About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Forestry Research
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 450715, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/450715
Research Article

Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Eucalyptus in Africa and Madagascar

1Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, Département BIOS, CIRAD, UMR 113, TA10J, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
2Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, Département Environnement et Ressources, IRD, UMR 113, TA10J, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
3Département des Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement, Fondation Universitaire Luxembourgeoise, 6700 Arlon, Belgium

Received 8 June 2012; Revised 25 September 2012; Accepted 8 October 2012

Academic Editor: Thomas R. Fox

Copyright © 2012 Marc Ducousso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Use of the Australian genus Eucalyptus in short rotation plantations in Africa and Madagascar has developed over the last century to such an extent that it is becoming the most frequently planted genus in Africa. In order to find ecologically well-adapted eucalypts, foresters have tested different species of various origins and the number of tested Eucalyptus species now exceeds 150 in Africa. Due to the ability of eucalypts to naturally form ectomycorrhizae, even in the absence of any controlled introduction of compatible ectomycorrhizal fungal partners, their introduction in new ecosystems has direct consequences for ectomycorrhizal fungus communities. A bibliographical compilation, together with original field observations on putative ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with eucalypts in Africa and in Madagascar, has been drawn up in two lists: one for Africa and one for Madagascar where surprisingly high fungal diversity was observed. The level of diversity, the putative origin of the fungi, and their potential impact on native ectomycorrhizal fungi are discussed. The development of eucalypts plantations will inexorably lead to the increase of exotic fungal species being potentially invasive in the considered region.

1. Introduction

Since colonial times, the African woodlands have been subjected to irreversible management policies that have resulted in the planting of large areas with exotic trees, for instance Pinus and Eucalyptus. In Mediterranean and tropical countries eucalypts are planted because they are generally fast-growing trees that make for a profitable business. Nowadays, eucalypt plantations cover approximately 1,8 Mha in Africa and are the most important planted genus on that continent [1]. In order to extend plantations and increase profits, it appeared necessary to find and select new eucalypt genotype adapted to different ecological situations. To that end, foresters started to test different Eucalyptus species of different origins, notably in Africa and Madagascar (e.g., [2, 3]). As a result, the number of introduced eucalypt species in African plantation trials now exceeds 150. Some of them are used in commercial plantations as pure species or as hybrids [4]. The mass introduction of these exotic species in Africa definitely has consequences for local plant biodiversity and also for soil microbial communities such as ectomycorrhizal (ecm) fungi. Indeed, the ability of eucalypt species to form ectomycorrhizae, which are ecologically important symbioses that mainly associate homobasidiomycetous fungi, was observed for the first time in South Africa by Van der Bijl [5]. Since then, the ecm status of eucalypt species has been clarified [6] notably in Australia where a large diversity of fungal partner has been described [712]. Until now, ecm fungi found in Africa and Madagascar have resulted putatively from chance introductions, from compatibility with native ecm fungi, or from compatibility with ecm fungi from other exotic plantations. Indeed, the use of soil as an inoculant or any other source of inoculation that might bring ecm fungi from the tree’s native area has not been reported when establishing eucalypt plantations. Some controlled field inoculation trials using pure strains were set up, but only on very limited areas (e.g., [14]) and, in this case, the invasion of neighboring plantations by the introduced strains was not reported. Controlled field inoculation trials provide ways of entry for new ecm fungi that cannot be neglected, as is the case for China [15, 16]. However, the fungal species or even the strain reference might be known, enabling tracking in the plantation or in surrounding plantations. In Africa, we are in a situation where we have no proof of any propagation of a fungal species after the controlled inoculation of a eucalypt plantation. However, we are in a particular case where human activity, eucalypt plantations, has direct and mostly uncontrolled consequences for another compulsorily related biological community: ecm fungi.

Published papers, unpublished information, and authors personal data formed the basis of our work to synthesize the knowledge available on putative ecm fungi of eucalypt plantations in Africa and Madagascar. An annotated list of putative ecm fungi of eucalypts is given for more than 20 African countries and Madagascar.

