Research Article
Flipping a Dental Anatomy Course: A Retrospective Study Over Four Years
Table 3
Showing a summary of the SEC standard questions results obtained over the period of the study before and after using the flipped classroom method.
| | SEC standard questions | 2012 | 2013 | Average before flipped classroom | 2014 | 2015 | Average after flipped classroom | value (single -test) |
| | Response rate (% response/total enrolment) | 52 (42%) | 42 (31%) | 47 | 84 (64%) | 113 (89%) | 98.5 | |
| | (1) This course was well-organised. | 3.6 | 4 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| | (2) This course engaged me in learning. | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.45 | |
| | (3) The teaching (lecturers, tutors, online etc..) on this course was effective in helping me to learn. | 3.6 | 4.1 | 3.85 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.35 | |
| | (4) Overall I am satisfied with the quality of this course. | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
|
|
