- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 236539, 12 pages
Sarcandra glabra Extract Reduces the Susceptibility and Severity of Influenza in Restraint-Stressed Mice
1Department of Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Natural Products, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Translational Medicine Research and Development Center, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
3State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
4Pharmacology Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510095, China
Received 5 July 2012; Revised 12 September 2012; Accepted 20 September 2012
Academic Editor: Seong-Gyu Ko
Copyright © 2012 Hui-Juan Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sarcandra glabra, as a type of “antipyretic-detoxicate drugs”, has always been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The Sarcandra glabra extract (SGE) is applied frequently as anti-inflammatory and anti-infectious drug in folk medicine. However, relative experiment data supporting this effective clinical consequence was limited. In order to mimic the physiological conditions of the susceptible population, we employed restraint stress mouse model to investigate the effect of SGE against influenza. Mice were infected with influenza virus three days after restraint, while SGE was orally administrated for 10 consecutive days. Body weight, morbidity, and mortality were recorded daily. Histopathologic changes, susceptibility genes expressions and inflammatory markers in lungs were determined. Our results showed that restraint stress significantly increased susceptibility and severity of influenza virus. However, oral administration of SGE could reduce morbidity, mortality and significantly prolonged survival time. The results further showed that SGE had a crucial effect on improving susceptibility markers levels to recover the balance of host defense system and inhibiting inflammatory cytokines levels through down-regulation of NF-B protein expression to ameliorate the lung injury. These data showed that SGE reduced the susceptibility and severity of influenza.
Influenza is an acute respiratory disease caused by influenza virus that seriously threatens human lives. Most people will completely recover from influenza without other special treatment apart from antipyretic medication and rest. However, some patients will develop other symptoms and complications, such as croup, arthralgia, chest pain, lymphadenopathy, and even pneumonia. Pneumonia can develop rapidly and may result in respiratory failure and death [1, 2]. Despite many chemical antiviral drugs have been used clinically, the emergence of influenza virus drug resistant and subsequent viral pneumonia is still the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in influenza patients [3, 4]. Therefore, more attention has been paid to explore natural and active substances on anti-influenza.
Sarcandra glabra (Thunb.) Nakai (Chloranthaceae) is widely used in TCM as antipyretic, detoxicate, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and anti-infectious drug . Sarcandra glabra extract (SGE) contains high level of rosmarinic acid, isofraxidin, fumaric acid, terpenoid saponins, and others. It has been showing potential effect in the therapy of influenza and its symptoms in clinical practice . However, there was only little data about the anti-influenza effect of SGE since the use of nonsuitable animal model and positive result was difficult to obtain through in vitro antiviral experiments. This paradox can be explained if host factors are important in the pathogenesis and outcome of influenza infection. It is well known that influenza virus killed millions of people in the 20th century . Although influenza virus infected a wide range of people, the ones most likely to need hospitalization are the newborns, elderly, the sick, and individuals presenting fatigue or stress, who have weakened immunity. It has been reported that over 90% of deaths had occurred in these susceptible population [7, 8]. Stress has been shown to increase susceptibility to viral or bacterial pathogens, influence the severity of infectious disease, and diminish the strength of host immune defense [9, 10]. The reason for using restraint stressed mice model is because restraint is a commonly used stressor. Our previous studies had indicated that restraint stress might enhance the risk of developing infectious disease and also prolong infectious illness episodes , which is more conducive to simulate the clinical features of susceptible population. We had also successfully used restraint stress mice model to evaluate anti-influenza effects of natural products . Therefore, we employed restraint stress mice model to investigate the effects of SGE on influenza and its subsequent pneumonia.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of SGE
Sarcandra glabra extract (no. 090303) was provided by Guangzhou Jingxiutang Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). SGE was qualitatively analyzed employing HPLC as previously reported . As shown in Figure 1, the main chemical ingredients of SGE were 5-caffeoylquinic acid, 3-caffeoylquinic acid, 4-caffeoylquinic acid, caffeic acid, isofraxidin, 4′-O-β-D-glycopyranosyl rosmarinic acid, and rosmarinic acid. Rosmarinic acid and isofraxidin were used as marker for the quality control of SGE. Each gram of SGE contained 2.4 mg of rosmarinic acid and 3.5 mg of isofraxidin .