2. Materials and Methods

A bibliographical search covering 30 years was carried out enabling us to uncover all the published papers and also a large share of the “grey literature” directly linked to our topic: ecm fungi associated with eucalypts in Africa and Madagascar. Written reports and all the oral reports of ecm partnerships have always to be considered with great caution and skepticism. Indeed, proving the ability of a tree species to form ectomycorrhizae with one particular fungal species is always a difficult task; the existence of other local or introduced ecm tree species in the vicinity of eucalypt plantations as well as the mistaken identification of the fungal partner can lead to misinterpretation. Definitely doubtful data are not considered in the rest of the paper and unreliable data are presented with a special mention of what needs to be considered with caution.

In addition, field surveys were organized in eucalypt plantations, notably in different African countries and in Madagascar; fungal fruiting bodies were systematically collected from the plantations. Litter and a few centimeters of topsoil were removed to search for hypogeous fungi on at least 4 m2 in each plantation. Fungal specimens were deposited at the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris (PC), France. In order to prove the ecm partnership, careful mycelium and root tracking were carried out in the field enabling us to assess physical links between fruiting bodies, ecm root tips, and the bearing trees.

Ectomycorrhizae histological studies were also carried out on materials collected in the field to reveal the fungal sheath and the Hartig net (Table 2).

3. Results

In Africa, 35 ecm fungal species are mentioned as being associated with 15 identified eucalypt species and a range of unidentified species (at least five), along with hybrids (Table 1). Pisolithus was present and often highly dominant or even alone in almost all the plantations, as is the case in the West African dry tropics with Pisolithus albus in E. camaldulensis plantations (Figure 1(a)). The importance of the genus Pisolithus and to a lesser degree, the genus Scleroderma, was noteworthy (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). The presence of the ubiquitous ecm fungus Thelephora sp. in the wet tropics was also noteworthy (Figure 1(d)). During the surveys ([13] in Table 1), ectomycorrhizae with a typical fungal sheath and a Hartig net (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)) were found in the vicinity of fruiting bodies.

tab1
Table 1: List of ectomycorrhizal fungi found associated with eucalypts in Africa with an indication of the country where the observation was made and the reference.
tab2
Table 2: Color, diameter, fungal mantle thickness, and Hartig net depth of ectomycorrhizae in situ collected in Senegal on 3 species of Eucalyptus.
fig1
Figure 1: Example of ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizae of eucalypts in Africa. (a) Pisolithus albus; (b) Pisolithus marmoratus; (c) Scleroderma flavidum; (d) Thelephora sp.; (e) golden yellow ectomycorrhizae of Pisolithus albus with E. camaldulensis; (f) cross-section of an ectomycorrhizae of Pisolithus albus with E. camaldulensis. The bar represents 50  m.

In Madagascar, we collected 38 putative ecm fungal species from nine E. robusta plantations on the outskirts of Antananarivo (Table 3, Figures 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), 2(e)). At these nine survey sites, Pisolithus was found only once and was far from dominant. In addition to this surprising diversity associated with E. robusta, two different Pisolithus species were found at two other sites in the southeast of Madagascar (Figure 2(f)).

tab3
Table 3: List of ectomycorrhizal fungi found associated with Eucalyptus robusta and Eucalyptus sp. in Madagascar.
fig2
Figure 2: Example of putative ectomycorrhizal fungi of Eucalyptus robusta in Madagascar. (a) Amanita sp.3; (b) Cantharellus eucalyptorum; (c) Cantharellus congolensis; (d) Rubinoboletus sp.; (e) Russula sp.3; (f) Pisolithus sp.

