number of executed tests and infections (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.80865, ).

941767.fig.001
Figure 1: Chronic viral seropositivity (former viral infection) at baseline (%, white bars) in evaluable patients (number, grey bars).
3.3. Prevalence of Critical Viral Infections

At baseline, 31 patients (13.8%) presented seropositivity for HCV, HBV, HSV-1 and -2, HHV-6, EBV, and parvovirus B19 (Table 3). One of them, positive for HBsAg, was treated with lamivudine, while the remaining 30 received no specific treatment or prophylaxis. In all these patients the viral infection was asymptomatic.

tab3
Table 3: Description of patients with acute viral seropositivity.

During the following 12 months all 31 patients continued their immunosuppressive treatment of PsA and none developed virus reactivation (Table 3). Two HCV-RNA-positive patients and one HBsAg-positive patient were negative after 12 months.

3.4. Evolution of Psoriasis and PsA during the Study Period

Evaluation of psoriasis and PsA during the study period was one of the secondary objectives of the study. PASI, VAS, and BASDAI were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. A progressive and significant ( versus baseline) reduction of PASI was observed at 6 and 12 months (Figure 2), indicating an improvement of psoriasis during the study period.

941767.fig.002
Figure 2: Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) median values and 25°–75° percentiles during the study period in 153 patients evaluable at baseline and at follow-up visits.

Similarly, there was a decrease in the global activity of PsA during the study, shown by a decrease in both VAS and BASDAI ( versus baseline) (Table 4), indicating an improvement in the musculoskeletal involvement of PsA.

tab4
Table 4: Clinical assessment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondylitis in patients evaluable at baseline and at follow-up visits (median and IQR).
3.5. Adverse Events

Eighteen adverse events were reported in 15 patients (Table 5). These adverse events were considered to be correlated with the treatment in 10 cases (to CsA in 9 cases and to infliximab in 1 case). One serious adverse event occurred (syncope); the patient fully recovered. No deaths occurred.

tab5
Table 5: List of adverse events.

4. Discussion

4.1. Chronic and Acute Viral Seropositivity

PsA is an uncommon disease affecting 0.3–1% of the general population [1, 9]. Therefore, the strength of this study is the high number of patients recruited and the execution of viral serologic tests not routinely performed in clinical practice. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of latent and acute viral infections in patients with PsA. Our data confirm previous observations from the literature indicating that patients with PsA are exposed to multiple viruses with increased prevalence compared to the normal population (Figure 1).

However, the most interesting finding of our study was that 31 patients with serologic findings suggestive of critical viral infections, despite immunosuppressive therapy, did not develop any virus-related clinical symptoms [10]. These patients were all chronically treated with CsA as monotherapy or in combination with other systemic immunosuppressants (Table 3). Although old and new immunosuppressive agents have the potential to induce virus reactivation, data from the literature are very limited in PsA, and the guidelines for the treatment of PsA do not provide therapeutic indications for patients with acute or latent viral infections [11]. However, the possibility that PsA patients also have viral infections is not negligible, and the administration of immunosuppressants to patients with moderate or severe forms can be necessary even in the presence of latent viral infections.

A few considerations can be made for HCV-positive PsA patients. The literature reports that systemic administration of corticosteroids in liver transplant recipients can increase HCV infectivity and exacerbate underlying viral infections [12, 13]; therefore, corticosteroids should probably be avoided in PsA HCV-positive patients. On the contrary, in vitro studies have shown that CsA inhibits HCV replication by inhibiting cyclophilin B [1416]. Moreover, patients treated with CsA after liver transplantation have lower HCV titers and reduced frequency of deaths or graft losses than patients treated with tacrolimus [17, 18].

Few cases of patients with PsA and HCV treated with CsA are reported in the literature. Miura et al. [19] described 4 patients with dermatologic diseases and HCV infection treated with CsA: in 3 cases, CsA was safe and it reduced HCV-RNA load and serum liver enzymes; the fourth patient showed a modest increase in alanine aminotransferases (ALT) levels but no change in blood HCV-RNA load. Galeazzi et al. [20] used CsA in 20 patients with rheumatologic disorders (4 with PsA) and concomitant HCV infection; they reported that HCV RNA load decreased significantly after 6 months. Giannitti et al. [21] treated 7 patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis and HCV infection with CsA and anti-TNF-alpha in combination and found that HCV RNA decreased significantly.

Our results support these earlier observations. An interesting and unexpected finding of our study was that two HCV- RNA-positive patients at baseline evaluation were negative after 12 months of treatment with CsA.

4.2. Efficacy during Routine Clinical Practice

During the 12-month period of the study, we observed a progressive improvement in our patients’ cutaneous and musculoskeletal clinical picture. We hypothesize the improvement to have been related in part to the progressive therapeutic effect of CsA and, in part, to the increased number of patients who received biologics in combination with CsA.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that PsA patients have a higher prevalence of viral seropositivity than the healthy population. Systematic screening for infections could improve identification of PsA patients at risk of developing active infections. In our patients, the treatment of PsA with CsA as monotherapy or in combination was effective and safe. In vitro experiments and clinical findings [22], including those obtained in our study, suggest that CsA as monotherapy or in combination with biologics might be the treatment of choice in HCV-positive patients if PsA needs systemic treatment, but caution and close laboratory and clinical monitoring are necessary prior to and during treatment.