2.2. Animals and Virus
Male specific pathogen free Kunming mice (13–15 g) were purchased from Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center (Guangzhou, China). All mice were kept in a pathogen-free animal room under controlled temperature at °C. A 12 h light-dark cycle was maintained, with lights on from the time 06:00 to 18:00. The mice were provided with standard laboratory diet and water. All studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (publication number 85-23, revised 1996). The influenza A/FM/1/47 (H1N1) virus was provided by the College of Veterinary Medicine of South China Agricultural University (Guangzhou, China). The virus strain was propagated in specific pathogen-free fertilized eggs and adapted for lethality in mice after three passages in the animal. Virus containing allantoic fluid was harvested and stored in aliquots at −80°C. The LD50 was determined in mice after serial dilution of the stock. Two times value of LD50 were used for viral challenge in all of the experiments. Infection was established by intranasal inoculation in mice anesthetized by ethyl ether. The influenza-related pathogenic operation was performed in the Animal Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory in South China Agriculture University.
2.3. Experimental Design
The experimental mice were randomly divided into six groups: normal control, virus control (virus only), model control (restraint + virus), positive control (restraint + virus + 50 mg/kg ribavirin), and two SGE groups (restraint + virus + 250 or 500 mg/kg SGE). Ribavirin and SGE were administered to mice by oral gavage for 10 consecutive days, while the rest of the groups received water only. On the 2nd day of administration, mice were physically restrained in a 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube with holes for 18 h. After recovery for three day, the animals were anesthetized by inhalation of ether vapor and then an approximate amount of virus (30 μL) was instilled into the nares.
Experiment was conducted in triplicates of 9–11 mice for each group to observe daily changes in body weight, survival, and several typical symptoms of illness, including ruffled fur, redness around the eyes, nose or mouth, hunched back, altered respiration and unresponsiveness, for 21 days or until death. Another experiment was conducted in duplicates of 8 mice for each group. On the 5th day after virus infection, mice were weighed and anesthetized by ethyl ether. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture and lungs were removed and weighed.
2.4. Histopathologic Analysis
To monitor the histological changes in the lungs of influenza virus-infected animal, all mice were sacrificed for determination of lung index. Simultaneously, lung tissues were immediately fixed in 4% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Lung sections (4–6 μm) were sliced by slicer (Leica) and mounted on microscopic slides. Histopathologic changes were examined by H&E staining under a light microscope (Olympus) as described.
2.5. Measurement of NO Level in Serum
2.6. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA in lysed lung tissues was extracted as previously described  and reversely-transcribed to cDNA by applying mouse moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Viral nucleoprotein (NP) gene, SP-A, SP-D, ICAM-1, IFITM 3, IL-1β, TNF-α and iNOs mRNA levels in lung tissues and internal control 18S gene were measured by the Veriti PCR System (Applied Biosystems), using primers listed in Table 1. The PCR products were fractionated on a 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The band intensity of ethidium bromide fluorescence was measured using an image analysis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), then quantified with Quantity One analysis software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and expressed as the ratio to 18S.
2.7. Western Blotting
The cytosolic and nuclear proteins were harvested from lung sample using extraction kit according to the protocol of the manufacturer (KeyGEN Biotech, China). Samples were run on a 10% SDS/PAGE gel and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Immunoblotting was assayed using anti-NF-κB p65 (1 : 2000) antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). The immunodetection was done using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (MultiSciences Biotech Co., Ltd., China). The bands density was quantified using Quantity One analysis software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) via calculating the average optical density in each field.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
The data were presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistical comparisons of data were carried out using the ANOVA of the SPSS 19.0 system. A value of was considered significant. Differences in morbidity (time to sickness) and mortality (time to death) between groups across the 21-day postinfection period were determined using the Lifetest Survival Analysis program in SigmaStat (), which analyzed mean and median time to sickness and death.