4. Discussion

Ectomycorrhizal deficiency never seems to have been a problem in the early establishment of eucalypts. Ryvarden et al. [17] noted that selected trees form satisfactory partnerships with some introduced ecm fungi, notably Pisolithus arhizus which is now extremely abundant under eucalypts in Africa, and also with some elements of the indigenous ecm mycoflora. It is interesting to note that renantherous species of Eucalyptus known for their high dependence on ecm symbiosis [6] have been excluded by foresters due to their poor growth performance even in a Mediterranean climate (North Africa and South Africa), where the range of putatively adapted species is wide. During the process of eucalypt introduction and selection, foresters have neglected ecm symbiosis. This fact has probably led to the selection of tree species dependent little on ectomycorrhizae for early survival and growth. South America is also a place where eucalypts were abundantly planted and are found to be ectomycorrhizal with a range of ecm fungi ([13, 1820, 42, 43] and Table 4). Some similarities with the African ecm fungi have to be mentioned, notably, the importance of genera Scleroderma and Pisolithus. On another hand, importance and diversity of genera Descomyces, Hydnangium, Hymenogaster, Hysterangium, and Setchelliogaster seems scarcer in Africa rather than in South America.

tab4
Table 4: List of some ecm fungi and associated eucalypt hosts spontaneously found in South America: Brazil (BR), Uruguay (UR), and Argentina (AR).
4.1. Fungal Diversity in Africa

According to Buyck [44], the native ecm fungi are unable to form ectomycorrhizae with exotic trees and consequently, eucalypts ecm fungi are limited to a few ecm fungal species that are now cosmopolitan. The observation made by Härkönen et al. [23] corroborated Buyck’s observation: the indigenous fungi cannot grow in symbiosis with the introduced trees. These assertions seem rather excessive; indeed records of typical European species such as Amanita muscaria, A. phalloides, Paxillus involutus, or Rhizopogon luteolus [21, 23, 32, 33] or typical African species such as Amanita zambiana, Cantharellus densifolius, or Phlebopus sudanicus [24, 25, 45], indicate possibilities for some native fungi, or for fungi introduced with other exotic species such as pines, to form ectomycorrhizae with eucalypts. The presented data clearly show that the level of fungal diversity in Africa remains very low under eucalypts: only 34 ecm fungal species were recorded since 1918 [5]! The easily disseminated (by wind and rain splashing) and largely distributed genus Pisolithus is present and dominates in most plantations; other records always seem exceptional. A regular increase in fungal diversity, due to new uncontrolled introductions, to the extension of plantations to new climatic and soil conditions, and to the ageing of some plantations creating favorable conditions for the development of late stage ecm fungi is unavoidable. With the increasing importance of eucalypt plantations in Africa, we have here an interesting area to improve our knowledge on the role played by ecm diversity in the sustainability of eucalypt plantations.

On the other hand, the presence of ecm fungi associated with eucalypts has not yet been reported under native ecm trees. Presumably there is incompatibility between eucalypt ecm fungi and those of the indigenous African ecm trees (e.g., Afzelia spp., Brachystegia spp., Berlinia spp., and Isoberlinia spp. among the Caesalpiniaceae; Monotes spp., Marquesia spp. among the Dipterocarpaceae; Uapaca spp. among the Euphorbiaceae).

4.2. The Case of Madagascar

In Madagascar 80% of the vascular plants were considered to be endemic [46]. It also has one of the highest concentrations of endemic plant families: nine families represented by a total of 19 genera ca. 90 species [47, 48]. Of these, the ectotrophic Sarcolaenaceae [49] represent 56 species. Plantations of the Central Plateau are widely dominated by one single species: E. robusta. Among the 38 putatively ecm fungal species found associated with E. robusta, some red cap Russula sp. and Cantharellus eucalyptorum are marketed locally as edible, and the latter is exported to the surrounding countries. The number of ecm fungi found associated with E. robusta in a one-year survey was larger than the number of ecm fungi found in the whole of continental Africa since more than 80 years of observations. Amanita, Boletus (s.l.), Cantharellus, and Russula are the dominating genera found under E. robusta; on the other hand, members of the Sclerodermataceae were rarely observed. The presence of Madagascan endemic plant taxa able to form ecm in eucalypt plantations or in the nearby surroundings as been carefully explored and none of the already known ecm families such as Sarcolaenaceae, Rhopalocarpaceae, Caesalpiniaceae, or Euphorbiaceae has been found. Other grass and shrubs growing under the canopy of eucalypts plantations were arbuscular mycorrhizal or for a few of them, nonmycorrhizal (unpublished). To conclude, this striking difference has yet to be elucidated.

