The O28 Antigen Gene Clusters of <i>Salmonella enterica</i> subsp. <i>enterica</i> Serovar Dakar and Serovar Pomona Are Different

Clark, Clifford G.; Grant, Christopher C. R.; Trout-Yakel, Keri M.; Tabor, Helen; Ng, Lai-King; Rahn, Kris; Franklin, Kristyn; Kropinski, Andrew M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/209291

International Journal of Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 | Article ID 209291 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/209291

The O28 Antigen Gene Clusters of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Dakar and Serovar Pomona Are Different

Clifford G. Clark,^1,2Christopher C. R. Grant,¹Keri M. Trout-Yakel,¹Helen Tabor,¹Lai-King Ng,^1,2Kris Rahn,³Kristyn Franklin,³and Andrew M. Kropinski^3,4

Academic Editor: Isabel Sá-Correia

Received04 Dec 2009

Revised04 Mar 2010

Accepted10 Mar 2010

Published28 Jun 2010

Abstract

A 10 kb O-antigen gene cluster was sequenced from a Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Dakar O28 reference strain and from two . Pomona serogroup O28 isolates. The two . Pomona O antigen gene clusters showed only moderate identity with the . Dakar O28 gene cluster, suggesting that the O antigen oligosaccharides may contain one or more sugars conferring the O28 epitope but may otherwise be different. These novel findings are absolutely critical for the correct interpretation of molecular serotyping assays targeting genes within the O antigen gene clusters of these Salmonella serotypes and suggest the possibility that the O antigen gene clusters of other Salmonella serovars may also be heterogenous.

1. Introduction

Salmonella O serotyping utilizes antibodies specific for sugars in the lipopolysaccharide O antigen side chain to differentiate among serovars of this bacterium. Antibodies, in highly absorbed serotyping reagents, frequently recognize a very small epitope within the O antigen oligosaccharide, perhaps only one sugar or part of one sugar [1]. The O antigen of Gram-negative bacteria is a highly variable, surface-exposed component of the lipopolysaccharide which contributes a significant role to the cell surface antigenic variation of these bacteria. It consists of repeated 3–6 monosaccharide units, with the variation in O antigens due to differences in the composition of the monosaccharide units and sugar linkages. Variations among O antigens provide the structural basis for both the Salmonella Kauffmann-White [1] and Escherichia coli O antigen serotyping schemes [2]. There are currently 46 O antigens recognized in the 2541 serovars comprising Salmonella [3] and 174 types of O antigen in E. coli [4].

Serotype currently provides the baseline from which other typing methods are carried out [5, 6]. Both the virulence and host range of Salmonella enterica isolates are serotype specific [7, 8]; thus, accurate determination of Salmonella serotype is currently essential for human disease surveillance and outbreak detection [9] and control of the organism in the food chain [10]. Additionally, the serogroup classification as defined by the Kauffmann-White scheme often indicates genetic relatedness, indicating that serotype frequently has phylogenetic significance [11].

The complexity, cost, and time required for the traditional serotyping using custom or commercial antisera have led researchers to consider development of alternative molecular methods [12]. Consequently it is necessary to develop techniques [13] that will allow the rapid and inexpensive determination of the most common Salmonella serotypes. Such methods [14, 15] can be incorporated into easy-to-use formats [8, 13, 16] that will be acceptable to primary laboratories.

The genes required for synthesis of the O antigen in S. enterica strains are found in a cluster between the galF and gnd genes on the bacterial chromosome [17]. Protein products of the genes within these clusters can be generally divided into three groups: (i) those required for the synthesis of the sugars, (ii) those involved in the transfer and modification of the O units, and (iii) those necessary for the polymerization and transport of the O units [17]. While the sugar biosynthetic genes have been found to be quite homogeneous between S. enterica strains, the transferase/flippase and polymerization genes encoded by the wzx and wzy genes show a great deal of heterogeneity. This heterogeneity can be used as the basis for the development of novel molecular serotyping methods [16].

