Mineral Properties and Dietary Value of Raw and Processed Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica L.)
Table 3
Fatty acid contenta in raw and processed stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) shoots harvested from field plots in the fall of 2011 and spring of 2012.
Total fat (%)
Fatty acidb (% of total fat)
16:0
16:1
18:0
18:1
18:2
18:3
20:0
20:1
22:0
22:1
24:0
Fall 2011
Raw
Blanched
Cooked
Cooked + salt
Spring 2012
Raw
3.17 ± 0.01d
16.30 ± 0.04a
1.88 ± 0.01b
1.76 ± 0.01a
2.99 ± 0.02a
23.89 ± 0.07a
48.06 ± 0.09d
1.12 ± 0.01a
0.25 ± 0.01a
1.63 ± 0.02a
0.53 ± 0.01a
1.61 ± 0.01a
Blanched
4.27 ± 0.04b
14.58 ± 0.06b
1.70 ± 0.01d
1.64 ± 0.01c
2.95 ± 0.01a
21.56 ± 0.27b
53.25 ± 0.30c
1.05 ± 0.02b
0.20 ± 0.01c
1.48 ± 0.01b
0.38 ± 0.01b
1.26 ± 0.01d
Cooked
4.50 ± 0.15a
14.07 ± 0.21d
1.93 ± 0.03a
1.64 ± 0.03c
2.30 ± 0.07c
20.78 ± 0.35c
55.59 ± 0.41a
0.99 ± 0.04c
0.21 ± 0.01b
1.47 ± 0.03b
0.38 ± 0.01b
1.35 ± 0.12c
Cooked + salt
c
c
1.84 ± 0.05c
b
2.39 ± 0.01b
20.19 ± 0.47d
54.44 ± 0.37b
1.04 ± 0.02b
0.18 ± 0.01d
1.50 ± 0.01b
0.36 ± 0.01c
1.50 ± 0.03b
Methylated samples were analyzed for total fatty acid content using gas chromatography.
bPalmitic acid (16:0); palmitoleic acid (16:1); stearic acid (18:0); oleic acid (18:1); linoleic acid (18:2); α-linoleic acid (18:3); gadoleic acid (20:1); behenic acid (22:0); erucic acid (22:1); lignoceric acid (24:0).
cMean () ± standard deviation. Column values followed by different letters within season are significantly different at (Tukey’s HSD).