4.3. Hypotheses on the Possible Origins of ECM Fungi in Eucalypts Plantations

Until now, the rational use of ecm fungi by eucalypt plantations has been poorly developed in Africa. Inoculations with selected ecm strains are still restricted to some experimental plantations [14]. The origin of the ecm fungi found associated with eucalypts in Africa and in Madagascar has yet to be elucidated. At least, three hypotheses can be put forward: (1) chance introductions from Australia of (fully) compatible ecm fungi (e.g., Pisolithus spp.), (2) compatibility with some “broad host” ecm fungi growing in native African forests, and (3) compatibility with some ecm fungi growing in other exotic plantations (e.g., pine plantations). In any event, further studies are necessary to unravel the origins of the fungi in eucalypt plantations.

Curiously, in Madagascar, the level of fungal diversity observed under E. robusta is comparable to the diversity level of native ectotrophic forests [49]. The possibility that ecm fungi associated with E. robusta in Madagascar are of Australian origin has to be explored. Comparisons of our material collected under eucalypts (Table 2) with native Australian specimens and with samples of ecm fungi from native Madagascan ectotrophic forests are necessary to unravel the origins of the fungi observed in eucalypts plantations in Madagascar.

References

  1. FAO, Global forest resources assessment, 2000, http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jsp.
  2. J. C. Delwaulle, Plantations Forestières en Afrique Tropicales Sèche, Centre Technique Forestier Tropical, Nogent-sur-Marne, France, 1979.
  3. G. O. Otegbeye and I. Samarawira, “Growth and form of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh provenances in northern Nigeria,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 42, no. 3-4, pp. 219–228, 1991. View at Scopus
  4. J. C. Delwaulle, J. Garbaye, and Y. Laplace, “Ligniculture en milieu tropical : les reboisements en eucalyptus hybrides de la savane côtière congolaise,” Revue Forestière Française, vol. 33, pp. 248–255, 1981.
  5. P. A. Van der Bijl, “Note on Polysaccum crassipes DC: a common fungus in eucalyptus plantations round pretoria,” Transaction of the Royal Society of South Africa, vol. 6, pp. 209–214, 1918.
  6. L. D. Pryor, “Ectotrophic mycorrhiza in renantherous species of eucalyptus,” Nature, vol. 177, no. 4508, pp. 587–588, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. H. Warcup, “Occurrence of ectomycorrhizal and saprophytic discomycetes after a wild fire in a eucalypt forest,” Mycological Research, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 1065–1069, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. O. K. Miller, “New species of Amanita from western Australia,” Canadian Journal of Botany, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 2692–2703, 1991.
  9. O. K. Miller, “Three new species of Amanita from western Australia,” Mycologia, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 679–686, 1992.
  10. T. I. Burgess, N. Malajczuk, and T. S. Grove, “The ability of 16 ectomycorrhizal fungi to increase growth and phosphorus uptake of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. and E. diversicolor F. muell,” Plant and Soil, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 155–164, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. A. Castellano and N. L. Bougher, “Consideration of the taxonomy and biodiversity of Australian ectomycorrhizal fungi,” Plant and Soil, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. L. Bougher, “Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with eucalypts in Australia,” in Mycorrhizas for plantation forestry in Asia, M. Brundrett, B. Dell, N. Malajczuk, and M. Q. Gong, Eds., Proceedings of the N°62, pp. 8–15, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia, 1995.