3.1. Effects of SGE on Influenza Caused Morbidity and Mortality in Restraint-Stressed Mice
The effects of SGE against H1N1 influenza were evaluated in restraint stressed mice plus viral infection. After intranasal inoculation of influenza virus, mice were monitored daily for survival and weight changes. A significantly lower survival rate was observed in model control group as compared to virus control (, Figure 2(a)). Only 22% of mice in the model control group survived and the mean day to death (MDD) was decreased from to day when compared to virus control group (). Ribavirin (50 mg/kg) significantly improved the survival rate to 90% and MDD to day (). SGE also demonstrated inhibitory effects against virus-induced death, with 45% and 64% of mice surviving in the 250 and 500 mg/kg/day SGE treatment groups, respectively. The MDD of 500 mg/kg/day SGE was also prolonged to day (). Thereafter, the body weight of virus infected mice began to decrease at day 5 and dropped to a minimum at day 7 (Figure 2(b)). Survived virus infected mice started to gain weight on day 8, but model control mice kept losing weight until day 10. SGE treatment at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day could significantly improve health status of virus infected mice. Body weight changes were rather stable when compared to other groups, with slight weight loss at day 6. Furthermore, behavioral changes, such as a tendency to huddle, ruffed fur, altered respiration, and reduced food intake were observed in infected mice on the 6th day after virus infection. Morbidity was presented as percentage of morbid mice to total number of mice. As shown in Table 2, group differences in morbidity were evident over the 21-day post-infection period. Mice fixed in a restraint cage for 18 h resulted in an increase in morbidity compared with virus control (). Model control experienced a 100% incidence in morbidity, while only 80% for virus control group. Mean time to sickness was day for model control and day for virus control. SGE treatment at 250 and 500 mg/kg/day significantly alleviated influenza symptoms and offset in morbidity associated with restraint stress (). Incidence of morbidity was both 82% in 250 and 500 mg/kg/day SGE groups, while mean time to sickness was and day, respectively. These results indicated that SGE improved survival rates and prolonged survival time of virus infected stressed mice in a dose-dependent manner.
3.2. Effects of SGE on Influenza-Caused Pneumonia in Restraint-Stressed Mice
As shown in Figure 3(a), on day 5 after infection, lungs were characterized by extensive edema, red blood cell extravasation, and inflammation. Part of the bronchial mucosa had shedding or erosion. Moreover, large lesions on all lung lobes were found in model group. The lung index was used to evaluate edema level caused by the influenza virus. As shown in Figure 3(c), the lung index baseline of normal control was mg/g. It was increased to mg/g () for virus control and was further increased to mg/g () in model control. In comparison to model control, ribavirin significantly recovered the lung index to mg/g (). Moreover, SGE (250 and 500 mg/g/day) also recovered lung index to and mg/g (). The effects of SGE on the pathogenesis of influenza virus-induced pneumonia in stressed mice were observed by H&E staining (Figure 3(b)). In lungs with pneumonia, there was more inflammatory cells infiltration. Alveoli were filled with hemorrhage exudates and alveolar wall was thickened. Moreover, the lung tissues of mice in model group around the lesions showed significant compensatory emphysema and bronchial epithelial hyperplasia. However, the lung pathogeneses in SGE and ribavirin groups were significantly reduced compared with model group.
3.3. Effects of SGE on the Susceptibility Genes to Influenza Infection in Restraint-Stressed Mice
RT-PCR was used to explore if SGE would reduce susceptibility to influenza infection in restraint-stressed mice. NP mRNA level was examined as an indicator of viral replication and clearance degree in the lungs. As shown in Figure 4, NP mRNA expression in the lungs of model mice was nearly two fold higher than that in virus control group (). However, SGE treatment (250, 500 mg/kg/day) obviously decreased NP mRNA level (, ). In addition, SP-A, SP-D, ICAM-1, and IFITM3, which were known to be crucial in host defense and affect virus replication and clearance capability in lung, were also examined. The mRNA expression of ICAM-1 was increased, while SP-A, SP-D, and IFITM3 were significantly decreased in restraint stress mice when compared to virus control. Administration of SGE (250, 500 mg/kg/day) obviously decreased ICAM-1 mRNA level and increased SP-A, SP-D and IFITM 3 mRNA expression.
3.4. Effects of SGE on Influenza-Caused Inflammatory Cytokine Production in Restraint-Stressed Mice
To explore the effects of SGE on inflammatory reaction in influenza-induced pneumonia, we detected the concentration of nitrogen containing radical NO in serum and the mRNA levels of iNOs in lung tissues. At the same time, inflammatory markers such as IL-1β and TNF-α mRNA levels in lung tissues were also assayed. As shown in Figure 5, virus infection induced an increase of serum NO level. It was even higher in virus-infected restrained mice. However, oral administration of SGE (500 mg/kg/day) to infected mice could significantly decrease serum NO level when compared with model control (). Alteration in iNOs mRNA level was compatible with the above finding. In addition, as shown in Figure 6, the transcription levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in model controls were significantly increased, while SGE groups (500 mg/kg/day) obviously lowered both mRNA levels. However, IL-1β mRNA level was only slightly decreased in those treated with ribavirin and SGE (250 mg/kg/day). It is well known that the production of inflammatory markers was regulated by a transcription factor NF-κB. We further examined the effects of SGE on NF-κB activation. As shown in Figure 7, SGE could prevent nuclear accumulation of p65 (the major component of NF-κB) in lung tissue of infected stressed-mice in a dose-dependent manner. Taken together, results demonstrated that SGE had protective effects against virus-caused pneumonia.
In ancient China, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has played a key role in fighting the influenza pandemic . TCM was performing well in clinical practice and showed potentials in the therapy of influenza [15, 16]. Although many TCM had been reported to have a valid anti-influenza effect [14, 17], there was limited data supporting this. There is an urgent need to find a suitable animal model for evaluation of anti-influenza activities of TCM. It is well known that antivirus drug and TCM work in a very different way upon the human body. Anti-virus drug target on virus and is ineffective in virus-induced complication. In contrast, TCMs are thought to work in a synergic way that interacts with the virus and the body based on the symptoms and keeps the body in a fine balance. Thus, in screening and evaluation of anti-influenza activities of TCM, host factors cannot be ignored. We also found that the effects of SGE against influenza were difficult to evaluate through general mouse model (Supplementary Figure 1 available online at doi:10.115/2012/236539). Some studies revealed that the pathogenesis of influenza virus infection in humans depends on a combination of virus and host factors . The results in the present study showed that intranasal administration of influenza virus to normal mice could only partially cause sickness in the animals, not even to start the outbreak of pneumonia. Although there were individual differences in experimental animals, when the infected mice were loaded with restraint stress, the induction of sickness was found in all animals. Instead, the induction rate was only 80% for those without restraint stress. Sickness symptoms, such as shortness of breath, piloerection, rapid losing of body weight and becoming moribund, were being aggravated at 5 days after infection. Moreover, the mortality of animals was significantly increased from 30% to 78% with restraint stress. When we observed from the ventral view of intact lungs, all lobes displayed severe edema and hemorrhagic pleural effusion. Lung pathological slides showed fulminant viral pneumonia with substantial damage and severe inflammation in restraint stress-loaded infected mice. When we calculated the virus load in restraint stress-loaded infected mice, we found that virus persisted and could not be cleared quickly. The content of replicating virus in the lungs was nearly twofold higher than that of the normal mice when measured at 5 days post-infection. Therefore, enhanced pathogenesis of influenza was attributable to restraint stress and consequential changes in immune defense of the lungs. Heightened cytokine and chemokine levels are also hallmarks of severe influenza infection, which have been observed in both human and animal models [18, 19]. Recent studies showed that the levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in lung or serum were correlated closely with the viral load . When compared with normal mice, a remarkable, exaggerated proinflammatory response was discovered in the lung and serum of restraint stressed mice. This could be an indicative sign describing the extent of viral spread within the lungs. In previous study, restraint stress had significantly altered the balance of CD4+ T/CD8+ T cells and reduced NK cell activity . Thus, when the animal was exposed to an unencountered influenza virus, the immune defense of the host was not able to act effectively. Indeed, restraint stressed mice might be more susceptible to viral infection by affecting related susceptibility genes expression levels, which could eliminate individual differences of animals. This animal model could clearly imitate the actual pathological condition of viral pneumonia that can be intuitively observed and detected. Therefore, our animal model provided an ideal condition for the evaluation of the effects of TCM on anti-influenza and its subsequent pneumonia.
In the present SGE study, we used restraint-stressed mice model to evaluate its effects against influenza and results have shown that oral administration of SGE to infected stressed-mice could reduce morbidity and facilitate the recovery from influenza in survived mice. During the administration of SGE, we found that treated mice were in a slightly better physiological condition and the survival rate was improved. Simultaneously, the survival time of mice was also significantly prolonged. From the view of intact lungs, SGE treatment could alleviate edema, red blood cell extravasation and hemorrhagic pleural effusion. We further found from lung pathological slides that SGE inhibited influenza virus-stimulated pulmonary morphological changes, including decreased structural damages in blood vessel and alveoli. Besides, data also showed that SGE could decrease virus load in lung 5 days after infection in restraint-stressed mice. These results suggested that the effect of SGE on reducing inflammation progression in lung might be related to the decreased virus load. However, direct anti-virus effect of SGE was not found in vitro (data not shown).
Influenza virus infection in host could be divided into five stages, which are adsorption, invasion, replication, maturation, and release. When host cells were infected by influenza virus, the collectins in the respiratory tract and lung, surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A, SP-D) will recognize, bind, and neutralize the virus to prevent attachment of virus to the host cell [21, 22]. Some studies indicated that SP-A and SP-D deficiency would aggravate influenza virus infection [23–25]. Previous studies have shown that transcription factor NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) regulates both SP-A and SP-D gene transcription, and NFAT in turn is negatively regulated by Akt [26, 27]. Stress could result in an increased expression of activated Akt, thus Akt activation may result in increased inhibition of NFAT and in turn lowered transcriptional activation of SP-A and SP-D [26, 27]. Apart from SP-A and SP-D deficiency, the increased ICAM-1 protein levels were also reported to aggravate virus infection . ICAM-1 is an adhesion molecule found on the vascular endothelium and airway epithelial cells. ICAM-1 participates in leukocyte recruitment and it could be an entry site for certain viruses . Some studies had showed that stress could induce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), while ROS was indicated to increase ICAM-1 levels . In this study, we found that restraint stress obviously increased ICAM-1 mRNA expression and decreased SP-A, SP-D mRNA expression. This may be a potential mechanism for how restraint stress predisposes the respiratory tract to influenza infections. However, oral administration of SGE could restore and further strengthen SP-A, SP-D expression levels, as well as reduce the expression of ICAM-1, which were in favor of clearing influenza virus. When the escaped virus successfully infected host cell, the single-stranded RNA of the influenza virus is recognized by toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) and retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I). The pathway induces the production of type I IFNs and activate interferon-inducible transmembrane (IFITM) protein family, which further activates the immune system to help elimination of virus [18, 31]. The latest study found that IFITM3 prevented the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza . Our results showed that restraint stress decreased IFITM3 mRNA expression, thereby impeding the transduction of cellular immunity signals. This delayed immune response after restraint stress is compatible with the previous findings, which showed that restraint stress could result in immunosuppression . Recent evidence has also shown that SGE possess immunomodulation effects. However, oral administration of SGE could strengthen IFITM3 mRNA expression. Combined with the evidence that SGE could protect against immunocompromise in restraint-stressed mice , it can be inferred that SGE could improve immune function to help the host effectively clear influenza virus by increasing IFITM3 mRNA expression in restraint-stressed mice.
