About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Lipids
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 890343, 16 pages
Research Article

Trans-10, cis 12-Conjugated Linoleic Acid-Induced Milk Fat Depression Is Associated with Inhibition of PPAR Signaling and Inflammation in Murine Mammary Tissue

1Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
2Mammalian NutriPhysioGenomics, Department of Animal Sciences, Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

Received 24 November 2012; Accepted 18 March 2013

Academic Editor: Angel Catala

Copyright © 2013 Anil K. G. Kadegowda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Exogenous trans-10, cis-12-CLA (CLA) reduces lipid synthesis in murine adipose and mammary (MG) tissues. However, genomewide alterations in MG and liver (LIV) associated with dietary CLA during lactation remain unknown. We fed mice ( /diet) control or control + trans-10, cis-12-CLA (37 mg/day) between d 6 and d 10 postpartum. The 35,302 annotated murine exonic evidence-based oligo (MEEBO) microarray and quantitative RT-PCR were used for transcript profiling. Milk fat concentration was 44% lower on d 10 versus d 6 due to CLA. The CLA diet resulted in differential expression of 1,496 genes. Bioinformatics analyses underscored that a major effect of CLA on MG encompassed alterations in cellular signaling pathways and phospholipid species biosynthesis. Dietary CLA induced genes related to ER stress (Xbp1), apoptosis (Bcl2), and inflammation (Orm1, Saa2, and Cp). It also induced marked inhibition of PPARγ signaling, including downregulation of Pparg and Srebf1 and several lipogenic target genes (Scd, Fasn, and Gpam). In LIV, CLA induced hepatic steatosis probably through perturbations in the mitochondrial functions and induction of ER stress. Overall, results from this study underscored the role of PPARγ signaling on mammary lipogenic target regulation. The proinflammatory effect due to CLA could be related to inhibition of PPARγ signaling.

1. Introduction

Dietary nutrients influence the quantity and composition of milk during lactation. Specifically, dietary lipids regulate milk lipid synthesis and milk fatty acid composition in different species of animals. Recently we showed that trans fatty acids (FA) and, in particular, trans-containing conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers regulate murine mammary lipid metabolism to different extents [1]. CLA isomers are the positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid, an 18-carbon FA with two double bonds. The conjugated double bonds in the CLA are responsible for their biological and biochemical activities. Of the different CLA isomers, the role of trans-10, cis-12-CLA in decreasing milk fat synthesis is well established.

The effects of dietary trans-10, cis-12-CLA on lipid metabolism in adipose and liver have been examined previously [2, 3]. Gene expression profiling studies in rodent adipose [2, 4], liver [57], and macrophages [8] have been conducted to help elucidate the molecular mechanisms elicited by trans-10, cis-12-CLA. In adipose and liver, trans-10, cis-12-CLA reduces adipogenesis, increases hepatic steatosis, and leads to insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and inflammation [3, 9]. Studies on the effects of trans-10, cis-12-CLA in the mammary tissue of rodents and cows have largely focused on the changes pertaining to lipid metabolism. However, in vitro cell culture and in vivo studies have reported induction of mammary epithelial cell apoptosis at supraphysiological doses of CLA [10, 11].

We hypothesized that the effects of trans-10, cis-12-CLA in mammary tissue are not limited to lipid metabolism pathways and may involve other functional networks as has been observed in adipose tissue [4]. The specific objective of this study was to use microarrays and bioinformatics to characterize mammary and liver gene networks that are sensitive to supplemental trans-10, cis-12-CLA during lactation in mice.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Maryland. The mammary and liver samples harvested from a previous experiment [1] were used in the present study. The details about the animals, diets, fatty acid composition of the diets, experimental design, and sample collection are described earlier [1]. Briefly, C57BL/6J mice fed the control diet from day 2 postpartum were randomly allotted to either control or a CLA-supplemented diet on day 6 postpartum. The control diet consisted of sucrose 590 g/kg, vitamin-free casein 200 g/kg, alphacel 50 g/kg, fat 100 g/kg (cocoa butter 14.3 g/kg, corn oil 30.9 g/kg, olive oil 34.8 g/kg, oleic acid 20 g/kg), AIN 76 mineral mixture 40 g/kg, AIN 76 vitamin mixture 15 g/kg, DL-methionine 3 g/kg, and choline bitartrate 2 g/kg. Oleic acid was replaced at 30% (wt/wt basis) by trans-10, cis-12-CLA in the CLA treatment. Oleic acid is incorporated into milk FA, but it was chosen because it has little effect on mammary lipid metabolism [12]. Litter size was adjusted to 6 or 7 pups to maintain uniform milk synthesis among mice. Lactating mice were fed the experimental diets from day 6 to day 10 postpartum. Milk samples were collected on day 6 and day 10 postpartum. On day 10 postpartum, the mice were sacrificed using isoflurane, and individual liver and mammary tissues were collected from dams, fast-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until RNA or lipid extraction.

2.1. RNA Extraction, Microarray, Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR), and Primer Design and Testing

The details of RNA extraction, microarrays, quantitative real time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR), and primer design and testing are presented in the Supplementary Material (see Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/890343). Protocols for RNA extraction, RT-qPCR, and primer design and testing were as described previously [13]. Primer sequences for Gpam, Insig1, Pparg, Scap, Scd, and Fasn were published previously [1]. Table 1 contains information on additional target genes. The Mouse Exonic Evidence-Based Oligonucleotide (Oligator “MEEBO,” Mouse Genome Set, Illumina Inc.) platform containing 38,467 single-spotted oligonucleotides targeting 35,302 genes was used for transcript profiling. Methods for aminoallyl labeling of cDNA, microarray hybridizations, and scanning were as described earlier [14].