  13. A. Giachini, V. L. Oliveira, M. A. Castellano, and J. M. Trappe, “Ectomycorrhizal fungi in Eucalyptus and Pinus plantations in southern Brazil,” Mycologia, vol. 92, no. 1–6, pp. 1166–1177, 2000. View at Scopus
  14. J. Garbaye, J. C. Delwaulle, and D. Diangana, “Growth response of eucalypts in the congo to ectomycorrhizal inoculation,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 1988. View at Scopus
  15. B. Dell and N. Malajczuk, “L'inoculation des eucalyptus introduits en Asie avec des champignons ectomycorhiziens australiens en vue d'augmenter la productivité des plantations,” Revue Forestière Française, vol. 49, pp. 174–184, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. T. S. Grove, N. Malajczuk, T. Burgess, B. D. Thomson, and G. Hardy, “Growth responses of plantation eucalypts to inoculation with selected ectomycorrhizal fungi,” in Proceedings of the IUFRO Symposium on Intensive Forestry: The Role of Eucalypts, A. P. G. Schînau, Ed., pp. 86–93, South African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, South African, 1991.
  17. L. Ryvarden, G. D. Piearce, and A. J. Masuka, An Introduction to the Larger Fungi of South Central Africa, Baobab Books, Harare, Zimbabwe, 1994.
  18. M. C. M. Kasuya, I. Da Silva Coelho, D. T. da Silva Campos, E. F. de Araújo, Y. Tamai, and T. Miyamoto, “Morphological and molecular characterization of pisolithus in soil under eucalyptus Plantations in Brazil,” Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1891–1898, 2010. View at Scopus
  19. A. J. Giachini, L. A. B. Souza, and V. L. Oliveira, “Species richness and seasonal abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi in plantations of Eucalyptus dunnii and Pinus taeda in southern Brazil,” Mycorrhiza, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 375–381, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. R. Nouhra, L. S. Dominguez, G. G. Daniele, S. Longo, J. M. Trappe, and A. W. Claridge, “Ocurrence of ectomycorrhizal, hypogeous fungi in plantations of exotic tree species in central Argentina,” Mycologia, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 752–759, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Abourouh, “Les mycorhizes et les maladies des eucalyptus,” in Les Eucalyptus au Maroc, M. Fechtal and A. Achnal El Kadmiri, Eds., pp. 132–153, Caisse Nationale du Crédit Agricole, 1994.
  22. M. Abourouh, Mycorhizes et mycorhization des principales essences forestières du Maroc [Ph.D. thesis], University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco, 2000.
  23. M. Härkönen, T. Saarimäki, and G. Mwasymbi, “Edible mushrrooms of Tanzania,” Karstenia, vol. 34, pp. 1–91, 1995.
  24. D. N. Pegler, A Preliminary Agaric Flora of East Africa, Kew Bulletin, Additional Series VI, HMSO, London, UK, 1977.
  25. D. N. Pegler and G. D. Piearce, “The edible mushrooms of Zambia,” Kew Bulletin, vol. 35, pp. 475–491, 1980.
  26. H. Kreisel, “Checklist of the gasteral and secotioid Basidiomycetes of Europe, Africa and the Middle East,” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde, vol. 10, pp. 213–313, 2001.
  27. A. Bañares Baudet, Hongos de los Pinares de Tamadaba (Gran Canaria), Monografías XXXVI, Instituto de Estudios Canarios, Tenerife, Spain, 1988.
  28. J. Maillat, “Les champignons des Eucalyptus,” Coordination Mycologique du Midi-Toulousain et Pyrénéen, vol. 14, pp. 4–5, 1995.
  29. M. Ducousso, R. Safou-Matondo, et al., Principales Caractéristiques des Champignons Ectomycorhiziens Récoltés dans les Plantations Forestières Industrielles de la Région de Pointe Noire, Congo, CIRAD-Forêt, Montpellier, France, 2000.
  30. G. Malençon, “Champignons hypogés du nord de l'Afrique—I. Ascomycètes,” Persoonia, vol. 7, pp. 261–288, 1973.
  31. P. Heinemann, “Hygrophoraceae, Laccaria et boletineae II (Complément),” Flore Iconographique des Champignons du Congo, vol. 15, pp. 279–308, 1966.