In fact, influenza virus alone does not make critical contribution to mortality induced by influenza, but the “cytokine storm” produced by the disorder of immune response triggered by the virus can result in inflammatory reaction of lung tissues and fatal lung tissue injury. Our results showed that SGE could decrease the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA levels in lung 5 days after infection. We further found that SGE prevented nuclear accumulation of NF-κB p65 in the lungs. This finding is predictable as rosmarinic acid, caffeoylquinic acid, and caffeic acid, which are major active constituents found in SGE, have antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects [33–36]. Moreover, isofraxidin, another active constituent of SGE, has potent anticancer, antifatigue, antistress, immune-accommodating and cholagogic effects [37, 38]. Thus, the immunoregulating effects of SGE could help keeping a fine balance of the host immune system, which may be critical for viral clearance and inflammatory process relief. Several studies had considered the ability of SGE in improving immunologic response was attributable to its antioxidative capacity . In addition, antioxidants were found to inhibit influenza A virus replication and influenza A virus-induced pro-inflammatory gene expression . Our previous study suggested that SGE interferes with the oxidative stress . In this study, we found that virus triggered iNOs upregulation and subsequent NO production was inhibited significantly by SGE treatment. Besides, the antioxidative property of rosmarinic acid has been demonstrated by its ability to reduce liver injury induced by D-galactosamine  and lipopolysaccharides  through the scavenging of superoxide molecules and the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [42, 43]. However, severe influenza virus infections are associated with increased LTB4 . The production of LTB4 was controlled by COX-2 . Our previous studies demonstrated that SGE could reduce the release of LTB4 from neutrophils . Our findings of lowered pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, and NF-κB) in the lungs of infected-mice treated by SGE are compatible with the above. SGE might act as a selective COX-2 inhibitor in influenza virus infection.
Our study confirmed that SGE not only effectively decreased susceptibility of influenza in restraint-stressed mice, but also lowered virus-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines levels and improved pneumonia. These results might do contributions to the antivirus study of herbal medicines.
Hui-Juan Cao and Rui-Rong Tan contributed equally in this work
This work was financially supported by the State Key Laboratory of Drug Research (no. SIMM1106KF-13) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (no. S2011040004893). The authors thank Pro Jian-Xin Chen and his Animal Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory in South China Agriculture University. They thank Dr. Yi Dai and Dr. Ying-Hui Duan who supplied HPLC fingerprint of SGE for this study.
- World Health Organization, Clinical Management of Human Infection with New Influenza A (H1N1) Virus: Initial Guidance, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009, http://www.who.int/.
- M. B. Rothberg and S. D. Haessler, “Complications of seasonal and pandemic influenza,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. e91–e97, 2010.
- F. Hayden, “Developing new antiviral agents for influenza treatment: what does the future hold?” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 48, no. 1, supplement, pp. S3–S13, 2009.
- W. Paul Glezen, “Prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 24, pp. 2579–2585, 2008.
- The State of Pharmacopoeia Commission of People's Republic of China, Pharmacopoeia of People's Republic of China, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, China, 2005.
- J. Dushoff, J. B. Plotkin, C. Viboud, D. J. D. Earn, and L. Simonsen, “Mortality due to influenza in the United States—an annualized regression approach using multiple-cause mortality data,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 181–187, 2006.