Table 1: Accession number, gene symbol, and primer sequences of target genes. Underlined are exon-exon junctions.
2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data from 40 microarrays (two dyes, two tissue samples/mouse, for a total of 10 animals) used for analysis were initially normalized for dye effects using the median of control elements on the microarray. Subsequently, the log2 normalized ratios of mammary versus reference (i.e., RNA mixture of different tissues including mammary) signal intensities were adjusted for global dye and microarray effects and normalized by Lowess. The data were analyzed using MIXED procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The fixed effects of the model included tissue and dye while the random effects were mouse and microarray. Raw values for the tissue effect were adjusted using Benjamini and Hochberg’s False Discovery Rate (FDR). Differences in relative expression between CLA and control were considered significant at an FDR-adjusted . For a more stringent characterization of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), a ≥1.5-fold difference in mRNA expression was set as threshold. We used a more liberal cutoff for the liver data set as very few genes met the criterion used for the mammary tissue. The liver data were assessed using a without an FDR adjustment but with a threshold of ≥1.4-fold difference to determine affected genes. Visualization of within-group variance for DEG in mammary gland tissue and for the entire set of transcripts in liver tissue was performed via hierarchical clustering and box-plot analysis using GeneSpring GX (Agilent Technologies; Figures 13). Data from qPCR after normalization with internal control genes (using the geometric mean of Stx8, Plod3, and Ngb) were analyzed using MIXED procedure (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The complete dataset files have been deposited at the MIAME database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/; username: reviewer_E-MEXP-3622, password: veitxmnm).

Figure 1: Hierarchical clustering analysis of DEG (1,496) in mammary tissue from individual lactating mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA (CLA) or the control diet (CTR). The colors of the heat map represent the expression of each DEG in mammary tissue versus reference, with red, green, and the various hues denoting greater (red) to lower (green) relative expression (tissue/reference). The average Pearson correlation across animals in the CLA group was 0.38 and for those in the CTR 0.41. The numbers represent an individual mouse within the CLA or CTR group. The clustering by gene is denoted by the pink tree on the left of the figure.
Figure 2: Top ten affected KEGG pathways/terms by trans-10, cis-12-CLA in mammary tissue. The horizontal bars denote the impact of DEG on the KEGG pathways. The larger the horizontal bar, the greater the impact. The direction of the impact is indicated under flux, green inhibition and red activation. The intensity of the color indicates the extent of inhibition (if green) or activation (if red); that is, darker the color, the greater the effect on the pathway.
Figure 3: Top ten affected GO terms (DAVID) by trans-10, cis-12-CLA in mammary tissue. The horizontal bars denote the impact of DEG on the GO terms. The larger the horizontal bar, the greater the impact. The direction of the impact is indicated under flux, green inhibition and red activation. The intensity of the color indicates the extent of inhibition (if green) or activation (if red); that is, darker the color, the greater the effect on the GO terms. BP: biological processes; CC: cellular components; MF: molecular functions.
2.3. Bioinformatics Data Mining

Bioinformatics was conducted using the Dynamic Impact Approach (DIA) according to Bionaz et al. [15]. Briefly, this analysis relied on the publicly available resources Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database and the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID v6.7, 20). Entrez gene IDs were used to identify individual sequences. The KEGG resource has pathway information associated with each gene ID in Mus musculus. There are six major pathway categories, namely, metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes, organismal systems, and human diseases. In addition, we used Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) relying on the entire microarray data set with associated statistical values. The DAVID resource provides typical batch annotation and gene-GO term enrichment analysis to highlight the most relevant GO terms associated with a given gene list. The latest version provides extended annotation content coverage including GO terms, protein-protein interactions, protein functional domains, disease associations, biological pathways, sequence general features, homologies, gene functional summaries, and tissue gene expression.

The ToppGene suite (http://toppgene.cchmc.org/) was used for functional enrichment analysis of data from liver tissue at an uncorrected and a threshold of ≥1.4-fold in CLA versus control. ToppGene suite is a web-based portal that provides 17 categories of annotations, including GO-molecular function, GO-biological process, GO-cellular component, human phenotype, mouse phenotype, protein domains, pathways, pubMed cocitations, protein-protein interactions, cytoband, transcription factor binding sites, gene family coexpression, computational expression correlations, micro-RNA targets, drug, and disease. The database details for each category of annotations are presented in the ToppGene web portal (http://toppgene.cchmc.org/).

3. Results

We have previously reported the effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on milk production, milk fat content, milk fatty acid composition, liver weight, and liver FA composition [16]. Briefly, compared with the control, CLA decreased milk fat percentage by 44% and reduced the proportion of de novo synthesized FA (FA C 16:0) while increasing 20:4n-6 (Table 2). The trans-10, cis-12-CLA was preferentially taken up by the mammary tissue (1.42 g/100 FAME in milk) compared with liver (0.20 g/100 FAME). However, the liver weight increased by 32% in mice fed CLA as a consequence of increased lipid content (0.47 g FAME/g liver, dry) compared with control (0.24 g FAME/g liver, dry). Furthermore, the proportions of FA 18:0, 18:3, and 20:4n-6 decreased ( ) in the liver of mice fed CLA diet (Table 2).

Table 2: Effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA diet on milk production, milk lipid content, milk fatty acid profile, liver weight, and liver fatty acid profile.
3.1. Mammary Tissue

In the mammary tissue, IPA identified 27,566 of 35,302 sequences on the MEEBO platform. The CLA diet resulted in a differential expression of 1,496 genes ( , ) of which 143 genes differed from control more than 1.5-fold (data not shown). Hierarchical clustering of the 1,496 DEG (Figure 1) revealed a high-degree of consistency among animals in the response to CLA or control. This analysis also allowed visualization of two obvious groups of genes that were downregulated or upregulated by CLA compared with controls. The IPA analysis (Table 3) revealed that trans-10, cis-12-CLA caused a marked effect in mammary tissue on genes associated with acute-phase response signaling, regulation of actin-based motility by rho, glycosphingolipid biosynthesis, RAR, and LXR/RXR activation.

Table 3: Top canonical pathways (FDR = 0.2, , and fold change >1.5) from IPA analysis of DEG in mammary tissue of lactating mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA.