We have sequenced the O antigen gene cluster of two S. Pomona O28 isolates and a S. Dakar O28 reference strain. Despite the fact that S. Dakar and S. Pomona have the same O serotype, the O antigen gene cluster of S. Dakar was quite different than that of S. Pomona. These results suggest that the O antigen oligosaccharides of S. Pomona O28 and S. Dakar O28, though they contain at least one common epitope, may be structurally different.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Salmonella Isolates

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Pomona (serotype 28₁28₂:y:7; NML number 07-0213) was from the strain collection of the OIE Salmonella Reference Laboratory at the Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Guelph, ON. The S. Pomona reference strain S-1467 (28₁28₂:y;1,7) and S. Dakar strain S-1097 (28₁, 28₃:a:1,6) were from the Enterics reference strain collection at the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML), Winnipeg, MB. Strain S-1467 was originally obtained from the Institut Pasteur in 1999 while S-1097 is a culture type strain obtained in 1972 from the Public Health Laboratory Service in Colindale, UK (their strain number JT 987).

2.2. Amplification of the O-Antigen Gene Cluster

The O-antigen gene cluster between the JUMPStart sequence [18] and gnd from isolate 07-0213 was amplified by long range PCR using primers 412 and 482 [19] with an Expand Long Range dNTPack kit (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC, Canada) following to the methods of the manufacturer. Template DNA was prepared using the protocol of [20]. The amount of DMSO used in each PCR reaction was optimized to 5% (vol/vol). The amplification conditions were 92C for 2 minutes; 10 cycles of 92C for 10 seconds, 65C for 15 seconds, and 68C for 15 minutes; 20 cycles of 92C for 10 seconds, 65C for 15 seconds, and 68C for 15 minutes plus 20 seconds added to each additional cycle; and final extension at 68C for 7 minutes. Following PCR amplification, amplicons were visualized on 1% agarose (Invitrogen Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada) gels after staining with ethidium bromide.

2.3. Cloning of the O-Antigen Gene Cluster DNA

Amplicons from several PCR reactions were pooled and sheared in a nebulizer (Invitrogen) for 3 minutes at 20 psi to obtain fragments between 0.5 and 4 kb. The pooled fragments were purified using Montage PCR Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and cloned into the pCR4-TOPO vector using the TOPO TA Cloning kit as instructed by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Transformants of E. coli strain DH5 were selected on Luria-Bertani agar plates containing 100g mL^-1 ampicillin with added X-Gal-IPTG (40g mL^-1; USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA). DNA was isolated from positive (white) clones by the boiling technique [21].

2.4. Sequencing of the O-Antigen Cluster DNA

The Salmonella DNA inserts were amplified in PCR reactions using the FastStart Taq DNA polymerase kit (Roche Diagnostics Laval QC Canada) with primers M13 (-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-) and T7 (-GTAATACGACTCACTATAG-) complementary to specific plasmid sequences flanking the insertion site. Amplification conditions were 94C for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of 94C for 30 seconds, 50C for 30 seconds, and 72C for 45 seconds, followed by a final extension at 72C for 5 minutes. Amplicons were visualized on agarose gels as above, purified by the DNA Core Facility at the National Microbiology Laboratory using the Agencourt Ampure PCR purification system (Agencourt Bioscience Corp., Beverly MA, USA), and sequenced using the M13 and T7 primers. DNA sequencing was performed by the DNA Core Facility at the National Microbiology Laboratory using Big Dye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA sequence data was generated using either an ABI 3100 or 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Lasergene DNASTAR software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison WI USA), Kodon (Applied Maths, Austin, TX) and Psi-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi) were used for editing, assembling, and annotation of DNA sequences.

2.5. GenBank Submission

The sequences described in this manuscript were deposited with GenBank under accession numbers EU805803 (S. Pomona NML 07-0213) and FJ467642 (S.Dakar S-1097).

3. Results

Long PCR amplification of DNA from strain S. Dakar S-1097 using JUMPstart and gnd primers produced a product of 11,386 bp (Table 1). The S. Pomona O28 isolate 07-0213 O antigen gene cluster was 10,125 bp long and contained 11 open reading frames (Table 2). The sequence of this region from reference strain S. Pomona isolate S-1467 was also determined and found to be identical to the 07-0213 sequence from nucleotides 50–10,010 (data not shown). All O antigen cluster ORFs had low %G + C content and significant homology to genes from several other bacteria (Tables 1 and 2, Figure 1).

(a)

(b)

Figure 1

Comparison of O antigen regions: A. S. Dakar O28 versus S. Pomona O28 and S. enterica serotype Dakar M269; B. E. coli 101-1 versus S. Pomona O28 and E. coli O114. The S. Pomona and S. Dakar O-antigen cluster DNA sequences were deposited with GenBank (accession numbers EU805803 and FJ467642, resp.). The E. coli O114 O antigen cluster was accession number AY573377, while E. coli 101-1 O antigen cluster sequence data was from E. coli 101-1 gcontig_1112603666495, accession number NZ_AAMK02000002.1.