  32. D. Thoen, “Premières indications sur les mycorhizes et les champignons mycorhiziques des plantations d'exotiques du haut-shaba (République du Zaïre),” Bulletin de la Recherche Agronomique de Gembloux, vol. 9, pp. 215–227, 1974.
  33. G. Malençon and R. Bertault, Champignons Supérieurs du Maroc, Tome 2, Faculté des Sciences, Rabat, Morocco, 1975.
  34. H. Dissing and M. Lange, “Gasteromycetes of congo,” Bulletin du Jardin Botanique d'Etat, vol. 32, pp. 325–416, 1962.
  35. H. Dissing and M. Lange, “Gasteromycetales II,” Flore Iconographique des Champignons du Congo, vol. 13, pp. 233–252, 1964.
  36. T. Mouaya, Contribution à l'étude de la Mycorhization Contrôlée des Plants d'Eucalyptus Urophylla Issus de Semis par Quelques Souches de Pisolithus Arhizus, Mémoire de fin d'étude, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Congo, 1989.
  37. M. Ducousso, R. Duponnois, and D. Thoen, “Pisolithus sp. host range in Senegal and infectiveness on some Australian and African Acacia,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Forest Soils, 1995.
  38. V. Demoulin and D. M. Dring, “Gasteromycetes of Kivu (Zaïre), Rwanda and Burundi,” Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de Belgique, vol. 45, pp. 339–372, 1975.
  39. D. Thoen and M. Ducousso, “Champignons et ectomycorhizes du fouta djalon,” Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, vol. 221, pp. 45–63, 1989.
  40. M. Ducousso, Importance des Symbioses Racinaires Pour L'utilisation des Acacias en Afrique de l'Ouest, CIRAD-ISRA, Lyon, France, 1991.
  41. R. Molina and J. M. Trappe, “Biology of the ectomycorrhizal genus, Rhizopogon. I.Host associations, host-specificity and pure culture syntheses,” New Phytologist, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 653–675, 1994. View at Scopus
  42. V. G. Cortez, M. A. Sulzbacher, I. G. Baseia, Z. I. Antoniolli, and R. M. Borges da Silveira, “New records of hysterangium (Basidiomycota) from a eucalyptus plantation in southern Brazil,” Revista Brasileira de Biociencias, vol. 9, pp. 1–220, 2011.
  43. M. Lupatini, P. A. P. Bonnassis, R. B. Steffen, V. L. Oliveira, and Z. I. Antoniolli, “Mycorrhizal morphotyping and molecular characterization of Chondrogaster angustisporus giachini, castellano, trappe & oliveira, an ectomycorrhizal fungus from eucalyptus,” Mycorrhiza, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 437–442, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. Buyck, “UBWOBA : les champignons comestibles de l'Ouest du burundi,” Publication Agricole, vol. 34, pp. 1–123, 1994.
  45. M. Ducousso, A. M. Bâ, and D. Thoen, “Les champignons ectomycorhiziens des forêts naturelles et des plantations d'Afrique de l'ouest : une source de champignons comestibles,” Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, vol. 275, pp. 51–63, 2003.
  46. P. P. Lowry, G. E. Schatz, and P. B. Phillipson, “The classification of natural and anthropogenic vegetation in Madagascar,” in Natural Change and Human Impact in Madagascar, S. M. Goodman and B. D. Patterson, Eds., pp. 93–122, Smithsonian Inst Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  47. G. E. Schatz, P. P. Lowry II, and A. E. Wolf, “Endemic families of madagascar—I. A synoptic revision of Melanophylla baker (Melanophyllaceae),” Adansonia, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 233–242, 1998.
  48. G. E. Schatz, P. P. Lowry II, and A. E. Wolf, “Endemic families of Madagascar—II. A synoptic revision of Sphaerosepalaceae,” Adansonia, vol. 21, pp. 107–123, 1999.
  49. M. Ducousso, G. Béna, C. Bourgeois et al., “The last common ancestor of Sarcolaenaceae and Asian dipterocarp trees was ectomycorrhizal before the India-Madagascar separation, about 88 million years ago,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 231–236, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus