Uncertain Associations of Major Bleeding and Concurrent Use of Antiplatelet Agents and Chinese Medications: A Nested Case-Crossover Study

Tsai, Hsin-Hui; Lin, Hsiang-Wen; Tsai, Chiu-Lin; Yam, Felix K.; Lin, Sheng-Shing

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9417186

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 9417186 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9417186

Uncertain Associations of Major Bleeding and Concurrent Use of Antiplatelet Agents and Chinese Medications: A Nested Case-Crossover Study

Hsin-Hui Tsai,^1,2,3Hsiang-Wen Lin ,^4,5Chiu-Lin Tsai,⁵Felix K. Yam,⁶and Sheng-Shing Lin^7,8

Academic Editor: Fabio Firenzuoli

Received13 Mar 2017

Revised23 May 2017

Accepted22 Jun 2017

Published02 Aug 2017

Abstract

Despite the evidence that some commonly used Chinese medications (CMs) have antiplatelet/anticoagulant effects, many patients still used antiplatelets combined with CMs. We conducted a nested case-crossover study to examine the associations between the concomitant use of antiplatelets and CMs and major bleeding using population-based health database in Taiwan. Among the cohort of 79,463 outpatients prescribed antiplatelets (e.g., aspirin and clopidogrel) continuously, 1,209 patients hospitalized with new occurring bleeding in 2012 and 2013 were included. Those recruited patients served as their own controls to compare different times of exposure to prespecified CMs (e.g., Asian ginseng and dong quai) and antiplatelet agents. The periods of case, control 1, and control 2 were defined as 1–4 weeks, 6–9 weeks, and 13–16 weeks before hospitalization, respectively. Conditional logistic regression analyses found that concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs with any of the prespecified CMs in the case period might not significantly increase the risks of bleeding over that in the control periods (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.95 and OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.97). The study showed no strong relationships between hospitalization for major bleeding events and concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs with the prespecified CMs.

1. Introduction

The use of aspirin and/or other antiplatelet therapies for adults with or at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is strongly recommended by international guidelines [1, 2]. The risks of bleeding do not outweigh the benefits of antiplatelet therapy [3, 4]. Advanced age, female gender, multiple comorbidities, and concomitant use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs were found to be risk factors for bleedings [5, 6]. While 2 to 46% of patients with CVD ever took herbal products [7, 8], 20% of CVD patients had a previous history of concomitant use of antiplatelet agents with herbal medicines [9].

Despite a lack of scientific evidence to support the use of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), TCM is still common in Asian countries and is also increasing in popularity in Western countries. More than 60% of the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) beneficiaries have utilized TCM services, and approximately 86% of TCM visits resulted in prescriptions for Chinese medications (CMs) [10]. Despite studies showing that commonly used CMs (e.g., danshen, dong quai, and licorice) may have antiplatelet/anticoagulant effects [11, 12], many patients still used antiplatelet agents combined with CMs [9, 13]. Our previous study showed that the prevalence of concurrent use of antiplatelet agents with CMs was 13%, as the average duration of using antiplatelets with CMs was about 26 days in one year [14]. It implied that the concurrent use of CMs is usually intermittent rather than continuous. The aim of this study was to examine the transient events of concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs with a set of prespecified CMs and its association with hospitalization due to major bleeding events.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

The NHI in Taiwan was launched in 1995 and has enrolled more than 99% of the Taiwanese population. The majorities of marketed Western medications are evaluated by the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration and are covered by the NHI Program. Powdered, concentrated CM products, which are manufactured by pharmaceutical factories that comply with the current good manufacture practice, are almost covered. We utilized the 2000 and 2005 Longitudinal National Health Insurance Databases, from which two million beneficiaries were randomly selected from all of the registered beneficiaries (e.g., 23.28 million persons in 2012). The variables of interest to evaluate the outcomes and associations included patients’ disease statuses and medication use during the study periods. Our study was exempt from the Institutional Review Board because the NHI research database contains the deidentified person identifiers and has been made publicly available through a rigorous application process.

