Research Article
Effects of MATAS Hopscotch Technique in the Teaching of Fractions and Error Patterns Made by Year 5 Pupils
Table 5
Distribution of errors in the subtraction of fractions made by the control group and treatment group in the pretest.
| Types of errors | Pretest | Control group | Treatment group | Average ability | Low ability | Total | Average ability | Low ability | Total |
| Whole number concept errors | 12 (42.9%) | 2 (7.1%) | 14 (50%) | 10 (35.7%) | 3 (10.7%) | 13 (46.4%) | Directions errors | 12 (42.9%) | 15 (53.6%) | 27 (96.4%) | 8 (28.6%) | 18 (64.3%) | 26 (92.9%) | Application errors | — | — | — | — | — | — | Careless errors | 1 (3.6%) | — | 1 (3.6%) | 2 (7.1%) | — | 2 (7.1%) | No errors | — | — | — | — | | |
|
|