- K. F. Cheng and P. C. Leung, “What happened in China during the 1918 influenza pandemic?” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 360–364, 2007.
- D. M. Fleming and A. J. Elliot, “The impact of influenza on the health and health care utilisation of elderly people,” Vaccine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. S1–S9, 2005.
- R. Glaser and J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, “Science and society—stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 243–251, 2005.
- R. R. He, M. Wang, C. Z. Wang et al., “Protective effect of apple polyphenols against stress-provoked influenza viral infection in restraint mice,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 3730–3737, 2011.
- R. R. He, X. S. Yao, H. Y. Li et al., “The anti-stress effects of Sarcandra glabra extract on restraint-evoked immunocompromise,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 2009.
- Y.-M. Pan, Z.-H. Yao, D. Yi, Z. Yi, D. Ying-hui, and Y. Xin-sheng, “Content determination of rosmarinic acid and isofraxidin in Sarcandra glabra extract and preparations by HPLC –UVD,” Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 457–461, 2010.
- S. T. Mayne, “Antioxidant nutrients and chronic disease: use of biomarkers of exposure and oxidative stress status in epidemiologic research,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 933S–940S, 2003.
- S. Q. Wu, M. Oteroc, F. M. Ungera et al., “Anti-inflammatory activity of an ethanolic Caesalpinia sappan extract in human chondrocytes and macrophages,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 364–372, 2011.
- N.-S. Zhong, Y.-M. Li, Z.-F. Yang et al., “Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of influenza (2011),” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 274–289, 2011.
- C. Z. Wang, P. Li, and C. S. Yuan, “Traditional chinese herbal therapy as a treatment option for H1N1 influenza,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 166–167, 2012.
- X. Wang, W. Jia, A. Zhao, and X. Wang, “Anti-influenza agents from plants and traditional chinese medicine,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 335–341, 2006.
- S. Fukuyama and Y. Kawaoka, “The pathogenesis of influenza virus infections: the contributions of virus and host factors,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 481–486, 2011.
- J. A. Belser, D. A. Wadford, C. Pappas et al., “Pathogenesis of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and triple-reassortant swine influenza A (H1) viruses in mice,” Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 4194–4203, 2010.
- M. D. de Jong, C. P. Simmons, T. T. Thanh et al., “Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1203–1207, 2006.
- R. Malhotra and R. B. Sim, “Collectins and viral infection,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 240–244, 1995.
- K. L. Hartshorn, M. R. White, V. Shepherd, K. Reid, J. G. Jensenius, and E. C. Crouch, “Mechanisms of anti-influenza activity of surfactant proteins A and D: comparison with serum collectins,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 273, no. 6, pp. L1156–L1166, 1997.
- S. Hawgood, C. Brown, J. Edmondson et al., “Pulmonary collectins modulate strain-specific influenza A virus infection and host responses,” Journal of Virology, vol. 78, no. 16, pp. 8565–8572, 2004.
- A. M. LeVine, J. A. Whitsett, K. L. Hartshorn, E. C. Crouch, and T. R. Korfhagen, “Surfactant protein D enhances clearance of influenza A virus from the lung in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 10, pp. 5868–5873, 2001.
- A. M. LeVine, K. E. Kurak, M. D. Bruno, J. M. Stark, J. A. Whitsett, and T. R. Korfhagen, “Surfactant protein-A-deficient mice are susceptible to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection,” The American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 700–708, 1998.
- V. Davé, T. Childs, Y. Xu et al., “Calcineurin/Nfat signaling is required for perinatal lung maturation and function,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 2597–2609, 2006.
- M. Yoeli-Lerner, G. K. Yiu, I. Rabinovitz, P. Erhardt, S. Jauliac, and A. Toker, “Akt blocks breast cancer cell motility and invasion through the transcription factor NFAT,” Molecular Cell, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 539–550, 2005.