2.2. Study Design

Upon the literature review, it seems more popular to use case-crossover study design to evaluate drug safety concerns with transient exposure and corresponding abrupt outcomes in the area of pharmacoepidemiology [15, 16]. In this study, the outcome of interest was hospitalization due to major bleeding events, which were considered as acute and transient events among survivors. Thus, we first identified a cohort of antiplatelet users and then performed the case-crossover study design to examine the relationships between the major bleeding events and concomitant use of antiplatelet agents with CMs. In contrast to a case-control or cohort study, those who were ever hospitalized for major bleeding would serve as his or her own control to compare different times of exposure, rather than comparing the same time period across different individuals. In this case, such study design is expected to effectively decrease the selection bias and reduce the influence of confounders related to individuals in those studies regarding drug interactions [17, 18].

2.3. Study Population

Patients who were prescribed with antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, or ticlopidine) continuously for at least 180 days in outpatient settings between January 2012 and December 2013 were included in this open cohort. If there was more than one exposure to antiplatelet agents during the observation period, only the first exposure was considered to calculate its continuous use for each patient. Those antiplatelet agents that were approved to be used in Taiwan after 2012 (i.e., ticagrelor) and administered as an injection (e.g., tirofiban, eptifibatide, and abciximab) were not included. Enrolled patients were followed from the day of first antiplatelet prescription to the day of hospitalization due to major bleeding, discontinuation of antiplatelet agents, or the end of the study (31 December 2013), whichever came first. Major bleeding was defined as a diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, intracranial bleeding, nose/eye bleeding, urogenital bleeding, and others. If the number of days between the last date of an antiplatelet prescription and the start date of the following antiplatelet prescription exceeded seven days, it was defined as discontinuous use. The date of hospitalization due to major bleeding was identified as the index date. For each patient, only the first hospitalization during the observation period was considered. Furthermore, we excluded those who had a history of major bleeding within the six months prior to the first exposure to antiplatelet agents as cases for further analysis in this study.

2.4. Exposure to Chinese Medications

The following concentrated, NHI covered CMs, which have been reported to have evidence of bleeding risks [12], were identified as the “prespecified” CMs: American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius), Asian ginseng (Panax ginseng), danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza), dong quai (Angelica sinensis), garlic (Allium sativum), ginger (Zingiber officinale), licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra), Siberian ginseng (Eleutherococcus senticosus), and turmeric (Curcuma longa). We further evaluated their risks of bleeding with antiplatelets. The use of any single CM or CM formula (i.e., 244 items of CM formula in total) with these prespecified CMs during the study period was defined as an exposure, which could be the source of potential interactions with antiplatelets.

Previous studies have shown that the majority of bleeding events in patients using dual antiplatelet therapy occurred in the 2–4 weeks following the initiation of the combination [4, 19]. Applying the same concept, we hypothesized that the concurrent use of antiplatelet agents and prespecified CMs would increase the risks of bleeding over a similar time frame. Thus, we defined the case period as 1–4 weeks prior to the index date (i.e., hospitalization due to major bleeding), while control period 1 and control period 2 were identified as 6–9 weeks and 13–16 weeks prior to the index date, respectively. The detailed exposure patterns of prespecified CMs before hospitalization due to major hemorrhage events among antiplatelet users during each study period were further examined. In a sensitivity analysis, we performed the same analysis approach on a different cohort of antiplatelet users (those who were NHI beneficiaries in 2010-2011) to compare the effects of the prespecified CM use between case period and control periods.

2.5. Potential Confounders

We controlled for comorbidities and comedications during these study periods, which might contribute to an increase or reduction of bleeding risks among antiplatelet users. The following comorbidities were included: cancer, cerebrovascular accidents, coronary artery diseases, diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, liver disease, obesity, and renal failure. Medications that potentiate or decrease the risks of bleeding were controlled for further analysis. The included medications were as follows: (1) glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, statins, and warfarin; and (2) selective histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2 blockers), proton-pump inhibitors, and cytoprotective agents (e.g., misoprostol and sucralfate) [17, 20–22].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

During the observation period, we calculated the period prevalence and incidence of hospitalization related to major bleeding occurrences among antiplatelet users. The number of patients hospitalized due to major bleeding was the numerator and all antiplatelet users included in the cohort were the denominator in the estimation of the period prevalence. Instead, the number of patients hospitalized due to major bleeding minus the number of patients with the prior history of bleeding was used as numerator to calculate the incidence. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences in comorbidities and comedications during case and control periods. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the associations between major bleeding and exposure to concomitant use of the prespecified CMs and antiplatelet agents. A univariate regression model was used to estimate the crude odds ratios (ORs), while a multivariate regression model was used for adjusted ORs. All the listed “potential confounders” in the prior section were included in the multivariate model. A value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for overall use of any CMs and each individual CM. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4.

