Research Article

Mineral Properties and Dietary Value of Raw and Processed Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica L.)

Table 3

Fatty acid contenta in raw and processed stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) shoots harvested from field plots in the fall of 2011 and spring of 2012.

Total fat (%)Fatty acidb (% of total fat)
16:016:118:018:118:218:320:020:122:022:124:0

Fall 2011
 Raw
 Blanched
 Cooked
 Cooked + salt
Spring 2012
 Raw3.17 ± 0.01d16.30 ± 0.04a1.88 ± 0.01b1.76 ± 0.01a2.99 ± 0.02a23.89 ± 0.07a48.06 ± 0.09d1.12 ± 0.01a0.25 ± 0.01a1.63 ± 0.02a0.53 ± 0.01a1.61 ± 0.01a
 Blanched4.27
± 0.04b
14.58 ± 0.06b1.70 ± 0.01d1.64 ± 0.01c2.95 ± 0.01a21.56 ± 0.27b53.25 ± 0.30c1.05 ± 0.02b0.20 ± 0.01c1.48 ± 0.01b0.38 ± 0.01b1.26 ± 0.01d
 Cooked4.50 ± 0.15a14.07 ± 0.21d1.93 ± 0.03a1.64 ± 0.03c2.30 ± 0.07c20.78 ± 0.35c55.59 ± 0.41a0.99 ± 0.04c0.21 ± 0.01b1.47 ± 0.03b0.38 ± 0.01b1.35 ± 0.12c
 Cooked + salt c c1.84 ± 0.05c b2.39 ± 0.01b20.19 ± 0.47d54.44 ± 0.37b1.04 ± 0.02b0.18 ± 0.01d1.50 ± 0.01b0.36 ± 0.01c1.50 ± 0.03b

Methylated samples were analyzed for total fatty acid content using gas chromatography.
bPalmitic acid (16:0); palmitoleic acid (16:1); stearic acid (18:0); oleic acid (18:1); linoleic acid (18:2); α-linoleic acid (18:3); gadoleic acid (20:1); behenic acid (22:0); erucic acid (22:1); lignoceric acid (24:0).
cMean ( ) ± standard deviation. Column values followed by different letters within season are significantly different at (Tukey’s HSD).