The gene order of the S. Dakar O28 O antigen gene cluster was very different than that of S. Pomona O28 (Figure 1, compare Tables 1 and 2). The first five genes of the S. Pomona O28 cluster were rmlB, rmlD, rmlA, orf2.9, and rmlC (Table 2), confirming the results previously reported by Li and Reeves [19] for the partial O antigen gene cluster sequence of a S. Dakar isolate. Of these, only rmlA and rmlB were present in S. Pomona; orf2.9 was moderately homologous to the amsE homolog of S. Pomona (Figure 1). The wcxM-like gene of S. Dakar S-1097 was in the opposite orientation with respect to the rest of the O antigen cluster, suggesting an independent origin. This gene was homologous to the fdtC gene of S. Pomona strain 07-0213 (Figure 1). Identification of the S. Pomona rmlA and rmlB genes was unambiguous, though rmlA had only moderate homology with rmlA genes from other Salmonella and E. coli. The 42.9% G + C content of rmlB from the S. Pomona O28 isolate was close to the average of this gene in other Salmonella isolates [19]. On the other hand, the S. Pomona rmlA %G + C content of 37.4% was much lower than that found in other Salmonella O antigen sequences.

The S. Pomona O antigen gene cluster showed similar organization to similar clusters from two E. coli strains (Figure 1). The rmlA and rmlB genes showed significant identity among all three strains. While both the fdtA and fdtC genes were similarly located in the O antigen clusters of S. Pomona and E. coli O114, only the fdtA gene/FdtA protein exhibited significant sequence identity (Figure 1). Both genes were absent from E. coli 101-1. Though the fdtB genes of both E. coli strains shared a similar degree of identity with fdtB from S. Pomona, the Fdt protein from E. coli 101-1 had a higher level of identity with the S. Pomona protein. All remaining genes of S. Pomona had no identity with the corresponding E. coli gene, though there were high levels of identity of the translated proteins (Figure 1).

The wzx and wzy genes were identified on the basis of homology of the translated protein with other genes (Tables 1 and 2, Figure 1). The topology of the translated protein products of these genes was determined to ensure that it was consistent with the proposed designation. The predicted transmembrane structure of Wzx and Wzy was confirmed using the TMHMM Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM) and the HMMTOP (http://www.enzim.hu/hmmtop/) servers, with the wzx translation product having 12 predicted membrane-spanning regions and the wzy translation products having 10. Both the wzx and wzy genes of S. Dakar O28 were unique and very different from the wzx and wzy genes of S. Pomona; the proteins showed only 28% identity (Figure 1). The S. Pomona Wzx and Wzy proteins had strong identity with their homologs in E. coli 101-1 and lower identity with Wzx and Wzy from E. coli O114 (Table 2, Figure 1). In both cases there was no identity at the DNA level, indicating convergent evolution of the protein without transfer of genes between either E. coli strain and S. Pomona.

Serotyping of the Salmonella and E. coli strains was performed by bacterial agglutination assays by the Identification and Serotyping Section, National Microbiology Laboratory, using Salmonella and E. coli specific rabbit antisera. These antisera were prepared, absorbed where necessary, and subject to stringent quality control by the NML according to reference methods [1, 3, 24]. Salmonella O antigens were determined by slide agglutination, whereas Salmonella H antigens and E.coli O and H antigens were determined by tube agglutination. In slide agglutinations the S. Dakar O28 reference strain S-1097, the S. Pomona O28 07-0213 strain, and the S. Pomona reference culture (S-1467) all gave a 4+ reaction when tested with anti-O28 antiserum. An E. coli O114 reference culture (EC 200) tested with the same antiserum resulted in a negative reaction.

4. Discussion

The DNA sequence of the S. Dakar O antigen gene cluster is consistent with the known structure of its O antigen oligosaccharide (Figure 2). Rhamnose is produced by the rmlA, B, C, and D gene cluster [17] and the O antigen oligosaccharide of S. Dakar contains rhamnose (Figure 2). A putative rhamnosyltransferase was also identified in the S. Dakar O antigen gene cluster (orf11 in Table 1). Though rmlB and rmlA were present in both S. Pomona and S. Dakar, they were closest in homology to proteins from different sources (compare Tables 1 and 2), suggesting that they may have been acquired from different sources. The S. Pomona O28 O antigen cluster did not contain the rmlC and rmlD genes necessary for production of rhamnose (Figure 1, Table 2). Furthermore, none of the other genes that were present would be expected to be active in the synthesis of this 6-deoxy-hexose [17]. This differential production of rhamnose must be confirmed by structural studies of the S. Pomona O antigen oligosaccharide. If true, it could contribute to the known heterogeneity of O28 antigens. Salmonella serogroup O28 was originally divided into three subfactors—O28₁, O28₂, and O28₃—without structural differences being ascribed [22, 25, 26]. S. Dakar expresses subfactors O28₁ and O28₃, whereas subfactors O28₁ and O28₂ are present in the LPS of S. Tel-Aviv and S. Pomona.