3. Results

During the study period of 2012-2013, 79,463 continuous antiplatelet users were identified and were followed for 86,615 person-years. The average follow-up time was 397.5 ± 177.0 days. Of them, 1,516 patients (1.91%) were identified to have had hospitalization due to major bleeding events. The majority of those patients (n = 1,068, 70.45%) were hospitalized for GI bleeding, followed by urogenital bleeding (n = 158, 10.42%), intracranial bleeding (n = 145, 9.56%), and nose/eye bleeding (n = 67, 4.42%) (Table 1). The period prevalence of total bleeding events and GI bleeding events among antiplatelet users increased with age (Figure 1), especially in the elderly (i.e., greater than 65 years old).

After excluding patients with a history of major bleeding, 1,209 patients were included for further analysis (Figure 2). More than half of the antiplatelet users with incidents of major bleeding were male (n = 742, 61.4%). The mean age of included participants was 74.1 ± 11.7. The incidence of any major bleeding was 1.52% (14.0 per 1000 person-years). Table 2 shows that more patients had a diagnosis of hypertension and renal failure during the case period (1–4 weeks prior to the index date) when compared with control period 2 (13–16 weeks prior to the index date). In addition, more patients had a prescription for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or a prescription for H2 receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors during the case period (1–4 weeks prior to the index date) when compared with the both control periods (6–9 weeks or 13–16 weeks prior to the index date).

No prescription records for American ginseng, garlic, or Siberian ginseng were found in the TCM outpatient records of the included NHI beneficiaries in the study periods. The detailed exposure patterns of prespecified CMs before hospitalization due to major hemorrhage events during each study period were described in Appendix 1 in Supplementary Material available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9417186. In total, there were 97 antiplatelet users ever exposed to specified CM during case and/or control periods before hospitalization due to major bleedings (Appendix 1 in Supplementary Material). Of them, 62, 60, and 56 antiplatelet users had ever been prescribed with the specified CMs during case, control 1, and control 2 periods, respectively (Table 3). Specifically, 42 and 32 among 62 antiplatelet users were prescribed with those CMs in both case/control period 1 and case/control period 2, respectively (Table 3). Twenty-nine patients were prescribed CMs exactly one day before the hospitalization due to major bleedings (with the exposure days ranging from 1 day to more than 2 weeks) and 18 patients were prescribed specified CMs more than 14 days during the closest two-week periods prior to hospitalization due to major hemorrhage events. Some other patients were prescribed CMs only in either control period 1 and/or control period 2 but not in case period (Appendix 1 in Supplementary Material).

To compare with control periods 1 and 2, the adjusted ORs (with a 95% CI) for risk of bleeding events were 1.00 (0.51–1.95) and 1.13 (0.65–1.97), respectively (Table 3). Most of those patients were prescribed with the CM formula; thus the ORs of any of prespecified CM formula were similar to the results of any use of prespecified CM. Although the OR of any of prespecified single CM was less than 1, the CI showed that there was no significant difference. Concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs with Asian ginseng in the case period increased the risk of bleeding more than that in the control period 2. The adjusted ORs were 3.27 (1.09–9.83). The use of danshen, dong quai, and ginger seemed to decrease the risk of bleeding, while these results did not reach statistical significance. The ORs of concurrent use of antiplatelets with licorice were similar to the results of any use of prespecified CM (Table 3). Some of the statistically significant differences and directions of outcomes varied in the sensitivity analysis. For instance, all of the adjusted ORs for antiplatelet users ever exposed to any of the individual CM (including Asian ginseng) were not statistically significant in the sensitivity analysis in 2010-2011 (Appendix 2 in Supplementary Material).

4. Discussion

We found that the period prevalence and incidence of any major bleeding events were 1.91% and 1.52%, respectively, among antiplatelet users. More than 70% of the bleeding events were attributed to GI bleeding. The use of any prespecified CMs (i.e., Asian ginseng, danshen, dong quai, ginger, licorice, and turmeric) in the cohort might not increase the risk of major bleeding event significantly. The relationship between hospitalization for major bleeding and concurrent use of antiplatelet agents with any individual CM was not robust.

