Research Article

Teacher Learning within a Multinational Project in an Upper Secondary School

Table 3

The analysis framework of the investigated courses.

Depth of the application of the DP
Level 1Level 2Level 3

(1) Organizing activities around shared “objects”Answers to teacher’s questions: every individual or a group answered the same questions and the answers were then sharedGroup work and a joint object: the improvement is based on division of labour; only limited collaborative improvementGroups had a collaborative object for their work: sharing and versioning were a collective responsibility

(2) Supporting integration of personal and collective agency and work through developing shared objectsEither individual or group work but the agency for these was not integratedIndividual and group work somewhat integrated; for example, an individual writing task following the group work and based on itIndividual and group work integrated; for example, group outcomes are constructed from individual contributions

(3) Emphasizing development and creativity in working on shared objects through transformations and reflectionVersioning or different types of information not used, no reflectionVersioning during the process but only limited reflection, for example, only by the teacher, or examination of various types of informationMultiple ways of versioning and reflecting by peers and the teacher, for example, mind maps for brainstorming, collaborative writing, and a presentation

(4) Fostering long-term processes of knowledge advancement with shared objectsMainly one lesson-two lessons; no reuse of the outcomesLongitudinal process, for example, time used regularly during a course; no reuse of the outcomesLongitudinal process, for example, time used regularly during a course; reuse for other activities supported

(5) Promoting cross-fertilization of knowledge practices and artefacts across communities and institutionsNo cross-fertilization; however, authentic (Internet) sources bring some external influencesSome cross-fertilization conducted but not integrated into the course work, for example, an external visitorCross-fertilization between subjects or external visits integrated in the course work, for example, prepared questions to the expert and postreflection of the expert’s answers

(6) Providing flexible tools for developing artefacts and practicesBasic office tools and the Internet in use but not used for collaborationMultiple tools, also collaborative, but the use is limited, for example, sharing only between the teacher and each groupA rich variety of tools, used meaningfully, for example, students’ mobile phones used for recording and brainstorming or mind maps tools and collaborative tools