(a)

(b)

fdtA (dTDP-6-deoxy-3,4-keto-hexulose isomerase) and fdtB (dTDP-6-deoxy-D-xylo-hex-3-ulose aminase) genes of were identified in S. Pomona and S. Dakar. A homolog of the fdtC (putative acetylase) gene was identified in S. Pomona, which and analysis suggested is a WcxM-like protein. We suggest that the gene was indeed fdtC based on two pieces of evidence: (1) a fdtC gene is present at the same location in the E. coli O114 O antigen gene cluster, and (2) fdtA, fdtB, and fdtC together comprise a functional unit [17]. A putative gene (orf12 in Table 2), also encoding a WcxM-like protein, was found in the S. Dakar O antigen gene cluster. This gene would appear to be a homolog of the fdtC gene of S. Pomona and E. coli O114. Since the S. Dakar fdtC homolog is present in the reverse orientation compared with other genes of the O antigen cluster, it has been acquired independently of these other genes. Its position at the end of the gene cluster differs markedly from the position of fdtC in S. Pomona (Figure 1).

The rmlA and rmlB genes encode the first two enzymes of the rhamnose biosynthetic pathway in Salmonella and E. coli [17, 19]. Beginning with glucose-1-phosphate, these two genes produce dTDP-6-deoxy-D-xylo-4-hexulose. This intermediate can then be converted to 3-acetamido-3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose by the fdtA, fdtB, and fdtC genes [17]. The fdtC gene was a homolog of wxcM genes that encode bifunctional enzymes, in which the amino terminal part of the proteins is homologous to acetyltransferases and the carboxy terminal portions are similar to isomerases responsible for isomerisation of 4-keto hexoses to 3-keto hexoses. If both activities are indeed functional in the S. Pomona FdtC protein, this protein could be responsible for the production of the Quip3NAc sugar (Figure 2; [17]) that is known to be present in the S. Dakar O28 O antigen [22] and further suggests that the sugar may be present in S. Pomona. Alternatively, S. Pomona may indeed incorporate 3-amino-3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose into its O antigen oligosaccharide. Structural determinations are required to resolve this question. E. coli O114 strain E2808 contains in its O-antigen a sugar very closely related to Quip3NAc, namely, 3,6-dideoxy-3-(N-acetyl-L-seryl)-aminoglucose [23]. The precursor of this sugar is likely the product of those genes homologous to the S. Pomona O28 genes that as we suggest may be implicated in 3-amino-3,6-dideoxy-D-galactose and/or Quip3NAc synthesis.

S. Dakar orf9 (Table 2) putatively encodes a protein having a very low homology to members of the glycosylase 2 family that was not found in S. Pomona. This strongly suggests that the oligosaccharide produced by S. Dakar will differ from that produced by S. Pomona. The product of the fourth open reading frame (orf2.9) was also a putative glycosyltransferase [19]. Together, these proteins would likely be responsible for adding two or more of the remaining three sugars to the S. Dakar O28 O antigen oligosaccharide (Figure 2). S. Pomona ORFs annotated here as wbuM and amsE also had strong homology with proteins belonging to the glycosyltransferase 2 family, though the specific function of these transferases cannot be inferred from DNA sequence alone [17]. There was no significant identity at either the DNA or protein level between these glycosyltransferases of S. Dakar and S. Pomona, suggesting that the O antigen oligosaccharides of these two isolates may contain further differences.

The protein encoded by the ORF designated wbuO contained no known conserved domains, and the function of the E. coli homolog has not been determined. Two other homologs (ACK44395 and ACD75797), which contain eight transmembrane domains, are designated as O-antigen acyltransferases.