The low prevalence of hospitalization due to the major bleedings (i.e., 1.91%) among the antiplatelet users in Taiwan was similar to the findings obtained in a meta-analysis [23]. The rates of major bleeding for aspirin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine were 1.0–2.5%. Moreover, the prevalence of major bleeding, especially GI bleeding, among antiplatelet users increased as the patients’ ages increased. This finding is consistent with other review articles [5]. Polypharmacy and polyherbacy are common among the elderly population and may be associated with a greater propensity for drug interactions [24–26].

There is conflicting evidence on the potential effects of Asian ginseng with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. An in vitro study found that a crude extract of Asian ginseng and its active component, ginsenoside Rg2, had strong anticoagulant effects [27]. However, the concurrent use of warfarin and Asian ginseng had no effect on international normalized ratios in a randomized crossover study [28]. Furthermore, the in vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that “unprocessed” Asian ginseng has fewer antiplatelet effects compared to “processed” Asian ginseng [29]. Although we did not observe a robust association between concomitant use of antiplatelet agents and Asian ginseng in the occurrence of major bleeding events in this study, the significant associations between case period and farther period (i.e., control period 2), regardless of controlling for other factors, were observed but these might have occurred due to chance. Nevertheless, it is still recommended that healthcare professionals still should be aware of the possible effects of Asian ginseng on antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents.

The integration of conventional medicine with complementary and alternative medicine, including TCM (e.g., using Asian ginseng as medications or in herbal cuisine), is becoming popular all over the world [30, 31]. In particular, the combination of Western medication and CM is increasingly prevalent and commonly used to treat many chronic diseases in the Chinese population, including CVD [32–36]. For instance, a meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of CM to conventional therapy for patients with myocardial infarction could reduce the mortality but could also increase the risk of bleeding [34].

We did not identify a strong relationship between major bleeding events and concomitant exposure to antiplatelet agents and any individual prespecified CMs in this study. The impact of the selected CMs on bleeding risks seemed various across different individual CMs. We assumed those CMs with multiple ingredients, with different concentrations of the active ingredients, and various processing procedures may be the reasons for the inconsistent findings [37]. Furthermore, the composition of a CM formula is usually based on the common, conventional principle of a drug remedy, that is, prescribing based on the roles of drugs as monarch, minister, adjuvant, or guide. Those CMs recognized as “monarch” drugs usually have major amounts of the ingredients and play important roles. In contrast, CMs categorized as guiding drugs are medications with relatively minor amounts to regulate the properties of the other CMs [38]. These guiding CMs are frequently used. For instance, licorice is the most common guiding drug and is contained in more than half of CM formulas to increase the effectiveness, to reduce the toxicity, or to improve the flavor of the other ingredients [39]. The majority of antiplatelet users who used CMs were also exposed to licorice in this study so that the crude ORs of licorice were similar to the results obtained from any use CMs.

Several limitations were unavoidable in this study and need to be addressed. Firstly, we only included antiplatelet users who had encountered the observed outcomes of hospitalization due to major bleeding events. Patients who suffered from mild or moderate bleeding but do not require to be hospitalized (i.e., visiting in outpatient clinics or the emergency department) and could die due to massive bleeding were not evaluated in this study. Secondly, only NHI covered concentrated CMs were included so that the clinical consequences of decoction pieces of crude CMs or of dietary supplement products with antiplatelet agents were not evaluated. Thirdly, this study did not include some other additional factors which might be associated with major bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy or combination with the new oral anticoagulants was not evaluated. The dosing of the antiplatelet medications or CMs was not considered in this study. The study used a predefined list of CMs with evidence for antiplatelet or anticoagulant effect and might miss those additional CMs or CM formulas which also have anticoagulant or antiplatelet properties. Moreover, the lifestyle data (i.e., smoking and drinking history and body mass index) was not evaluated due to lack of data in the study database. Adherence to prescribed medications and CMs was also not able to be assessed using the NHI database. In addition, only the first three and five diagnoses were included in outpatient and inpatient databases of NHI databases, respectively. Thus, only the most important diagnoses (i.e., the most severe diseases) could be identified during each of the study periods. As a result, we performed a case-crossover study instead of a conventional case-control or cohort study to reduce the influence of these confounders. Further, the length of exposure windows for case and control periods prior to the hospitalization due to major bleedings (e.g., 1–4 weeks versus 13–16 weeks) might be the other contributing factor for the various associations as well. Lastly, a case-crossover study is typically performed when events are considered acute and transient. We made the assumption that bleeding events leading to hospitalization were acute events triggered by a recent occurrence. This method may underestimate the bleeding risk that is present throughout treatment. However, a similar case-crossover study approach was used in the other studies evaluating the risk of acute myocardial infarction based on the time of day [40, 41].