Conflict of Interests

Delia Colombo is a part-time employee of Novartis Farma Italy and received grants from Allergan and Aventis. Sergio Chimenti has received advisory/speaker honoraria and/or research funding from Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Paolo Grossi has received advisory/speaker honoraria and/or research funding from Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Biotest, Astrazeneca, Gilead, and Astellas. Antonio Marchesoni has received advisory and speaker honoraria from Novartis. Sergio Di Nuzzo, Vito Griseta, and Anna Gargiulo have no conflict of interest. Aurora Parodi has received advisory/speaker honoraria and/or research funding from Abbvie, Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Shire. Lucia Simoni is an employee of Medidata srl, Italy. Gilberto Bellia is an employee of Novartis Farma Italy.

Acknowledgments

On behalf of the SYNERGY study group, Synergy Study Group included D. Casanova (Parma), V. Griseta (Bari), S. Chimenti (Rome), A. Gargiulo (Caserta), A. Parodi (Genoa), F. Ayala (Naples), F. Bardazzi (Bologna), G. Camplone (Rome), R. Foti (Catania), P. G. Calzavara-Pinton (Brescia), S. Donelli (Piacenza), N. Aste (Cagliari), C. Lauriti (Pescara), G. Cruciani (Rome), S. Calvieri (Rome), A. G. Galluccio (Benevento), C. Meschini (Viterbo), G. A. Vena (Bari), G. Altomare (Milan), P. Frugiuele (Cosenza), C. Giannitti (Siena), M. Govoni (Ferrara), P. P. Sainaghi (Novara), and G. Valenti (Catanzaro). The authors thank Roberto Imberti who provided assistance with English language editing.

References

  1. P. Mease, “Management of psoriatic arthritis: the therapeutic interface between rheumatology and dermatology,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 348–354, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Salaffi, R. de Angelis, W. Grassi et al., “Prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in an Italian population sample: results of a regional community-based study. I. The MAPPING study,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 819–828, 2005. View at Scopus
  3. P. J. Mease, “Psoriatic arthritis: update on pathophysiology, assessment and management,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, supplement 1, pp. i77–i84, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. J. Love, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, et al., “Obesity and the risk of psoriatic arthritis: a population-based study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, pp. 1273–1277, 2012.
  5. W. Taylor, D. Gladman, P. Helliwell, A. Marchesoni, P. Mease, and H. Mielants, “Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2665–2673, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Fredriksson and U. Pettersson, “Severe psoriasis—oral therapy with a new retinoid,” Dermatologica, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 238–244, 1978. View at Scopus
  7. G. A. Hawker, S. Mian, T. Kendzerska, and M. French, “Measures of adult pain: visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP),” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 63, supplement 11, pp. S240–S252, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Garrett, T. Jenkinson, L. G. Kennedy, H. Whitelock, P. Gaisford, and A. Calin, “A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2286–2291, 1994. View at Scopus
  9. V. Chandran, “Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 213–215, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Vassilopoulos and L. H. Calabrese, “Risks of immunosuppressive therapies including biologic agents in patients with rheumatic diseases and co-existing chronic viral infections,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 619–625, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Gossec, J. S. Smolen, C. Gaujoux-Viala et al., “European league against rheumatism recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 4–12, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Ciesek, E. Steinmann, M. Iken et al., “Glucocorticosteroids increase cell entry by hepatitis C virus,” Gastroenterology, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 1875–1884, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Ciesek and H. Wedemeyer, “Immunosuppression, liver injury and post-transplant HCV recurrence,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Watashi, M. Hijikata, M. Hosaka, M. Yamaji, and K. Shimotohno, “Cyclosporin A suppresses replication of hepatitis C virus genome in cultured hepatocytes,” Hepatology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1282–1288, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Nakagawa, N. Sakamoto, Y. Tanabe et al., “Suppression of hepatitis C virus replication by cyclosporin A is mediated by blockade of cyclophilins,” Gastroenterology, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 1031–1041, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Yang, J. M. Robotham, H. B. Nelson, A. Irsigler, R. Kenworthy, and H. Tang, “Cyclophilin A is an essential cofactor for hepatitis C virus infection and the principal mediator of cyclosporine resistance in vitro,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 5269–5278, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Levy, F. Villamil, D. Samuel et al., “Results of LIS2T, a multicenter, ramdomized study comparing cyclosporine microemulsion with C2 monitoring and tacrolimus with C0 monitoring in de novo liver transplantation,” Transplantation, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 1632–1638, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Levy, G. L. Grazi, F. Sanjuan et al., “12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 12, pp. 1464–1472, 2006.
  19. H. Miura, Y. Itoh, Y. Matsumoto et al., “Long-term administration of cyclosporin A to HCV-antibody-positive patients with dermatologic diseases,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 310–314, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Galeazzi, F. Bellisai, C. Giannitti, S. Manganelli, G. Morozzi, and G. D. Sebastiani, “Safety of cyclosporin A in HCV-infected patients: Experience with cyclosporin A in patients affected by rheumatological disorders and concomitant HCV infection,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1110, pp. 544–549, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Giannitti, M. Benucci, R. Caporali et al., “Efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α therapy combined with cyclosporine a in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant hepatitis C virus infection,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 543–546, 2009. View at Scopus
  22. C. Giannitti, I. Fineschi, B. Frediani, A. Fioravanti, and M. Galeazzi, “Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab combined with cyclosporine A in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant chronic hepatitis C virus infection,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 31, article 816, 2013.