Overall, the S. Pomona O28 O antigen gene cluster showed a remarkable conservation of gene order with the O antigen gene clusters from E. coli 101-1 and E. coli O114:H32 type strain G1088 (Figure 1, [27]). No structural analysis for the E. coli 101-1 O antigen polysaccharide was found. The E. coli O114 O-antigen oligosaccharide (Figure 2) consists of equimolar amounts of galactose, ribose, N-acetylglucosamine, and 3,6-dideoxy-3-aminoglucose [23]. This is consistent with a role for the conserved wbuM, -N, and -O genes in transfer of galactose and glucose (or N-acetylglucosamine) to the O-antigen oligosaccharide and a role for the genes unique to E. coli O114 in the transfer of ribose. Ribose would therefore not be expected to be part of the S. Pomona O28 O antigen oligosaccharide. An additional gene (wbuL) was present in the E. coli O114 strain immediately downstream of the fdtC gene but was absent in S. Pomona. The final gene in the S. Pomona O antigen cluster showed a higher homology with wbeD from E. coli O117 [28] than that with the wbuP gene from E. coli O114.

The wbuL and wbuP genes of E. coli O114 are both glycosyltransferases that have no homolog in S. Pomona O28; these two genes may alter the E. coli O antigen structure in a fashion that either does not allow it to be recognized by antiserum against the Salmonella O28 serogroup or creates an alternative immunodominant epitope. This view is supported by the low homology of the wzy gene from S. Pomona O28 with the wzy gene from E. coli O114 and by the fact that the S. Pomona wzx gene was most closely homologous to a gene from Geobacter metallireducens GS-15.

The S. Pomona O antigen cluster could have been assembled using the wbuM, wbuN, and wbuO genes, at least, from E. coli O114 and other genes from a variety of different sources. E. coli O103 isolate H515b (GenBank accession numbers AY532664 and EF027106) has in its O antigen gene cluster homologs of the S. Pomona O28 rmlB, rmlA, fdtA (wbtA), fdtC (wbtB), and fdtB (wbtC) genes in the same order preceding wzx [29]. E. coli H515b strain, or a similar serogroup O103 E. coli, could also have been the source of the first five genes of the S. Pomona O28 O antigen gene cluster.

Information provided through sequencing of the S. Pomona and S. Dakar O-antigen gene clusters will allow probes for the various O28 wzx and wzy genes to be included in updated versions of DNA microarray-based Salmonella serotyping assays, as well as in assays comprising other formats [30]. This will make accurate serotyping more accessible for primary laboratories within the health care system.

Differences in both the O antigen gene organization and content, as well as in the wzx and wzy gene sequences, suggest that the O antigen oligosaccharides of S. Dakar and S. Pomona may each have a different chemical structure but that both fortuitously contain the dominant O28 epitope. This needs confirmation in structural studies that are beyond the scope of the current investigations. Whether this situation occurs in any other serogroup is not known. It is clear that the development of molecular serotyping methods and the interpretation of results from these methods will require characterization of the relevant genes from each Salmonella serotype. Furthermore, the data presented here reinforce the observation that two isolates with the same serogroup may not, in fact, have the same gene content. Interpretation of the meaning of serovar identity and its relationship with virulence and host restriction or adaptation then becomes somewhat more problematic. For some purposes it may be of greater advantage to determine the genovar [11] of an isolate.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through the Health Canada Biotechnology (Genomics) funding program. The authors acknowledge the contributions of Lorea Baker, Katherine Bown, and Kristine Cruz in the Identification and Serotyping Laboratory, Enteric Diseases Program, Bacteriology and Enteric Diseases Program, NML, PHAC, for performing all serological assays. They wish to thank Brynn Kaplen, Kimberly Melnychuk, Erika Landry, Shari Tyson, and Travis Murphy with the DNA Core Facility at the National Microbiology Laboratory for DNA sequencing and oligonucleotide synthesis.