5. Conclusions

The findings of this population-based study showed that the risk of major bleeding associated with combination of any prespecified CMs (including Asian ginseng, danshen, dong quai, ginger, or licorice) with antiplatelet agents was not ascertained. Regardless, healthcare professionals still need to carefully monitor and assess bleeding risks on those patients who are taking CMs and are prescribed antiplatelet agents. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of concomitant use of antiplatelet agents and CMs in the integrative therapy in the future.

Disclosure

The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the National Health Insurance Administration, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, or the National Health Research Institutes. The listed funding agencies had no role in the study implementation, analysis, or interpretation of data or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Further, the preliminary results of this study have been presented as a poster at the 18th Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in New Orleans, USA, during May 18–23, 2013.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The research database was based, in part, on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the National Health Insurance Administration, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and was managed by the National Health Research Institutes. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant NSC102-2320-B-039-007), the National Health Research Institute, Taiwan (Grants NHRI-EX103-10318PC, NHRI-EX104-10318PC, NHRI-EX105-10318PC, and NHRI-EX106-10318PC), and Department of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy in Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW104-CMAP-M-114-112412 and MOHW105-CMAP-M114-122403).

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 1: The detailed use pattern of any of the prespecific Chinese medications during 2012-2013.

Appendix 2: Results of sensitive analyses using the cohort with the same criteria and same case and control periods of 2010-2011 databases.

Supplementary Material

References

S. Lischke and D. J. Schneider, “Recent developments in the use of antiplatelet agents to prevent cardiovascular events,” Future Cardiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 403–413, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Furie, S. E. Kasner, and R. J. Adams, “Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 227–276, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Spinler, “Oral antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: Balancing efficacy and bleeding risk,” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, vol. 67, no. 15, pp. S7–S17, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Alli, C. Smith, M. Hoffman, S. Amanullah, P. Katz, and A. M. Amanullah, “Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 410–414, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kalyanasundaram and A. M. Lincoff, “Managing adverse effects and drug-drug interactions of antiplatelet agents,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 592–600, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cohen, “Expanding the recognition and assessment of bleeding events associated with antiplatelet therapy in primary care,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Grant, Y. S. Bin, H. Kiat, and D. H.-T. Chang, “The use of complementary and alternative medicine by people with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review,” BMC Public Health, vol. 12, no. 1, article 299, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Anderson and A. G. Taylor, “Use of complementary therapies by individuals with or at risk for cardiovascular disease: Results of the 2007 national health interview sSurvey,” Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 96–102, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Saw, M. B. Bahari, H. H. Ang, and Y. H. Lim, “Potential drug-herb interaction with antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs,” Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 236–241, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F.-P. Chen, T.-J. Chen, Y.-Y. Kung, Y.-C. Chen, L.-F. Chou, and S.-J. Hwang, “Use frequency of traditional Chinese medicine in Taiwan,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 7, article 26, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Mousa, “Antithrombotic effects of naturally derived products on coagulation and platelet function,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 663, pp. 229–240, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-H. Tsai, H.-W. Lin, Y.-H. Lu, Y.-L. Chen, and G. B. Mahady, “A review of potential harmful interactions between anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents and Chinese herbal medicines,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e64255, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. W. Elmer, W. E. Lafferty, P. T. Tyree, and B. K. Lind, “Potential interactions between complementary/alternative products and conventional medicines in a Medicare population,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1617–1624, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-H. Tsai, H.-W. Lin, C.-R. Chien, and T.-C. Li, “Concurrent use of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or digoxin with Chinese medications: A population-based cohort study,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 629–639, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maclure and M. A. Mittleman, “Should we use a case-crossover design?” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 21, pp. 193–221, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. P. Consiglio, A. M. Burden, M. Maclure, L. Mccarthy, and S. M. Cadarette, “Case-crossover study design in pharmacoepidemiology: Systematic review and recommendations,” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1146–1153, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schelleman, W. B. Bilker, C. M. Brensinger, X. Han, S. E. Kimmel, and S. Hennessy, “Warfarin with fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, or azole antifungals: Interactions and the risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 581–588, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Wright, T. Gomes, M. M. Mamdani, J. R. Horn, and D. N. Juurlink, “The risk of hypotension following co-prescription of macrolide antibiotics and calcium-channel blockers,” CMAJ, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 303–307, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Grau, S. Reiners, C. Lichy, F. Buggle, and A. Ruf, “Platelet function under aspirin, clopidogrel, and both after ischemic stroke: A case-crossover study,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 849–854, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hippisley-Cox, C. Coupland, and R. Logan, “Risk of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Population based nested case-control analysis,” British Medical Journal, vol. 331, no. 7528, pp. 1310–1312, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Schalekamp, O. H. Klungel, P. C. Souverein, and A. De Boer, “Effect of oral antiplatelet agents on major bleeding in users of coumarins,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1076–1083, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Mackenzie, M. W. H. Coughtrie, T. M. MacDonald, and L. Wei, “Antiplatelet drug interactions,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 268, no. 6, pp. 516–529, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. L. Serebruany, A. I. Malinin, R. M. Eisert, and D. C. Sane, “Risk of Bleeding Complications with Antiplatelet Agents: Meta-Analysis of 338,191 Patients Enrolled in 50 Randomized Controlled Trials,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Loya, A. González-Stuart, and J. O. Rivera, “Prevalence of polypharmacy, polyherbacy, nutritional supplement use and potential product interactions among older adults living on the United States-Mexico border: A descriptive, questionnaire-based study,” Drugs and Aging, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 423–436, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Venturini, P. Engroff, L. S. Ely et al., “Gender differences, polypharmacy, and potential pharmacological interactions in the elderly,” Clinics, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 1867–1872, 2011, (Sao Paulo, Brazil).
View at: Google Scholar
J. Luo, H. Xu, and K.-J. Chen, “Potential benefits of Chinese Herbal Medicine for elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases,” Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 305–309, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Li, H. B. Wang, and B. J. Xu, “A comparative study on anticoagulant activities of three Chinese herbal medicines from the genus Panax and anticoagulant activities of ginsenosides Rg1 and Rg2,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1077–1080, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Jiang, K. M. Williams, W. S. Liauw et al., “Effect of St John's wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 592–599, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-J. Lau, D.-F. Toh, T.-K. Chua, Y.-K. Pang, S.-O. Woo, and H.-L. Koh, “Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effects of Panax notoginseng: Comparison of raw and steamed Panax notoginseng with Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolium,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 380–386, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Eisenberg, “Trends in integrative medicine: A U.S. perspective,” European Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 160, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. R. Liang and Y. Tang, “International trends in integrative medicine-the Chinese perspective,” European Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 159, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. F. Li and H. H. Zhang, “The development of integrated Chinese and western medicine in recent 5 decades,” Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 289–293, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Dobos and I. Tao, “The model of Western integrative medicine: the role of Chinese medicine,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. C. H. Chung, M. Chen, Q. Ying et al., “Add-on effect of chinese herbal medicine on mortality in myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 675906, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, H. Yin, and K. Chen, “Platelet proteomics and its advanced application for research of blood stasis syndrome and activated blood circulation herbs of Chinese medicine,” Science China Life Sciences, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1000–1006, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li and H. Xu, “Integrative western and chinese medicine on coronary heart disease: Where is the orientation?” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 459264, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Coxeter, A. J. McLachlan, C. C. Duke, and B. D. Roufogalis, “Herb-drug interactions: An evidence based approach,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1513–1525, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, X. Wang, and P. Liu, “Progress of Research on Organic Fibrosis with Traditional Chinese Medicine,” World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 53–59, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Chen, L. Shan, G. Fan, and X. Gao, “Liquorice, a unique ‘guide drug’ of traditional Chinese medicine: a review of its role in drug interactions,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 781–790, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Mittleman, M. MacLure, and D. B. Glasser, “Evaluation of acute risk for myocardial infarction in men treated with Sildenafil Citrate,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 443–446, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-Y. Shau, H.-C. Chen, S.-T. Chen et al., “Risk of new acute myocardial infarction hospitalization associated with use of oral and parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammation drugs (NSAIDs): A case-crossover study of Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database and review of current evidence,” BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, vol. 12, article no. 4, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Hsin-Hui Tsai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1312

Downloads

829

Citations