- T. Ito, H. Okumura, N. Tsukue, T. Kobayashi, K. Honda, and K. Sekizawa, “Effect of diesel exhaust particles on mRNA expression of viral and bacterial receptors in rat lung epithelial L2 cells,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2006.
- L. D. Martin, T. M. Krunkosky, J. A. Voynow, and K. B. Adler, “The role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in airway epithelial gene expression,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1197–1203, 1998.
- H. Takizawa, S. Abe, T. Ohtoshi et al., “Diesel exhaust particles up-regulate expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in human bronchial epithelial cells,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 356–362, 2000.
- K. Takeda and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors in innate immunity,” International Immunology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2005.
- A. R. Everitt, S. Clare, T. Pertel et al., “IFITM3 restricts the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza,” Nature, vol. 484, no. 7395, pp. 519–523, 2012.
- V. Swarup, J. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, A. Saxena, and A. Basu, “Antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects of rosmarinic acid in an experimental murine model of Japanese encephalitis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 3367–3370, 2007.
- G. D. Gamaro, E. Suyenaga, M. Borsoi, J. Lermen, P. Pereira, and P. Ardenghi, “Effect of rosmarinic and caffeic acids on inflammatory and nociception process in rats,” ISRN Pharmacology, vol. 2011, Article ID 451682, 6 pages, 2011.
- H. J. Luo, J. Z. Wang, J. F. Chen, and K. Zou, “Docking study on chlorogenic acid as a potential H5N1 influenza A virus neuraminidase inhibitor,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 554–557, 2011.
- K. Ikeda, H. Tsujimoto, and M. Uozaki, “Inhibition multiplication of herpes simplex virus by caffeic acid,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 595–598, 2011.
- F. Wang, S. T. Yuan, and D. N. Zhu, “Active components of antitumor fraction from Sarcandra glabra,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 174–178, 2007.
- X. H. Xiao, Z. N. Guo, J. Deng, and G. Li, “Separation and purification of isofraxidin from Sarcandra glabra by microwave-assisted extraction coupled with high-speed counter-current chromatography,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 250–254, 2009.
- J. Geiler, M. Michaelis, P. Naczk et al., “N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) inhibits virus replication and expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in A549 cells infected with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 413–420, 2010.
- J. Won, Y. G. Hur, E. M. Hur et al., “Rosmarinic acid inhibits TCR-induced T cell activation and proliferation in an Lck-dependent manner,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 870–879, 2003.
- X. Chu, X. X. Ci, J. He et al., “Effects of a natural prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitor, rosmarinic acid, on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 3586–3598, 2012.
- J. Psotová, M. Kolář, J. Soušek, Z. Švagera, J. Vičar, and J. Ulrichová, “Biological activities of Prunella vulgaris extract,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1082–1087, 2003.
- N. Huang, C. Hauck, M. Y. Yum et al., “Rosmarinic acid in Prunella vulgaris ethanol extract inhibits lipopolysaccharide-Lnduced prostaglandin E2 and nitric oxide in RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 22, pp. 10579–10589, 2009.
- H. Widegren, M. Andersson, P. Borgeat, L. Flamand, S. Johnston, and L. Greiff, “LTB4 increases nasal neutrophil activity and conditions neutrophils to exert antiviral effects,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 997–1006, 2011.
- M. A. Carey, J. A. Bradbury, J. M. Seubert, R. Langenbach, D. C. Zeldin, and D. R. Germolec, “Contrasting effects of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 deficiency on the host response to influenza A viral infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 10, pp. 6878–6884, 2005.
- H. Y. Li, R. R. He, T. Liang, W. C. Ye, X. S. Yao, and H. Kurihara, “Effect of Sarcandra glabra (Thunb) Nakai extract on mice model of immunological hepatitis and acute inflammation,” Zhongguo Yaolixue Tongbao, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2008.