References

A. A. Lindberg and L. Le Minor, “Serology of Salmonella,” Methods in Microbiology, vol. 13, pp. 1–64, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
I. ⌀rskov, F. ⌀rskov, B. Jann, and K. Jann, “Serology, chemistry, and genetics of O and K antigens of Escherichia coli,” Bacteriological Reviews, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 667–710, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Y. Popoff, J. Bockemühl, and L. L. Gheesling, “Supplement 2002 (no. 46) to the Kauffmann-White scheme,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 568–570, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Scheutz, T. Cheasty, D. Woodward, and H. R. Smith, “Designation of O174 and O175 to temporary O groups OX3 and OX7, and six new E. coli O groups that include Verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC): O176, O177, O178, O179, O180 and O181,” Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 569–584, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Foley, S. Zhao, and R. D. Walker, “Comparison of molecular typing methods for the differentiation of Salmonella foodborne pathogens,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 253–276, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Liebana, “Molecular tools for epidemiological investigations of S. enterica subspecies enterica infections,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 169–175, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fierer and D. G. Guiney, “Diverse virulence traits underlying different clinical outcomes of Salmonella infection,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 775–780, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Wollin, “A study of invasiveness of different Salmonella serovars based on analysis of the Enter-net database,” Eurosurveillance, vol. 12, no. 9, p. E070927, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
F. W. Brenner, R. G. Villar, F. J. Angulo, R. Tauxe, and B. Swaminathan, “Salmonella nomenclature,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 2465–2467, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
R. K. Gast, “Serotype-specific and serotype-independent strategies for preharvest control of food-borne Salmonella in poultry,” Avian Diseases, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 817–828, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Porwollik, E. F. Boyd, C. Choy et al., “Characterization of Salmonella enterica subspecies I genovars by use of microarrays,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 17, pp. 5883–5898, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kérouanton, M. Marault, R. Lailler et al., “Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis subtyping database for foodborne Salmonella enterica serotype discrimination,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 293–303, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Fitzgerald, M. Collins, S. van Duyne, M. Mikoleit, T. Brown, and P. Fields, “Multiplex, bead-based suspension array for molecular determination of common Salmonella serogroups,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 3323–3334, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. C. Luk, U. Kongmuang, P. R. Reeves, and A. A. Lindberg, “Selective amplification of abequose and paratose synthase genes (rfb) by polymerase chain reaction for identification of Salmonella major serogroups (A, B, C2, and D),” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 2118–2123, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
C. K. Mortimer, T. M. Peters, S. E. Gharbia, J. M. Logan, and C. Arnold, “Towards the development of a DNA-sequence based approach to serotyping of Salmonella enterica,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 4, article 31, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ballmer, B. M. Korczak, P. Kuhnert, P. Slickers, R. Enricht, and H. Hächler, “Fast DNA serotyping of Escherichia coli by use of an oligonucleotide microarray,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 370–379, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Samuel and P. Reeves, “Biosynthesis of O-antigens: genes and pathways involved in nucleotide sugar precursor synthesis and O-antigen assembly,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 338, no. 23, pp. 2503–2519, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hobbs and P. R. Reeves, “The JUMPstart sequence: a 39 bp element common to several polysaccharide gene clusters,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 855–856, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Li and P. R. Reeves, “Genetic variation of dTDP-L-rhamnose pathway genes in Salmonella enterica,” Microbiology, vol. 146, part 9, pp. 2291–2307, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
E. M. Ribot, M. A. Fair, R. Gautom et al., “Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
J. Kumirska, J. Szafranek, M. Czerwicka et al., “The structure of the O-polysaccharide isolated from the lipopolysaccharide of Salmonella Dakar (serogroup O:28),” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 342, no. 14, pp. 2138–2143, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Dmitriev, V. Lvov, N. V. Tochtamysheva et al., “Cell-wall lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli 0114:H2. Structure of the polysaccharide chain,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 517–521, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
F. ⌀rskov and I. ⌀rskov, “Serotyping of Escherichia coli,” Methods in Microbiology, vol. 14, pp. 44–112, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Kauffmann, The Bacteriology of Enterobacteriaceae: Collected Studies of the Author and His Co-Workers, The Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1966.
L. Le Minor, Guidelines for the Preparation of Salmonella antisera, WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France, 1986.
L. Feng, W. Wang, J. Tao et al., “Identification of Escherichia coli O114 O-antigen gene cluster and development of an O114 serogroup-specific PCR assay,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 3799–3804, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Leslie, H. Parolis, and L. A. S. Parolis, “The structure of the O-specific polysaccharide of Escherichia coli O117:K98:H4,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 323, no. 1–4, pp. 103–110, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Fratamico, C. DebRoy, T. P. Strobaugh Jr., and C.-Y. Chen, “DNA sequence of the Escherichia coli O103 O antigen gene cluster and detection of enterohemorrhagic E. coli O103 by PCR amplification of the wzx and wzy genes,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 515–522, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yoshida, K. Franklin, P. Konczy et al., “Methodologies towards the development of an oligonucleotide microarray for determination of Salmonella serotypes,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 261–271, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2010 Clifford G. Clark et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1265

Downloads

1090

Citations