The top upregulated genes were defensin beta (Defb), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (Hprt1), orosomucoid 1 (Orm1), sphingosine kinase, kinesin family member 26b (Sphk1), ceruloplasmin (ferroxidase) (Cp), and serum amyloid A2 (Saa2) (Table 4). The top down-regulated genes were Major urinary protein 4 (Mup4), Major urinary protein 2 (Mup2), Carbonic anhydrase III (Ca3), Adiponectin (Adipoq), TATA box binding protein (Tbp), Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (Scd1), ELOVL family member 5, elongation of long chain fatty acids (Elvol5), and tubulin (Tubg2) (Table 4).

Table 4: Fold change in expression among the most up- and downregulated DEG in mammary tissue of lactating mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA.
3.1.1. Bioinformatics

A total of 217 pathways in the KEGG database (murine genome) contained 30% or more genes represented on the microarray platform; these were deemed appropriately to be covered for further analysis. Among the most-impacted pathways (average impact SD (16.4)) that were affected due to feeding CLA versus control were biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, PPAR signaling pathway, adipocytokine signaling pathway, and nitrogen metabolism (Figure 2). Overall, those pathways were inhibited due to dietary CLA. Pathways are considered moderately affected by feeding CLA ( SD (11.1)) and with clear activation included glycosphingolipid biosynthesis and vasopressin-regulated water reabsorption. Other pathways are considered modestly affected by feeding CLA ( SD (8.4)) including riboflavin metabolism, fatty acid elongation in mitochondria, ErbB signaling, and pentose and glucuronate interconversions, which were activated (Figure 2).

The DAVID categories biological process (GOTERM_BP_ALL), molecular function (GOTERM_MF_ALL), and cellular component (GOTERM_CC_ALL) are shown in Figure 3. Within biological processes are “biological goals” such as regulation of gluconeogenesis which is accomplished by ordered assemblies of molecular functions. Molecular Function describes the tasks performed by individual gene products, for example, calcium channel inhibitory activity. The cellular component classification type involves subcellular structures, localization, and macromolecular complexes, for example, Golgi cisterna.

The top 10 GO terms from our analysis are shown in Figure 3, and the approach for calculating impact and flux within each GO category has been described previously [14, 15]. Briefly, the length of the impact bar denotes the relative biological significance of the gene identifiers in each category; that is, a bigger bar reflects a more important biological term based on DEG. Similarly, the relative direction of the flux (activation or inhibition) is denoted by the intensity of color as reported in Bionaz et al. [15]. Results using DIA indicated that, within biological processes, only 2 of the top 10 most-impacted categories were inhibited, that is, negative regulation of gluconeogenesis and selenium metabolic process, whereas protein refolding and regulation of cytotoxic T cell differentiation were highly impacted and activated (Figure 3). Interestingly, the GO terms within cellular component were the least impacted among the three GO categories and mostly seemed to be inhibited in response to feeding CLA, for example, golgi cis cisterna and beta-catenin destruction complex (Figure 3). Within molecular functions, feeding CLA led to an activation of calcium channel inhibitor activity, myosin head/neck binding, and ATP dependent protein binding, whereas it inhibited retinol transporter activity and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase activity.

3.1.2. Microarray Verification

The microarray results were verified by quantitative real time RT-PCR assays for genes regulating lipid metabolism, apoptosis, inflammation, acute-phase response signaling, and transcription regulation (Table 5). Of the 21 genes tested, 17 genes were similar to those of microarray and four were false-positives (Table 5).

Table 5: Verification of selected genes in mammary tissue with RT-qPCR.
3.2. Liver

The effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on the liver transcriptome was modest at the same criterion used for selecting DEG of mammary tissue. Hierarchical clustering (not shown) across individual animals and the box-plot analysis (not shown) revealed a high-degree of animal variation in response to CLA or control, which is not unexpected based on previous studies with lactating mice [17]. We were unable to cluster by gene due to the large size of the dataset (38,185 elements); that is, there were no statistically significant genes in liver at the stringent cutoff used with mammary data. There were 170 DEGs when the selection criteria were relaxed (uncorrected , 1.5-fold difference in CLA versus control) with 72 upregulated and 98 down-regulated. The CLA diet did not affect genes related to FA synthesis (e.g., Fasn, Acc, and Scd1; data not shown) even though there was increase lipid accumulation in the liver. Some of the genes related to FA oxidation (Acox1, Cpt1c, and Fmo3) were down-regulated (data not shown). Among the genes related to FA transport, CD36, Fabp1, and Fabp2 were upregulated while Fabp4 was down-regulated (data not shown).

Feeding CLA increased liver mass and altered hepatic FA composition (Table 2). The greater liver mass was due in part to lipid accumulation and was associated with several alterations in gene expression. For instance, the “mouse phenotype” feature of the ToppGene suite used for the gene enrichment analysis identified hepatic steatosis, abnormal Kupffer cell morphology, abnormal liver sinusoid morphology, abnormal mononuclear phagocyte, abnormal circulating creatinine level, and abnormal circulating amino acid level as the top terms affected by CLA feeding (Table 6). The most impacted pathways by CLA were electron transport chain, glucose regulation of insulin, glyoxylate cycle, biosynthesis of unsaturated FA, alanine and aspartate metabolic pathway, erythrocytes differentiation pathway, and tyrosine degradation (Table 7). The finding of an overall upregulation of the unsaturated FA biosynthesis pathway was due to the fact that the pathway includes several upregulated genes (e.g., Acot2, Fads1, Fads2, Agpat2, and Elovl5; data not shown) as identified by ToppGene.

Table 6: Top terms associated with the “mouse phenotype” and “disease” functions in the liver of mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA using the ToppGene suite application.
Table 7: Top pathways affected in the liver of mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA determined by gene enrichment analysis using the ToppGene suite application.

The GO categories GO: molecular function, GO: biological process, and GO: cellular component are presented in Table 8. Feeding CLA activated molecular functions related to oxidoreductase activity, chaperone binding, unfolded protein binding, pyrophosphatase activity, but inhibited cofactor binding, pyridoxal phosphate binding, and vitamin B6 binding. CLA feeding upregulated the biological processes related to oxoacid-, carboxylic acid-, organic acid-, and ketone-metabolic processes in addition to cellular catabolic process. Mitochondrion was identified as the most-impacted cellular component in the liver of mice fed CLA.

Table 8: Top terms associated with GO functions in the liver of mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA using the ToppGene suite application.

4. Discussion

We observed contrasting effects of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on liver and mammary tissue, two predominantly lipid-synthesizing tissues in lactating mice. In the mammary tissue, the reduction in milk lipid content was characterized by lower concentrations of de novo synthesized fatty acids (FA C 16:0) as a consequence of inhibition of several genes related to lipid synthesis (data not shown). Lipid metabolism was the main cellular function affected by trans-10, cis-12-CLA, and the large impact and inhibition of biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids KEGG pathway confirmed such effect. The bioinformatics analyses underscored that a major effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on mammary tissue encompassed alterations in signaling pathways and phospholipid species biosynthesis.

Substantial regulation of milk lipid synthesis in lactating mice occurs at the mRNA level, and there is evidence suggesting that part of the pathway is regulated by SREBP1 [18, 19]. The lower expression of Srebp1 and its downstream genes in previous studies provided evidence of its role in murine milk lipid synthesis. However, the effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on SREBP1 is indirect as FA cannot bind to this transcription factor [20]. In contrast, FA are natural ligands of the nuclear receptor PPARγ which is known to regulate lipogenesis in some cell types [2123]. The overall inhibition of PPAR signaling KEGG pathway, the reduction in Pparγexpression and its downstream genes regulating FA uptake (Fabp4), FA synthesis (Fasn), FA desaturation (Scd), and lipid droplet formation (Cav1) due to trans-10, cis-12-CLA, all support a role for PPARγ in murine mammary lipid metabolism.

We have previously shown that activation of PPARγ could upregulate mammary lipogenic gene networks in bovine mammary epithelial cells [13]. CLA has also been shown to act as a PPARγ activator in some cell types [24]. However, an important consideration in the context of PPARγ regulation of murine mammary lipid synthesis is the fact that the mammary gland of this species contains a substantial amount of adipocytes which may in fact be an important source of PPARγ and also adipocytokine mRNA expression [25].

Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-ganglio series was the most activated KEGG pathway in addition to being one of the most-impacted pathways by trans-10, cis-12-CLA. Glycosphingolipids are key components of the apical plasma membrane and subcellular components including vesicles [26]. Glycosphingolipids are involved in molecular functions such as differentiation, apoptosis, and cell-cell interaction [26]. In murine mammary tissue, ganglioside GD1α is specifically increased during lactation and is highly concentrated in the milk fat globule membranes and helps prevent aggregation of milk fat globules [27]. We have previously observed a shift in the lipid globule distribution towards an increase in the number of smaller lipid droplets in the secreted milk as well as intracellular mammary epithelium in mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA [17], and this could be due to altered glycosphingolipid biosynthesis in addition to reduced lipogenesis.

Based on microarray data from murine mammary tissue Rudolph et al. [19] suggested that gluconeogenesis per se is not an important function in murine mammary epithelium. However, the enzyme PCK1 which is a key component of this pathway in liver also is central for the generation of glycerol-phosphate for esterification during the process of glyceroneogenesis [28]. Thus, it is not surprising that the top most-impacted GO biological process due to dietary CLA was inhibition of negative regulation of gluconeogenesis; that is, supply of glucose to mammary gland might have been decreased with a consequent increase in use of other carbon sources (e.g., lactate) to generate glycerol-phosphate.

In addition to its effects on lipid metabolism, in the IPA analysis trans-10, cis-12-CLA affected cellular processes related to cell cycle progression, cell-cell interactions, and cell assembly and organization (data not shown). These effects of CLA were probably through signaling pathways regulating ErbB receptors and the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 2). ErbB signaling was identified as one of the top 10 impacted KEGG pathways in our study. The ErbB signaling pathway in murine mammary gland is involved in the control of cell survival, cell-cell interaction and cellular differentiation, cell cycle progression, and morphogenesis [29, 30]. Activation of the ErbB pathway is considered beneficial for cellular proliferation in damaged tissue [30]; thus, it could be possible that the activation of this pathway in our study was a compensatory response due to CLA. Proliferation of mammary epithelium and ductal hyperplasia has also been observed in CLA-fed mice independent of alterations of ErbB expression [31]. Ovariectomized mice fed CLA experienced an estrogen-independent allosteric mammary growth characterized by ductal elongation due to enlarged proliferative terminal end buds [32]. In addition, CLA feeding was associated with increased incidence of tumor development and progression [31, 33].

Regulation of actin-based motility by rho was one of the top 5 canonical pathways identified by IPA analysis. Dietary CLA upregulated expression of actin B (Actb) and actin G (Actg), which play an important role in formation of stress fibers connecting extracellular matrix to the intracellular medium. Profilin (Pfn) is involved in actin filament polymerization [34]. Rho proteins regulate Actb, Actg, and Pfn [35] and can affect actin polymerization which can actively drive vesicle movement in cells [36]. The ras homolog D (RhoD), which is involved in endosomal dynamics and rearrangement of actin cytoskeleton, was also upregulated by CLA in this study. RhoD is involved in the regulation of both membrane traffic and cytoskeleton in the cell [37]. Overexpression of RhoD induced remodeling of actin cytoskeleton accompanied by increased endosomal fission and scattering of vesicles in the cells [37]. Thus, our results suggested that CLA either directly or indirectly caused a substantial remodeling of cellular structures. It could be possible that such effects were partly due to changes in unsaturated FA availability, for example, for cellular membrane formation.

Trans-10, cis-12-CLA causes marked dilation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in the mammary epithelial cells and upregulates x-box binding protein 1 (Xbp1) expression. In addition, CLA is also known to induce the ER stress response by increasing splicing of XBP1 mRNA and activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling [38, 39]. In our study, a greater expression of Xbp1 and Jnk1, genes coding key proteins in the ER stress response, due to CLA suggested the induction of an unfolded protein response (UPR) in the ER. That idea is supported by the downregulation of calnexin (Canx), a molecular chaperone which mediates the proper folding of nascent proteins in ER, coupled with upregulation of BiP and HSP90AA1 which bind to misfolded proteins. Thus, the activation of UPR with CLA might have been associated with greater ER stress and underscored a marked derangement in posttranslational modification of proteins. A key feature of the UPR is cellular inflammation [40], and the activation of cytotoxic T cell differentiation along with several acute-phase proteins in our study seems to confirm that CLA exerted a proinflammatory state in mammary cells (Figure 4). In this context, the inhibition of golgi cis cisterna, beta-catenin destruction complex, and nuclear exosome could have been a response to ER stress and inflammation.

Figure 4: Acute-phase response signaling pathway (IPA) expression in the mammary tissue of lactating mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA. Green indicates downregulation while red indicates upregulation.

Trans-10, cis-12-CLA inhibits cellular proliferation and induces apoptosis in primary mammary epithelial cells [10]. Different mechanisms have been proposed for the induction of apoptosis by CLA: (a) p53-dependent [41, 42]; (b) mitochondrial pathway targeting Bcl2 [43]; and (c) ER response involving induction of Xbp1, phosphorylation of eIF2α, induction of CHOP, and the cleavage of caspase 12 [38]. In this study, in addition to the induction of ER stress response, a gene related with the mitochondrial pathway, for example, Bcl2, was also affected. The Bcl protein decreases the activation of caspase 3 involved in apoptosis [44], and a mouse Bcl2-mutant strain has greater rates of apoptosis in cells [45].

The acute-phase response signaling was the major canonical pathway affected by trans-10, cis-12-CLA in the mammary tissue (Figure 4). The top three upregulated genes Orm1 (3.7-fold), Cp (2.9-fold), Saa2 (2.6-fold), in addition to C4b (2.1-fold), Orm2 (2.27-fold), and Saa1 (2.3-fold) are classified as acute-phase proteins (Figure 3). Some of the top down-regulated genes Mup4 (−8.4-fold), Mup2 (−4.6-fold), and Rbp4 (−1.8) are well-established negative regulators of acute-phase proteins [40, 46] (Figure 3). Acute-phase proteins are induced in response to tissue injury leading to robust inflammatory responses [40, 47]. In addition to acute-phase proteins Defb (4.6-fold), involved in antimicrobial immune response [48], increases during chronic wounds to promote healing [49, 50], and Sphk1 (3.6-fold) enhances proinflammatory cytokines [51].

The murine mammary tissue is characterized by an upregulation of acute-phase proteins during the initial phase of involution, but the exact role of such response has not been determined [5254]. In our study, a proinflammatory effect induced by CLA on mammary tissue could have led to decreased milk synthesis capacity of the epithelial cells and a subsequent effect on the growth of pups nursing mice fed trans-10, cis-12-CLA [1]. The marked accumulation of 20:4n-6 in milk of CLA-fed mice might have played a role in the proinflammatory response observed, for example, by enhancing the production of oxidized lipid products [55]. The accumulation of 20:4n-6, however, contrasts with the marked decrease in its concentration in milk of lactating dairy cows receiving an exogenous infusion of CLA that reduced milk fat synthesis [56].

The acute-phase response proteins are closely regulated at the transcriptional level by STAT3 and NFkB [57]. ER stress can induce upregulation of acute-phase proteins through NFkB activation [58]. None of these transcriptional regulators was upregulated with CLA. However, there was upregulation of the proinflammatory cytokines IL6 and TNF. IL6 is known to exert its action through increasing STAT3 [52]. During the acute-phase response, TNF decreases the expression of nuclear receptors PPARγ, PPARα, RXRα, and LXRα [43] which in turn could affect the lipid-synthesizing transcriptome. In addition to its effects on lipid metabolism, PPARγ dampens inflammation via transrepression of proinflammatory molecules [21]. For instance, PPARγ inhibits inflammation by direct interaction with AP1 and NFkB, thus, preventing their binding to response elements on inflammatory genes [21]. Activation of PPARγ by synthetic PPARγ agonists reduces the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in bovine mammary epithelial cells [59]. While FA are considered as natural ligands of PPARγ [2123], the lower PPARγ expression and greater acute-phase protein expression, which confirmed the existence of a marked degree of inflammation, suggested that trans-10, cis-12-CLA antagonizes PPARγ.

Further work is needed to determine if the ability of PPARγ to repress proinflammatory molecules is diminished due to its interaction (e.g., competitive inhibition) with trans-10, cis-12-CLA. Overt inflammation might reduce transcription of anti-inflammatory nuclear receptors (e.g., feedback inhibition) leading to negative effects on cellular mechanisms including lipid synthesis and secretion. In lactating mouse mammary tissue targeted deletion of Pparγ resulted in greater concentration of proinflammatory lipids in milk leading to reduced pup growth and induction of inflammation. Those results highlighted the importance of PPARγ signalling during lactation [55]. Some of the effects of trans-10, cis-12-CLA in our study might have been regulated through its effects on PPARγ.

The effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on liver was dramatic as CLA caused accumulation of lipid in the span of four days. The associated increase in liver mass due to TAG accumulation suggested induction of hepatic steatosis in CLA-fed animals. This was confirmed with the gene functional analysis as “hepatic steatosis” was one of the top terms associated with the “mouse phenotype” category. Primary biliary cirrhosis and liver cirrhosis were the top terms in the “disease” category suggesting that trans-10, cis-12-CLA feeding predisposed the mice to these conditions. The onset of hepatic steatosis could predispose liver to inflammation and oxidative stress leading to steatohepatitis and eventually to liver cirrhosis [60, 61]. The development of hepatic steatosis is specific for trans-10, cis-12-CLA feeding but not to other CLA isomers [62]. Hepatic steatosis has been previously reported in growing mice after 14 days of trans-10, cis-12-CLA feeding [63].

Potential mechanisms involved in the onset of hepatic steatosis due to trans-10, cis-12-CLA have been reviewed recently [3], but it is important to recognize that all those previous studies have been conducted with nonlactating animals. The reduction in FA oxidation coupled with increased uptake of FA may be one of the reasons for hepatic lipid accumulation [3]. Decreased FA oxidation could lead to accumulation of intracellular diacylglycerol concentration which is implicated in hepatic insulin resistance through activation of protein kinase C [26]. In a recent study, CLA-induced hepatic steatosis was associated with an increase in diacylglycerol content and membrane associated protein kinase C [64] suggesting that CLA feeding could potentially lead to hepatic insulin resistance.

In this study, mitochondria, the primary organelle involved in FA oxidation, were the most-impacted cellular component followed by ER and peroxisomes. Mitochondrial dysfunction causes hepatic steatosis and has been implicated in the progression from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [65]. The top affected pathways (e.g., electron transport chain and glucose activation of insulin secretion), molecular functions (e.g., oxidoreductase activity), biological processes (e.g., oxoacid metabolic process, and cellular catabolic process, cellular ketone metabolic process), and diseases (e.g., Leigh disease, Leigh syndrome) are related to mitochondria further confirming that trans-10, cis-12-CLA feeding affected hepatic mitochondrial functions.

The ER was the second most affected cellular organelle in the liver of trans-10, cis-12-CLA-fed mice. The activation of molecular functions such as chaperone binding and unfolded protein binding suggests induction of ER stress response in hepatic tissue. Induction of ER stress could further deteriorate the steatotic condition by augmenting hepatic lipogenesis via activating proteolytic cleavage of SREBP1 [66], decreasing hepatic secretion of TAG by reducing apoB secretion [67] and upregulation of Xbp1 [68]. The transcriptional regulator Xbp1, a known regulator of the unfolded protein response, regulates the expression of lipogenic genes Scd1, acetyl-CoA carboxylase beta (Acc2), and diacylglycerol acetyltransferase 2 (Dgat2), independent of SREBP1 and ChREBP [68]. Also, a shift in hepatic FA composition towards saturated FA disrupts ER homeostasis and promotes ER stress [69, 70]. An increased ratio of saturated to unsaturated FA is considered as a secondary hit in the progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis [69, 71]. Trans-10, cis-12-CLA-fed mice in our study had greater hepatic palmitate concentration (67% over control) thereby increasing the ratio of saturated FA. Thus, those data confirm previous reports that the induction of ER stress could be caused in part by altered hepatic FA profile.

As indicated above, the presence of adipocytes in the mammary tissue used for transcriptomics is an important consideration when interpreting our data, particularly as it relates to PPAR and adipocytokine signaling. Adipose tissue constitutes ca. 20% of the lactating murine mammary tissue in early lactation [69] and in rodents is indispensable for the normal function of the mammary epithelium [16, 72]. It has been suggested that the gene expression changes in a complex tissue like rodent mammary could be a function of changes in the gene expression within a particular cell type (i.e., mammary or adipose) or the proportion of the given cell type (i.e., mammary or adipose) [25]. This could be an important factor during different stages of mammary function and development when the abundance of the two cell types varies substantially [25]. Our study was conducted during peak lactation when the adipose content is at its lowest, but further studies are needed to delineate more closely the impact of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on the relative abundance of mammary and adipose cell types in the rodent mammary gland during peak lactation.

5. Conclusions

During lactation the effect of CLA on the liver was similar to those observed previously in growing mice. The hepatic gene enrichment functional analysis revealed induction of hepatic steatosis, perturbations in the mitochondrial functions, and induction of ER stress. The major effect of CLA on mammary tissue encompassed alterations in cellular signaling pathways, phospholipid species biosynthesis, and a marked degree of inflammation and ER stress. Such responses might be associated with enhanced cellular apoptosis and precocious involution of the mammary gland. Inhibition of PPARγ signaling was associated with decreased milk fat synthesis and uncontrolled inflammation.


The authors acknowledge the help from Dr. Massimo Bionaz and Dr. Peng Ji during analysis of RT-qPCR data, and Dr. Bruce Aronow (University of Cincinnati) for conducting the ToppGene analysis. Financial support for the animal studies were by the Maryland Agriculture Experiment Station (MAES), Competitive Grants, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA (to Richard A. Erdman, Liliana S. Piperova, Juan J. Loor, and Anil K. G. Kadegowda), and Pennfield Graduate Research Award by Pennfield Corporation, Lancaster, PA, USA (to Anil K. G. Kadegowda and Richard A. Erdman). Financial support for the microarray and RT-qPCR was given in part by the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, USDA, under Hatch Projects ILLU-538-307 and ILLU-538-391 (both to Juan J. Loor).


  1. A. K. G. Kadegowda, E. E. Connor, B. B. Teter et al., “Dietary trans fatty acid isomers differ in their effects on mammary lipid metabolism as well as lipogenic gene expression in lactating mice,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 919–924, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. L. House, J. P. Cassady, E. J. Eisen et al., “Functional genomic characterization of delipidation elicited by trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (t10c12-CLA) in a polygenic obese line of mice,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 21, pp. 351–361, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Vyas, A. K. Kadegowda, and R. A. Erdman, “Dietary conjugated linoleic Acid and hepatic steatosis: species-specific effects on liver and adipose lipid metabolism and gene expression,” Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 2012, Article ID 932928, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. P. C. LaRosa, J. Miner, Y. Xia, Y. Zhou, S. Kachman, and M. E. Fromm, “Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid causes inflammation and delipidation of white adipose tissue in mice: a microarray and histological analysis,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 282–294, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. S. Ashwell, R. P. Ceddia, R. L. House et al., “Trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid alters hepatic gene expression in a polygenic obese line of mice displaying hepatic lipidosis,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 848–855, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Guillén, M. A. Navarro, C. Arnal et al., “Microarray analysis of hepatic gene expression identifies new genes involved in steatotic liver,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 187–198, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Rasooly, D. S. Kelley, J. Greg, and B. E. Mackey, “Dietary trans 10, cis 12-conjugated linoleic acid reduces the expression of fatty acid oxidation and drug detoxification enzymes in mouse liver,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Ecker, T. Langmann, C. Moehle, and G. Schmitz, “Isomer specific effects of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on macrophage ABCG1 transcription by a SREBP-1c dependent mechanism,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 352, no. 3, pp. 805–811, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Poirier, J. S. Shapiro, R. J. Kim, and M. A. Lazar, “Nutritional supplementation with trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid induces inflammation of white adipose tissue,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1634–1641, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. M. Ip, P. A. Masso-Welch, S. F. Shoemaker, W. K. Shea-Eaton, and C. Ip, “Conjugated linoleic acid inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of normal rat mammary epithelial cells in primary culture,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. F. Keating, F. Q. Zhao, K. A. Finucane, D. R. Glimm, and J. J. Kennelly, “Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on bovine mammary cell growth, apoptosis and stearoyl Co-A desaturase gene expression,” Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 284–292, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. J. Loor, X. Lin, and J. H. Herbein, “Effects of dietary cis 9, trans 11–18 : 2, trans 10, cis 12–18 : 2, or vaccenic acid (trans 11–18 : 1) during lactation on body composition, tissue fatty acid profiles, and litter growth in mice,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 1039–1048, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. K. G. Kadegowda, M. Bionaz, L. S. Piperova, R. A. Erdman, and J. J. Loor, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activation and long-chain fatty acids alter lipogenic gene networks in bovine mammary epithelial cells to various extents,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 4276–4289, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Bionaz, K. Periasamy, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, et al., “Old and new stories: revelations from functional analysis of the bovine mammary transcriptome during the lactation cycle,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e33268, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Bionaz, K. Periasamy, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, W. L. Hurley, and J. J. Loor, “A novel dynamic impact approach (DIA) for functional analysis of time-course omics studies: validation using the bovine mammary transcriptome,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e32455, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. R. C. Hovey and L. Aimo, “Diverse and active roles for adipocytes during mammary gland growth and function,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 279–290, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. K. Kadegowda, J. H. Jeong, and I. H. Mather, “Effect of dietary trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on the lactating mammary glands of wild-type and butyrophilin 1a1 knock-out mice,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 21, supplement, abstract #634, 2010.
  18. M. C. Rudolph, J. Monks, V. Burns et al., “Sterol regulatory element binding protein and dietary lipid regulation of fatty acid synthesis in the mammary epithelium,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 299, no. 6, pp. E918–E927, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. C. Rudolph, J. L. McManaman, T. Phang et al., “Metabolic regulation in the lactating mammary gland: a lipid synthesizing machine,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 323–336, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. P. Pegorier, C. Le May, J. Girard, et al., “Control of gene expression by fatty acids,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 9, pp. 2444S–2449S, 2004.
  21. S. J. Bensinger and P. Tontonoz, “Integration of metabolism and inflammation by lipid-activated nuclear receptors,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 470–477, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Berger and D. E. Moller, “The mechanisms of action of PPARs,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 53, pp. 409–435, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, and W. Wahli, “Transcriptional regulation of metabolism,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 465–514, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Cimini, L. Cristiano, S. Colafarina et al., “PPARγ-dependent effects of conjugated linoleic acid on the human glioblastoma cell line (ADF),” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 923–933, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Wang, S. R. Master, and L. A. Chodosh, “Computational expression deconvolution in a complex mammalian organ,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, article 328, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Tettamanti, “Ganglioside/glycosphingolipid turnover: new concepts,” Glycoconjugate Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 301–317, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Momoeda, S. Fukuta, Y. Iwamori, Y. Taketani, and M. Iwamori, “Prolactin-dependent expression of GD1α ganglioside, as a component of milk fat globule, in the murine mammary glands,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 525–531, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. K. Nye, R. W. Hanson, and S. C. Kalhan, “Glyceroneogenesis is the dominant pathway for triglyceride glycerol synthesis in vivo in the rat,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 41, pp. 27565–27574, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. P. DiAugustine, R. G. Richards, and J. Sebastian, “EGF-related peptides and their receptors in mammary gland development,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 1997. View at Scopus
  30. Y. Yarden and M. X. Sliwkowski, “Untangling the ErbB signalling network,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. M. Ip, S. O. McGee, P. A. Masso-Welch et al., “The t10,c12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid stimulates mammary tumorigenesis in transgenic mice over-expressing erbB2 in the mammary epithelium,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1269–1276, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. E. Berryhill, J. M. Gloviczki, J. F. Trott, et al., “Diet-induced metabolic change induces estrogen-independent allometric mammary growth,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 40, pp. 16294–16299, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Flowers, J. A. Schroeder, A. D. Borowsky et al., “Pilot study on the effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on tumorigenesis and gene expression in PyMT transgenic mice,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1642–1649, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, M. I. Furman, D. Wachsstock, D. Safer, V. T. Nachmias, and T. D. Pollard, “The control of actin nucleotide exchange by thymosinβ4 and profilin. A potential regulatory mechanism for actin polymerization in cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1015–1024, 1992. View at Scopus
  35. A. Hall, “Rho GTpases and the actin cytoskeleton,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5350, pp. 509–514, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. J. Ridley, “Rho GTPases and cell migration,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 114, no. 15, pp. 2713–2722, 2001. View at Scopus
  37. C. Murphy, R. Saffrich, M. Grummt et al., “Endosome dynamics regulated by a Rho protein,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6608, pp. 427–432, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Ou, Y. Wu, C. Ip, X. Meng, Y. C. Hsu, and M. M. Ip, “Apoptosis induced by t10,c12-conjugated linoleic acid is mediated by an atypical endoplasmic reticulum stress response,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 985–994, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. S. Pierre, M. Minville-Walz, C. Fevre, et al., “Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induced cell death in human colon cancer cells through reactive oxygen species-mediated ER stress,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1831, no. 4, pp. 759–768, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. E. Gruys, M. J. M. Toussaint, T. A. Niewold, and S. J. Koopmans, “Acute phase reaction and acute phase proteins,” Journal of Zhejiang University, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1045–1056, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Q. Kemp, B. D. Jeffy, and D. F. Romagnolo, “Conjugated linoleic acid inhibits cell proliferation through a p53-dependent mechanism: effects on the expression of G1-restriction points in breast and colon cancer cells,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 3670–3677, 2003. View at Scopus
  42. J. H. Seo, H. S. Moon, I. Y. Kim et al., “PEGylated conjugated linoleic acid stimulation of apoptosis via a p53-mediated signaling pathway in MCF-7 breast cancer cells,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 621–626, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. Ou, C. Ip, B. Lisafeld, and M. M. Ip, “Conjugated linoleic acid induces apoptosis of murine mammary tumor cells via Bcl-2 loss,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 356, no. 4, pp. 1044–1049, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. W. Wick, C. Grimmel, B. Wagenknecht, J. Dichgans, and M. Weller, “Betulinic acid-induced apoptosis in glioma cells: a sequential requirement for new protein synthesis, formation of reactive oxygen species, and caspase processing,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 289, no. 3, pp. 1306–1312, 1999. View at Scopus
  45. L. M. Fedorov, O. Y. Tyrsin, T. Papadopoulos, G. Camarero, R. Götz, and U. R. Rapp, “Bcl-2 determines susceptibility to induction of lung cancer by oncogenic CRaf,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 6297–6303, 2002. View at Scopus
  46. M. D. Glibetic and H. Baumann, “Influence of chronic inflammation on the level of mRNA for acute-phase reactants in the mouse liver,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 1616–1622, 1986. View at Scopus
  47. I. Kushner, “The phenomenon of the acute phase response,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 389, pp. 39–48, 1982. View at Scopus
  48. M. E. Selsted and A. J. Ouellette, “Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 551–557, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. M. E. Bowdish, D. J. Davidson, and R. E. W. Hancock, “Immunomodulatory properties of defensins and cathelicidins,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 306, pp. 27–66, 2006. View at Scopus
  50. J. Butmarc, T. Yufit, P. Carson, and V. Falanga, “Human β-defensin-2 expression is increased in chronic wounds,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 439–443, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. Nayak, Y. Huo, W. X. T. Kwang et al., “Sphingosine kinase 1 regulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide in activated microglia,” Neuroscience, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 132–144, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Pensa, C. J. Watson, and V. Poli, “Stat3 and the inflammation/acute phase response in involution and breast cancer,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–129, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. T. Stein, J. S. Morris, C. R. Davies et al., “Involution of the mouse mammary gland is associated with an immune cascade and an acute-phase response, involving LBP, CD14 and STAT3,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. R75–R91, 2004. View at Scopus
  54. C. J. Watson, “Immune cell regulators in mouse mammary development and involution,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 87, no. 13, pp. 35–42, 2009. View at Scopus
  55. Y. Wan, A. Saghatelian, L. W. Chong, C. L. Zhang, B. F. Cravatt, and R. M. Evans, “Maternal PPARγ protects nursing neonates by suppressing the production of inflammatory milk,” Genes and Development, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 1895–1908, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. J. Loor and J. H. Herbein, “Exogenous conjugated linoleic acid isomers reduce bovine milk fat concentration and yield by inhibiting de novo fatty acid synthesis,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 128, no. 12, pp. 2411–2419, 1998. View at Scopus
  57. V. Poli, “The role of C/EBP isoforms in the control of inflammatory and native immunity functions,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 45, pp. 29279–29282, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. K. Zhang and R. J. Kaufman, “From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 455–462, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. S. Kim, T. R. Sweeney, J. K. Shigenaga et al., “Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 1 decrease RXRα, PPARα, PPARγ, LXRα, and the coactivators SRC-1, PGC-1α, and PGC-1β in liver cells,” Metabolism, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 267–279, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. P. Day and O. F. W. James, “Steatohepatitis: a tale of two ‘Hits’?” Gastroenterology, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 842–845, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Z. Z. Li, M. Berk, T. M. McIntyre, and A. E. Feldstein, “Hepatic lipid partitioning and liver damage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: role of stearoyl-Coa desaturase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 9, pp. 5637–5644, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. L. Clément, H. Poirier, I. Niot et al., “Dietary trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperinsulinemia and fatty liver in the mouse,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1400–1409, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. N. Tsuboyama-Kasaoka, M. Takahashi, K. Tanemura et al., “Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation reduces adipose tissue by apoptosis and develops lipodystrophy in mice,” Diabetes, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1534–1542, 2000. View at Scopus
  64. M. B. Stout, L. F. Liu, and M. A. Belury, “Hepatic steatosis by dietary-conjugated linoleic acid is accompanied by accumulation of diacylglycerol and increased membrane-associated protein kinase C ε in mice,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1010–1017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. B. Fromenty, M. A. Robin, A. Igoudjil, A. Mansouri, and D. Pessayre, “The ins and outs of mitochondrial dysfunction in NASH,” Diabetes and Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 121–138, 2004. View at Scopus
  66. M. Flamment, H. L. Kammoun, I. Hainault, P. Ferré, and F. Foufelle, “Endoplasmic reticulum stress: a new actor in the development of hepatic steatosis,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 239–246, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. T. Ota, C. Gayet, and H. N. Ginsberg, “Inhibition of apolipoprotein B100 secretion by lipid-induced hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress in rodents,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 316–332, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. H. Lee, E. F. Scapa, D. E. Cohen, and L. H. Glimcher, “Regulation of hepatic lipogenesis by the transcription factor XBP1,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5882, pp. 1492–1496, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. D. Wang, Y. Wei, and M. J. Pagliassotti, “Saturated fatty acids promote endoplasmic reticulum stress and liver injury in rats with hepatic steatosis,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 943–951, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. Y. Wei, D. Wang, and M. J. Pagliassotti, “Saturated fatty acid-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis are augmented by trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid in liver cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 303, no. 1-2, pp. 105–113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. L. Gentile and M. J. Pagliassotti, “The role of fatty acids in the development and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 567–576, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. Landskroner-Eiger, J. Park, D. Israel, J. W. Pollard, and P. E. Scherer, “Morphogenesis of the developing mammary gland: stage-dependent impact of adipocytes,” Developmental Biology, vol. 344, no. 2, pp. 968–978, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus